This NCO evaluation report covers the period from November 2010 to November 2011 and evaluates SSG Gabriel Tate. During this period, SSG Tate served as an Intelligence Analyst with the 41st Military Intelligence Battalion in Afghanistan. He received excellent ratings in competence, physical fitness, leadership, training, and responsibility from his rater. SSG Tate increased exploited media production by 108% and directly contributed to improved intelligence production quality. His rater recommends promoting him with his peers.
This document discusses music used in crime-thriller films and short films. It begins by defining a crime thriller as a genre that provides excitement and suspense, keeping the audience engaged through plot twists and cliffhangers. It then discusses how soundtracks and music are commonly used in short films to help convey the story in a limited time. Examples are provided of different types of music used effectively in short films to set mood. The document also analyzes the soundtracks of some famous crime/thriller films like Misery and Furious 7 to understand what type of music may work well for a crime-thriller short film.
Representation of stereotypes in thrillersBillieMayxo
The document discusses stereotypes used in the opening sequence of a thriller film. It describes having a young female protagonist who is vulnerable and alone in her home as stereotypical of a victim character. A male antagonist following typical villainous stereotypes would enter the home, playing the role of the mystery kidnapper or threat. Feedback could address providing more depth to the characters beyond these stereotypes.
Marion Crane steals $40,000 from her employer to run away with her boyfriend Sam. While driving to meet Sam, she stops for the night at the Bates Motel where she meets the owner Norman Bates. Hitchcock establishes the film's noir style through its black-and-white cinematography, use of claustrophobic spaces, and Bernard Herrmann's ominous score. The film explores themes of voyeurism, guilt, and the subjugation of women through Marion's characterization and interactions with male authority figures.
This document discusses the anatomy and classification of fractures of the femoral neck. It begins by providing background on the increasing incidence of hip fractures globally. It then describes the anatomy of the hip joint and proximal femur, including the femoral neck, angles, blood supply, and trabecular patterns. It discusses several classification systems for femoral neck fractures, including the Garden, Pauwels, and OTA classifications, which are based on the location and degree of displacement of the fracture. Imaging modalities for evaluating these fractures such as radiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine are also summarized.
El Bushido fue el código de conducta que rigió la vida de los samuráis entre los siglos IX y XII en Japón. Tomó influencias del budismo zen, confucionismo y sintoísmo, enfatizando virtudes como la lealtad, el honor y el sacrificio. Los samuráis eran expertos guerreros que se comprometían a servir y proteger a su señor hasta la muerte. Preferían luchar cuerpo a cuerpo y consideraban el suicidio ritual como la única forma honorable de morir tras una derrota o deshonra.
This document outlines common stereotypes found in horror films, including the hero, villain, victim, non-believer, loved up couple, helper, donor, and false hero. The hero is typically male and strong, while the villain takes many forms but often wears a mask. The victim is usually female and portrayed as stupid. The non-believer doubts the threat until being killed. The loved up couple become separated and oblivious, building tension. The helper and donor provide aid to the hero at critical moments. The false hero initially assists before a reveal as a villain's ally.
Camera shots and angles for a horror and thriller filmbilliewilson_
This document discusses various camera shot techniques used in horror and thriller films to build suspense and tension. It describes how high angle shots make characters seem powerless, while close-ups show emotion and detail. Tracking shots establish movement and build suspense as the audience doesn't know what will be shown next. Tilt shots can simplify supernatural elements or portray the camera as a victim. Low angle shots emphasize how intimidating villains are, while point-of-view shots make the audience feel emotionally invested. Zooming and shots involving mirrors and reflections also heighten tension.
O documento discute os desejos de um aluno para melhorar a cidade de São Vicente em seu aniversário de 500 anos. Ele quer mais ruas asfaltadas, praças arrumadas, casas para as pessoas, preservação ambiental, esgotos consertados, quadras de escola decentes, respeito aos idosos, e médicos bons que tratem os pacientes com respeito para que São Vicente se torne a melhor cidade do mundo.
This document discusses music used in crime-thriller films and short films. It begins by defining a crime thriller as a genre that provides excitement and suspense, keeping the audience engaged through plot twists and cliffhangers. It then discusses how soundtracks and music are commonly used in short films to help convey the story in a limited time. Examples are provided of different types of music used effectively in short films to set mood. The document also analyzes the soundtracks of some famous crime/thriller films like Misery and Furious 7 to understand what type of music may work well for a crime-thriller short film.
Representation of stereotypes in thrillersBillieMayxo
The document discusses stereotypes used in the opening sequence of a thriller film. It describes having a young female protagonist who is vulnerable and alone in her home as stereotypical of a victim character. A male antagonist following typical villainous stereotypes would enter the home, playing the role of the mystery kidnapper or threat. Feedback could address providing more depth to the characters beyond these stereotypes.
Marion Crane steals $40,000 from her employer to run away with her boyfriend Sam. While driving to meet Sam, she stops for the night at the Bates Motel where she meets the owner Norman Bates. Hitchcock establishes the film's noir style through its black-and-white cinematography, use of claustrophobic spaces, and Bernard Herrmann's ominous score. The film explores themes of voyeurism, guilt, and the subjugation of women through Marion's characterization and interactions with male authority figures.
This document discusses the anatomy and classification of fractures of the femoral neck. It begins by providing background on the increasing incidence of hip fractures globally. It then describes the anatomy of the hip joint and proximal femur, including the femoral neck, angles, blood supply, and trabecular patterns. It discusses several classification systems for femoral neck fractures, including the Garden, Pauwels, and OTA classifications, which are based on the location and degree of displacement of the fracture. Imaging modalities for evaluating these fractures such as radiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine are also summarized.
El Bushido fue el código de conducta que rigió la vida de los samuráis entre los siglos IX y XII en Japón. Tomó influencias del budismo zen, confucionismo y sintoísmo, enfatizando virtudes como la lealtad, el honor y el sacrificio. Los samuráis eran expertos guerreros que se comprometían a servir y proteger a su señor hasta la muerte. Preferían luchar cuerpo a cuerpo y consideraban el suicidio ritual como la única forma honorable de morir tras una derrota o deshonra.
This document outlines common stereotypes found in horror films, including the hero, villain, victim, non-believer, loved up couple, helper, donor, and false hero. The hero is typically male and strong, while the villain takes many forms but often wears a mask. The victim is usually female and portrayed as stupid. The non-believer doubts the threat until being killed. The loved up couple become separated and oblivious, building tension. The helper and donor provide aid to the hero at critical moments. The false hero initially assists before a reveal as a villain's ally.
Camera shots and angles for a horror and thriller filmbilliewilson_
This document discusses various camera shot techniques used in horror and thriller films to build suspense and tension. It describes how high angle shots make characters seem powerless, while close-ups show emotion and detail. Tracking shots establish movement and build suspense as the audience doesn't know what will be shown next. Tilt shots can simplify supernatural elements or portray the camera as a victim. Low angle shots emphasize how intimidating villains are, while point-of-view shots make the audience feel emotionally invested. Zooming and shots involving mirrors and reflections also heighten tension.
O documento discute os desejos de um aluno para melhorar a cidade de São Vicente em seu aniversário de 500 anos. Ele quer mais ruas asfaltadas, praças arrumadas, casas para as pessoas, preservação ambiental, esgotos consertados, quadras de escola decentes, respeito aos idosos, e médicos bons que tratem os pacientes com respeito para que São Vicente se torne a melhor cidade do mundo.
Colonel Mark P. McGuire was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal for his exceptionally meritorious service over 33 years in the Army, culminating as the Commander of the Southeast Medical Area Readiness Support Group. He exemplified leadership during five deployments that directly supported combat operations. Colonel McGuire expertly integrated medical units and provided direct medical support to service members and civilians in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. His leadership was critical to the success of the 2007 troop surge in Iraq.
This document provides a summary of a monograph analyzing international relations in Central Asia through three case studies. The case studies examine Kazakhstan's security engagements, energy involvement, and US basing in the region. The case studies highlight that Central Asian governments act primarily based on realist theories to balance influences from major powers like Russia, China, and the US in order to preserve their regimes. This constrains US goals in the region and suggests the US maintain a minimal presence to enable future operations if security deteriorates, as neither increased engagement nor disengagement will further US interests.
This DD Form 214 serves as Fredrick A. Smith's military discharge papers. It summarizes his service from July 1974 to June 1980 as an avionic communications specialist and maintenance management specialist in the U.S. Air Force. He achieved the rank of Staff Sergeant E-4 and was awarded the Air Force Longevity Service Award and Good Conduct Medal. Upon separation from active duty, he was honorably discharged from Bergstrom AFB in Texas.
Manuel Torres III is a veteran of the United States Army with 26 years of experience in leadership, instruction, operations, and logistics. He seeks a position as a professional driver where he can utilize his proven skills in decision making, multi-tasking, and communication. His resume highlights his extensive qualifications including leadership of over 120 cadets as an instructor, management of equipment and resources valued at over $100 million, and 19 awards and honors received during his military career.
Carlos J. Hernandez is a Chief Warrant Officer Five with over 31 years of experience in the U.S. Army, including currently serving as the Command Senior Warrant Officer for the First Armored Division at Fort Bliss, Texas. He has extensive experience in logistics management, procurement, and inventory control. Hernandez holds a Bachelor's degree in Management and has received numerous awards and honors for his service.
This document provides guidance for setting up a Base of Operations (BOO) for an Urban Search and Rescue team responding to a disaster, including identifying site requirements, priorities for setup, assigning responsibilities, and procedures for setting up areas for the cache, Task Force Command Post, medical treatment, personnel shelters, and other functions.
The document discusses several topics related to military personnel planning and policy:
- It summarizes current end strengths and growth areas for active duty and reserve personnel, including increases in special operations forces and individual augmentees.
- It outlines challenges in sustaining personnel quality due to economic recovery factors like the post-9/11 GI Bill and national healthcare. More competitive retention is expected.
- It discusses force shaping strategies like the performance-based continuation board, Perform to Serve program, and selective reenlistment bonuses to maintain the right skill mix.
Greg Thompson has over 33 years of experience in leadership and management roles in the military and private sector. He has a Bachelor's degree in Animal Science from the University of Idaho. His experience includes 27 years of active Army service including deployed combat operations. He also has 3 years of intelligence experience within the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. He has extensive experience in program management, operations management, property management, and intelligence analysis.
This document is a resume for Paul Goldberg, seeking a senior management or principal analyst position. It summarizes his qualifications including over 27 years of experience leading and managing organizations in the US Army as a Signal Corps Officer. It details his strong analytical and leadership skills, experience compiling and analyzing critical information to make strategic recommendations. The resume provides a chronological history of his professional experience in senior analyst roles supporting the Department of the Army and 18th Medical Command, planning communications for wartime operations in Korea, and other signal officer and leadership positions over his military career.
OPERATIONS ORDER (OPORD)San Diego State Army ROTC.docxcherishwinsland
OPERATIONS ORDER
(OPORD)
San Diego State Army ROTC
1
5 Paragraph OPORD
Situation
Mission
Execution
Service Support
Command and Signal
San Diego State Army ROTC
2
Baseline Data
Operations Order # / Code Name if Used
References (maps, previous orders,
FRAGOs, etc)
3) Time Zone Used Throughout Order
4) Task Organization
San Diego State Army ROTC
3
Task Organization
Explains how the unit is organized for the operation
Done by phase
San Diego State Army ROTC
4
Paragraph 1: Situation
Situation - Provides information essential to subordinate leader’s understanding of the mission
a. Enemy Forces
b. Friendly Forces
c. Attachments / Detachments
San Diego State Army ROTC
5
Enemy Forces – include pertinent intel / data
(1) Weather & Light Data
(2) Terrain (AOKOC)
(3) Enemy composition, disposition, & strength
(4) Enemy Capabilities
(5) Enemy Intentions
Paragraph 1: Situation
San Diego State Army ROTC
6
Enemy Forces:
Terrain
Enemy Forces
(2) Terrain – define area of operations & area of interest, advantages / disadvantages to friendly & enemy, impact on mission
A - Avenues of approach
O - Observation and fields of fire
K - Key terrain
O - Obstacles
C - Cover and concealment
San Diego State Army ROTC
7
Enemy Forces:
Composition, Disposition, & Strength
Enemy Forces
(3) Enemy Composition, Disposition, & Strength - important characteristics and significance, advantages / disadvantages to friendly & enemy, impact on mission
- type of enemy unit, how it’s equipped,
designation, location, size, and strength
- current (pertinent) enemy activities
- distinguish known and templated enemy
locations
San Diego State Army ROTC
8
Enemy Forces:
Capabilities
Enemy Forces
(4) Enemy Capabilities – combat capability
- range and orientation of direct / indirect fires
- counter-attack forces
- reserves
- NBC
- mobility / countermobility
- ability to reposition
San Diego State Army ROTC
9
Enemy Forces:
Intensions
Enemy Forces
(5) Enemy Intentions
- the most probable and most dangerous
course of action
- how the enemy will react to attack / defense
- critical enemy events
San Diego State Army ROTC
10
Friendly Forces
b. Friendly Forces
- higher unit missions (two levels up)
- left unit and mission
- right unit and mission
- forward unit and mission
- following / reserve unit and mission
- units in support or higher supporting unit
h artillery support
h air support
h mortar support
San Diego State Army ROTC
11
Attachments / Detachments
c. Attachments & Detachments
(1) Attachments – who, why, when, where, support requirements
(2) Detachments – who, why, when, where, support requirements
San Diego State Army ROTC
12
Paragraph 2: Mission
Mission
- Who, what, where, when, why
- Concise statement of task(s) & purpose
- Derived .
Annotated BibliographyThere are 2 .docxtarifarmarie
Annotated Bibliography
There are 2 article about immigration and these article must use as a source for this annotated essay. Each paragraph should mention these article for supporting detail in the essay.
1. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/articles/2017-07-31/donald-trump-should-realize-the-us-economy-needs-immigrants
2. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/trump-clinton-immigration-economy-unemployment-jobs-214216
Topic is “Does immigration beneficial or harmful for the U.S. economy?
It is Annotated Bibliography.
Introduction Paragraph
There must be 3 body paragraph for Essay
First paragraph: Yes, Immigration good for US economy.
Second paragraph: Also there should be Yes, immigration good for US economy BUT……..( this paragraph should explain yes immigration good for US, however there is some problem or some issue about……)
Third paragraph: No, immigration bad for US economy.
Conclusion Paragraph
Almost 800 words with MLA citation.
I need all citation information with their web address too.
I have to explain them, so I will read them.
You have two article and you need to choose at least 3 outside sources for Annotated Essay.
Write a summary and response for each source.
Remember, they should have different answers to your problem.
Provide both a summary of the source and your evaluation
why this is a useful source for your research and how it answers your question.
NORAD-USNORTHCOM
Interagency Coordination
This Briefing is Classified:
UNCLASSIFIED
Mr. Barry Nightingale
Directorate of Interagency
Coordination
UNCLASSIFIED
2
UNCLASSIFIED
What is Interagency Coordination?
• “The Coordination that occurs between agencies of
the US Government, including the Department of
Defense, for the purpose of accomplishing an
objective” - JP 3-08
• Interagency Coordination is integrated throughout
both Commands . . . not a separate function.
• We at N-NC include:
-US Government Agencies
(Dept of Homeland Security, State, Transportation, Health
and Human Services, etc)
-Non-Government Agencies
(Red Cross, Humanitarian Int’l Service Group, etc)
-Private Sector Organizations
(Academic, business, professional)
3
UNCLASSIFIED
N-NC Interagency Coordination Directorate
CMOC
HQS NORAD-USNORTHCOM
Peterson AFB
Cheyenne Mountain
Air Station
N-NC J4
Logistic and
Engineering
N-NC J1
Manpower &
Personnel
N-NC J6
Architectures &
Integration
N-NC J7
Training &
Exercise
N-NC J8
Programs &
Resources
N-NC J2
Intelligence
NC J3
Operations
SJFHQ - North
N J3
Operations
N-NC IC
Interagency
Coordination
NN--NC ICNC IC
Interagency Interagency
Coordination Coordination
N-NC J5
Plans and
Policy
N-NC IC Directorate Mission
Facilitate the integration and synchronization of Interagency activities
to ensure mutual understanding, unity of effort and full spectrum support
to and from NORAD and USNORTHCOM
4
UNCLASSIFIED
Resident and Local
Agency Representati.
Alameda County Sheriff Ahern Form 460 7/1/13 to 12/31/13Yehoshua7
This document is a cover page and summary page for a campaign disclosure statement filed in California. It provides information about the type of committee filing the statement, the period covered, the committee name and contact information, and totals for contributions received and expenditures made. It lists the treasurer and indicates this is a semi-annual statement with no amendments. The summary page provides monetary figures for contributions, expenditures, beginning and ending cash balances.
This thesis analyzes the U.S. Army's enlisted assignment process to identify opportunities for improvement. The Army's centralized and hierarchical process assigns over 100,000 soldiers to positions each year. The thesis evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the current process, compares it to the U.S. Navy's decentralized approach, and uses computer simulation to analyze alternative matching processes. The results indicate the Army could improve efficiency and soldier satisfaction by incorporating individual preferences and automation into the assignment system.
This unofficial transcript summarizes Mario Angulo Alvarado's academic record. It shows that he transferred 77 credits from Montgomery College in 2013-2014. He has since completed his undergraduate degree at UMBC, maintaining a cumulative GPA of 3.946 across 56 credit hours. His coursework included majors in Political Science and History and a minor in History. He is graduating in Spring 2015 with a Bachelor of Arts degree.
Paul Fore has over 15 years of experience in the Marine Corps, including roles as a Lessons Learned Analyst, Program Manager, Executive Officer, and Liaison Officer. He has extensive experience advising senior military leaders, managing large projects and budgets, and leading teams in combat zones. Currently he works as an independent consultant providing strategic advice to government and corporate clients.
Glen Carl Ridinger III was released from active duty in the US Marine Corps after completing his required service. He served from August 2001 to August 2005 as a Sergeant in Field Artillery, with a specialty as a Field Artillery Fire Control Man. His character of service was honorable.
Donald E. Vandergriff (Major, US Army, retired) looks at the best armies of the past. From these, he makes a powerful case that larger ratios of officers to enlisted ranks makes an army more effective.
This document is a Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) for Robert Charles Henold. It summarizes his military service record, including his character of service as honorable, dates of service from 2009-2011, and reason for separation as unsatisfactory performance. Key details provided include his social security number, rank, military education, pay grade, decorations, and contact information.
Joseph O. Williams received a certificate from the United States Park Police recognizing his distinguished pistol and rifle qualification scores of 509 out of a possible 600 total points. The certificate honors Williams for his combined pistol and rifle skills and recognizes him as the top shooter for the United States Park Police in 2008.
Colonel Mark P. McGuire was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal for his exceptionally meritorious service over 33 years in the Army, culminating as the Commander of the Southeast Medical Area Readiness Support Group. He exemplified leadership during five deployments that directly supported combat operations. Colonel McGuire expertly integrated medical units and provided direct medical support to service members and civilians in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. His leadership was critical to the success of the 2007 troop surge in Iraq.
This document provides a summary of a monograph analyzing international relations in Central Asia through three case studies. The case studies examine Kazakhstan's security engagements, energy involvement, and US basing in the region. The case studies highlight that Central Asian governments act primarily based on realist theories to balance influences from major powers like Russia, China, and the US in order to preserve their regimes. This constrains US goals in the region and suggests the US maintain a minimal presence to enable future operations if security deteriorates, as neither increased engagement nor disengagement will further US interests.
This DD Form 214 serves as Fredrick A. Smith's military discharge papers. It summarizes his service from July 1974 to June 1980 as an avionic communications specialist and maintenance management specialist in the U.S. Air Force. He achieved the rank of Staff Sergeant E-4 and was awarded the Air Force Longevity Service Award and Good Conduct Medal. Upon separation from active duty, he was honorably discharged from Bergstrom AFB in Texas.
Manuel Torres III is a veteran of the United States Army with 26 years of experience in leadership, instruction, operations, and logistics. He seeks a position as a professional driver where he can utilize his proven skills in decision making, multi-tasking, and communication. His resume highlights his extensive qualifications including leadership of over 120 cadets as an instructor, management of equipment and resources valued at over $100 million, and 19 awards and honors received during his military career.
Carlos J. Hernandez is a Chief Warrant Officer Five with over 31 years of experience in the U.S. Army, including currently serving as the Command Senior Warrant Officer for the First Armored Division at Fort Bliss, Texas. He has extensive experience in logistics management, procurement, and inventory control. Hernandez holds a Bachelor's degree in Management and has received numerous awards and honors for his service.
This document provides guidance for setting up a Base of Operations (BOO) for an Urban Search and Rescue team responding to a disaster, including identifying site requirements, priorities for setup, assigning responsibilities, and procedures for setting up areas for the cache, Task Force Command Post, medical treatment, personnel shelters, and other functions.
The document discusses several topics related to military personnel planning and policy:
- It summarizes current end strengths and growth areas for active duty and reserve personnel, including increases in special operations forces and individual augmentees.
- It outlines challenges in sustaining personnel quality due to economic recovery factors like the post-9/11 GI Bill and national healthcare. More competitive retention is expected.
- It discusses force shaping strategies like the performance-based continuation board, Perform to Serve program, and selective reenlistment bonuses to maintain the right skill mix.
Greg Thompson has over 33 years of experience in leadership and management roles in the military and private sector. He has a Bachelor's degree in Animal Science from the University of Idaho. His experience includes 27 years of active Army service including deployed combat operations. He also has 3 years of intelligence experience within the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. He has extensive experience in program management, operations management, property management, and intelligence analysis.
This document is a resume for Paul Goldberg, seeking a senior management or principal analyst position. It summarizes his qualifications including over 27 years of experience leading and managing organizations in the US Army as a Signal Corps Officer. It details his strong analytical and leadership skills, experience compiling and analyzing critical information to make strategic recommendations. The resume provides a chronological history of his professional experience in senior analyst roles supporting the Department of the Army and 18th Medical Command, planning communications for wartime operations in Korea, and other signal officer and leadership positions over his military career.
OPERATIONS ORDER (OPORD)San Diego State Army ROTC.docxcherishwinsland
OPERATIONS ORDER
(OPORD)
San Diego State Army ROTC
1
5 Paragraph OPORD
Situation
Mission
Execution
Service Support
Command and Signal
San Diego State Army ROTC
2
Baseline Data
Operations Order # / Code Name if Used
References (maps, previous orders,
FRAGOs, etc)
3) Time Zone Used Throughout Order
4) Task Organization
San Diego State Army ROTC
3
Task Organization
Explains how the unit is organized for the operation
Done by phase
San Diego State Army ROTC
4
Paragraph 1: Situation
Situation - Provides information essential to subordinate leader’s understanding of the mission
a. Enemy Forces
b. Friendly Forces
c. Attachments / Detachments
San Diego State Army ROTC
5
Enemy Forces – include pertinent intel / data
(1) Weather & Light Data
(2) Terrain (AOKOC)
(3) Enemy composition, disposition, & strength
(4) Enemy Capabilities
(5) Enemy Intentions
Paragraph 1: Situation
San Diego State Army ROTC
6
Enemy Forces:
Terrain
Enemy Forces
(2) Terrain – define area of operations & area of interest, advantages / disadvantages to friendly & enemy, impact on mission
A - Avenues of approach
O - Observation and fields of fire
K - Key terrain
O - Obstacles
C - Cover and concealment
San Diego State Army ROTC
7
Enemy Forces:
Composition, Disposition, & Strength
Enemy Forces
(3) Enemy Composition, Disposition, & Strength - important characteristics and significance, advantages / disadvantages to friendly & enemy, impact on mission
- type of enemy unit, how it’s equipped,
designation, location, size, and strength
- current (pertinent) enemy activities
- distinguish known and templated enemy
locations
San Diego State Army ROTC
8
Enemy Forces:
Capabilities
Enemy Forces
(4) Enemy Capabilities – combat capability
- range and orientation of direct / indirect fires
- counter-attack forces
- reserves
- NBC
- mobility / countermobility
- ability to reposition
San Diego State Army ROTC
9
Enemy Forces:
Intensions
Enemy Forces
(5) Enemy Intentions
- the most probable and most dangerous
course of action
- how the enemy will react to attack / defense
- critical enemy events
San Diego State Army ROTC
10
Friendly Forces
b. Friendly Forces
- higher unit missions (two levels up)
- left unit and mission
- right unit and mission
- forward unit and mission
- following / reserve unit and mission
- units in support or higher supporting unit
h artillery support
h air support
h mortar support
San Diego State Army ROTC
11
Attachments / Detachments
c. Attachments & Detachments
(1) Attachments – who, why, when, where, support requirements
(2) Detachments – who, why, when, where, support requirements
San Diego State Army ROTC
12
Paragraph 2: Mission
Mission
- Who, what, where, when, why
- Concise statement of task(s) & purpose
- Derived .
Annotated BibliographyThere are 2 .docxtarifarmarie
Annotated Bibliography
There are 2 article about immigration and these article must use as a source for this annotated essay. Each paragraph should mention these article for supporting detail in the essay.
1. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/articles/2017-07-31/donald-trump-should-realize-the-us-economy-needs-immigrants
2. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/trump-clinton-immigration-economy-unemployment-jobs-214216
Topic is “Does immigration beneficial or harmful for the U.S. economy?
It is Annotated Bibliography.
Introduction Paragraph
There must be 3 body paragraph for Essay
First paragraph: Yes, Immigration good for US economy.
Second paragraph: Also there should be Yes, immigration good for US economy BUT……..( this paragraph should explain yes immigration good for US, however there is some problem or some issue about……)
Third paragraph: No, immigration bad for US economy.
Conclusion Paragraph
Almost 800 words with MLA citation.
I need all citation information with their web address too.
I have to explain them, so I will read them.
You have two article and you need to choose at least 3 outside sources for Annotated Essay.
Write a summary and response for each source.
Remember, they should have different answers to your problem.
Provide both a summary of the source and your evaluation
why this is a useful source for your research and how it answers your question.
NORAD-USNORTHCOM
Interagency Coordination
This Briefing is Classified:
UNCLASSIFIED
Mr. Barry Nightingale
Directorate of Interagency
Coordination
UNCLASSIFIED
2
UNCLASSIFIED
What is Interagency Coordination?
• “The Coordination that occurs between agencies of
the US Government, including the Department of
Defense, for the purpose of accomplishing an
objective” - JP 3-08
• Interagency Coordination is integrated throughout
both Commands . . . not a separate function.
• We at N-NC include:
-US Government Agencies
(Dept of Homeland Security, State, Transportation, Health
and Human Services, etc)
-Non-Government Agencies
(Red Cross, Humanitarian Int’l Service Group, etc)
-Private Sector Organizations
(Academic, business, professional)
3
UNCLASSIFIED
N-NC Interagency Coordination Directorate
CMOC
HQS NORAD-USNORTHCOM
Peterson AFB
Cheyenne Mountain
Air Station
N-NC J4
Logistic and
Engineering
N-NC J1
Manpower &
Personnel
N-NC J6
Architectures &
Integration
N-NC J7
Training &
Exercise
N-NC J8
Programs &
Resources
N-NC J2
Intelligence
NC J3
Operations
SJFHQ - North
N J3
Operations
N-NC IC
Interagency
Coordination
NN--NC ICNC IC
Interagency Interagency
Coordination Coordination
N-NC J5
Plans and
Policy
N-NC IC Directorate Mission
Facilitate the integration and synchronization of Interagency activities
to ensure mutual understanding, unity of effort and full spectrum support
to and from NORAD and USNORTHCOM
4
UNCLASSIFIED
Resident and Local
Agency Representati.
Alameda County Sheriff Ahern Form 460 7/1/13 to 12/31/13Yehoshua7
This document is a cover page and summary page for a campaign disclosure statement filed in California. It provides information about the type of committee filing the statement, the period covered, the committee name and contact information, and totals for contributions received and expenditures made. It lists the treasurer and indicates this is a semi-annual statement with no amendments. The summary page provides monetary figures for contributions, expenditures, beginning and ending cash balances.
This thesis analyzes the U.S. Army's enlisted assignment process to identify opportunities for improvement. The Army's centralized and hierarchical process assigns over 100,000 soldiers to positions each year. The thesis evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the current process, compares it to the U.S. Navy's decentralized approach, and uses computer simulation to analyze alternative matching processes. The results indicate the Army could improve efficiency and soldier satisfaction by incorporating individual preferences and automation into the assignment system.
This unofficial transcript summarizes Mario Angulo Alvarado's academic record. It shows that he transferred 77 credits from Montgomery College in 2013-2014. He has since completed his undergraduate degree at UMBC, maintaining a cumulative GPA of 3.946 across 56 credit hours. His coursework included majors in Political Science and History and a minor in History. He is graduating in Spring 2015 with a Bachelor of Arts degree.
Paul Fore has over 15 years of experience in the Marine Corps, including roles as a Lessons Learned Analyst, Program Manager, Executive Officer, and Liaison Officer. He has extensive experience advising senior military leaders, managing large projects and budgets, and leading teams in combat zones. Currently he works as an independent consultant providing strategic advice to government and corporate clients.
Glen Carl Ridinger III was released from active duty in the US Marine Corps after completing his required service. He served from August 2001 to August 2005 as a Sergeant in Field Artillery, with a specialty as a Field Artillery Fire Control Man. His character of service was honorable.
Donald E. Vandergriff (Major, US Army, retired) looks at the best armies of the past. From these, he makes a powerful case that larger ratios of officers to enlisted ranks makes an army more effective.
This document is a Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) for Robert Charles Henold. It summarizes his military service record, including his character of service as honorable, dates of service from 2009-2011, and reason for separation as unsatisfactory performance. Key details provided include his social security number, rank, military education, pay grade, decorations, and contact information.
Joseph O. Williams received a certificate from the United States Park Police recognizing his distinguished pistol and rifle qualification scores of 509 out of a possible 600 total points. The certificate honors Williams for his combined pistol and rifle skills and recognizes him as the top shooter for the United States Park Police in 2008.
1. NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y (FOUO)
+ SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
+For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. IN AR623-3.
PART I -ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First. Middle Initial) Ib. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRlEL P. SSG ( ) 20090211 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND f.2. STATUS CODE g. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
MI Det 41 Sth Military Intelligence Battalion, Carville, LA 70721 139th RSG 02 !Annual
h. PERIOD COVERED i. RATED j. NON- k.NO.OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (gov or .mil} CODE CODE
CODES
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY
20100427 20101031 6 gabricl.tatc@us.army.mil WYT3BO NG 22
PART II - AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last. First, Midd/elnit1al)
ISSN ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
MAYERS, JOSHUA I. MAYBRS.IOSHIJANBS.lll89IH$ 20101201
RANK PMOSCIBRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or .mil)
SFC 35L4L MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence SR CI AGENT josh.mayers(li)us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last. First, Middle Initial)
ISSN
ALLEN, BRYANT.
ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
ALI..m(.BRYA11f.'IllOMAS.m6127$ 20I01201
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or mil)
SFC 35F MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence DETSGT bryan.allen@us.army.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last. First. Middle Initial )
ISSN ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
PIPER, THELMA R. l'll'Jll.:rnm.MAKOCm!LLB.12444270. 20Io1201
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or mil}
CPT 35D/MI MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence CDR thelma.piper@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS [ ] NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMOD)
~~cj:f;~;i~~1r
1
~;~~ty ~~~~~~~'fg~~~~emth;
1
&,~~~~i~~~:~!h1~t~~111,~i~~stJ:~~taa~
0
ct~~19
1
hil:eF~r9
TATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.112033850entries in Part !Ve are correct I have seen the completed report I am aware of the appeals process of AR 62~3. 20101201
PART Ill - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE Ib. DUTY MOSC
Intelligenee Analyst 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, eqwpment. facilities and dollars)
Assists in preparing intelligence produets to support the commander; provide support in establishing and maintaining systematic,
cross-referenced intelligence records and files; provide support in determining significance and reliability of incoming information;
supports the integration of incoming information with current intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map;
supports analysis evaluation ofintelligence holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of
action; assists in assembling and proofreading intelligence reports and consolidating them into military intelligence.
d. AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
Safety, training, and readiness
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL ILATER ILATER LATER
20100727
PART IV· ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO" (Bullet Comments are mandatory Substantive buffet comments are required for 'NO' entries)
=mLOYALTY: Bears !rue faith and allegiance to the S. Constitution, the Army, !he unit, and other Soldiers.
v
Loyalty DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
Duty '
Respect
RESPECT!EOIEEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
mA Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the vvelfare of !he nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values.
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral) IX
u ou11et commem:s
o professional and competent NCO
Honor
E o motivates and challenges subordinates through leadershipIntegrity
Personal Courage
s 0 Soldiers witha and " v their his
DA FORM 2166-8, MAR 2006 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
2. COMPETENCE
and
abilities
0
o alvvays
o Ac(:orr1prnshlr1g tasks to the fullest capacity;
ccrnmirted to excellence
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
Ji
SUCCESS
(Meets std}
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina lo go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a soldier
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
SUCCESS
(Meets std}
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some} (Much)
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting the example; Be, Know, Do
the
exploitation
o aided National Guard Intelligence Center Document and Media Exploitation
instructors in IT issues the Comand Post Exercise
APFT PASS 721 198 YES
o took initiative to maintain a high state readiness at all times
demanded and enforced standards Soldiers' appearance
o took charge ofthe detatehment in absence
18 Soldiers
command; supervised training for
o developed strategies to advance detachment mission readieness
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o took challenges head on; always looked for opportunities to improve as a leader
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
I
e. TRAINING
o Individual and team
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duly-related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and win
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
o successfuly and safely zeroed 26 Battalion personnel as the zero range safety
NCOIC with no accidents or injuries while in a high risk inviroment
o used two months personal time in order attend training to ensure that the unit
acomplished necessary goals to support OEF mobilization
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) o obtained CompTia Network+ industry training and certification during his down
time
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY o delegated responsibility effectively
o Care and maintenance of equipment/facilities
o Soldier and equipment safely
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o maintained 100% accountability for personal and equipment
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong o accepted responsibity for own mistakes; encouraged integrity in subordinates
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion andlor
service in positions of greater responsibility.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
b. RATER List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her
current or next higher grade.
Platoon Sergeant
Senior Analyst
OCS Candidate
c. SENIOR RATER. Overall performance
+
PART V - OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS
o professional NCO, promote with peers
o performs well as leader, handles pressure and high stress issues with extreme
professionalism
o well rounded NCO with potential to accept a position ofincreased responsibly
o constintly seeks additional training to maintain a high state of Soldier readiness
2 3
Successful Fair
5
Poor
d. SENIOR RATER. Overall potential
for promotion and/or service in
positions of greater responsibility. 2
Superior Fair Poor
DA FORM 2166-8, MAR 2006 Page 2 of 2
APD PE v501ES
3. NCO EVALUATION REPORT
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1.
a. NAME (Last. First. Middle lnma/J
TATE, GABRIEL P.
PART I -ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
!c. RANK
SSG
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIPCODEORAPO, MAJORCCM.i!AND f.2 STATUS CODE
MOBMIDET 41 Sth l1I BN, Bagram, Afghanistan, APO AE 09354 CENTCOM
h. PERIOD COVERED
FROM THRU
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY
20101!01 i 20111110 13
I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS
(gov or .mil)
gabricl.p.tate@us.arrny.mil
PART II • AUTHENTICATION
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)
SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
IN AR 623-3
d. DATE OF RANK ! e. PMOSC
) 20090211 35F
WYT3130 NG
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First. Middle lmf1al) 1 SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
I1A'Nlt5mSAWJEL.MAH.m9mO 111021BANK.ESTER, SAMUEL M.
22
RANK
SFC
PMOSCIBRANCH
35F4L
ORGANIZATION
HIID 41 STH Ml BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT RATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov or mtl)
TIG J3 NCOfC sam.bankester(W,us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last First Middle Initial)
POUNDERS, ANTHONY L
SSN I SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
I 10aau.~l.Oll>.M.111t1miO 20111021
RANK PMOSCIBRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT SENIOR RATERS AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov or m1/)
MAJ MI HHD 41 STH MI BN TIG J3 OIC anthony.1.pounders(~(us.army.mil
·.; NAME oFREVrEWER-[iasr F1rsi. Miciiieln1liaii________'SSN_______~oi.iATuRE ---- ---·--------- DATE-!Y-YYYMi..ioo)______
WI IIPPLE. GARY J II ; 1 WHIPPIEJlARYJOSEPfUI.11113110 20111030
RANK
MAJ
PMOSCIBRANCH
AD
ORGANIZATIO
HHD 41 STH MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
BNXO
REVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or m11)
gary.whipple@usarmy.mil
d. ~ CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
"- RATED NCO! I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations or SIGNATURE ! DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senior rater I further understand my signature venftes that the administrative data In Part f, the ratitig Iofftclafs m Part ll, the duty description to include the counseling dates ln Part !ll, and the APFT and he ht/-Ne ht
entries in Part IVc are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of9AR 62£3 TATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.11203385$ ,20 J J1106
PART Ill • DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
--------------·----------------------,-----"'· PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE b. DUTY MOSC
Intelligence Analyst 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include. as appropnate_ people. eqwpment. facilities and dollars)
Jssisls in preparing intelligence products to support the commander; provide support in establishing aIJd maintaining systematic, cross
-referenced intelligence records and files; provide suppott in determining significance and reliability of incoming information: supports
the integration of incoming information with current intelligence holdings; supports analysis evaluation ofintelligcnee holdings to
determine ehanges in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable eourses of action; assists m assembling and proofreading raw data
and consolidating it into military intelligence products.
d_ AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
Knowledge Management; Safety.
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Theater fntelligence
COUNSELING DATES
v
A
Honor
Integrity
L
DA FORM 2166-8,
([JG) infr)rmation and database system mamtenance; lnter-Departmental Data Management Coordinator.
u
E
s
4. RATED NCO'S N.AME (Last, Ftrst. Middle lnit1at)
TATE. GABRIEL P
PART IV (Rater) ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
o Duty proficiency; MOS competency
o Technical & tactical; knowlooge, skills, and
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-Improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity;
committed lo excellence
SSN
&/fief comments are mtJndlftory,
THRU DATE
20111110
b.stsnttve bullet comments are r uired for "EXCELLENCE' or 'NEEDS !MPROVeMENT, •
.o increased the DOMEX Section's exploited media production hy 108% within the
Ifirst month of assuming duties
o chosen over five other Knowledge Management personnel to produce the TIG
Information Mimagement Sy3tem plan and present to TIG Commander
EXCELLENCE
(Exceegs strJ)
success
(M~f§, std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o din:utly uontributed lo the improvement of overall quality of TIG DOMEX
(Some) (Much)
! ! !l r-·1 intelligence production by streamlining all reporting channels
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina to go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a Soldier
APFT PASS 20110415 HEIGHT/WEIGHT 721 194 YES
o consistently auhieved the Army standard on the APFT during the rated period
o always wore his unifonn properly and maintained a professional demeanor
EXCELLENCE success NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o when faced with daunting, time-consuming data management tasks, always attacked
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) /Some) (Much) those tasks with enthusiasm and perseverant:e
I I
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting the example; Be, Know, Do
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
D ..a. TRAINING
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
~
o Individual and team
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much)
n
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duty-related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and win
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
success
(Meets std)
-1
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much}
I
o used personal time to mentor two junior Knowledge Management personnel and
provided them with necessary tools to maintain TIG databases
o expertly managed the work imd production of 8 personnel. which resulted in
increased overall efficiency in the DOMEX
o provided positive input and feedback to 13 staff when data management challenges
seemed insunnmmtable
o trained 8 personnel in operating the Dcployahlc Harmony DOCEX Suite and rt.-dueed
spccilfo media exploitation time from 5 days to 12 hours
o volunteered lo provide additional Distributed Common Ground System - Army
(DCGS-A) training to 30 TIG personnel
o shared extensive experience in Knowledge Management with 27 J3 Section staff
memhers, increasing the efficiency of TIO statistical intelligence reporting
i--~--~~~~~~~~~~~------~~~-----4
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
o Care and maintenance of equipmenl/facili!ies
o Soldier and equipment safely
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow
o Responsible for good, bad. right & wrong
o consolidated over 12 TIG databases into one tracking system and saved 160 man
hours of database maintenanue per week
o worked beyond nonnal duty hours for a 3 month period in order to complete the
reconfiguration ofT!G databases which track the records ofover 2500 detainees
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) fS/}...f!I.'!) rr~h) o entrusted with the maintenance of DoD computer svstems valued at over $50,000,
, I with zero incidents of uquipmcnt failure or replacement
promotion and/or
PART V ·OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMl.1ENTS
DA FORM 2166-8,
5. NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y f:OUO)
SEE PRIVACYACTSTATE ENT
For use otthis form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency Is DCS, G-1. INAR623·3.
PARTI - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
e. NAME (Last, First, Middle lnilial) lb. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIEL P. SSG ( > 20040424 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND f.2. STATUS CODE g. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
Analysis Detachment, 4 I5th MI 13N (L), Carville, LA 70721, l39th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED I. RATED j. NON- k. NO. OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (.gov or .mil) CODE CODE
CODES
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY
20111111 20121110 12 gabricl.tate@us.army.miI WYTJBO NG 22
PART II· AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First. Middle /nit/a/) ISSN I ~NATU.Bf._ -- - -1DATE (YYYYMMDD)
MULLEN DARREN R. MtJU.BNDARIU!N.lONALD.11202JI.0 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT lRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or.mil)
SFC 35M40 Analysis Detachment, 415th Ml BN Sr Humint Coli SGT darren.nmllen@us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First. Middle /nil/al) ISSN I =~TUBL.. - - - - -1DATE (YYYYMMDD)
BANKESTER SAMUEL BM4JJ!3IER.SAMUBl.MAll.lll9!nl0 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or.mil)
SFC 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 4l5th MI BN Readiness NCO sam.bankester@us.army.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last, First, Middle Initial}
.....I~IGNATURE__ ·-- - - IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIER DARRYL W. 1,PELTIBR.DARRYLWAY$.1261151it 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
lLT Ml Analysis Detachment, 4l5th MI BN XO darryl.w.pelticr@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS [ ] NONCONCUR WITH RATER ANDIOR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or dlsaQreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senlQr rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data In Part I, the rali~
officials In Part~, the duty desyrtptlon to Include lhe counselin~ dates in Parl 11~and the fs,FT and hej!Wl/vel~h
ITATE.-GABRIBL.PAUL.11203385~ 20130407entries In Part I care correct. have seen the compleled repo< . I am aware of e appea s process of 623- .
PART Ill ·DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE Ib. DUTY MOSC
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To Include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
Prepares all-source intelligence products to support the commander; assists in establishing and maintaining systematic, cross-referenced
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability ofincoming information; integrates incoming
information with cnrrent intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield {IPB) products.
d. AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator.
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section Sergeant.
I. COUNSELING DATES IINITIAL ILATER ILATER LATER
20120121 20120811
PART IV· ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.) YES NO
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers. IX
v
Loyalty 2. DUTY: Fulfills !heir obligations. ><
Duty
3. RESPECT/EC/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated. )(
Respect
A Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own. ><
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values. )<
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right· legally and morally. )<
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral). ~
u Bullet comments
o displays loyalty to country through duty and dedication
Honor
Integrity
E o always gives 100% to accomplish mission
Personal Courage
s o respected for his candor and integrity
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1of2
APO PE v1.02ES
6. RATED NCO'S NAME (Last First. Middle Initial)
TATE, GABRIEL P.
PART IV (Rater ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
o Duty proficiency; MOS competency
o Technical & tactical; knowledge, skills, and
abllllles
THRU DATE
20121110
o assisted on the upgrading of the Louisiana Point of Distribution System fro1i1 a
SharePoint 2003 Version to 2010 Version
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-Improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity:
committed lo excellence
o displayed superior attention to detail and played a vital role in mission success of
PODIS mission during Hurricane Issac
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS
(Exceeds std) (Meets std)
I
NE~g~~~PR~Z~~fNT o competency led to being chosen by LTC Barth, Datacenter Manager USPFO for
LA/J8, to be placed on the DTC JMD during emergencies
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina to go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a Soldier
APFT HEIGHT/WEIGHT 721 220 YES
o always displayed a impeccable military appearance and bearing
o mentally and physically tough NCO; easily managed multiple missions and tasks
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 no APFT administered during rating period
(E'l<.ceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o performed as Night Shift POD Operation NCOIC during Hurricane Issac
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting tha example; Be, Know, Do
o consistently volunteered to the I39th Data Processing Center for PODIS systems
improvements
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 served as Section Sergeant in charge oftwo squads
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
e. TRAINING o ensured the training and documentation of required state training and analyst training
o Individual and team
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duty.related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and Win
o helped reorganize MlDETs Squads for the training of two cadets to act as platoon
leaders
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 maintained a training plan for his section
(Excee,ds std) (Meets std) (Some) (M_uch)
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
a Care and maintenance of equlpmenVlacilitles
o performed research on his own time to provide implemented improvements on the
PODIS System
o Soldier and equipment safety
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow o maintained 100% accountability ofall assigned equipment
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted in saving the LANG countless dollars in the implementation ofthe new
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) PODIS
I I
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion and/or
service In positions of greater responslblllty.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
PART V ·OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS
o prior Navy NCO experience immensely valuable, send NCO to WLC and ALC as
soon as possible
o promote to Sergeant First Class as sopn as possible
:!fl]
1-b-.-RA...L-T-"E'-R-.-Li-st-
3
-po-si-Uo_n_jsl....in-,..L"'h-lc_h_t-he-ra-te_d_-...____--10 possesses potential to perform at increased levels ofresponsibility with little
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her supervision; continue to challenge to potential
current or next higher grade.
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
c. SENIOR RATER. Overall performance
o a rare mix of intelligence and initiative; constantly performed above standard
technology and mission support during hurricane operations
2 3
Successful
4
Fair
s
Poor
d. SENIOR RATER. Overall potential
for promotion and/or service In
positions of greater responsibility. 2 3
Superior
4
Fair
5
Poor
DA FORM 2168·8, OCT 2011 Page 2 of 2
APO PE v1.02ES
7. NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y f:OUO)
SEE PRIVACYACT STATE ENT
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. JNAR 623-3.
PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial} I b. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK I e. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIELP. SSG ( ) 20090211 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND f.2. STATUS CODE g. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN (L), Carville, LA 70721, 139th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED i. RATED j. NON- k. NO. OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (.gov or .mil} CODE CODE
CODES
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY gabriel.tate@us.army.mil
20121111 20131110 12 WYT3BO NG LA22
PART II -AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
ISSN I SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
MULLEN DARREN R. IMlJLLJilll.DARllEl'!.ROJl{ALD,1120251. 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil}
SFC 35M40 Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN Sr Humint Coll SGT darren.r.mullen.mil@mail.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN I t'G~AIUBE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
HEBERT, DARRYL IHF.BER.T.DARR.YL.JAMEB.11202141!# 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
MSG 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 415thMIBN Detachment SGT darryl.j.hebert.mil@mail.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN I ~1r,NlTI IDC I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIER DARRYL W. IPELTIBll,DARR.YL,WAYml,ll611S8'; 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
CPT MI Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN XO darryl.w.peltier@us.army.mil
d. ~ CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS D NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data In Part I, the ratin~
officials in Part II, the duty description to include the counseiin~ dates in Part illhand the APFT and hei~t/wei~h
ITATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.112D33851) 20131208entries in Part IVc are correct. I have seen the completed repor . I am aware oft e appeals process of A 623- .
PART 111- DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE I b. DUTY MOSC
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
Prepares all-source intelligence products to support the commander; assists in establishing and maintaining systematic, cross-referenced
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability of incoming information; integrates incoming
infonnation with current intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) products.
d. AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section SGT
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL I LATER I LATER LATER
20121204 20130407
PART IV - ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.)
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U. S. Constitution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers.
v
Loyalty 2. DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
Duty
3. RESPECT/EO/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
Respect
A Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values.
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral).
u Bullet comments
o displays loyalty to country through duty and dedication
Honor E o always gives 100% to accomplish missionIntegrity
Personal Courage
s o respected for his candor and integrity
-DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
YES NO
x
><
x
x
x
x
1X
Page 1 of 2
APO PE v1 .02ES
8. RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
TATE, GABRIEL P.
PART IV (Rater) - VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
o Duty proficiency; MOS competency
o Technical & tactical; knowledge, skills, and
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity;
committed to excellence
Bullet comments are mandatory.
THRU DATE
20131110
Substantive bullet comments are re uired for "EXCELLENCE" or "NEEDS IMPROVEMENT."
o displayed superior attention to detail and played a vital role in success of PODIS
mission during Hurricane DRX resulting in 100% accuracy
o possessed an attitude to continue self-improvement by volunteering to attend
training in configuring and administering Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o consulted in the upgrading of the Louisiana Point of Distribution System from a
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) SharePoint 2003 Version to 2010 Version
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina to go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a Soldier
APFT PROFILE HEIGHT/WEIGHT
o displayed an impeccable military appearance and bearing
o mentally tough; easily managed multiple missions and tasks
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o physically tough NCO; always volunteered to do heavy lifting
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
73 / 225 YES
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
o displayed an attitude that fosters concern and respect for all soldiers ensuring that no
one is mistreated physically or mentally
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting the example; Be, Know, Do
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
o consistently volunteered to assist thel39th Data Processing Center for PODIS
systems improvements
(Exceeds std) (Meets std} (Some) (Much) o served as Section Sergeant in charge of two squads
e. TRAINING o conducted and supervised execution and documentation of required annual training
o Individual and team
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duty-related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and win
o mentored and trained his section on DOMEX operations in a deployment
environment
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o attended Microsoft training in his civilian job and shared this knowledge with his
(Exceeds std) (Meets std} (Some) (Much} peers
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
o Care and maintenance of equipmenUfacilities
o performed research on his own time to provide implemented improvements on the
PODIS System
o Soldier and equipment safety
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow o maintained 100% accountability of all assigned equipment
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted in saving the LANG countless dollars in the implementation of the new
(Exceeds std} (Meets std) (Some) (Much} PODIS
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion and/or
service in positions of greater responsibility.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
PART V - OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS
o prior Navy NCO ~xperience immensely valuable, send NCO to WLC and ALC as
soon as possible
o possesses potential to increased responsibility; promote ahead of peers
~
1--'---'-------><--"-------==""-----~ o a competent and innovative NCO; not afraid of risk in order to improve
b. RATER. List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her
current or next higher grade.
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
c. SENIOR RATER. Overall performance
o a rare mix of intelligence and initiative; consistently performs above the standard
~DD DD2 3 4 5
Successful Fair Poor
d. SENIOR RATER. Overall potential
for promotion and/or service in
positions of greater responsibility.
D~D
2 3
Superior
D
4
Fair
D
5
Poor
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 Page 2 of 2
APD PE v1 .02ES
9. ~,-.L--~-"-V'N·~~,~·VAL~~T~o';-~~p~~;~~---------..1-~-~-{flffiff;xgffffkf{;g;fFZF,.,,
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. JN AR 623-3,
n-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~o~.~.~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PART I -ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME(Last, First, Middle Initial) I~ c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIEL P. ~ SSG ( J 20040424 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAN-D-1-f-.2-.-S-T_A_TU_S_C_O_D_E_ _,_g.-R-E-AS_O_N_F_O_R_S_U~B-M_l_S_S-IO-N------<<
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN (I), Carville, LA 70721, 139th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED
FROM THRU
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR. MONTH DAY
20131111 20141110
i. RATED j. NON-
MONTHS RATED
CODES
12
k. NO. OF
ENCL
I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS
(.gov or .mil)
gabriel.p.tate.mil@mail.mil
m. UIC
WYT3BO
n. CMD
CODE
NG
PART II -AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER(Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN
SANCHEZ, CARLOS H. I
SIGNATURE . I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
tl./NCHFZ.CAJlLOll HllMB!lllIO.JUtl~ 20 150208
o. PSB
CODE
LA22
DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
Sr Humint Coll SGT carlos.h.sanchez.mil@mail.mil
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION
SFC 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial) I SSN
HEBERT, DARRYL J. I
SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
HFBEllT.DARR.YL.JAMES.1120214:J°& 20150210
RANK
MSG
PMOSCIBRANCH
35M4L
ORGANIZATION
Analysis Detachment, 4l 5th MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
Detachment SGT darryl.j.hebert2.mil@mail.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER(Lasl, First, Middle Initial)
PELTIERDARRYL W.
ISSN
I
SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIBR.DARRYL,WAY1'1E,12611Sm@ 20150210
11-----------------------~
RANK
CPT
PMOSC/BRANCH
M{
ORGANIZATION
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
XO darryl.w.peltier@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS D NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMOD)
the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating
offic_ials. in Part 11, the duty description to include the counseling dates in Part 111, and the APFT and height/weighf T.l'TE GABRIEL PAUL 112"''!385'11Q._ 2015022
3entries m Part IVc are correct. l have seen the completed reporl I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-3. a , , . U.J ~J
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST NCO
PART Ill - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
I
b. DUTY MOSC
35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
Prepares all-source intelligence products to support the commander; assists in establishing and maintaining systematic, cross-referenced
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability of incoming infonnation; integrates incoming
infomiation with cuITent intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to dete1mine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) products.
d. AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section SGT
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL
20140112 I
LATER
20140406 I
LATER
20140712
PART IV - ARMY VALUES/ATIRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Raterj
LATER
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.)
v
A
L
Honor
Integrity
Personal Courage
Loyalty
Duty
Respect
Selfless-Service
u
E
s
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U. S. Constttution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers.
2. DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
3. RESPECT/EO/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up lo all the Army values.
6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moralj.
Bullet comments
o went the extra mile to suppmi and care for his Soldiers
o displayed an exceptional devotion to duty
o an honorable NCO; demontrated high integrity and personal comage
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
YES NO
><
x
XI
XI
XI
XI
Page 1 of 2
APD PE v1 .02ES
10. "RllT~~;;t,Mid~-' ---~ ISSN -==··~JT~r:~T,~,,~~~-·1
Bullet comments are mandatory. ---~---·~-_.,, .. ~i
PART IV (Rater) ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES Substantive bullet comments are renuired for 'EXCELLENCE" or "NEEDS IMPROVEMENT."
b. COMPETENCE o provided outstanding technical suppmi through out the rating period for the
0
Duty proficiency; MOS competency Louisiana Point of Distribution System at the request of the J6 director
o Technical & tactical; knowledge, skills, and
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity;
committed to excellence
o served as a Project Manager in the installation of the Nutanix Platfonn and
maintained the project under the allocated $288,000 budget
EXCELLENCE
(Exe~ std)
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o shared his technical and tactical intelligence operational knowledge to develop the
(Some) (Much)
n n n technical proficiency of five junior intelligence analysts
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina to go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a Soldier
-
APFT PROFILE 20140228 IHEIGHT/WEIGHT 73 i 225 YES
o no APFT taken this rating period while on profile through 28 February 2014.
o a confident and mentally tough NCO with professional militmy bearing
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted with conducting multiple unit APFT events; motivated Soldiers to improve
n D<I
(Some) (Much) pe1f01mance during each event
n nd. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting the example; Be, Know, Do
o performed as the Fusion Section Sergeant; supervised two ES and 4 junior enlisted
analysts; stepped up when needed to serve as acting Platoon Sergeant
o demonstrated execptional genuine concern for all the welfare of all unit Soldiers
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std}
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o demonstrated strong support of the unit SHARP program
(Some) (Much)
n ~ II ne. TRAINING
o Individual and team
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duty-related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and win
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDSIMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
~ n n nf. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
o Care and maintenance of equipmenl/facilities
o Soldier and equipment safety
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
n
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
~
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much)
n n
o helped to develop and conduct METL situation training to improve the skills of 8
intelligence analysts and 4 intelligence collectors
o conducted PMI training for 14 MI Detachn1ent Soldiers to include proper cleaning
and maintenance of individual weapons
o completed CompTIA San+ certification programs at his full time employment
o assisted the Supply Sergeant in ensuring the weapons maintenance and inspection
requirements were completed to standards for 40 assigned unit weapons
o maintained 100% accountability of all assigned equipment
o encouraged assigned Soldiers to explore and develop their skills in open source
intelligence Internet resem·ch; stessed the value of using all resources available
PART V - OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion and/or
service in positions of greater responsibility.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
nb. RATER. List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could besl serve the Army at his/her
current or next higher grade.
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
c. SENIOR RATER. Overall performance
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011
•
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS
o send NCO to WLC as soon as possible
o promote to Sergeant First Class as soon as NCO is able to meet all requirements
o a demonstrated highly intelligent and tactically knovvledgeable Intelligence NCO
o NCO functioned easily at levels above his CUITent assignment; continue to challange
with higher levels of responsibility
1 2 3 4
Successful Fair
D5
Poor
d. SENIOR RATER. Overall potential
for promotion and/or service in
positions of greater responsibility.
DXD D
1 2 3 4
Superior Fair
D
5
Poor
Page 2 of 2
APO PE v1 .02ES