Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Successfully reported this slideshow.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- fauvel_igarss.pdf by grssieee 527 views
- Nonlinear component analysis as a k... by Michele Filannino 3632 views
- Kernel Entropy Component Analysis i... by grssieee 1350 views
- Different kind of distance and Stat... by Khulna University 580 views
- Principal Component Analysis For No... by Jordan McBain 2271 views
- KPCA_Survey_Report by Randy Salm 119 views

1,292 views

Published on

Published in:
Technology

No Downloads

Total views

1,292

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

3

Shares

0

Downloads

46

Comments

0

Likes

1

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Part 2. Spectral Clustering from Matrix Perspective A brief tutorial emphasizing recent developments (More detailed tutorial is given in ICML’04 )PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 56
- 2. From PCA to spectral clustering using generalized eigenvectors Consider the kernel matrix: Wij = φ ( xi ),φ ( x j ) In Kernel PCA we compute eigenvector: Wv = λv Generalized Eigenvector: Wq = λDq D = diag (d1,L, dn ) di = ∑w j ij This leads to Spectral Clustering !PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 57
- 3. Indicator Matrix Quadratic Clustering Framework Unsigned Cluster indicator Matrix H=(h1, …, hK) Kernel K-means clustering: max Tr( H T WH ), s.t. H T H = I , H ≥ 0 H K-means: W = XT X; Kernel K-means W = (< φ ( xi ),φ ( x j ) >) Spectral clustering (normalized cut) max Tr( H T WH ), s.t. H T DH = I , H ≥ 0 HPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 58
- 4. Brief Introduction to Spectral Clustering (Laplacian matrix based clustering)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 59
- 5. Some historical notes • Fiedler, 1973, 1975, graph Laplacian matrix • Donath & Hoffman, 1973, bounds • Hall, 1970, Quadratic Placement (embedding) • Pothen, Simon, Liou, 1990, Spectral graph partitioning (many related papers there after) • Hagen & Kahng, 1992, Ratio-cut • Chan, Schlag & Zien, multi-way Ratio-cut • Chung, 1997, Spectral graph theory book • Shi & Malik, 2000, Normalized CutPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 60
- 6. Spectral Gold-Rush of 2001 9 papers on spectral clustering • Meila & Shi, AI-Stat 2001. Random Walk interpreation of Normalized Cut • Ding, He & Zha, KDD 2001. Perturbation analysis of Laplacian matrix on sparsely connected graphs • Ng, Jordan & Weiss, NIPS 2001, K-means algorithm on the embeded eigen-space • Belkin & Niyogi, NIPS 2001. Spectral Embedding • Dhillon, KDD 2001, Bipartite graph clustering • Zha et al, CIKM 2001, Bipartite graph clustering • Zha et al, NIPS 2001. Spectral Relaxation of K-means • Ding et al, ICDM 2001. MinMaxCut, Uniqueness of relaxation. • Gu et al, K-way Relaxation of NormCut and MinMaxCutPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 61
- 7. Spectral Clustering min cutsize , without explicit size constraints But where to cut ? Need to balance sizesPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 62
- 8. Graph Clustering min between-cluster similarities (weights) sim(A,B) = ∑∑ wij i∈ A j∈B Balance weight Balance size Balance volume sim(A,A) = ∑∑ wij i∈ A j∈ A max within-cluster similarities (weights)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 63
- 9. Clustering Objective Functions s(A,B) = ∑∑ w ij • Ratio Cut i∈ A j∈B s(A,B) s(A,B) J Rcut (A,B) = + |A| |B| • Normalized Cut dA = ∑d i i∈A s ( A, B) s ( A, B) J Ncut ( A, B) = + dA dB s ( A, B) s ( A, B) = + s ( A, A) + s ( A, B) s(B, B) + s ( A, B) • Min-Max-Cut s(A,B) s(A,B) J MMC(A,B) = + s(A,A) s(B,B)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 64
- 10. Normalized Cut (Shi & Malik, 2000) Min similarity between A & B: s(A,B) = ∑ ∑ wij i∈ A j∈B Balance weights s ( A, B) s ( A, B) J Ncut ( A, B) = dA + dB dA = ∑d i∈A i ⎧ d B / d Ad ⎪ if i ∈ A Cluster indicator: q (i ) = ⎨ ⎪− d A / d B d ⎩ if i ∈ B d= ∑d i∈G i Normalization: q Dq = 1, q De = 0 T T Substitute q leads to J Ncut (q) = q T ( D − W )q min q q T ( D − W )q + λ (q T Dq − 1) Solution is eigenvector of ( D − W )q = λDqPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 65
- 11. A simple example 2 dense clusters, with sparse connections between them. Adjacency matrix Eigenvector q2PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 66
- 12. K-way Spectral Clustering K≥2PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 67
- 13. K-way Clustering Objectives • Ratio Cut ⎛ s (C k ,Cl ) s (C k ,Cl ) ⎞ s (C k ,G − C k ) J Rcut (C1 , L , C K ) = ∑ ⎜ ⎜ |C | + |C | ⎟ = < k ,l > ⎝ k l ⎟ ⎠ ∑ k |C k| • Normalized Cut ⎛ s (C k ,Cl ) s (C k ,Cl ) ⎞ s (C k ,G − C k ) J Ncut (C1 , L , C K ) = < k ,l > ∑⎜ ⎜ d ⎝ k + dl ⎟= ⎟ ⎠ ∑ k dk • Min-Max-Cut ⎛ s (C k ,Cl ) s (C k ,Cl ) ⎞ s (C k ,G − C k ) J MMC (C1 , L , C K ) = ⎜ < k ,l > ⎝ ∑ k k l l ⎠ ⎟ ⎜ s (C , C ) + s (C , C ) ⎟ = ∑ k s (C k , C k )PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 68
- 14. K-way Spectral Relaxation h1 = (1L1,0 L 0,0 L 0)T Unsigned cluster indicators: h2 = (0L 0,1L1,0 L 0)T LLL Re-write: hk = (0 L 0,0L 0,1L1)T h1 ( D − W )h1 T hk ( D − W )hk T J Rcut (h1 , L, hk ) = T +L+ T h1 h1 hk hk h1 ( D − W )h1 T hk ( D − W )hk T J Ncut (h1 , L, hk ) = T +L+ T h1 Dh1 hk Dhk h1 ( D − W )h1 T hk ( D − W )hk T J MMC (h1 , L , hk ) = T +L+ T h1 Wh1 hk WhkPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 69
- 15. K-way Normalized Cut Spectral Relaxation Unsigned cluster indicators: nk } y k = D1/ 2 (0 L 0,1L1,0L 0)T / || D1/ 2 hk || Re-write: ~ ~ J Ncut ( y1 , L , y k ) = T y1 ( I − W ) y1 + L + y k ( I − W ) y k T ~ ~ = Tr (Y T ( I − W )Y ) W = D −1/ 2WD −1/ 2 ~ Optimize : min Tr (Y ( I − W )Y ), subject to Y T Y = I T Y By K. Fan’s theorem, optimal solution is ~ eigenvectors: Y=(v1,v2, …, vk), ( I − W )vk = λk vk ( D − W )u k = λk Du k , u k = D −1/ 2 vk λ1 + L + λk ≤ min J Ncut ( y1 ,L , y k ) (Gu, et al, 2001)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 70
- 16. K-way Spectral Clustering is difficult • Spectral clustering is best applied to 2-way clustering – positive entries for one cluster – negative entries for another cluster • For K-way (K>2) clustering – Positive and negative signs make cluster assignment difficult – Recursive 2-way clustering – Low-dimension embedding. Project the data to eigenvector subspace; use another clustering method such as K-means to cluster the data (Ng et al; Zha et al; Back & Jordan, etc) – Linearized cluster assignment using spectral ordering and cluster crossingPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 71
- 17. Scaled PCA: a Unified Framework for clustering and ordering • Scaled PCA has two optimality properties – Distance sensitive ordering – Min-max principle Clustering • SPCA on contingency table ⇒ Correspondence Analysis – Simultaneous ordering of rows and columns – Simultaneous clustering of rows and columnsPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 72
- 18. Scaled PCA similarity matrix S=(sij) (generated from XXT) D = diag(d1 ,L, d n ) di = si. ~ −1 −1 ~ Nonlinear re-scaling: S = D SD , sij = sij /(si.s j. ) 2 2 1/ 2 ~ Apply SVD on S⇒ ~ 1 ⎡ T⎤ S = D S D = D ∑ zk λk z k D = D ⎢∑ qk λk qk ⎥ D 1 1 1 2 2 2 T 2 k ⎣k ⎦ qk = D-1/2 zk is the scaled principal component Subtract trivial component λ = 1, z = d 1/ 2 /s.., q =1 0 0 0 ⇒ S − dd T /s.. = D ∑ qk λk qT D k k =1 (Ding, et al, 2002)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 73
- 19. Scaled PCA on a Rectangle Matrix ⇒ Correspondence Analysis ~ −1 −1 ~ Nonlinear re-scaling: P = D 2 PD 2 , p = p /( p p )1/ 2 r c ij ij i. j. ~ Apply SVD on P Subtract trivial component P − rc / p.. = Dr ∑ f k λk g Dc T T r = ( p1.,L, pn. ) T k k =1 −1 −1 c = ( p.1,L, p.n ) T fk = D u , gk = D v r 2 k 2 c k are the scaled row and column principal component (standard coordinates in CA)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 74
- 20. Correspondence Analysis (CA) • Mainly used in graphical display of data • Popular in France (Benzécri, 1969) • Long history – Simultaneous row and column regression (Hirschfeld, 1935) – Reciprocal averaging (Richardson & Kuder, 1933; Horst, 1935; Fisher, 1940; Hill, 1974) – Canonical correlations, dual scaling, etc. • Formulation is a bit complicated (“convoluted” Jolliffe, 2002, p.342) • “A neglected method”, (Hill, 1974)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 75
- 21. Clustering of Bipartite Graphs (rectangle matrix) Simultaneous clustering of rows and columns of a contingency table (adjacency matrix B ) Examples of bipartite graphs • Information Retrieval: word-by-document matrix • Market basket data: transaction-by-item matrix • DNA Gene expression profiles • Protein vs protein-complexPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 76
- 22. Bipartite Graph Clustering Clustering indicators for rows and columns: ⎧ 1 if ri ∈ R1 ⎧ 1 if ci ∈ C1 f (i ) = ⎨ g (i ) = ⎨ ⎩− 1 if ri ∈ R2 ⎩− 1 if ci ∈ C2 ⎛ BR1 ,C1 BR1 ,C2 ⎞ ⎛ 0 B⎞ ⎛f ⎞ B=⎜ ⎟ W =⎜ T ⎟ q=⎜ ⎟ ⎜g⎟ ⎜ BR ,C BR2 ,C2 ⎟ ⎜B 0⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ 2 1 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ Substitute and obtain s (W12 ) s (W12 ) J MMC (C1 , C 2 ; R1 , R2 ) = + s (W11 ) s (W22 ) f,g are determined by ⎡⎛ Dr ⎞ ⎛ 0 B ⎞⎤⎛ f ⎞ ⎛ Dr ⎞⎛ f ⎞ ⎜ ⎢⎜ ⎟−⎜ T ⎟⎥⎜ ⎟ = λ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎢⎝ ⎣ Dc ⎟ ⎜ B ⎠ ⎝ 0 ⎟⎥⎜ g ⎟ ⎠⎦⎝ ⎠ ⎜ ⎝ Dc ⎟⎜ g ⎟ ⎠⎝ ⎠PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 77
- 23. Spectral Clustering of Bipartite Graphs Simultaneous clustering of rows and columns (adjacency matrix B ) s ( BR1 ,C2 ) = ∑ ∑b ri ∈R1c j ∈C 2 ij min between-cluster sum of xyz weights: s(R1,C2), s(R2,C1) max within-cluster sum of xyz cut xyz weights: s(R1,C1), s(R2,C2) s ( BR1 ,C2 ) + s ( B R2 ,C1 ) s ( B R1 ,C2 ) + s ( B R2 ,C1 ) J MMC (C1 , C 2 ; R1 , R2 ) = + 2 s ( B R1 ,C1 ) 2 s ( B R2 ,C2 ) (Ding, AI-STAT 2003)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 78
- 24. Internet Newsgroups Simultaneous clustering of documents and wordsPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 79
- 25. Embedding in Principal Subspace Cluster Self-Aggregation (proved in perturbation analysis) (Hall, 1970, “quadratic placement” (embedding) a graph)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 80
- 26. Spectral Embedding: Self-aggregation • Compute K eigenvectors of the Laplacian. • Embed objects in the K-dim eigenspace (Ding, 2004)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 81
- 27. Spectral embedding is not topology preserving 700 3-D data points form 2 interlock rings In eigenspace, they shrink and separatePCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 82
- 28. Spectral Embedding Simplex Embedding Theorem. Objects self-aggregate to K centroids Centroids locate on K corners of a simplex • Simplex consists K basis vectors + coordinate origin • Simplex is rotated by an orthogonal transformation T •T are determined by perturbation analysis (Ding, 2004)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 83
- 29. Perturbation Analysis Wq = λDq Wˆ z = ( D −1 / 2WD −1 / 2 ) z = λz q = D −1 / 2 z Assume data has 3 dense clusters sparsely connected. C2 ⎡W W W ⎤ 11 12 13 C1 W = ⎢ 21 W22 W23⎥ ⎢W ⎥ ⎢ 31 W32 W33⎥ ⎣W ⎦ C3 Off-diagonal blocks are between-cluster connections, assumed small and are treated as a perturbation (Ding et al, KDD’01)PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 84
- 30. Spectral Perturbation Theorem Orthogonal Transform Matrix T = (t1 ,L , t K ) T are determined by: Γt k = λ k t k −1 −1 Spectral Perturbation Matrix Γ=Ω 2 ΓΩ 2 ⎡ h11 − s12 L − s1K ⎤ s pq = s (C p , Cq ) ⎢− s L − s2 K ⎥ Γ = ⎢ 21 ⎢ M h22 M L M ⎥ ⎥ hkk = ∑ s p| p ≠ k kp ⎢ ⎥ ⎣− s K 1 − s K 2 L hKK ⎦ Ω = diag[ ρ (C1 ),L, ρ (Ck )]PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 85
- 31. Connectivity Network ⎧ 1 if i, j belong to same cluster Cij = ⎨ ⎩ 0 otherwise K Scaled PCA provides C≅D ∑k =1 qk λk qT D k K ∑ 1 Green’s function : C ≈G = qk qT k =2 1 − λk k K Projection matrix: C≈P≡ ∑k =1 qk qT kPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding (Ding et al, 2002) 86
- 32. Similarity matrix W 1st order Perturbation: Example 1 1st order solutionConnectivity λ2 = 0.300, λ2 = 0.268 matrix Between-cluster connections suppressed Within-cluster connections enhanced Effects of self-aggregationPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 87
- 33. Optimality Properties of Scaled PCA Scaled principal components have optimality properties: Ordering – Adjacent objects along the order are similar – Far-away objects along the order are dissimilar – Optimal solution for the permutation index are given by scaled PCA. Clustering – Maximize within-cluster similarity – Minimize between-cluster similarity – Optimal solution for cluster membership indicators given by scaled PCA.PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 88
- 34. Spectral Graph Ordering (Barnard, Pothen, Simon, 1993), envelop reduction of sparse matrix: find ordering such that the envelop is minimized min ∑ max j | i − j | wij ⇒ min ∑ ( xi − x j ) wij 2 i ij (Hall, 1970), “quadratic placement of a graph”: Find coordinate x to minimize J= ∑ ij ( xi − x j ) 2 wij = x T ( D − W ) x Solution are eigenvectors of LaplacianPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 89
- 35. Distance Sensitive Ordering Given a graph. Find an optimal Ordering of the nodes. π permutation indexes J (π ) = ∑ d n−d i =1 π i ,π i + d π (1,L, n) = (π 1 ,L, π n ) w ∩∩ ∩∩∩∩∩∩∩∩ wπ1 ,π 3 J d =2 (π ) : ∪∪∪∪∪∪∪∪ min J (π ) = ∑ n −1 d =1 d J d (π ) 2 π The larger distance, the larger weights, panelity.PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 90
- 36. Distance Sensitive Ordering J (π ) = ∑ (i − j ) wπ i ,π j = ∑ (i − j ) wπ i ,π j 2 2 ij π i ,π j = ∑ (π − π ) wi , j i −1 −1 2 j ij n2 π i−1 −( n +1) / 2 π −1 −( n +1) / 2 2 = 8 ij ∑( n/2 − j n/2 ) wi , j Define: shifted and rescaled inverse permutation indexes π i−1 − (n + 1) /2 1− n 3 − n n −1 qi = ={ , ,L, } n /2 n n n J (π ) = n2 8 ∑ (qi − q j ) wij = q ( D − W )q 2 n2 4 T ijPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 91
- 37. Distance Sensitive Ordering Once q2 is computed, since q2 (i ) < q2 ( j ) ⇒ π i −1 <π −1 j π i −1 can be uniquely recovered from q2 Implementation: sort q2 induces πPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 92
- 38. Re-ordering of Genes and Tissues J (π ) r= J (random) r = 0.18 J d =1 (π ) rd =1= J d =1 ( random ) rd =1 = 3.39PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 93
- 39. Spectral clustering vs Spectral ordering • Continuous approximation of both integer programming problems are given by the same eigenvector • Different problems could have the same continuous approximate solution. • Quality of the approximation: Ordering: better quality: the solution relax from a set of evenly spaced discrete values Clustering: less better quality: solution relax from 2 discrete valuesPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 94
- 40. Linearized Cluster Assignment Turn spectral clustering to 1D clustering problem • Spectral ordering on connectivity network • Cluster crossing – Sum of similarities along anti-diagonal – Gives 1-D curve with valleys and peaks – Divide valleys and peaks into clustersPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 95
- 41. Cluster overlap and crossing Given similarity W, and clusters A,B. • Cluster overlap s(A,B) = ∑∑ w i∈ A j∈B ij • Cluster crossing compute a smaller fraction of cluster overlap. • Cluster crossing depends on an ordering o. It sums weights cross the site i along the order m ρ (i ) = ∑ wo (i− j ),o (i+ j ) j =1 • This is a sum along anti-diagonals of W.PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 96
- 42. cluster crossingPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 97
- 43. K-way Clustering Experiments Accuracy of clustering results: Method Linearized Recursive 2-way Embedding Assignment clustering + K-means Data A 89.0% 82.8% 75.1% Data B 75.7% 67.2% 56.4%PCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 98
- 44. Some Additional Advanced/related Topics • Random talks and normalized cut • Semi-definite programming • Sub-sampling in spectral clustering • Extending to semi-supervised classification • Green’s function approach • Out-of-sample embedingPCA & Matrix Factorizations for Learning, ICML 2005 Tutorial, Chris Ding 99

No public clipboards found for this slide

Be the first to comment