When Rubber Meets the Road: Rethinking Your Library Collections by Sue Woodson, Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins Medicine
1. When the rubber meets the road,
Pt. 2 -- Welch Library’s experience
Sue M. Woodson, MLIS, PhD
Welch Medical Library
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Charleston Conference
November 5, 2010
2. Shrink the Welch print collection
• Shrink print holdings by about 80%
• Do this by 2012
15. Welch – it’s not your father’s library
• We collect for today
• If we don’t have it buy it or ILL it
• If our users no longer use it, we don’t buy it
19. SE/A – Print Retention
Task Force
National Network | Libraries of Medicine
20. • How long do we need to keep *some*
print copies of our journal literature?
• How many copies need to be kept?
• How to coordinate distributed
presevation?
• What becomes of print when it is no
longer valuable to Medicine?
Roger theoretical framework
Me one instance of de-accessioning tied to increasing # online
What we’re doing
Why we’re doing it
How the work has changed us | how we are the same
Where we go from here
dramatically reduce print
To 83K @ Welch & 140K @ LSC
At one point we had 400K volumes
ELEMENT OF LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLAN -- 10 years
OTHER MEDICAL LIBRARIES FACING SAME CALL LTO GIVE BACK SPACE -- Duke
Why stopping here?
Some press about Shrinking the print collection
I’ve gotten Odd ?s @ MTGS
We aren’t getting rid of the library – the library is not a building
We aren’t throwing out all the books
Better service for our patrons
OUR patrons
May not work for YOUR patrons
Medical library of Johns Hopkins Medical Institute
Johns Hopkins UNiversity
Supports JHMI
SOM, SON, SPH, JHH
FTE=14,900
Carnegie Research Univ with Very High Research activity
Volumes? 300,000 ??
Print Subscriptions? 88. for Welch, 200 odd for Welch, Meyer
ALSO
Institute History of Medicine
Top floor of the bldg
forty thousand volumes, including runs of more than 300 journals.
108 periodicals currently subscribed to
Active in helping us, especially for the
Nancy began in Jan 2000
architectural study of the Welch Library. The report is a culmination of the strategic thinking by staff, focus groups, and our advisory committee as interpreted and enhanced by the architectural team from Hillier and DEGW.
In Summary – take the library to our patrons
Improve staff work space in support of this model
On the simplest level it’s because they aren’t coming to us anymore
1. If it isn’t online it doesn’t exist
Gate count = average of 10 people an hour
+/- 30 repeat offenders
image retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Willie_Sutton.jpg 11/9/2010
Great study spaces all over campus
Red circle is Welch
Red arrow is new Medical Education Bldg
Bottom line: it doesn’t work for us the way it is now
Too small for staff
Some in other buildings
Needs renovation – no one renovates a book museum
Scary
Bad economy
Long term doing same job
Limited skills
Kept witin the dept.
We’ve just recently announced that we are reducing our hours from 79.5 to xxx
Running established searches
Importing to RefWorks, EndNote, etc.
De-duping
This is where we’re seeing people grow and it is very heartening.
We’re no longer a traditional research library
We’re not a repository
We aren’t collecting for future users
Our print has a shelf life… we’ll not be keeping it forever --- one thing that jumped out at me from Roger’s What to withdraw report.
We are not a repository
We are a library but a library is not a building
Not every library will do this
That can be pretty scary
There is an extension to the task force that will take up the task force’s recommendations.
Some of the questions we’ll ask are…..
My slide
I promised Rob I’d use this in a talk some day.