SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
Why Most Document Reviews are not Really Reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly of review practices in the clinical sciencesThe importance of understanding the root causes of poor review outcomes
To Bring Change For effective CAPA you must identify and manage root cause not just the symptoms This dictum applies absolutely to review practices
Starting Point: Know Where You Want to Look Recognize the differences between:  Practices and processes Cooperation and collaboration Inspection and review
Bottom-line If you want to improve collaborative work practices, but your systems are built around cooperative processes, then you will never get the there. Fix the process and then work on the practices
Root Cause of Poor Review Outcomes No formal training in review Reviewer discipline
No Formal Training Results In Failure to recognize differences between review and inspection Lack of meaningful markers and metrics to establish quality Lack of appreciation for how rhetorical strategy varies by document genre Lack of understanding of situational reading behavior
Failure to recognize differences between review and inspection Symptoms: “word smithing” even when requested to avoid doing so 5 people with 5 suggestions how to rewrite one sentence Starting on page one, line one, word one and reading document in serial progression
Lack of meaningful markers and metrics to establish quality Symptoms: Competing opinions about “what to do” or “how to state” in a document Continually revisit a narrative in successive drafts Work on a narrative until “take it away from me” Use previous work (narratives or full documents) as benchmark to judge current work
Lack of appreciation for how rhetorical strategy varies by document genre, document section, audience situation Symptoms: All feet will fit one shoe: Repurposing without account for audience, genre, or section intention “the template is king…long live the king!!” “well when I was writing manuscripts we…..” Well this does not work for me
Lack of understanding of situational reading behavior Symptoms: If we write it…..they will read it I am an SME and that means all SMEs like me read “just like I do” I want documents written just like how I think/conduct science Starting to review from page 1, line 1, and reading straight through to page n
Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time
Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time It’s gotta be done my way
Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time It’s gotta be done my way Misapply review focus
In Summary Recognizing non-productive review practices should be an object of focus for more organizations  Know where you want to look Address root cause not just symptoms For CAPA: take small bites of the apple Start measuring and reporting Changing non-productive practices not an easy matter because of deeply in-grained learned behavior

More Related Content

What's hot

The literature review
The literature reviewThe literature review
The literature review
s1150056
 

What's hot (8)

How to get ur paper published
How to get ur paper publishedHow to get ur paper published
How to get ur paper published
 
Review writing
Review writing Review writing
Review writing
 
How to Write Research Proposal in 2018-2019
How to Write Research Proposal in 2018-2019How to Write Research Proposal in 2018-2019
How to Write Research Proposal in 2018-2019
 
Ethics in peer review
Ethics in peer reviewEthics in peer review
Ethics in peer review
 
The literature review
The literature reviewThe literature review
The literature review
 
Litelature review
Litelature reviewLitelature review
Litelature review
 
ANALYTICAL REVIEW AND PROCEDURE: RESEARCH AND ACCEPTABLE PAPER FOR INDEXED JO...
ANALYTICAL REVIEW AND PROCEDURE: RESEARCH AND ACCEPTABLE PAPER FOR INDEXED JO...ANALYTICAL REVIEW AND PROCEDURE: RESEARCH AND ACCEPTABLE PAPER FOR INDEXED JO...
ANALYTICAL REVIEW AND PROCEDURE: RESEARCH AND ACCEPTABLE PAPER FOR INDEXED JO...
 
Dear Reviewer: Notes of appreciation from authors to peer reviewers
Dear Reviewer: Notes of appreciation from authors to peer reviewersDear Reviewer: Notes of appreciation from authors to peer reviewers
Dear Reviewer: Notes of appreciation from authors to peer reviewers
 

Similar to Why Most Document Reviews Are Not Really Reviews Ver Final Draft

Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docxGibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
shericehewat
 
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work ReportHibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
Hibatul Ghalib Barus
 

Similar to Why Most Document Reviews Are Not Really Reviews Ver Final Draft (11)

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Review Practices in The Clinical Sciences
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Review Practices in The Clinical SciencesThe Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Review Practices in The Clinical Sciences
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Review Practices in The Clinical Sciences
 
What is peer review of a manuscript. benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript ...
What is peer review of a manuscript. benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript ...What is peer review of a manuscript. benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript ...
What is peer review of a manuscript. benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript ...
 
Rater Errors
Rater ErrorsRater Errors
Rater Errors
 
A Academy
A AcademyA Academy
A Academy
 
Literature review outline tips
 Literature review outline tips Literature review outline tips
Literature review outline tips
 
A Summary Of Interrater Reliability
A Summary Of Interrater ReliabilityA Summary Of Interrater Reliability
A Summary Of Interrater Reliability
 
Does Critiquing Qualitative Research Make Sense?
Does Critiquing Qualitative Research Make Sense?Does Critiquing Qualitative Research Make Sense?
Does Critiquing Qualitative Research Make Sense?
 
Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docxGibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
Gibbs’ CycleGibbs’ cycle is a reflective model which helps you.docx
 
Understanding writing process
Understanding writing processUnderstanding writing process
Understanding writing process
 
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work ReportHibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
Hibatul Ghalib_Barus_Type Dynamics Indicator_Type at Work Report
 
REVIEW WRITING presentation.pptx
REVIEW WRITING presentation.pptxREVIEW WRITING presentation.pptx
REVIEW WRITING presentation.pptx
 

Why Most Document Reviews Are Not Really Reviews Ver Final Draft

  • 1. Why Most Document Reviews are not Really Reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly of review practices in the clinical sciencesThe importance of understanding the root causes of poor review outcomes
  • 2. To Bring Change For effective CAPA you must identify and manage root cause not just the symptoms This dictum applies absolutely to review practices
  • 3. Starting Point: Know Where You Want to Look Recognize the differences between: Practices and processes Cooperation and collaboration Inspection and review
  • 4. Bottom-line If you want to improve collaborative work practices, but your systems are built around cooperative processes, then you will never get the there. Fix the process and then work on the practices
  • 5. Root Cause of Poor Review Outcomes No formal training in review Reviewer discipline
  • 6. No Formal Training Results In Failure to recognize differences between review and inspection Lack of meaningful markers and metrics to establish quality Lack of appreciation for how rhetorical strategy varies by document genre Lack of understanding of situational reading behavior
  • 7. Failure to recognize differences between review and inspection Symptoms: “word smithing” even when requested to avoid doing so 5 people with 5 suggestions how to rewrite one sentence Starting on page one, line one, word one and reading document in serial progression
  • 8. Lack of meaningful markers and metrics to establish quality Symptoms: Competing opinions about “what to do” or “how to state” in a document Continually revisit a narrative in successive drafts Work on a narrative until “take it away from me” Use previous work (narratives or full documents) as benchmark to judge current work
  • 9. Lack of appreciation for how rhetorical strategy varies by document genre, document section, audience situation Symptoms: All feet will fit one shoe: Repurposing without account for audience, genre, or section intention “the template is king…long live the king!!” “well when I was writing manuscripts we…..” Well this does not work for me
  • 10. Lack of understanding of situational reading behavior Symptoms: If we write it…..they will read it I am an SME and that means all SMEs like me read “just like I do” I want documents written just like how I think/conduct science Starting to review from page 1, line 1, and reading straight through to page n
  • 11. Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time
  • 12. Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time It’s gotta be done my way
  • 13. Reviewer discipline Right people wrong time It’s gotta be done my way Misapply review focus
  • 14.
  • 15. In Summary Recognizing non-productive review practices should be an object of focus for more organizations Know where you want to look Address root cause not just symptoms For CAPA: take small bites of the apple Start measuring and reporting Changing non-productive practices not an easy matter because of deeply in-grained learned behavior