the rhythms of occupy: broadcasting and listening practices on #ows

805 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
805
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

the rhythms of occupy: broadcasting and listening practices on #ows

  1. 1. THE RHYTHMS OF OCCUPY: BROADCASTING AND LISTENING PRACTICES ON #OWSSharon Meraz, PhD Zizi Papacharissi @zizipAssistant Professor, Communication Professor and Head, CommunicationUniversity of Illinois at Chicago University of Illinois at Chicago
  2. 2. premise and previous research•  Twi$er  as  news  repor-ng  mechanism   •  Established  news  values  guide  use  of  Twi$er   •  News  breaking/premedia-on/instantaneity   •  Homophily,  peripheral  awareness  and  ambient  news  environments,   hybridity    •  Twi$er  as  news  sharing  mechanism  during  uprisings   •  Electronic  word  of  mouth   •  Broadcas-ng  and  ‘listening  in’  on  uprisings   •  Homophily  and  group  iden-ty
  3. 3. theoretical framework Who says what to whom [w/what effect] Framing/Gatekeeping Networked Gatekeeping Process through which actors crowdsourced to prominence through the use of addressivity markers and conversational practices Networked Framing Process through which a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation attain prominence through crowdsourcing practices
  4. 4. research designRQ 1: How do tweets containing conversational markers describe the networked rhythms of content produced via #ows?RQ2: Who are the elite users across addressivity markers?RQ3: To what extent do hashtags provide organic level framing?Computerized content analysis, 10% stratified random sample,Oct 2011- July 2012Frequency analysis (SQL scripts), addressivity markers and hashtag frequencyDiscourse analysis isolated episodes of high addressivity/peaks, examine content, addressity patterns, focus of conversation, conversational tendencies
  5. 5. RQ1: Networked rhythms of content produced via #ows 6000 5000 4000 3000 count Mention RT 2000 Via 1000 0
  6. 6. RQ2: Networked Gatekeeping
  7. 7. RQ3: Networked Framing
  8. 8. Conversational practices and affordances(discourse analysis findings) •  Affect •  Performativity •  Openness and disorder •  ideological trolling, contention
  9. 9. conclusions and next steps•  Networked framing and gatekeeping over time•  [semantic analysis, discourse analysis]•  Digital textures, affective structures, and online footprints of movements•  Affective publics Thank you! @zizip uic.edu/~zizi

×