If you want to grow, go for a wide and shallow approach. In a market of declining loyalty, it is penetration that provides the fuel for growth.
We look at the best approach for maximising growth in a changing market.
2. WHAT REALLY DRIVES BRAND GROWTH?
At Seymour Sloan, we have worked with FMCG brands on a number of growth initiatives and the
core message from our work has been that, for a brand to grow they must increase the number
of purchasers. As obvious as it sounds, we have found that often our clients are thinking in terms
of targeting niches and increasing wallet spend within those niches. It has led to brands focusing
on depth over breadth, an approach that we have found is not as effective as simply selling to as
many customers as possible.
When we looked at what marks the leading brands out as strong market operators, there was one
thing consistent through each example, the leading brand had the highest level of penetration
in their category in any chosen geography. Penetration refers to the number of households that
purchased the product in any given year. It seems that having your product in more households
is the platform for growth. If you look at the traditionally low levels of brand loyalty among FMCG
customers then it is a clear battle to sustain high penetration levels annually. The idea that, once
you get a customer, you keep them is over.
From, Budweiser in beer, Coca-Cola in beverages and Pantene in shampoo, all have penetration
rates significantly higher than the average of the top 20 competing brands—at least four times
higher. These brands usually earn higher repurchasing and purchasing frequency rates than their
rivals, but their outperformance in penetration is far more dramatic
Penetration is both a blessing and a curse. It is likely that if two purchase years were compared,
the buyers would significantly differ, even for a consistent level of penetration. The high churn rate
in the FMCG market means that brands are engaged in a perennial battle to recruit new custom-
ers. With this acquisitive mindset, it becomes difficult, and maybe even a false economy, to con-
sider issues such as retention and loyalty. They move from being essentials to, ‘nice to haves.’ It
means the marketing messages are targeted at a far wider span of customers than they may end
up selling to.
As important as this factor appears to be, we have observed many brands operate with low levels
of penetration, not really understanding their competitive position. Across many products, a large
majority of brands will typically enjoy less than 5% penetration. At 5% penetration, it then becomes
a challenge to build scale into the operation. Ideally, brands need to reach 10% to 15% penetration
before reaching the scale that would justify levels of investment required to sustain and grow the
brand. Solid brands maintain penetration in the 25%–30% range, and perennial brands like Coca-
Cola can achieve 50% or more.
3. One of the challenges many brands face is that they link brand, product and customer so tightly
that their focus narrows, excluding a large number of potential customers. Looking at examples
like Apple, Red Bull and Nike the common feature is that the brand represents far more than the
products they sell. It is this breadth that creates the level of awareness and engagement required
to rapidly increase penetration levels. If Nike only focused on those engaged in sport and exer-
cise it is unlikely that their running shoes would become fashion staples. It is this ability to build a
broader brand narrative that widens the appeal and in turn encourages customers to find a reason
to purchase.
By acknowledging this, Nike and Red Bull managed to boost their penetration in the US to above
14% of the adult population, respectively.
How can brands increase their penetration rates?
Brands have to embrace a strategy for the long-term. In markets that are intensively competitive,
where billions are spent on marketing, increasing penetration happens over a number of years.
Sadly, we are at a stage where plans are usually for 1-3 years. We estimate that if a brand can
have all the correct elements in place then increases of 1-1.5% penetration annually are possible.
At that rate it can be a lengthy process to go from 10% to 25%. However, most organisations do
not seem willing to last the course. In contrast, if you observe brands such as Coca Cola, their
strategies have a longer horizon and they fully understand the value of penetration built over gen-
erations.
Switching strategies is akin to resetting the whole process. There is greater value is a moderate
strategy that persists into the long-term against strategy shifts on an annual basis. Both in cost
and consistency, brands lose out by changing course regularly. Brands that remain consistent,
even in challenging times, will serve as the platform for future growth. There must be a commit-
ment to the long-term goal over and above any short-term hiccups. A clear example is the impact
of short-term price cuts in driving sales volumes. Eventually, any short term benefit is swallowed
up by the market, with the net result being a lower average market price. In such a scenario, there
is no winner, except the customer.
It is difficult to improve penetration without improving the customer’s connection with the brand
and product. Successful brands are such because they give the customer more than one reason
to purchase the product. They are leading brands because they excel at gaining the customers
consideration. Earning consideration and penetration requires investing in three key brand assets:
memory structures, product portfolios and in-store assets. All three are examined below.
4. Memory structures. Successful brands remain in the mind of the customer through consistent
and engaging narratives. They build their marketing programmes around a small number of dis-
tinct messages, anchored by high impact messages, which emain in the customer’s memory.
In a congested marketing space, it is difficult for customers to remember all the messages trans-
mitted and as such, building the mental connection requires a long-term approach coupled with
consistency of approach and messaging. The three words that typify the approach are: consist-
ency, persistence and repetition. Successful brands use the same messaging and cues every-
where—from media advertising to packaging or point-of-sale signage. They avoid changes to mes-
saging, logos, catch lines or music that erase memory structures. And they do not shy away from
repetition.
Examining brands with sustained success over decades like Nutella or Nivea you see consistency.
The iconic chocolate-spread brand hasn’t significantly altered the product formulation and taste,
and rarely modifies its message. Nivea has used the same visual identity for its core product for
decades: from the round tin since 1911; the blue-and-white colours 1925; with the same logo and
font since 1959.
Taking a modern example like Innocent, we see a similar approach. Every communication on its
containers consistently reminds consumers that its products are natural, healthy, and that con-
sumption helps them achieve their objective of “five-a-day” (the daily consumption of five different
fruits or vegetables for nutritional balance). Regardless of whether, five a day is the right amount,
the customers believe in it sufficiently that it is a message with meaning.
Successful brands adhere to the brand’s heritage to anchor the identity in the mind of the custom-
er, but make sure to refresh it to retain brand relevance. Then, they achieve reach, repetition and
audibility by concentrating their resources on fewer brands. They identify those that either have
enough scale to self-fund the required investments or enough potential to break into a new consid-
eration set—and they commit the required resources.
Product portfolios. Leading brands understand complexity is fatal to a repeatable business
model. Instead they have a pared-down and simplified product portfolio. Customers are then able
to make sense of the product offering and lose no time in dealing with complexity. Simplicity allows
brands to quickly identify what works and what does not in order to drive improvement. Keeping
the product offering simple is at the core of successful market penetration. An example is Coca
Cola, many times they have sought to wider their portfolio, only for customer feedback to force a
retreat. An example of that is Tab Clear, the clear cola launched in the UK in the 1990s. The Coca
Cola executives have accepted that their core offering is till their best and have generally left it
alone.
We have witnessed many companies chase the innovation train, throwing millions at marketing
innovation they feel with change the world. Sadly, market evidence suggests that few innovations
truly take hold, which makes them risky ventures and they can often divert focus and resources
from products that are already successful.
Innovation is something that should be trialled in the background and managed incrementally. How
200 customers feel about a product often has little relation to how 2,000,000 customers will feel.
As such, we suggest that success is based on focusing on the profitable core.
5. Successful brands constantly invest in their successful products to keep building on their success.
They invest to increase product quality, maintaining the quality differential with white label brands
and justifying the price premium. They invest in trade relationships to deliver increased distribu-
tion, prime placements or promotional slots that attract new consumers to the category. Investing
in advertising improves consideration while investing in store renovations and range expansion
broaden the bounds of consideration. In support of that, successful brands will also have an eye
on brands that could become successful brands with additional investment and then develop a
plan to then bring those over the line.
In-store assets. Finally, having focused on the most important products, it is essential to invest
to activate them at the point of sale and ensure availability, being at the right place on the shelf or
in secondary placements—and visible. Nivea, in France for instance, is known for having empha-
sized excellent in-store execution: the brand prioritises its top products, for which its salesforce
must systematically fulfil an objective of 100% distribution. It also sets the challenge of “turning
points-of-sales blue”—the iconic brand’s colour.
Leading companies identify store assets that are critical to own in their category. They shape a
compelling view of success to guide the execution of their salesforce. These winners reverse-en-
gineer their core processes and make them compatible with the primary constraints of their trade
customers. In essence, they place the retail outlet at the core of their distribution approach. They
consider retail space constraints when defining their product portfolio, ensuring that the majority
of the products make it to the customers’ eye and consideration. They consider placement con-
straints when defining merchandising plans, and calendar constraints when defining promotional
plans. And they ensure their entire organization is synchronized and delivers a coherent plan,
delivering maximum impact.
Apple is a champion in managing in-store assets. They invest heavily to create a unique expe-
rience in its own stores. But in third-party stores, too, it works hard to create the highest impact
for its products, often by creating a shop-within-a-shop, more than compensating for its relatively
narrow range of products.