Forandringsledelse det betaler sig share
•
1 like•664 views
Det giver rigtig god mening af bedrive struktureret foradnringsledelse. Det giver større change for at opnå projektmål, holde tidsplanen og budgettet. Se hvilke faktorer der medvirker til god forandringsledelse og hvilke der hindre det.
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Forandringsledelse det betaler sig share
- 3. • • Tid Produktivitet L H Varighed af produktivitetsfald Dybde af produktivitets- fald God koordineret forandring Dårlig koordineret forandring Ukoordineret forandring IBM Global Services 2001 Tid Produktivitet L H Varighed af produktivitetsfald Dybde af produktivitets- fald God koordineret forandring Dårlig koordineret forandring Ukoordineret forandring IBM Global Services 2001
- 4. Tid Produktivitet L H Varighed af produktivitetsfald Dybde af produktivitets- fald God koordineret forandring Dårlig koordineret forandring Ukoordineret forandring IBM Global Services 2001 Tid Produktivitet L H Varighed af produktivitetsfald Dybde af produktivitets- fald God koordineret forandring Dårlig koordineret forandring Ukoordineret forandring IBM Global Services 2001
- 5.
- 6. © Prosci.From Prosci’s 2009 BestPractices in Change Managementbenchmarkingreport Correlation of change management effectiveness to meeting project objectives 16% 51% 80% 95% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Poor (n=111) Fair (n=259) Good (n=313) Excellent (n=65) Percentofrespondentsthatmet orexceededprojectobjectives Overall effectiveness of change management program
- 7. © Prosci.From Prosci’s 2009 BestPractices in Change Managementbenchmarkingreport Correlation of change management effectiveness to staying on budget 51% 61% 74% 82% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Poor (n=116) Fair (n=299) Good (n=386) Excellent (n=71) Percentofrespondentsthat wereonorunderbudget Overall effectiveness of change management program
- 8. Correlation of change management effectiveness to staying on schedule 16% 32% 60% 71% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Poor (n=134) Fair (n=318) Good (n=394) Excellent (n=72) Percentofrespondentsthatwere onoraheadofschedule Overall effectiveness of change management program
- 9. • •