Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Lmxleader 130208005622-phpapp02

267 views

Published on

Leader-Member exchange theory

Published in: Leadership & Management
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Lmxleader 130208005622-phpapp02

  1. 1. Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX) • News • Quiz • Multiple-Linkage Model • Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) & Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) • Team Task Question: what is the relationship between leaders & followers & how does that affect response?
  2. 2. Multiple-Linkage Model (Yukl, 1994) • Recognizes complexity in formal organizations • Incorporates other theories • Leaders have short (tactical) and long term (strategic) impact • Short term relies on skillful correction of deficiencies of intervening variables in the work unit • Long term relies on leader changing situational variables to be more favorable (e.g., strategic planning, policy formation, program development, organizational change, political activity, etc. )
  3. 3. Short-term Long-term Extent to which these are appropriately used will reflect the leader’s success
  4. 4. Yukl’s Multiple Linkage Model
  5. 5. • Mission success • Member well being & commitment • Internal integration • External adaptability • Technical • Cognitive • Social • Personality • Motivation • Values • Analysis • Intent formation Influence • Directive • Contingent • Ach-oriented • Persuasive • Facilitative • Supportive • Participative • Delegative • Legitimate • Reward • Coercive • Information • Ecological • Responsibilities • Constraints • Opportunities • Resources • Structures • Procedures • Climate and culture • Strategic capabilities • Professional attributes • External relationships Uncontrollable factors • Task role clarity • Task proficiency • Motivation & effort confidence • Teamwork & cohesion • Professional conduct • Resilience • Professional image & reputation • Trust & confidence in Ldr • Support for the Ldr • Expert • Reference • Connection Leader characteristics Personal power Leader behavior Direct Position power Task, group, system, institution & environ. characteristics Individual /group behavior, capabilities & performance Essential Outcomes Secondary outcomes Modification of Yukl’s Model http://www.cda.forces.gc.ca/cfli-ilfc/lea/conc/ch8-eng.asp Leader Variables Situational Variables
  6. 6. Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) / Leader- Member Relations (LMX) • Think of a work/team situation in which there have been an “in-group (close to the boss) and “out-group” (well established but just not given those special tasks) • How what influenced the formation of those two groups? • What did the boss expect of each group? How did s/he treat them differently? • What were advantages and disadvantages of being in each group? • How did the groups perceive each other? • What was the effect on the work environment & relationships?
  7. 7. Vertical-Dyad Linkage (VDL) Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) (Dansereau, Cashman, & Graen, 1973) • While most leadership theories account for the impact of leadership on groups or the organization as a whole, Leader-Member Exchange Theory uniquely focuses on the Leader-Follower dyad. • Not every follower is treated the same by the leader due to time and resources. This differential treatment, expectation, and exchange separates followers into two groups: the “in-group” and “out- group” • Interaction varies from dyad to dyad, exchanging privilege for performance, & focuses on quality of interaction • Negotiating latitude: as relationship evolves, the leader enables the role incumbent to further define his/her own role Perceptions of the “out-group” when LMX is not going well
  8. 8. The Role theory of Katz and Kuhn (1966) is the original theoretical base of the LMX (Graen, 1976). Leaders accomplish their work through role sets, in which the leader is most influential. The leader communicates to the member a set of expectations regarding the appropriate role behavior of the member (role expectation). The member then receives and interprets these sent expectations (received role) and may modify his or her role behavior. Finally, the member's role behavior transmits feedback to the leader (monitored behavior). Burns and Otte (1999) describe the three stages: Phase 1: Role-taking as leaders and members come to understand how the other views and desires respect, the leader communicates role expectations to the member, with no reciprocal contribution from the member. Phase 2: Role-making is the trust that develops in order for leaders and members to further extend the relationship and influence over each other's attitudes and behaviors. Both contribute to role re-definition and this is where in/out work groups are differentiated Phase 3: Role-routinization of the social exchange pattern becomes established and routine http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/power_and_leadership.htm
  9. 9. Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Vertical-Dyad Linkage (VDL) Leader Subordinate Other Subordinates-- Viewed as having less potential, interest, or opportunity “Out-Group” • Comply with basic role requirements • Accept legitimate direction • Standard benefits and compensation • Alienation • Apathy • Hostility • Low performance “In-Group” • Unstructured tasks • Volunteer extra • Additional responsibilities • Special projects •Leadership potential •Competency •Compatibility •Agreement •Personality •Loyalty •Commitment Perceived Equity or Inequity • Inside information • Influence decisions • Task assignment • Job latitude • Support • Attention High----Negotiating Latitude-----Low High Power Leaders give more negotiating latitude to high power employees)
  10. 10. Strengths of LMX • As a descriptive theory, it notes the importance of the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization • The LMX theory is unique as the only leadership theory that makes the the dyadic relationship the central factor of the leadership process • LMX directs our attention to the importance of leadership communication and relationships • Research substantiates how the practice of the LMX theory is related to positive organizational outcomes http://www.d.umn.edu/~stau0106/group/LMX.doc Strengths & Weaknesses of LMX
  11. 11. Weaknesses of LMX http://www.d.umn.edu/~stau0106/group/LMX.doc • The LMX theory runs counter to basic human belief in fairness: It gives the appearance of discrimination against groups that don’t receive the special attention • The basic ideas and theory are not fully developed: details of compatibility of personality, interpersonal skills, how trust is developed, etc., are not presented or discussed how important they are compared to other constructs • Few empirical studies have used dyadic measures to analyze the LMX process • Measurement scales lack content validity (may lack what they intended to measure) and unclear whether they measure single or many dimensions
  12. 12. What makes a good “follower”?
  13. 13. Team Discussion • Pick a case you are familiar with that involves in/out group dynamics • Use the theory to analyze what went well/not well and why • If you were a trainer or consultant to this leader, write out a series of recommendations about what should be changed to improve the situation (consider selection criteria for subordinates, how in/out groups are framed, equity issues, opportunities to break into the in-group, dealing with alienation, etc.)

×