4. Human death: two views 1. Those Scripture passages refer only to spiritual death. Adam and Eve did not die immediately, but as sinners were separated from God. Human death was always part of our original created nature. When did death become a reality? Genesis : very good bad Evolution : bad (?) better
5.
6.
7.
8. An added word evolution: 1. The temptation to transfer accepted truths of biological evolution to other arenas (e.g. social, racial, religious arenas), must be resisted. 2. The fact that we are beings open to God (regardless of how that happened) means that our moral lives are not to be determined by our genetic makeup but by his will.
9.
10. Intelligent Design The following is largely based on a talk given by Loren Haarsma, (Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Calvin College) titled, āIs Intelligent Design āScientificā?ā and his and his wifeās book, Origins: A Reformed Look at Creation, Design, & Evolution.
11. Intelligent Design Preliminary observations: 1. In discussions about Intelligent Design theory and evolution we are often offered a false choice: either modern life forms evolved or they were designed . We Christians believe that God designed life forms whether he used natural evolutionary processes or intervened at particular points.
12. Intelligent Design 2. A distinction should be made between designing something (purposeful planning) and assembling it (construction, actualizing) what was designed. Godās design for life is not in question among Christians who discuss the merits of ID. How God chose to assemble life, is.
13.
14. Intelligent Design Bag B is similar to the Bag A except that all the pieces in it are designed to latch onto each other is specific ways, such that when any two parts that belong together happen to collide, they connect and stay connected. The more you shake this bag, the more the pieces come together in the right way, and eventually the music box will self-assemble. It would still be a designed object but its assembly would happen differently.
15. 1. The fundamental laws of nature appear to be finely tuned for life (the anthropic principle ). This can be broken into three claims ( Origins , 182) Intelligent Design theory rests on two assertions: Scientific: the fundamental laws of physics and the basic parameters of the universe fall within a narrow range of parameters that allow life to exist. Cf. John Leslieās Firing Squad Intelligent Design
16. Philosophical: No natural explanation exists for why the laws and parameters are tuned for life. Lucky? The most reasonable explanation is that the parameters of this universe were designed to support life. Eg. Scrabble board w/ 19 letters āCan we play a game today?ā Intelligent Design
17. Religious: the best explanation is that God, the Creator, designed these parameters from the beginning in order to bring about life. The scientific claim is accepted by nearly all scientists. The philosophical and religious claims are disputed. Intelligent Design Most Christians agree that, while fine-tuning might not prove that God exists, that is the best explanation for fine-tuning. Atheists sometimes refer to the multi-verse hypothesis to explain fine-tuning.
18. 2. Biological life is irreducibly complex, too complex to be explained by natural evolutionary mechanisms alone. That complexity is best explained in terms of the actions of an intelligent agent. Intelligent Design
19. Intelligent Design This, too, can be broken into 3 claims: Scientific: It is very improbable that complex biological features such as the bacteria flagellum could have evolved via the mechanism of evolution. It is very improbable that a living cell could self-assemble out of chemicals.
20. Intelligent Design Philosophical: If biological complexity could not have evolved and the complexity has an obvious function, then we should conclude that some sort of intelligent being intervened in the history of life to create the complexity.
21. Intelligent Design Religious: the best explanation is that God, the Creator revealed through Scripture, intervened miraculously in the history of life to create biological complexity.
22. Intelligent Design The scientific claim is disputed. Progressive creationists accept it; evolutionary creationists do not. The majority of biologists believe that the general weight of evidence (genetic and fossil and a few specific examples where complex evolution is understood) weighs against the claim. But not enough data to decide fully. Horizontal gene transfer, exaptations, chromosome shuffling
23. Intelligent Design Some critics of ID say that the philosophical claim is simple the religious claim in disguise. ID proponents say that the philosophical claim is religiously neutral and is based on scientific data and therefore can properly be discussed in a science classroom.
24.
25. Intelligent Design 1. The basis for science: Can we discover new truths about nature? How? Why can we? A broad picture of science includes: 2. The processes of science: What are effective scientific methods for learning about nature? 3. The discoveries of science: What do we learn about nature when we apply these methods?
26. Intelligent Design 4. The inferences of science: Do scientific discoveries have implications for society, philosophy, religion? 5. The human aspect of science: What are our motives, ethics, and goals for doing science?
27. Intelligent Design While all 5 should contribute to a broad under- standing of science, scientists assert that only #2 & #3 speak directly to the narrower scientific enterprise: the construction of explanatory models that explain natural events. The others are philosophical or religious concerns that should be addressed in philosophy or religion classes.
28. Intelligent Design Natural events are explainable by known natural laws, partially explainable them, or unexplainable by known natural laws.
29.
30.
31.
32. Powerpoint presentations for viewing: www.aacrc.org/interfriends tab: Questions about Powerpoint presentations for downloading: www.slideshare.net Search for: Creation and Evolution Session 1 (2,3,4,5,6)
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],When did death become a reality?]()