Q2-2014 Results Presentation

SECOND QUARTER
2014 RESULTS
July 31, 2014

AGNICO EAGLE | SECOND QUARTER 2014 RESULTS| 2
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information in this presentation has been prepared as at July 30, 2014. Certain statements contained in this document constitute “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” under the provisions of Canadian
provincial securities laws. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “expect”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “will”, “planned” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include without limitation: statements the Company's forward-looking production guidance, including
estimated ore grades, project timelines, drilling results, metal production, mine estimates horizons, production, total cash costs per ounce, minesite costs per tonne;
all-in sustaining costs and cash flows; the estimated timing and conclusions of technical reports and other studies; the methods by which ore will be extracted or
processed; statements concerning expansion projects, recovery rates, mill throughput, and projected exploration expenditures, including costs and other estimates
upon which such projections are based; estimates of depreciation expense, general and administrative expense and tax rates; the impact of maintenance
shutdowns; statements regarding timing and amounts of capital expenditures and other assumptions; estimates of future reserves, resources, mineral production,
optimization efforts and sales; estimates of mine life; estimates of future internal rates of return, mining costs, total cash costs, minesite costs, all-in sustaining costs
and other expenses; estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs, and expectations as to the funding thereof; statements as to the projected
development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of exploration, development and production and other capital costs, and estimates of the timing of such
exploration, development and production or decisions with respect to such exploration, development and production; estimates of reserves and resources, and
statements regarding anticipated future exploration; the anticipated timing of events with respect to the Company’s mine and project sites and statements and
information regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash resources and other statements regarding anticipated trends with respect to the Company's operations,
exploration and the funding thereof. Such statements reflect the Company’s views as at the date of this document and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and
assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Agnico Eagle as of the date of such statements, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies. The material factors and assumptions used in the preparation of the forward looking statements and information
contained herein, which may prove to be incorrect, include, but are not limited to, the assumptions set forth herein and in management's discussion and analysis
(“MD&A”) and the Company's Annual Information Form (“AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2103 filed with Canadian securities regulators and that are included
in its Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (“Form 40-F”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as well
as: that there are no significant disruptions affecting operations; that production, permitting and expansion at each of Agnico Eagle's properties proceeds on a basis
consistent with current expectations and plans; that the relevant metals prices, exchange rates and prices for key mining and construction supplies will be consistent
with Agnico Eagle's expectations; that Agnico Eagle's current estimates of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery are accurate;
that there are no material delays in the timing for completion of ongoing growth projects; that the Company's current plans to optimize production are successful;
and that there are no material variations in the current tax and regulatory environment. Many factors, known and unknown could cause the actual results to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward looking statements and information. Such risks include, but are not limited to: the volatility of
prices of gold and other metals; uncertainty of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and mineral recovery estimates; uncertainty of future production,
capital expenditures, and other costs; currency fluctuations; financing of additional capital requirements; cost of exploration and development programs; mining
risks; community protests; risks associated with foreign operations; governmental and environmental regulation; the volatility of the Company’s stock price; and risks
associated with the Company’s byproduct metal derivative strategies. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors that may affect the Company’s
ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this document, see the AIF and MD&A filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com
and included in the Form 40-F filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Canadian securities regulators and the SEC. The
Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements and information. For a detailed breakdown of the
Company’s reserve and resource position see the AIF or Form 40-F.

NOTES TO INVESTORS
Note Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This document discloses certain measures, including ‘‘total cash costs per ounce’’ and ‘‘minesite costs per tonne’’ that are not recognized measures under US
GAAP. This data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. For a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable financial
information presented in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP and for an explanation of how management uses these
measures, see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” in the Company’s earnings news release dated July 30, 2014 as well as the
Company’s MD&A and Form 40-F. All references herein to total cash costs per ounce are to total cash costs per ounce on a by-product basis, that is, deducting by-
product metal revenue from production costs. For further information on this measure and for information on total cash costs per ounce on a co-product basis, that
is before the effect of by-product metals revenues, please see the Company’s earnings news release dated July 30, 2014. The Company believes that the generally
accepted industry measures that it uses are realistic indicators of operating performance and are useful in allowing year over year comparisons. However, non-US
GAAP measures should be considered together with other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP, and such measures, taken by themselves, are not
necessarily indicative of operating costs or income measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. This document also contains information as to estimated
future total cash costs per ounce and minesite costs per tonne. The estimates are based upon the total cash costs per ounce and minesite costs per tonne that the
Company expects to incur to mine gold at its mines and projects and, consistent with the reconciliation of these actual costs referred to above, do not include
production costs attributable to accretion expense and other asset retirement costs, which will vary over time as each project is developed and mined. It is therefore
not practicable to reconcile these forward-looking non-US GAAP financial measures to the most comparable US GAAP measure.
Note Regarding Production Guidance
The gold production guidance is based on the Company’s mineral reserves but includes contingencies and assumes metal prices and foreign exchange rates that
are different from those used in the reserve estimates. These factors and others mean that the gold production guidance presented in this disclosure does not
reconcile exactly with the production models used to support these mineral reserves.

 Continued strong operating performance resulting in second quarter gold production of
326,059 oz with total cash costs on a by-product basis of $626/oz
 Joint acquisition with Yamana Gold of Osisko Mining Corporation completed on June
16, 2014 – studies already underway to explore synergies and optimize the Canadian
Malartic mine
 Production guidance increased to 1.35 Moz - 1.37 Moz with cash costs forecasted to be
between $650 and $675 per ounce
 Mid-Year 2014 Exploration Update – IVR discovery near Meadowbank continues to
expand; new deep intersection at Kittila; and technical studies progress at Meliadine
and Akasaba West projects
HIGHLIGHTS – INCREASED 2014 GUIDANCE

Q2 2014 OPERATING RESULTS
CONTINUED STRONG OPERATING PERFORMANCE
Q2 2014 YTD 2014
All amounts are in US$
(Unless Otherwise Indicated)
Production
(Gold oz)
Total Cash Cost*
($/oz)
Operating Margin ($000’s) Production (Gold oz)
Total Cash Cost*
($/oz)
Northern Business
LaRonde 48,494 $691 $27,820 107,846 $642
Lapa 18,821 $847 $8,763 42,230 $747
Goldex 23,929 $654 $13,674 43,359 $678
Canadian Malartic (50%) 11,878 $614 $547 11,878 $614
Kittila 31,830 $862 $14,002 70,382 $825
Meadowbank 118,161 $577 $80,644 274,605 $496
253,113 $664 $145,450 550,300 $603
Southern Business
Pinos Altos 43,978 $481 $33,324 89,195 $465
Creston Mascota 11,159 $616 $7,336 21,476 $615
La India 17,809 $457 $12,678 31,509 $446
72,946 $496 $53,338 142,180 $484
Total 326,059 $626 $198,788 692,480 $579
Q2 2014 Total Operating Margin – $198.8 MQ2 2014 Revenue by Metal
Gold
95%
Silver
4%
Base Metals
1%
Meadowbank,
41%
Pinos Altos, 17%LaRonde, 14%
Kittila, 7%
Goldex, 7%
La India, 6%
Lapa, 4%
Creston Mascota,
4%
Canadian
Malartic, 0.3%
*Total cash costs are presented on a by-product basis, that is net of by-product revenue

Q2 2014 FINANCIAL RESULTS
CONTINUED STRONG OPERATING RESULTS AND LOW COSTS DRIVE EARNINGS AND CASH
FLOW PERFORMANCE
All amounts are in US$
(Unless Otherwise Indicated) Q2 2014 Q2 2013 H1 2014 H1 2013
Realized Gold Price ($/oz) $1,291 $1,336 $1,300 $1,474
Revenues (millions) $438 $336 $930 $757
Earnings (millions) $38 ($24) $147 ($1)
Earnings per share (basic) $0.20 ($0.14) 0.81 ($0.00)
Cash provided by operating
activities (millions)
$197.7 $75.3 $445.4 $221.4
Payable Production
Gold (ounces) 326,059 224,089 692,480 461,064
Silver (ounces in thousands) 861 1,066 1,741 2,317
Zinc (tonnes) 3,793 3,455 5,853 11,694
Copper (tonnes) 1,058 1,280 2,612 2,362
Total cash costs ($/oz) $626 $785 $579 $762

FINANCIAL POSITION
CASH, EXPECTED CASH FLOWS AND AVAILABLE CREDIT PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY
Long-term Debt Maturities
2017 2020 2022 2024
Notes Outstanding (millions) $115 $360 $225 $100
Coupon 6.13% 6.67% 5.93% 5.02%
All Amounts Are In US$ (Unless Otherwise Indicated) June 30, 2014
Cash And Cash Equivalents (millions) $241
Outstanding Debt (millions) $1,320
Available Credit Facilities (millions) $680
Common Shares Outstanding, Basic (Q2 2014 Weighted Average, millions) 185.7
Common Shares Outstanding, Fully Diluted (Q2 2014 Weighted Average, millions) 186.2

LARONDE
GOOD COST PERFORMANCE CONTINUES
 Production and service hoist drive upgrade completed
 Strong costs per tonne performance driven by reduced
labor and contractor costs and lower material costs
 Production from the deeper mine expected to increase
in H2 2014 as deeper higher grade ore from the level
293 pyramid advances to maturity
 Mined grade forecast to increase towards the average
reserve grade over the next several years
Proven Gold Reserves (million oz)
(6.0 M tonnes @ 3.48 g/t)
0.7
Probable Gold Reserves (million oz)
(18.1 M tonnes @ 5.50 g/t)
3.2
Indicated resource (million oz)
(4.2 M tonnes @ 2.12 g/t)
0.3
Inferred resource (million oz)
(10.5 M tonnes @ 4.61 g/t)
1.6
Estimated LOM (years) 12
See AEM Feb 13, 2014 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources.
$80
$90
$100
$110
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Q1-13 Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14
Production (koz) Cost/tonne

MEADOWBANK
RECORD THROUGHPUT AND CONTINUED COST CONTROL DRIVES STRONG PERFORMANCE
 Record daily throughput in Q2 2014 due to continued
optimization of mine plan and improved equipment
availability
 Increase in year-over-year production reflecting higher
grades, increased throughput and better recoveries
 60:40 split of production between H1 and H2 as the
higher grade Goose pit expected to be mined out by
year-end 2014
 Exploration drilling has expanded the scope of the
mineralization at the IVR property – a second phase,
20,000 metres drill program has commenced
(1.1 M tonnes @ 2.88 g/t)
0.1
(15.7 M tonnes @ 3.26 g/t)
1.6
Indicated gold resource (million oz)
(7.3 M tonnes @ 3.28 g/t)
0.8
Inferred gold resource (million oz)
(3.3 M tonnes @ 3.96 g/t)
0.4
$70
$76
$82
$88
$94
-
25
50
75
100
125
150
Q1-13 Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14

IVR DISCOVERY NEAR MEADOWBANK CONTINUES TO EXPAND
FOUR MINERALIZED ZONES HAVE BEEN OUTLINED – MINERALIZATION OPEN IN ALL DIRECTIONS
IVR14-044
8.70 g/t Au / 5.8 m
IVR14-031
10.90 g/t Au / 2.9 m
and 26.13 g/t Au / 4.8 m
IVR14-015
10.52 g/t Au / 3.5 m
IVR13-008
6.55 g/t Au / 7.2 m
And 9.77 g/t Au / 3.5 m
IVR13-004
6.20 g/t Au / 5.7 m
And 6.05 g/t Au / 4.1 m
IVR14-037
2.81 g/t Au / 10.8 m
Incl. 5.83 g/t Au / 2.8 m
IVR14-039
3.70 g/t Au / 7.4 m
IVR14-017
1.83 g/t Au / 14.5 m
Incl. 2.72 g/t Au / 4.8 m
IVR14-028
27.62 g/t Au / 3.0 m

 On June 16, 2014, Agnico Eagle and Yamana Gold each acquired a 50% interest in Osisko Mining
and formed a joint committee to operate the Canadian Malartic mine
 A new NI 43-101 report is being prepared for Canadian Malartic and the partners expect to provide an
update on optimization plans by the end of Q3 2014
 The partners will also jointly explore and potentially develop the Kirkland Lake Assets and continue
exploration at the Pandora property.
 In Kirkland Lake, one drill is active on each of the Upper Beaver and Canadian Kirkland properties
 Exploration work programs, budgets and a strategic plan to develop the Kirkland Lake camp to be
released later this fall
CANADIAN MALARTIC GP (50% INTEREST)
OPTIMIZATION AND COST SAVING STUDIES UNDERWAY
$540
$560
$580
$600
$620
100
110
120
130
140
150
Q1-14 Q2-14*
Production (koz) Cash Costs
*Includes 11,878 ounces attributable to AEM post the Osisko acquisition

KIRKLAND LAKE PROJECTS
35M OZ OF HISTORICAL GOLD PRODUCTION IN THE DISTRICT - MAIN TARGETS
UPPER BEAVER & CANADIAN KIRKLAND
230km2 hosting five deposits with disclosed NI 43-101 resources of 2.1 Moz indicated and 1.8 Moz inferred
BIDGOOD (OP)
Ind: 1.5 Mt @ 1.7 g/t Au, 76 k oz
Inf: 0.3 Mt @ 2.0 g/t Au, 21 k oz
AK (UG)
Ind: 1.2 Mt @ 4.5 g/t Au, 164 k oz
Inf: 1.5 Mt @ 4.2 g/t Au, 207 k oz
ANOKI / MCBEAN (UG)
Ind: 1.4 Mt @ 4.7 g/t Au, 217 k oz
Inf: 1.6 Mt @ 4.7 g/t Au, 237 k oz
MACASSA MINE + SMC
P+P: 2.5 Mt @ 17.1 g/t Au, 1.4 M oz
M+I: 3.8 Mt @ 17.0g/t Au, 2.1M oz
Inf: 1.9 Mt @ 18.6g/t Au, 1.1M oz
(UG) Ind: 0.24 Mt @ 4.3 g/t Au, 33 k oz
(UG) Inf: 3.6 Mt @ 4.8 g/t Au, 557 k oz
(OP) Ind: 1.7 Mt @ 1.9 g/t Au, 104 k oz
(OP) Inf: 1.3 Mt @ 1.9 g/t Au, 76 k oz
UPPER BEAVER (UG)
Ind: 6.9 Mt @ 6.6 g/t Au, 1.5 M oz
Inf: 4.6 Mt @ 4.9 g/t Au, 712 k oz
Canadian Kirkland
Upper Beaver
Source: Modified from Osisko reports and Kirkland Lake Gold reports

 Mill expansion expected to be completed by the end of
2014 (ahead of original mid-2015 schedule)
 Expansion scope increased from 750 tpd to 1,000 tpd;
mill expected to process over 4,000 tpd and expected
to be completed within original budget of $103 million
 Studies for Rimpi zone and shaft completed – Focus
on developing the Rimpi zone through a ramp system
to provide additional mill feed
 Deep drilling indicates Suuri zone remains open below
1,340m (approximately 240m below the reserve base)
(1.1 M tonnes @ 4.27 g/t)
0.1
(30.5 M tonnes @ 4.65 g/t)
4.6
Measured & Indicated gold resource (million oz)
(11.0 M tonnes @ 2.79 g/t)
1.0
(7.5 M tonnes @ 4.12 g/t)
1.0
KITTILA
PLANT EXPANSION TO BE COMPLETED AHEAD OF SCHEDULE
€ 60
€ 70
€ 80
€ 90
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
Q4-12 Q1-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14
No production in Q2-13 due to scheduled shutdown

DEEP DRILLING EXTENDS SUURI ZONE AT DEPTH
MINERALIZATION APPEARS OPEN APPROXIMATELY 240M BELOW CURRENT RESERVES
ROD14-002C
6.81 g/t Au / 6.4 m
Incl. 12.0 g/t Au / 2.2 m

 Throughput forecast to increase to 6,000 tpd by year-end
2014
 Q2 2014 minesite costs per tonne were C$33, significantly
lower than 2014 guidance (C$37/t)
 Accelerated development of the exploration ramp into the
D zone (the top of the Deep zone) is underway
 Development progressing on the M2, M5 and E2 satellite
zones and technical studies on development of additional
satellites expected in early 2015
 Akasaba West technical study expected by year end 2014
(7.5 M tonnes @ 1.52 g/t)
0.4
Measured gold resource (million oz)
(12.4 M tonnes @ 1.86 g/t)
0.7
(17.7 M tonnes @ 2.03 g/t)
1.2
(26.1 M tonnes @ 1.64 g/t)
1.4
GOLDEX
EXCELLENT COST PERFORMANCE; MILL RAMP UP TO 6,000 TPD AHEAD OF SCHEDULE
$30
$33
$36
15
20
25
Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14

RAMP DEVELOPMENT ACCELERATED INTO TOP OF THE D ZONE
DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL SATELLITES COULD POTENTIALLY EXTEND MINE LIFE

 Lower minesite costs in Q2 2014 due to lower labor
costs and continued cost reduction efforts despite
mining at a deeper depth
 Grades are expected to improve in H2 2014 with
mining commissioned in the Zulapa 7 zone
(1.0 M tonnes @ 5.99 g/t)
0.2
(0.5 M tonnes @ 5.92 g/t)
0.1
(1.6 M tonnes @ 4.28 g/t)
0.2
(1.0 M tonnes @ 5.49 g/t)
0.2
LAPA
HIGHER GRADES EXPECTED FROM ZULAPA ZONE 7 IN Q4 2014
$100
$105
$110
$115
$120
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
Q1-13 Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14

 Exploration ramp extended by 301 metres during Q2 2014, now 527 metres long, to a depth of 168
metres below surface
 Surface drilling program expected to be completed late July
 118 holes (30,900 metres) completed to the end of Q2 2014
 Conversion drilling at Wesmeg/Normeg and Tiriganiaq zones and exploration drilling at Pump,
Discovery and Wolf zones
 Significant new discovery in the Pump zone, indicating potential for high-grade resources – including
hole M14-2220 that yielded 19.8 g/t gold over 5.2 metres at 12 metres depth
 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) delivered in Q2 2014
 Updated technical study on track for late 2014
MELIADINE
2014 DRILLING EXPECTED TO FURTHER EXPAND RESOURCE BASE
(0.03 M tonnes @ 7.31 g/t)
0.0
(11.9 M tonnes @ 7.38 g/t)
2.8
(19.0 M tonnes @ 5.05 g/t)
3.1
(11.7 M tonnes @ 7.20 g/t)
2.7
Estimated LOM (years)

PINOS ALTOS
STRONG CASH FLOW GENERATION CONTINUES
 Costs in the 2014 period were favorably impacted by
shorter hauls and better drilling and blasting
performance (lower explosives consumption) in the
open pit and lower consumable costs
 The shaft is currently excavated to a depth of 228
metres with concrete lining to a depth of 212 metres
 Cost per tonne variation primarily due to normal
fluctuations in milled vs. heap leach ratio ore mix
Proven Gold Reserves (million oz)*
(2.0 M tonnes @ 2.54 g/t)
0.2
Probable Gold Reserves (million oz)*
(26.7 M tonnes @ 2.45 g/t)
2.1
Indicated gold resource (million oz)*
(13.9 M tonnes @ 1.54 g/t)
0.7
Inferred gold resource (million oz)*
(17.7 M tonnes @ 1.28 g/t)
0.7
*Pinos Altos reserves and resources include the Creston Mascota mine
$35
$50
$65
-
10
20
30
40
50
Q1-13 Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14

CRESTON MASCOTA
PHASE 3 LEACH PAD NOW COMMISSIONED
 The expanded capacity for the agglomerator and
overland conveyors was installed in May and
commissioned in early June
 Phase 3 leach pad was completed in June and
has been fully commissioned
*Pinos Altos reserves and resources include the Creston Mascota mine
$10
$15
$20
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Q2-13 Q3-13 Q4-13 Q1-14 Q2-14
No production in Q4-12 and Q1-13 due to temporary suspension of Phase one leach pad
Proven Gold Reserves (million oz)*
(0.3 M tonnes @ 0.61 g/t)
0.0
Probable Gold Reserves (million oz)*
(6.8 M tonnes @ 1.31 g/t)
0.3
Indicated gold resource (million oz)*
(2.4 M tonnes @ 0.66 g/t)
0.05
Inferred gold resource (million oz)*
(0.8 M tonnes @ 0.82 g/t)
0.02

LA INDIA
RAMP-UP CONTINUES; CRUSHING CIRCUIT REFINEMENTS EXPECTED TO
ENHANCE STACKING RATES
 1.1M tonnes of ore stacked on heap leach pad during
Q2 2014 which yielded 17,809 ounces of payable
gold production
 Throughput continues to ramp up - stacking rates
currently averaging approximately 12,500 tpd
 Planned modifications to the crushing and stacking
circuits are expected to be completed during Q3 2014
 La India closed the first “water year” (July 1, 2013 to
June 30, 2014) with approximately 200,000 m3 in
storage
(26.9 M tonnes @ 0.87 g/t)
0.8
Measured gold resource (million oz)
(5.0 M tonnes @ 0.33 g/t)
0.1
(51.3 M tonnes @ 0.38 g/t)
0.6
(82.1 M tonnes @ 0.36 g/t)
1.0

 Production guidance is now expected to be 1,350,000 to 1,370,000 million ounces with total
cash costs of $650 to $675 per ounce
 Details on the optimization plan for Canadian Malartic will be presented by the Partnership by
the end of Q3 2014
 Anticipated update to 2015 guidance by the end of Q3 2014
 Completion of 1,000 tpd mill expansion at Kittila expected by year end-2014
 Update on Akasaba West project expected in late 2014
 Updated Meliadine technical study expected in late 2014 or early 2015
 Installation of new ore conveyor at LaRonde Deep expected in 2015 – should help reduce
costs and congestion
 Continuing evaluation of satellite deposits at Pinos Altos and Goldex, which could enhance
production and cost profiles
FUTURE CATALYSTS

204,380 234,837 218,980
781,080
808,974 880,355
$580
$640
$672
$663*
2011A 2012A 2013A 2014E 2015E** 2016E**
INCREASED 2014 PRODUCTION AND LOWER COST GUIDANCE
STRONG OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND OSISKO ACQUISITION DRIVES 14% INCREASE
FROM ORIGINAL GUIDANCE
Payable Gold Production Profile
* Mid range of estimated 2014 guidance
** Includes 50% of Osisko’s March 2014 LOM production for the Canadian Malarctic mine
985,460 1,043,811
1,099,335
1,360,000*
1,546,000
1,590,000
Northern Business (oz) Southern Business (oz) Annual Production Cash Cost

GOLD AND SILVER RESERVES AND RESOURCES
DECEMBER 31, 2013
Gold Silver
Tonnes
(000’s)
Gold
(g/t)
Gold
(ounces) (000’s)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Silver
(g/t)
Silver
(ounces) (000’s)
Proven & Probable
Reserves
Northern Business 93,618 4.60 13,841 24,127 19.59 15,192
Southern Business 55,800 1.69 3,024 28,703 64.32 59,354
Total 149,418 3.51 16,865 52,830 43.89 74,546
Measured & Indicated
Resources
Total 157,040 1.91 9,654 18,177 33.37 19,502
Inferred Resources
Total 169,470 1.86 10,121 28,243 21.97 19,948
See AEM Feb 12, 2014 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources.

COPPER, ZINC AND LEAD RESERVES AND RESOURCES
DECEMBER 31, 2013
Copper Zinc Lead
Tonnes
(000’s)
Copper
(%)
Copper
(tonnes)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Zinc
(%)
Zinc
(tonnes)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Lead
(%)
Lead
(tonnes)
Proven & Probable
Reserves
Northern Business 24,127 0.25 59,519 24,127 0.67 161,108 24,127 0.04 9,964
Southern Business
Total 24,127 0.25 59,519 24,127 0.67 161,108 24,127 0.04 9,964
Measured & Indicated
Resources
Southern Business
Total 4,242 0.16 6,981 4,242 1.61 68,127 4,242 0.16 6,793
Inferred Resources
Southern Business
Total 10,536 0.27 28,118 10,536 0.55 58,463 10,536 0.05 5,176
See AEM Feb 12, 2014 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources.

NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources
This document uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources”. Investors are advised that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the
SEC does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.
Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources
This document also uses the term “inferred resources”. Investors are advised that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it.
“Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of
an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-
feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Scientific and Technical Data
Cautionary Note To U.S. Investors - The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically
and legally extract or produce. Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reports mineral resource and reserve estimates in accordance with the CIM guidelines for the estimation, classification and
reporting of resources and reserves in accordance with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities' (the "CSA") National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects ("NI 43-101"). These standards are similar to those used by the SEC’s Industry Guide No. 7, as interpreted by Staff at the SEC ("Guide 7"). However, the definitions in NI 43-
101 differ in certain respects from those under Guide 7. Accordingly, mineral reserve information contained herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S.
companies. Under the requirements of the SEC, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be
economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. A "final" or "bankable" feasibility study is required to meet the requirements to designate
reserves under Industry Guide 7. Agnico Eagle uses certain terms in this news release, such as "measured", "indicated", and "inferred", and "resources" that the SEC guidelines
strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC.
In prior periods, reserves for all properties were typically estimated using historic three-year average metals prices and foreign exchange rates in accordance with the SEC guidelines.
These guidelines require the use of prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which the Staff of the SEC has interpreted to mean historic
three-year average prices. Given the current lower commodity price environment, Agnico Eagle has decided to use price assumptions that are below the three-year averages. The
assumptions used for the mineral reserves estimates at all mines and advanced projects as of December 31, 2013, reported by the Company on February 12, 2014, are $1,200 per
ounce gold, $18.00 per ounce silver, $0.82 per pound zinc, $3.00 per pound copper, $0.91 per pound lead and C$/US$, US$/Euro and MXP/US$ exchange rates of 1.03, 1.32 and
12.75, respectively.
NI 43-101 requires mining companies to disclose reserves and resources using the subcategories of "proven" reserves, "probable" reserves, "measured" resources, "indicated"
resources and "inferred" resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
A mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured and/or indicated mineral resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when
the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at pre-feasibility or feasibility level as appropriate that include application of modifying factors. Such studies demonstrate
that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified.
Modifying factors are considerations used to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure,
economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors.
A proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource. A proven mineral reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the modifying factors. A
probable mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some circumstances, a measured mineral resource. The confidence in the modifying factors applying
to a probable mineral reserve is lower than that applying to a proven mineral reserve.
A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a mineral resource are known, estimated or
interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.
A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence
sufficient to allow the application of modifying factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from
detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An indicated mineral
resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the
application of modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately
detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An inferred mineral resource
is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to
imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
A feasibility study is a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of
applicable modifying factors together with any other relevant operational factors and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that
extraction is reasonably justified (economically mineable). The results of the study may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to
proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. The confidence level of the study will be higher than that of a Pre-Feasibility Study.
The effective date for all of the Company's mineral resource and reserve estimates in this news release is December 31, 2013. Additional information about each of the mineral projects
that is required by NI 43-101, sections 3.2 and 3.3 and paragraphs 3.4 (a), (c) and (d) can be found in the Technical Reports referred to above, which may be found at www.sedar.com.
Other important operating information can be found in the Company's AIF and Form 40-F.
The scientific and technical information contained herein has been approved by Daniel Doucet, Corporate Director, Reserve Development, and/or Alain Blackburn, Senior Vice-
President, Exploration. Both Mr. Doucet and Mr. Blackburn are designated P.Eng. with the Ordre ingenieurs du Québec and qualified persons as defined by NI 43-101.

Trading Symbol:
AEM on TSX & NYSE
Investor Relations:
416-947-1212
info@agnicoeagle.com
agnicoeagle.com

Q2-2014 Results Presentation

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to Q2-2014 Results Presentation

Similar to Q2-2014 Results Presentation (13)

More from Agnico Eagle Mines

More from Agnico Eagle Mines (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Q2-2014 Results Presentation