SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
Should same sex
marriage be legally
  recognized?
      Lauren Zurmuhl
       Sociology 130
           UO1
Introduction
 Heated political and social debate past 15-20 years




    http://www.cagle.com/news/obama-gay-marriage/page/7/
Supporters
 Ban on same sex marriage is form of discrimination
 Violates personal liberty and civil rights
 Similar to racial discrimination of 1950’s
Opponents
 Homosexual marriage is “special rights”, not civil right
  (Conant)

 Religious marriage is between a man and a women
  only (Fingerhut et al)

 Superiority of intact biological family compared to same
  sex marriage family (Ponnuru)
History
 1993 Hawaii- National Attention
 Judges ruled state constitution required compelling
  reason not to extend to Homosexuals equal marriage
  rights (Fingerhut et al)
Defense of Marriage Act
 Passed by congress in 1996
 Denied homosexual couples from receiving benefits
 Defined marriage as "a legal union between one man and
  one woman as husband and wife.”

 source-Fingerhut et al
1999 Vermont
 Vermont Supreme Court rules “same-sex couples were
  entitled to the same rights, protections, and benefits”

 first state in the US to institute civil unions without
  calling it marriage

 Source-John Dooley, Baker v. Vermont, Majority
  Opinion, www.umass.edu, Dec. 20, 1999
Massachusetts Supreme
             Court
 2003 gays have equal marriage rights
 2004 first same sex marriage granted




   http://anaverageamericanpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/06/gay-marriage-victory-new-york-joins.html
Attempts by Congress to ban
      same sex marriage
 July 2004, US Senate effort to pass a constitutional
  amendment to ban gay marriage fails. Only 48 votes of
  the necessary 60 votes for the proposal to pass.

 September 2004, US House of Representatives rejects
  a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage
  by a vote of 227 to 186

 Source-"House Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Ban,"
  Washington Post, Oct. 1, 2004
State Constitutional Marriage
        Amendments
 2004-2008
 26 states pass constitutional amendments banning
  same sex marriage

 Campaign strategy supported by opponents of same
  sex marriage

 Laws are difficult to overturn
 Source-Fingerhut et al
Battle in California
         Proposition 8




http://secondpagemedia.com/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2010/08/Prop8-cartoon.jpg
California Proposition 8
        National Attention
 November 2008 - California statewide referendum on
  same sex marriage
 Put constitutional ban on same sex marriage(52.3%
  voters approved)
 May 2009 California Supreme Court upheld
 August 2010 US Appeals Court overturned ban
 Lessens status and dignity of gays and lesbians
 Source-Vaughn Walker, JD, Opinion, Perry v.
  Schwarzenneger, www.uscourts.gov, Aug. 4, 2010
Opponents Arguments
 Question normality and morality of LGBT individuals
 Uses religious arguments
 Gay and Lesbian values are encroaching on traditional
  values and rights of others

 Families not as stable as traditional families
Religious Argument against
      Same Sex Marriage
 Marriage is a religious rite.
 July 2003 -Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
  and approved by Pope John Paul II, marriage "was
  established by the Creator with its own
  nature, essential properties and purpose. No ideology
  can erase from the human spirit the certainty that
  marriage exists solely between a man and a woman”.
  (Source-Joseph Card. Ratzinger, "Considerations
  Regarding Proposals To Give Legal Recognition To
  Unions Between Homosexual Persons”.)
Encroaches on
            Rights of Others
 Conservative groups campaign against same sex
  marriage (nationformarriage.org)

 Argue "Gays and Lesbians have a right to live as
  they choose, they don’t have the right to redefine
  marriage for all of us."
nationformarriage.org




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp76ly2_NoI
“Special Rights”
                not Civil Right
 Diminishes religious freedom
 will diminish the religious freedom of those who
  consider homosexuality sinful (Conant)

 “not civil right, but civil wrong”
 Many African –Americans believe gays discriminated
  against, but marriage not civil rights issue (Conant)
Family Issues-Children of
       Same Sex Marriages
 More likely to be involved in crime
 More depression and thoughts of suicide
 Greater rates of infidelity
 More likely to be unemployed and on public assistance
 Source-Ponnuru
Proponents Arguments
 No one else’s business
 Protected by Constitution, Is Civil Right
 Lessens status of individuals, makes acceptable to
  discriminate

 Basic rights for couples
 Does not harm heterosexual marriages or family values
Civil Rights Issue
 Protected under Constitution-Right to liberty and
  equality

 “Unconstitutional under both the Due Process and
  Equal Protection Clauses” (source-Vaughn
  Walker, JD, Opinion, Perry v.
  Schwarzenneger, www.uscourts.gov, Aug. 4, 2010)

 Similar to ban on inter-racial marriages prior to 1967
Lessens Status
 Same sex marriage bans - Lessens status and dignity of
  gays and lesbians
 Stigmatizes gay and lesbian families
 Makes acceptable to discriminate against gays and lesbians
 Civil Union but not marriage is second class status
 Source-
  http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/2011
  _build/sexual_orientation/sexual_orientation_and_gender_id
  entity_policies.authcheckdam.pdf
Legal Marriage
        Conveys Basic Rights
 Hospital visitations during illness
 Tax benefits from marriage
 Inheritance rights
 Family healthcare benefits
 Legal rights in case of divorce
 Source-Tara Siegel Bernard and Ron Lieber, "The
  High Price of Being a Gay Couple,"
  www.nytimes.com, Oct. 2, 2009
No Harm to
        Traditional Marriages
 Legal same sex marriage has no effect on heterosexual
  marriages

 No adverse affect on “family values” (rates of
  divorce, abortion, illegitimate children)

 Source-Laura Langbein and Mark A. Yost, Jr., "Same-
  Sex Marriage and Negative Externalities," Social
  Science Quarterly, June 2009
Changing Popular Opinion




Source: Nate Silver, "Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage Appears to Shift at Accelerated Pace,”
www.fivethirtyeight.com, Aug. 12, 2010
Changing Political Tide
Class Discussion
 What do you believe?
Conclusion

More Related Content

What's hot

Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalizedWhy Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
Ilene123
 
Marriage Equality
Marriage EqualityMarriage Equality
Marriage Equality
wjmays09
 
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR PresentationGay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
thatotherliam
 
Cameron Niemann Powerpoint
Cameron Niemann PowerpointCameron Niemann Powerpoint
Cameron Niemann Powerpoint
cameronflips
 
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
RYan
 
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. TexasJonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
marcus hurt
 
Gay marriage speech
Gay marriage speechGay marriage speech
Gay marriage speech
spurcell94
 
Same-Sex & Sociology
Same-Sex & SociologySame-Sex & Sociology
Same-Sex & Sociology
zinonabinona
 
Same sex marriage
Same sex marriageSame sex marriage
Same sex marriage
Tawni Marie
 

What's hot (20)

Gay Marriage Presentation...HILARIOUS!
Gay Marriage Presentation...HILARIOUS!Gay Marriage Presentation...HILARIOUS!
Gay Marriage Presentation...HILARIOUS!
 
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 1: What is Marriage and Why does redefining it make...
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 1: What is Marriage and Why does redefining it make...Same-sex Marriage Lecture 1: What is Marriage and Why does redefining it make...
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 1: What is Marriage and Why does redefining it make...
 
Same sex marriage[1]
Same sex marriage[1]Same sex marriage[1]
Same sex marriage[1]
 
Shacking up Power Point.PDF
Shacking up Power Point.PDFShacking up Power Point.PDF
Shacking up Power Point.PDF
 
Gay marriage research power point
Gay marriage research power pointGay marriage research power point
Gay marriage research power point
 
Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalizedWhy Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
Why Same-Sex Marriage should be lagalized
 
Marriage Equality
Marriage EqualityMarriage Equality
Marriage Equality
 
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR PresentationGay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
 
Family Law Issues
Family Law IssuesFamily Law Issues
Family Law Issues
 
Cameron Niemann Powerpoint
Cameron Niemann PowerpointCameron Niemann Powerpoint
Cameron Niemann Powerpoint
 
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
Same sex marriage-powerpoint[1]
 
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. TexasJonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
Jonathan Euceda Lawrence V. Texas
 
Gay marriage speech
Gay marriage speechGay marriage speech
Gay marriage speech
 
2014 bumper stickers
2014 bumper stickers2014 bumper stickers
2014 bumper stickers
 
Constitutional Law M Casto 7.24.10
Constitutional Law M Casto 7.24.10Constitutional Law M Casto 7.24.10
Constitutional Law M Casto 7.24.10
 
Same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriageSame-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage
 
Frances Johnston - 4/4 - Gather.com : Gather.com
Frances Johnston - 4/4 - Gather.com : Gather.comFrances Johnston - 4/4 - Gather.com : Gather.com
Frances Johnston - 4/4 - Gather.com : Gather.com
 
Same-Sex & Sociology
Same-Sex & SociologySame-Sex & Sociology
Same-Sex & Sociology
 
Same sex marriage
Same sex marriageSame sex marriage
Same sex marriage
 
Project steps
Project stepsProject steps
Project steps
 

Presentation1

  • 1. Should same sex marriage be legally recognized? Lauren Zurmuhl Sociology 130 UO1
  • 2. Introduction  Heated political and social debate past 15-20 years http://www.cagle.com/news/obama-gay-marriage/page/7/
  • 3. Supporters  Ban on same sex marriage is form of discrimination  Violates personal liberty and civil rights  Similar to racial discrimination of 1950’s
  • 4. Opponents  Homosexual marriage is “special rights”, not civil right (Conant)  Religious marriage is between a man and a women only (Fingerhut et al)  Superiority of intact biological family compared to same sex marriage family (Ponnuru)
  • 5. History  1993 Hawaii- National Attention  Judges ruled state constitution required compelling reason not to extend to Homosexuals equal marriage rights (Fingerhut et al)
  • 6. Defense of Marriage Act  Passed by congress in 1996  Denied homosexual couples from receiving benefits  Defined marriage as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.”  source-Fingerhut et al
  • 7. 1999 Vermont  Vermont Supreme Court rules “same-sex couples were entitled to the same rights, protections, and benefits”  first state in the US to institute civil unions without calling it marriage  Source-John Dooley, Baker v. Vermont, Majority Opinion, www.umass.edu, Dec. 20, 1999
  • 8. Massachusetts Supreme Court  2003 gays have equal marriage rights  2004 first same sex marriage granted http://anaverageamericanpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/06/gay-marriage-victory-new-york-joins.html
  • 9. Attempts by Congress to ban same sex marriage  July 2004, US Senate effort to pass a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage fails. Only 48 votes of the necessary 60 votes for the proposal to pass.  September 2004, US House of Representatives rejects a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage by a vote of 227 to 186  Source-"House Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Ban," Washington Post, Oct. 1, 2004
  • 10. State Constitutional Marriage Amendments  2004-2008  26 states pass constitutional amendments banning same sex marriage  Campaign strategy supported by opponents of same sex marriage  Laws are difficult to overturn  Source-Fingerhut et al
  • 11. Battle in California Proposition 8 http://secondpagemedia.com/blog/wp- content/uploads/2010/08/Prop8-cartoon.jpg
  • 12. California Proposition 8 National Attention  November 2008 - California statewide referendum on same sex marriage  Put constitutional ban on same sex marriage(52.3% voters approved)  May 2009 California Supreme Court upheld  August 2010 US Appeals Court overturned ban  Lessens status and dignity of gays and lesbians  Source-Vaughn Walker, JD, Opinion, Perry v. Schwarzenneger, www.uscourts.gov, Aug. 4, 2010
  • 13. Opponents Arguments  Question normality and morality of LGBT individuals  Uses religious arguments  Gay and Lesbian values are encroaching on traditional values and rights of others  Families not as stable as traditional families
  • 14. Religious Argument against Same Sex Marriage  Marriage is a religious rite.  July 2003 -Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and approved by Pope John Paul II, marriage "was established by the Creator with its own nature, essential properties and purpose. No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists solely between a man and a woman”. (Source-Joseph Card. Ratzinger, "Considerations Regarding Proposals To Give Legal Recognition To Unions Between Homosexual Persons”.)
  • 15. Encroaches on Rights of Others  Conservative groups campaign against same sex marriage (nationformarriage.org)  Argue "Gays and Lesbians have a right to live as they choose, they don’t have the right to redefine marriage for all of us."
  • 17. “Special Rights” not Civil Right  Diminishes religious freedom  will diminish the religious freedom of those who consider homosexuality sinful (Conant)  “not civil right, but civil wrong”  Many African –Americans believe gays discriminated against, but marriage not civil rights issue (Conant)
  • 18. Family Issues-Children of Same Sex Marriages  More likely to be involved in crime  More depression and thoughts of suicide  Greater rates of infidelity  More likely to be unemployed and on public assistance  Source-Ponnuru
  • 19. Proponents Arguments  No one else’s business  Protected by Constitution, Is Civil Right  Lessens status of individuals, makes acceptable to discriminate  Basic rights for couples  Does not harm heterosexual marriages or family values
  • 20. Civil Rights Issue  Protected under Constitution-Right to liberty and equality  “Unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses” (source-Vaughn Walker, JD, Opinion, Perry v. Schwarzenneger, www.uscourts.gov, Aug. 4, 2010)  Similar to ban on inter-racial marriages prior to 1967
  • 21. Lessens Status  Same sex marriage bans - Lessens status and dignity of gays and lesbians  Stigmatizes gay and lesbian families  Makes acceptable to discriminate against gays and lesbians  Civil Union but not marriage is second class status  Source- http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/2011 _build/sexual_orientation/sexual_orientation_and_gender_id entity_policies.authcheckdam.pdf
  • 22. Legal Marriage Conveys Basic Rights  Hospital visitations during illness  Tax benefits from marriage  Inheritance rights  Family healthcare benefits  Legal rights in case of divorce  Source-Tara Siegel Bernard and Ron Lieber, "The High Price of Being a Gay Couple," www.nytimes.com, Oct. 2, 2009
  • 23. No Harm to Traditional Marriages  Legal same sex marriage has no effect on heterosexual marriages  No adverse affect on “family values” (rates of divorce, abortion, illegitimate children)  Source-Laura Langbein and Mark A. Yost, Jr., "Same- Sex Marriage and Negative Externalities," Social Science Quarterly, June 2009
  • 24. Changing Popular Opinion Source: Nate Silver, "Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage Appears to Shift at Accelerated Pace,” www.fivethirtyeight.com, Aug. 12, 2010
  • 26. Class Discussion  What do you believe?