SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 29
PRESENTATION NAME
    Company Name
• STATISTICS IS A BRANCH OF APPLIED
  MATHEMATICS THAT INVOLVES
  COLLECTING AND ORGANIZING
  DATA FOR INTERPRETATION AND
  THE PREDICTION OF FUTURE
  BEHAVIOR OR RESULTS
NUMBER OF DISPUTES BY
SECTORS AND SPHERES


      INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED
      BY CAUSES AND INDUSTRY


           ALL STRIKES DURING THE
           YEAR 2005
           METHODS OF RESOLUTION

               CONCLUSION
• Please add INDUSTRIAL industrial dispute
             the definition of DISPUTES
SECTOR/SPHERE-WISE NUMBER
    OF DISPUTES, WORKERS
     INVOLVED, MANDAYS
       LOST, WAGES LOST
AND VALUE OF PRODUCTION LOSS
  DUE TO INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES
         DURING 2005.
Sphere                          Number        Number of      Number of       Wages Lost       Production
                                        of          Workers        Mandays         (in Rs.)            Loss
                                     Disputes       involved        Lost                             (in Rs.)
              1           2              3             4                5               6                7

I                                            45      1,971,244      2,005,518     68,58,30,049     29,26,40,370
                       Strikes                                                             (32)             (13)

                                              1         64,721        194,163      7,76,66,000      8,34,50,000
        Central
                      Lockouts                                                              (1)              (1)
        Sphere
                      Strikes &              46      2,035,965      2,199,681     76,34,96,049     37,60,90,370
                      Lockouts                                                             (33)             (14)
                       Total-1
II                     Strikes               182       751,540      8,795,168     17,55,38,005    2,54,16,98,62
                                                                                           (87)           7 (82)

                                             228       126,096     18,670,150     22,21,36,270     53,29,54,623
         State
                      Lockouts                                                             (26)             (25)
        Sphere
                      Strikes &              410       877,636     27,465,318     39,76,74,275    3,07,46,53,25
                      Lockouts                                                           (113)          0 (107)
                       Total-II
GRAND TOTAL          Total Strikes           456     2,913,601     29,664,999 1,16,11,70,32       3,45,07,43,62
   ( I + II )        & Lockouts                                                     4 (146)             0 (121)


         Note: Figures in brackets indicate the number of cases to which the relevant information relates.
NUMBER OF DISPUTES BY
SECTORS AND SPHERES DURING
       2003 TO 2005.
Sr.No        Sphere        Nature of               Public Sector             Private Sector             Total
   .                        Dispute
                                             2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005
                               Strikes        35        36         41    8         1          4   43     37     45
  I      Central Sphere
                              Lockouts        3          0         1     0         0          0    3      0      1

                              Strikes &       38        36         42    8         1          4   46     37     46
                           Lockouts Total-
                                   I
                               Strikes        21        11         15   191       188     167     212    199    182
 II       State Sphere
                              Lockouts        0          2         0    294       239     228     294    241    228


                              Strikes &       21        13         15   485       427     395     506    440    410
                           Lockouts Total-
                                  II


                               Strikes        56        47         56   199       189     171     255    236    227
          Total
(Central & State Sphere)
                              Lockouts        3          2         1    294       239     228     297    241    229



                             Strikes &        59        49         57   493       428     399     552    477    456
        Grand Total        Lockouts Total
YEARWISE COMPARISON
      2003   2004     2005

                                297

                                                  255
                                            236
                          241         227
                    229




                                             STRIKES

                          LOCKOUTS
STATISTICAL FINDNGS
• During the year 2005 as compared to 2004, the time-loss due
  to Strikes both of public and private sectors accounted for an
  increase of 21.82%.

• Lockouts registered a significant increase of 100.00% in the
  Central Sphere, while in the State Sphere the time-loss due to
  Strikes registered an increase of 176.37 per cent and Lockouts
  decreased by 1.93 per cent during the same period.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED
  BY CAUSES (CENTRAL SPHERE)
     DURING THE YEAR 2005
Sr.No.           Cause Group       Number of Disputes          Number of Workers             Number of Mandays Lost
                                                                   involved
                                  Number     Percent- age     Number        Percent- age     Number         Percent- age
                                               to Total                       to Total                        to Total


  1                  2              3             4             5                6              7                8

  1      Wages and Allowances           11             23.9    12,36023               60.7    1,375,476               62.5


  2      Personnel                      3               6.5         1,923              0.1          3,504              0.2

  3      Indiscipline                   3               6.5      25,013                0.2       28,108                1.2

  4      Non-implementation in          1               2.2            50              0.0           100               0.0
         connection with Labour
         Enactments/
         Agreements
  5      Charter of Demands             8              17.4     75,8423               37.3      758,423               34.5


  6      Standing Orders/               1               2.2         1,445              0.1          1,445              0.1
         Rules/ Service
         conditions/Safety
  7      Other reasons                  19             41.3      13,088                0.6       32,625                1.5


         Total                          46            100.0   2,035,965              100.0    2,199,681              100.0
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED
 BY INDUSTRY DURING THE YEARS
        2004 AND 2005
Item Description     All Industries    Manufacturing       Mining and          Crops and
                                        Industries         Quarrying          Horticulture

                    2004      2005    2004     2005      2004      2005     2004       2005
Average Time Loss   50,034   65,054   56,227   66,646   103,825   131,147   46,260   182,614
   per Dispute
   (Mandays)

Average Number      4,344     6,389   1,353    2,149    15,259    21,282    1,211     8,810
    of Workers
   involved per
Dispute (Workers)


Average Number       12        10      42       31        7         6        38         21
of Mandays Lost
   per Worker
 involved (Days)
200000
                      182614

                                                                            150000
                                             103825
                                         131147
                                 46260                                     100000
                                                              56227
                                                                          50000
                                                            66646
                                                                      0




                                                                           2004      2005
      Crops and
     Horticulture
                    Mining and
                    Quarrying

                                            Manufacturing


AVERAGE TIME LOSS PER DISPUTE (MANDAYS)
ALL STRIKES DURING THE YEAR
            2005
         (BY STATES)
Sr. No.       State/Union Territory   Number of       Number of      Number of Mandays     Wages Lost            Production Loss
                                       Strikes         Workers             Lost             ( in Rs)                 (in Rs.)
                                                       involved

  1       Andhra Pradesh                      18          128,100               365,158        8,30,74,523(18)         23,18,22,423(17)
  2       Assam                                   1         15,832               15,832           28,44,775(*)                        ..
  3       Bihar                                   *         23,163               23,163                     ..                        ..
  4       Chattisgarh                             1          7,700               10,400           41,60,000(1)                        ..
  5       Gujarat                             28            78,972              165,205        5,40,67,627(23)         52,27,01,500(14)
  6       Haryana                             16            21,285              493,589                     ..                        ..
  7       Himachal Pradesh                    11             6,394               23,447            2,54,800(1)          1,35,55,000(10)
  8       Jammu & Kashmir                         1           145                   145                     ..                        ..
  9       Karnataka                           14          146,268               457,533       10,74,13,444(13)          57,72,57,288(6)
  10      Kerala                              15          562,504              3,368,458        3,54,53,753(6)                        ..
  11      Madhya Pradesh                          1         84,773               84,823         3,46,73,050(*)            3,07,01,100(*)
  12      Maharastra                              6       929,670               951,889        31,31,51,834(3)                        ..
  13      Manipur                                 2           600                19,200           19,20,000(2)                        ..
  14      Orissa                                  3         23,856               80,385           36,63,285(3)          19,87,12,999(2)
  15      Punjab                                  6          8,544               33,455           29,98,899(5)            7,41,95,412(5)
  16      Rajasthan                           13            54,871              665,376        3,59,40,768(11)          33,15,15,118(9)
  17      Tamil Nadu                          52            31,464              536,366        4,40,24,510(21)         50,21,73,550(21)
  18      Uttar Pradesh                           7         46,266               61,530         2,18,03,650(6)            1,87,63,000(6)
  19      Uttranchal                              3          4,824               38,761         1,10,63,052(3)          18,85,01,237(3)
  20      West Bengal                         26          492,936              3,348,967       10,16,65,454(3)          14,44,40,370(2)
  21      Chandigarh                              3         44,204               46,591                     ..                        ..
  22      Delhi                                   *         10,413               10,413           31,94,630(*)                        ..
  23      Total                              227         2,722,784            10,800,686     86,13,68,054(119)       2,83,43,38,997(95)
TERMINATED DISPUTES
  CLASSIFIED BY METHOD OF
SETTLEMENT & RESULT DURING
       THE YEAR 2005
Sr.     Method of      Terminated   Successful     Partially     Un-     Indefinite Not
No.     Settlement      Disputes                 successfully successful            Known

 1    Mediation/          72           21            12          8          9       22
      Conciliation/
      Adjudication

 2    Mutual              84           40            8           4          0       32
      Settlement /
      Direct
      Negotiations


 3    By third Party      11            2            0           0          0        9
 4    Voluntary           46            9            7          24          1        5
      Resumption by
      Employees

 5    Voluntary            1            0            0           1          0        0
      Resumption by
      Employers

 6    Not Known           37            3            2           1          1       30
 7    Others               5            2            3           0          0        0
      Total               256          77            32         38         11       98
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• During the calendar year 2005, there were in all 456 industrial
  disputes, out of these, 57 disputes were reported in public
  sector and 399 in private sector.

• The percentage share of public sector in the number of
  disputes, workers involved and mandays lost was 12.5, 70.0
  and 7.8 per cent respectively of the all India total numbers of
  disputes, workers involved and mandays lost.

• Similarly, private sector constituted 87.5, 30.0 and 92.2 per
  cent respectively.
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• The numbers of strikes reported during 2005 were 227 and
  229 lockouts .

• The numbers (456) of disputes reported during 2005 were
  less by 4.4% as compared to the year 2004 (477).
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• Amongst the States West Bengal accounted for the highest
  time loss during 2005(19.22 million mandays) followed by
  Kerala (3.62 million mandays), Rajasthan (1.93 million
  mandays), Maharashtra (1.43 million mandays), Andhra
  Pradesh (1.01 million mandays) and Tamil Nadu (0.66 million
  mandays .
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• Amongst the Industry group, manufacturing sector accounted
  for the highest number of disputes (290 or 63.60% of the total
  disputes) with a time lost of 19.33 million mandays or 65.15%
  of the total time loss.

• Within this Industry division, manufacturing of Textiles
  accounted for the highest time loss (13.54 million mandays or
  70.03% of the total time loss) in manufacturing Division
  during the year 2005.
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• In the Central Sphere, the Banks accounted for the highest
  time loss (1.49 million mandays) followed by Industry
  group Coal Mines with 0.50 million mandays.
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• Out of 229 lockouts, as many as 223 or 97.38% were pure
  lockouts (i.e. lockouts originating and terminating as
  lockouts). These lockouts resulted a time loss of 18.26 million
  mandays or 96.78% of the total time loss caused by all
  lockouts in the country.

• The state of West Bengal accounted for highest number of
  pure lockouts i.e.181 resulting in a time loss of 15.86 million
  mandays or 86.85% of the total time loss caused by pure
  lockouts during the year 2005.
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• The causesWages and Allowances and Bonus accounted for
  31.35% of the total time loss due to industrial disputes.

• Amongst the non-monetary causes, the indiscipline
  accounted for the highest time loss i.e. 47.84% followed by
  personnel i.e. 1.87% of the total time loss during the year
  2005. The single most important cause Indiscipline
  was responsible for 72.93% (167) lockouts to the total number
  of Lockouts which alone accounted for 74.28% of the total
  time loss due to lockouts during the year 2005.
STATISTICAL FINDINGS
• Three All India strikes took place on 22.03.2005, 31.03.2005 and
  29.09.2005 in Nationalised Banks, Life Insurance Corporation of
  India and in other various industries due to the causes ofWages
  and Allowances and Charter of Demands in which 1.83 million
  workers were involved and accounted for a time loss of 1.83
  million mandays during the year 2005.

• During the year 2005, 239 disputes were reported which were
  caused by reasons other than industrial disputes. Out of these,
  235 (98.33%) cases were of lockouts and 4 (1.67%) cases of strikes
  which accounted for 99.44% and 0.56% of time loss respectively.

More Related Content

Similar to Statistics

conoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
conoco phillips 2008 First Quarterconoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
conoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
finance1
 
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarterconoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
finance1
 
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarterconoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
finance1
 
alltel 3Q04_Highlights
alltel  3Q04_Highlightsalltel  3Q04_Highlights
alltel 3Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Informationchubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
finance18
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
finance27
 

Similar to Statistics (20)

credit-suisse Restatement re
credit-suisse Restatement recredit-suisse Restatement re
credit-suisse Restatement re
 
conoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
conoco phillips 2008 First Quarterconoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
conoco phillips 2008 First Quarter
 
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarterconoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Third Quarter
 
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarterconoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
conoco phillips 2008Second Quarter
 
alltel 3Q04_Highlights
alltel  3Q04_Highlightsalltel  3Q04_Highlights
alltel 3Q04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
 
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Informationchubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
chubb 8921 Supplementary Investor Information
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
alltel  4Q04_Highlightsalltel  4Q04_Highlights
alltel 4Q04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
alltel  4Q 04_Highlightsalltel  4Q 04_Highlights
alltel 4Q 04_Highlights
 

Recently uploaded

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
panagenda
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdfCyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 

Statistics

  • 1. PRESENTATION NAME Company Name
  • 2. • STATISTICS IS A BRANCH OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS THAT INVOLVES COLLECTING AND ORGANIZING DATA FOR INTERPRETATION AND THE PREDICTION OF FUTURE BEHAVIOR OR RESULTS
  • 3. NUMBER OF DISPUTES BY SECTORS AND SPHERES INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED BY CAUSES AND INDUSTRY ALL STRIKES DURING THE YEAR 2005 METHODS OF RESOLUTION CONCLUSION
  • 4. • Please add INDUSTRIAL industrial dispute the definition of DISPUTES
  • 5.
  • 6. SECTOR/SPHERE-WISE NUMBER OF DISPUTES, WORKERS INVOLVED, MANDAYS LOST, WAGES LOST AND VALUE OF PRODUCTION LOSS DUE TO INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES DURING 2005.
  • 7. Sphere Number Number of Number of Wages Lost Production of Workers Mandays (in Rs.) Loss Disputes involved Lost (in Rs.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 45 1,971,244 2,005,518 68,58,30,049 29,26,40,370 Strikes (32) (13) 1 64,721 194,163 7,76,66,000 8,34,50,000 Central Lockouts (1) (1) Sphere Strikes & 46 2,035,965 2,199,681 76,34,96,049 37,60,90,370 Lockouts (33) (14) Total-1 II Strikes 182 751,540 8,795,168 17,55,38,005 2,54,16,98,62 (87) 7 (82) 228 126,096 18,670,150 22,21,36,270 53,29,54,623 State Lockouts (26) (25) Sphere Strikes & 410 877,636 27,465,318 39,76,74,275 3,07,46,53,25 Lockouts (113) 0 (107) Total-II GRAND TOTAL Total Strikes 456 2,913,601 29,664,999 1,16,11,70,32 3,45,07,43,62 ( I + II ) & Lockouts 4 (146) 0 (121) Note: Figures in brackets indicate the number of cases to which the relevant information relates.
  • 8. NUMBER OF DISPUTES BY SECTORS AND SPHERES DURING 2003 TO 2005.
  • 9.
  • 10. Sr.No Sphere Nature of Public Sector Private Sector Total . Dispute 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 Strikes 35 36 41 8 1 4 43 37 45 I Central Sphere Lockouts 3 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 Strikes & 38 36 42 8 1 4 46 37 46 Lockouts Total- I Strikes 21 11 15 191 188 167 212 199 182 II State Sphere Lockouts 0 2 0 294 239 228 294 241 228 Strikes & 21 13 15 485 427 395 506 440 410 Lockouts Total- II Strikes 56 47 56 199 189 171 255 236 227 Total (Central & State Sphere) Lockouts 3 2 1 294 239 228 297 241 229 Strikes & 59 49 57 493 428 399 552 477 456 Grand Total Lockouts Total
  • 11. YEARWISE COMPARISON 2003 2004 2005 297 255 236 241 227 229 STRIKES LOCKOUTS
  • 12. STATISTICAL FINDNGS • During the year 2005 as compared to 2004, the time-loss due to Strikes both of public and private sectors accounted for an increase of 21.82%. • Lockouts registered a significant increase of 100.00% in the Central Sphere, while in the State Sphere the time-loss due to Strikes registered an increase of 176.37 per cent and Lockouts decreased by 1.93 per cent during the same period.
  • 13. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED BY CAUSES (CENTRAL SPHERE) DURING THE YEAR 2005
  • 14. Sr.No. Cause Group Number of Disputes Number of Workers Number of Mandays Lost involved Number Percent- age Number Percent- age Number Percent- age to Total to Total to Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Wages and Allowances 11 23.9 12,36023 60.7 1,375,476 62.5 2 Personnel 3 6.5 1,923 0.1 3,504 0.2 3 Indiscipline 3 6.5 25,013 0.2 28,108 1.2 4 Non-implementation in 1 2.2 50 0.0 100 0.0 connection with Labour Enactments/ Agreements 5 Charter of Demands 8 17.4 75,8423 37.3 758,423 34.5 6 Standing Orders/ 1 2.2 1,445 0.1 1,445 0.1 Rules/ Service conditions/Safety 7 Other reasons 19 41.3 13,088 0.6 32,625 1.5 Total 46 100.0 2,035,965 100.0 2,199,681 100.0
  • 15. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES CLASSIFIED BY INDUSTRY DURING THE YEARS 2004 AND 2005
  • 16. Item Description All Industries Manufacturing Mining and Crops and Industries Quarrying Horticulture 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 Average Time Loss 50,034 65,054 56,227 66,646 103,825 131,147 46,260 182,614 per Dispute (Mandays) Average Number 4,344 6,389 1,353 2,149 15,259 21,282 1,211 8,810 of Workers involved per Dispute (Workers) Average Number 12 10 42 31 7 6 38 21 of Mandays Lost per Worker involved (Days)
  • 17. 200000 182614 150000 103825 131147 46260 100000 56227 50000 66646 0 2004 2005 Crops and Horticulture Mining and Quarrying Manufacturing AVERAGE TIME LOSS PER DISPUTE (MANDAYS)
  • 18. ALL STRIKES DURING THE YEAR 2005 (BY STATES)
  • 19. Sr. No. State/Union Territory Number of Number of Number of Mandays Wages Lost Production Loss Strikes Workers Lost ( in Rs) (in Rs.) involved 1 Andhra Pradesh 18 128,100 365,158 8,30,74,523(18) 23,18,22,423(17) 2 Assam 1 15,832 15,832 28,44,775(*) .. 3 Bihar * 23,163 23,163 .. .. 4 Chattisgarh 1 7,700 10,400 41,60,000(1) .. 5 Gujarat 28 78,972 165,205 5,40,67,627(23) 52,27,01,500(14) 6 Haryana 16 21,285 493,589 .. .. 7 Himachal Pradesh 11 6,394 23,447 2,54,800(1) 1,35,55,000(10) 8 Jammu & Kashmir 1 145 145 .. .. 9 Karnataka 14 146,268 457,533 10,74,13,444(13) 57,72,57,288(6) 10 Kerala 15 562,504 3,368,458 3,54,53,753(6) .. 11 Madhya Pradesh 1 84,773 84,823 3,46,73,050(*) 3,07,01,100(*) 12 Maharastra 6 929,670 951,889 31,31,51,834(3) .. 13 Manipur 2 600 19,200 19,20,000(2) .. 14 Orissa 3 23,856 80,385 36,63,285(3) 19,87,12,999(2) 15 Punjab 6 8,544 33,455 29,98,899(5) 7,41,95,412(5) 16 Rajasthan 13 54,871 665,376 3,59,40,768(11) 33,15,15,118(9) 17 Tamil Nadu 52 31,464 536,366 4,40,24,510(21) 50,21,73,550(21) 18 Uttar Pradesh 7 46,266 61,530 2,18,03,650(6) 1,87,63,000(6) 19 Uttranchal 3 4,824 38,761 1,10,63,052(3) 18,85,01,237(3) 20 West Bengal 26 492,936 3,348,967 10,16,65,454(3) 14,44,40,370(2) 21 Chandigarh 3 44,204 46,591 .. .. 22 Delhi * 10,413 10,413 31,94,630(*) .. 23 Total 227 2,722,784 10,800,686 86,13,68,054(119) 2,83,43,38,997(95)
  • 20. TERMINATED DISPUTES CLASSIFIED BY METHOD OF SETTLEMENT & RESULT DURING THE YEAR 2005
  • 21. Sr. Method of Terminated Successful Partially Un- Indefinite Not No. Settlement Disputes successfully successful Known 1 Mediation/ 72 21 12 8 9 22 Conciliation/ Adjudication 2 Mutual 84 40 8 4 0 32 Settlement / Direct Negotiations 3 By third Party 11 2 0 0 0 9 4 Voluntary 46 9 7 24 1 5 Resumption by Employees 5 Voluntary 1 0 0 1 0 0 Resumption by Employers 6 Not Known 37 3 2 1 1 30 7 Others 5 2 3 0 0 0 Total 256 77 32 38 11 98
  • 22. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • During the calendar year 2005, there were in all 456 industrial disputes, out of these, 57 disputes were reported in public sector and 399 in private sector. • The percentage share of public sector in the number of disputes, workers involved and mandays lost was 12.5, 70.0 and 7.8 per cent respectively of the all India total numbers of disputes, workers involved and mandays lost. • Similarly, private sector constituted 87.5, 30.0 and 92.2 per cent respectively.
  • 23. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • The numbers of strikes reported during 2005 were 227 and 229 lockouts . • The numbers (456) of disputes reported during 2005 were less by 4.4% as compared to the year 2004 (477).
  • 24. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • Amongst the States West Bengal accounted for the highest time loss during 2005(19.22 million mandays) followed by Kerala (3.62 million mandays), Rajasthan (1.93 million mandays), Maharashtra (1.43 million mandays), Andhra Pradesh (1.01 million mandays) and Tamil Nadu (0.66 million mandays .
  • 25. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • Amongst the Industry group, manufacturing sector accounted for the highest number of disputes (290 or 63.60% of the total disputes) with a time lost of 19.33 million mandays or 65.15% of the total time loss. • Within this Industry division, manufacturing of Textiles accounted for the highest time loss (13.54 million mandays or 70.03% of the total time loss) in manufacturing Division during the year 2005.
  • 26. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • In the Central Sphere, the Banks accounted for the highest time loss (1.49 million mandays) followed by Industry group Coal Mines with 0.50 million mandays.
  • 27. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • Out of 229 lockouts, as many as 223 or 97.38% were pure lockouts (i.e. lockouts originating and terminating as lockouts). These lockouts resulted a time loss of 18.26 million mandays or 96.78% of the total time loss caused by all lockouts in the country. • The state of West Bengal accounted for highest number of pure lockouts i.e.181 resulting in a time loss of 15.86 million mandays or 86.85% of the total time loss caused by pure lockouts during the year 2005.
  • 28. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • The causesWages and Allowances and Bonus accounted for 31.35% of the total time loss due to industrial disputes. • Amongst the non-monetary causes, the indiscipline accounted for the highest time loss i.e. 47.84% followed by personnel i.e. 1.87% of the total time loss during the year 2005. The single most important cause Indiscipline was responsible for 72.93% (167) lockouts to the total number of Lockouts which alone accounted for 74.28% of the total time loss due to lockouts during the year 2005.
  • 29. STATISTICAL FINDINGS • Three All India strikes took place on 22.03.2005, 31.03.2005 and 29.09.2005 in Nationalised Banks, Life Insurance Corporation of India and in other various industries due to the causes ofWages and Allowances and Charter of Demands in which 1.83 million workers were involved and accounted for a time loss of 1.83 million mandays during the year 2005. • During the year 2005, 239 disputes were reported which were caused by reasons other than industrial disputes. Out of these, 235 (98.33%) cases were of lockouts and 4 (1.67%) cases of strikes which accounted for 99.44% and 0.56% of time loss respectively.

Editor's Notes

  1. Animated picture buttons grow and turn on path(Advanced)To reproduce the curved shape on this slide, do the following:On the Home tab, in the Slides group, click Layout, and then click Blank.On the Home tab, in the Drawing group, click Shapes, and then under Basic Shapes click Right Triangle (first row, fourth option from the left).On the slide, draw a triangle. Under Drawing Tools, on the Format tab, in the Size group, enter 7.5” into the Height box and enter 4.75” into the Width box.On the Home tab, in the Drawing group, click Arrange, point to Align, and then do the following:Click Align Middle. Click Align Left.On the slide, select the triangle. Under Drawing Tools, on the Format tab, in the Insert Shapes group, click Edit Shape, and then click Edit Points. Right-click the diagonal side of the triangle, and then click Curved Segment. Click the bottom right corner of the triangle and then move the curve adjustment handle to create a consistent curve.Also on the Format tab, in the Shape Styles group, click Shape Fill, and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1 (first row, first option from the left).Also on the Format tab, in the Shape Styles group, click Shape Outline, and then click No Outline.To reproduce the background effects on this slide, do the following:On the Design tab, in the Background group, click Background Styles, and then click Format Background. In the Format Background dialog box, click Fill in the left pane, select Gradient fill in the Fill pane, and then do the following:In the Type list, select Linear.In the Angle box, enter 225.Under Gradient stops, click Add gradient stops or Remove gradient stops until two stops appear in the slider.Also under Gradient stops, customize the gradient stops as follows:Select the first stop in the slider, and then do the following: In the Position box, enter 0%.Click the button next to Color, and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1 (first row, first option from the left).In the Transparency box, enter 0%. Select the first stop in the slider, and then do the following: In the Position box, enter 100%.Click the button next to Color, click More Colors, and then in the Colors dialog box, on the Custom tab, enter values for Red: 230, Green: 230, Blue: 230.To reproduce the picture and text effects on this slide, do the following:On the Insert tab, in the Images group, click Picture. In the Insert Picture dialog box, select a picture, and then click Insert.On the slide, select the picture. Under Picture Tools, on the Format tab, in the Size group, click the arrow under Crop, click Crop to Shape, and then under Basic Shapes click Oval (first option from the left).With the picture still selected, under PictureTools, on the Format tab, in the Size group, click the Size and Position dialog box launcher. In the Format Picture dialog box, resize or crop the image so that the height is set to 1.2” and the widthis set to 1.2”. To crop the picture, click Crop in the left pane, and in the right pane, under Crop position, enter values into the Height, Width, Left, and Top boxes. To resize the picture, click Size in the left pane, and in the right pane, under Size and rotate, enter values into the Height and Width boxes.Also in the Format Picture dialog box, click 3-D Format in the left pane, and then, in the 3-D Format pane, do the following:Under Bevel, click the button next to Top and click Circle (first row, first option from the left).Under Surface, click the button next to Material, and then under Standard click Metal (fourth option from the left). Click the button next to Lighting, and then under Neutral click Contrasting (second row, second option from the left). In the Angle box, enter 25°.Also in the Format Picture dialog box, click Shadow in the left pane. In the Shadow pane, click the button next to Presets, under Outer click Offset Diagonal Bottom Left (first row, third option from the left), and then do the following:In the Transparency box, enter 77%.In the Size box, enter 100%.In the Blur box, enter 10 pt.In the Angle box, enter 141°.In the Distance box, enter 10 pt.On the slide, drag the picture onto the curve, near the top. On the Insert tab, in the Text group, click Text Box. On the slide, drag to draw the text box.Enter text in the text box and select it. On the Home tab, in the Font group, do the following:In the Font list, select Corbel.In the Font Size box, enter 22.Click the arrow next to Font Color,and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1, Darker 50% (sixth row, first option from the left).On the Home tab, in the Paragraph group, click Align Text Left to align the text left in the text box.On the slide, drag the text box to the right of the picture. To reproduce the animation effects on this slide, do the following:It will help to zoom out in order to view the area off the slide. On the View tab, in the Zoom group, click Zoom. In the Zoom dialog box, select 65%.On the Animations tab, in the AdvancedAnimation group, click AddAnimation, and then click More Entrance Effects. In the Add Entrance Effect dialog box, under Moderate, click Grow & Turn, and then click OK.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select WithPrevious.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Duration box, enter 1. On the Animations tab, in the AdvancedAnimation group, click AddAnimation, and then under Motion Paths click Arcs.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select WithPrevious.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Duration box, enter 1. On the Animations tab, in the Animation group, click EffectOptions, and then click Right.On the Animations tab, in the Animation group, click EffectOptions, and then click Reverse Path Direction.On the slide, select the arc effect path, and then drag the bottom sizing handle below the bottom of the slide. Drag the right side sizing handle to the left until the path curve approximately matches the curve of the modified triangle. Drag the green rotation handle to the left to rotate the arc path to match the curve of the modified triangle. Drag the arc path so that the red arrow is in the center of the picture. You may need to make further adjustments to the length, width, and angle of the arc path to match the curve of the modified triangle.On the slide, select the text box. On the Animations tab, in the AdvancedAnimation group, click AddAnimation, and then under Entrance click Fade.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select After Previous.On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Duration box, enter 1. To reproduce the other animated pictures and text boxes on this slide, do the following:On the Animations tab, in the Advanced Animation group, click Animation Pane. On the slide, press and hold CTRL and then select the picture and the text box. On the Home tab, in the Clipboard group, click the arrow next to Copy, and then click Duplicate.On the slide, drag the duplicate picture and text onto the curve below the first group. On the slide, select the duplicate picture. Under Picture Tools, on the Format tab, in the Adjust group, click ChangePicture. In the Insert Picture dialog box, select a picture, and then click Insert. Under PictureTools, on the Format tab, in the Size group, click the Size and Position dialog box launcher. In the Format Picture dialog box, resize or crop the image so that the height is set to 1.2” and the widthis set to 1.2”. To crop the picture, click Crop in the left pane, and in the right pane, under Crop position, enter values into the Height, Width, Left, and Top boxes. To resize the picture, click Size in the left pane, and in the right pane, under Size and rotate, enter values into the Height and Width boxes.In the AnimationPane, click the Arc animation effect for the new picture. Drag the green rotation handle to the right to rotate the arc path to match the curve of the modified triangle. Drag the arc path so that the red arrow is in the center of the picture.Click in the duplicate text box and edit the text.Repeat steps 2-7 two more times to reproduce the third and fourth pictures and text boxes with animation effects.