Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements

256

Published on

In this slideshare we cover the restraints set in place by non-solicitation agreements on consulting professionals. In this slideshare we explore why these are set in place and how they are being …

In this slideshare we cover the restraints set in place by non-solicitation agreements on consulting professionals. In this slideshare we explore why these are set in place and how they are being combated along with the bullets listed below.


• Limitations
• Department of Justice
• Hiring practices
• Impact on competitive Healthcare IT employment market.

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
256
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Demise of Non-Solicitation Agreements
  • 2. Nothing can be more disruptive to an organization’s plans than the loss of key personnel.
  • 3. As a result, many times partnering organizations, vendor/clients, client/client, and even competing organizations will put in place formal and informal “agreements” to not hire each other’s employees.
  • 4. • These types of agreements have existed for many years within various industries, Healthcare IT certainly being one of them. • In fact, over the past couple of years, some Healthcare IT vendors and consulting firms have been very aggressive in establishing policies as it relates to hiring practices. • The most common of these types of agreements is as simple as two organizations agreeing to not hire each other’s employees.
  • 5. Others may consist of a vendor telling its clients that they cannot hire from their other clients, due to the disruptions that may be caused to current projects. Not much consideration is given to the limitations this puts on the people who may want to take advantage of career opportunities within the organizations with which their current employer has such agreements.
  • 6. Many of the organizations with which our firm works have been very proactive in adding to their staffs over the last six months and are now looking to implement policies with the hopes of retaining their current staff for the long haul.
  • 7. What may make things more difficult is a September 2010 settlement by the Department of Justice: “In September, the Department of Justice announced that it has reached a settlement with six high technology companies — Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar — that prevents them from entering into no solicitation agreements for employees. The department said that the agreements eliminated a significant form of competition to attract highly skilled employees, and overall diminished competition to the detriment of affected employees who were likely deprived of competitively important information and access to better job opportunities.” http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/September/10-at-1076.html
  • 8. The agreements the six organizations had in place did not prevent them from “hiring” each other’s employees. If an employee from one of the organizations were to apply for a job on their own, the company to which they applied could hire them.
  • 9. They were in agreement only to not solicit each other’s employees. The Department of Justice had a problem with just the “non-solicitation” part of the agreement and how that could affect the employee’s options and value in the marketplace.
  • 10. With this ruling, employers have a few fewer tactics to prevent or limit turnover. As these types of agreements are dissolved, what impact will it have on an already competitive Healthcare IT employment market?
  • 11. Learn More At HealthcareIS.com Receive weekly tips from Healthcare IS on ways to improve your contracting career. • • • • Ways to Negotiate How to get the right contract Who to work with Tips for traveling consultants

×