Call girls Service Phullen / 9332606886 Genuine Call girls with real Photos a...
Dr Scott Payne & Dr Mark Owens: ARBD in the Northern Irish Context
1. Dr Scott Payne & Dr Mark Owens: Consultant Psychiatrist in Addiction
Psychiatry & ARBD Researcher
Alcohol-Related Brain Damage in the Northern Irish Context
ARBI: A Best Practice Seminar: Royal College of Physicians, 20th April 2015
2. Dr Mark Owens
ARBD Researcher WHSCT
Dr Scott Payne
Consultant in Addiction Psychiatry WHSCT
3. ARBD Project WHSCT
Big Lottery Impact of Alcohol Programme
18 month ARBD Project Team
Recruitment:
– Alcohol Liaison Nurse
– Research Assistant
– 2 support workers Apex Housing
Project Aim and Purpose:
– Scope out the prevalence in the West, assess any
gaps in service provision for this client group and
develop ways to improve services
4. ARBD Project Team
Head of Service for Primary Care & Specialist Services
Alcohol Liaison Nurse
Trust Research Associate and Research Assistant
Apex Housing
Foyle Haven (De Paul Ireland)
Team Managers, Drug and Alcohol Team
Primary Care Liaison Team Manager
Consultant Clinical Psychologist, PCOP
Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Brain Injury Service
Senior Social Worker, Women & Children Directorate
Discharge Co-ordinator, Altnagelvin Hospital
Consultant Addiction Psychiatrist
5. Scoping Exercise Of ARBD in
WHSCT Area
Period Scoped: 1st April 2012 through to
31st March 2013.
Two pronged approach
with data collection.
Electronic. Questionnaire
6. • Both the prevalence & incidence of ARBD show
marked increases over recent years, (McCall et al,
2010; Ramayya & Jaunhar, 1997; Kok, 1991)
• The Hague (KAS)........... 5 / 10,000 (Blansjaar et
al, 1987)
• Argyll & Clyde (ARBD).......... 7 / 10,000 (Chiang,
2002)
• One G.P. Practice estimated 14.4 / 10,000 for
same area (McRae & Cox, 2003).
Previous Studies Have Reported
7. Data collection
Electronic databases Epex & PAS systems were searched
for discharges.
ICD 10 codes:
• Either F10.6 (Amnesic Syndrome) or F10.7 (Late onset
psychotic disorder).
• F01 (Vascular dementia) or F03 (unspecified dementia) but
only with harmful or dependent alcohol consumption.
• G31.2 (degeneration of the nervous system due to alcohol)
with F10.6, F10.7, F01 or F03
8. In the Scoping Questionaire respondents were asked to
tell us about those clients who had a formal diagnosis of
KAS, Alcohol-related Dementia, or ARBD
And were also asked to include those patients or residents
without a formal diagnosis but for whom in their opinion (or
that of their staff) there existed substantial memory
impairment that was related to sustained heavy
alcohol abuse.
Data collection 2
9. EPEX / PAS
33 across Trust who met coding criteria
22 SWAH / AAH / T and C
11 T and F / Gransha
10. Cost
WHSCT acute beds are listed as costing £434 per day,
psychiatric beds £330 per day:
– If patients were in for on average 22 days (as per
Liverpool) for our 33 patients that would cost £ 210,056
+ £79,860 = £289,916
– An 80% saving to this would be £231,932
11. Community Groups
126 agencies contacted – across health and social care
spectrum – stat, C and V, residential
99% response rate with assertive Fup
66 positive responses
278 separate individuals recorded
45 at more than one service
1 patient recorded at 8 different services
2 patients at 5 different services
12. Prevalence = 0.09% or 9.4 in 10,000
The mean age (SD) for the cohort was 57.68 (13.49)
Min = 22; Max =91
A ratio of M : F 3.5 : 1
Males Mean Age (SD) = 58.01 (13.76) Min = 23; Max = 91
Females Mean Age (SD) = 56.53 (12.56) Min = 22; Max = 79
Results & Analysis
14. Qualitative Results And Analysis;
Respondents were asked to report on
What they were doing well.
The main difficulties.
Requirements/needs.
The data were examined for themes.
15. Respondents Outlined What they Were
Doing Well including;
Meeting Basic Needs
Managing Alcohol.
Team Working
Therapeutic Interventions.
Providing Person-Centered Care.
16. Diagnosis.
Stigmatisation.
Management of Alcohol.
Care Planning & Risk Assessment.
Lack of Resources.
Challenging Behaviours.
Respondents Main Difficulties Included
17. Specialism / Specialisation.
Training & Education.
Assessment & Diagnosis.
Care Pathway & adequate Service
Provision.
Appropriate therapeutic interventions.
Respondents Outlined Needs &
Requirements
18. Appropriate services
Reduce acute hospital bed usage by 85%
Significant reductions in relapse
Significant reductions in mortality
Improvements in 75% of patients over 3 years with
appropriate rehabilitation
Maintain 75% in non institutional community
settings
19. Principles of good care
Multi-disciplinary – Psychiatry, Rehab Psychology, SW, OT
Involve family and carers
Experienced key worker
Active care plan
Ongoing review of cognition, capacity, behaviour, risks
Carefully managed transitions from community to institutional care
First 3/12 important
– Abstinence
– Good nutrition
3 years rehab – regularisation of routines e.g. eating, sleeping,
personal hygiene
Introduction of memory and orientation cues
Further cognitive rehabilitation
20. Alcohol and brain damage in adults
Royal College Guidelines : College
report CR185
Clinical commissioning groups should commission clinically
appropriate services to provide multidisciplinary, specialist care for the
assessment and rehabilitation of patients with severe ARBD.
In the absence of established specialist services, consideration should
be given to the embedding of ‘specialisation’ within the most
appropriate established generic mental health service provision.
Such specialisation should provide advice and support to other
services who are managing people with mild to moderate ARBD,
including community teams and alcohol services.
21. Alcohol and brain damage in adults
Royal College Guidelines : College report
CR185
Clinical commissioning groups should commission appropriate services
for facilitating early hospital discharge and short-term psychosocial
assessment (up to 3 months).
Arrangements should be in place to provide safe and active
institutional rehabilitation for those patients who are not well enough to
be rehabilitated into non-institutional settings after the initial 3-month
period of assessment.
Funding for long-term institutional care for supporting people with
permanent brain damage should be made available.
22. Draft Hospital ARBD
Referral & Care Pathway. Revised
19/02/14
Suspected Alcohol
Related Brain
Damage
Patient with heavy alcohol use or
identified as alcohol dependant.
(See guidance notes for staff)
With patient agreement and if
required commence
detoxification and adhere to
WHSCT ‘Management and
Guidelines of Acute Alcohol
Withdrawal Policy’.
NB. Give iv. Pabrinex
Immediately following
detoxification and
stabilisation
Cognitive impairment
identified using clinical
judgement, YES/NO?
YES
No ARBD input required.
Refer to alternative
service.
NO
6 CIT completed by ALN
result >10/28
Exclude possible physical/ mental
health/transient causes for
cognitive impairment e.g,
infection /medication). Consider
CT / MRI (brain) scan.
ARBD Team to screen referral
and complete initial assessments.
YES
Review placement for suitability for longer term
ARBD rehabilitation i.e. specialist care or supported
environment with input from ARBD team over a
2-3 year period.
On-going assessment and
multidisciplinary care planning in
partnership with other services.
• Addictions Services
• Brain Injury service
• Mental Health Teams
• Physical and Sensory
Disability Team
• Primary Care Services
(GP)
• No input
ARBD Team to identify a keyworker who will
liaise with hospital SW to enable discharge
planning to home or other appropriate
setting. Ongoing assessments and multi-
disciplinary care planning over a 3 month
period i.e.
• Psycho-Social Assessments
• Risk Assessments
• Neuropsychological Tests
• Mental Capacity Assessments.
• Functional Assessments.
• Abstinence support.
Complete ARBD Referral Form
providing the following
information:
• Functional assessment
completed by OT
• Mobility assessment by Physio
(if required)
• Social circumstance report
(including assessment of home
situation) by hospital SW.
• Cognitive assessment by ALN.
Further
assessment
required
No
Yes
23. Patient with history of heavy
alcohol use or identified as
alcohol dependant.
(see guidance notes for staff)
Draft Community ARBD Referral & Care Pathway
revised 19/02/14
Concerns about cognitive
impairment/ memory
+/- risks to themselves.
• If the person is already abstinent or
is continuing to drink then the GP
in collaboration with other
community staff /support workers
to complete the ‘ARBD Referral
Form’ providing information on the
persons:
• level of risk/vulnerability
• social circumstances (including
assessment of home situation)
• functional ability
• cognitive ability – i.e. complete
6 CIT and note period of abstinence.
ARBD Team to identify a keyworker
and complete assessments over a 3
month period i.e:
• Psychosocial Assessments
• Risk Assessments.
• Neuropsychological Tests
• Mental Capacity Assessments.
• Review Home situation.
• Ongoing Functional Assessments
• Abstinence support.
• Addiction Services
• Mental Health Teams
• Physical and Sensory
Disability Team
• Primary Care/GP
• Brain Injury Service
• No input
Suspected Alcohol
Related Brain Damage ARBD Team to screen referral and
complete initial assessments.
YES
Review placement for suitability for longer
term ARBD rehabilitation i.e. specialist
care or supported environment with input
from ARBD team over a 2-3 year period.
On-going assessment and care
planning in partnership with other
services.
NO
Collaborative working across services during
3 month assessment period is an essential requirement.
Refer to GP
If detox appropriate refer to detox nurse
and follow WHSCT community detox
pathway. Following detox consider
referral to ARBD team if concerns remain
- see below.
Refer to ARBD
Team
Further
assessment
required
Yes
No
24. Summary.
• We have established a crude prevalence
rate of 9/10,000.
• The current work goes beyond previous
studies that concentrated on Acute hospital
discharge & admission data exclusively.
• Carepathways have been informed and
developed from the data presented.
Editor's Notes
Let me take you back to January 2011 the Big Lottery announced a £10m Investment in Northern Ireland for the “Impact of Alcohol Programme”
I was appointed in June 2011 to assist Yvonne in developing the Trusts Porfolio
For Epex it became necessary to include F10(Alcohol related).
Wirral 2-3 referrals / month
? Any overlap
Statistically speaking there was no difference in age between Males & Females.
Stem width: 10.00
Each leaf: 1 case(s)
The qualitative data was examined for themes using a thematic analysis approach. The data was processed in stages by sorting & classifying, open coding, Axial coding, and Selective coding.
Respondents outlined what they felt they were doing well and they felt that they could;
meet clients basic needs
food, shelter, warmth, and maintain a safe environment.
alcohol management
worked well with abstinence, controlled drinking/harm reduction approaches.
Therapeutic Interventions
included a range of activities with,
1:1 time, reminding, education, befriending, involving families, advocacy, outings, and chaperoning clients to appointments.
Providing Personcentered Care
Respondents were able to provide some choices for their clients.
Diagnosis was considered by respondents to be
rigid, problematic, impossible, and unclear – generating considerable confusion and difficulty.
Dual “Diagnosis” & clients being “undiagnosed.”
“There is a lack of diagnosis initially and then a total lack of appropriate services available. They are the lost group. GPs and other services are unable to make clear diagnosis due to input from others.”
STIGMATISATION.
Respondents felt that a lack of “empathy” from professionals was a difficulty.
Professionals tended to see the alcohol rather than the cognitive impairment.
Labelling and denial of services to those that continued to drink
“Trying to make GPs and hospital staff aware that sometimes the way they are feeling, ie if they are sick, is not due to the fact they are a person who has an alcohol problem – trying to get people to see the person behind the drink. Trying to take away the stigma associated with drinking.”
The literature would also suggest that people with ARBD face a triple whammy of stigmatization when trying to access accommodation, benefits, and care.
17
(including on brain scans)
enabling access to expertise, advice, multidisciplinary assessment (including Social Service support); and coordination or supervision of care pathways.
neuropsychiatric/psychological
These facilities may have to manage clinically disturbed and mentally incapacitated patients
It should be expected that the majority of patients (75%) will make some improvement over 3 years as a consequence of active rehabilitation.