m e djo urnal.co m                       http://www.medjo urnal.co m/2012/08/an-easy-way-to -predict-risk-o f-heart.htmlAn...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5

20120803 An Easy Way to Predict the Risk of a Heart Attack


Published on

A quick way to assess your risk of a heart attack.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

20120803 An Easy Way to Predict the Risk of a Heart Attack

  1. 1. m e djo urnal.co m http://www.medjo urnal.co m/2012/08/an-easy-way-to -predict-risk-o f-heart.htmlAn Easy Way to Predict the Risk of a Heart AttackCould it really be possible to predict the risk of a heart attack by doing a simple test at home that takes lessthan a minute to perf orm? No need to get a CT scan, an angiogram, or blood tests, but just a simple testthat just about anyone can do at home? It sounds too good to be true, but researchers f rom the UnitedKingdom and China think otherwise, and they have scientif ic proof .T he researchers started out with a simple hypothesis: the metabolic syndrome is related to an increased riskof adverse cardiovascular diseases (including risk of a heart attack). If there was a test that could be doneat home that predicted the metabolic syndrome, then by extension this test will also predict an increased riskof heart disease.T he metabolic syndrome is a combination of risk f actors that together greatly increase the risk of heartdisease, stroke, and diabetes. It is diagnosed when a person has any three of the f ollowing: an elevatedf asting blood sugar, elevated blood pressure (over 130 mmHg systolic), large waist circumf erence, low HDL(good) cholesterol levels, and high triglyceride levels. T he primary symptom is increased girth around thewaist, and the treatment consists primarily of weight loss and exercise. If there was a simple home test thatcould predict the metabolic syndrome, then this test would also predict an increased risk of a heart attack.T his research study was very simple and straightf orward: measure the resting heart rate in over 30,000people and see if it is related to the metabolic syndrome. It was. People with a resting heart rate of around85 to 100 beats per minute had about twice the risk of metabolic syndrome compared to people with aresting heart rate of 60 to 70 beats per minute.Well, there are no surprises here. Regular cardiovascular exercise tends to lower the heart rate, and regularexercise tends to lower the risk of the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and a wide rangeof other health problems. I like this test-- measuring the resting heart rate-- because it is simple, costsnothing, and appears to accurately guage the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. But there areother similar tests that will do the same thing. Heres one: do you regularly exercise? If yes, your risk ofdisease is greatly reduced. If no, then it is time to change your habits.Cool technology can create amazing pictures of your heart and the inside of your body, but do we alwaysneed these tests? No, but lots of people still think so. For example, research published in the New EnglandJournal of Medicine suggests that CT screening f or lung cancer saves lives, but is this really any better thansimply telling people that if you smoke, you need to quit, and heres how? Screening tests dont prevent thedevelopment of disease, they only can identif y it in its early stages. Changing behavior, however, will actuallyhelp prevent ever getting the disease.T his research linking the resting heart rate to an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome is agood start at putting technology in its place. Measure your resting heart rate f or a week straight uponarising. Is it elevated? If yes, then it is likely you need to eat better and get more exercise. But wait a second,why dont we all do that anyway?- Tom Heston, MDT he Internet Medical Journal is an editorial blog and is not to be used to guide medical management bypatients or by health care providers. Articles are not edited f or content. Authors names are self -identif iedand not independently verif ied.