Staff Development Ii

327 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
327
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Staff Development Ii

  1. 1. Staff Development
  2. 2. Staff Development?
  3. 3. Barriers to Technology Staff Development <ul><li>Administrators don’t have a vision which includes technology’s capacity. </li></ul><ul><li>State education agencies lack resources and funding to support schools. </li></ul><ul><li>Technology staff development is underfunded. </li></ul><ul><li>Current structure of school days. </li></ul><ul><li>No consistent delivery model. </li></ul>
  4. 4. 10 Steps to Effective Technology Staff Development <ul><li>Develop a Staff Development Committee </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrate examples of how technology can be used. </li></ul><ul><li>Use a needs assessment instrument. </li></ul><ul><li>Design individual learning plans for each staff member </li></ul>
  5. 5. 10 Steps to Effective Technology Staff Development <ul><li>Identify the leaders </li></ul><ul><li>List on-site learning opportunities </li></ul><ul><li>List off-site learning opportunities </li></ul><ul><li>Provide time for grade/dept meetings </li></ul><ul><li>Share successes at staff meetings </li></ul><ul><li>Continue with ongoing planning and re-evaluating </li></ul>
  6. 7. Foundations of the IPD Model <ul><li>School Improvement/Staff development driven by student learning needs </li></ul><ul><li>The Focus is on Instruction & Curriculum </li></ul><ul><li>Improving student learning works best with efforts of collectivities. </li></ul><ul><li>Collection/analysis of data guide the entire Prof. Dev. Process. </li></ul>
  7. 8. Simultaneity
  8. 9. Foundations of the IPD Model <ul><li>Specific student learning goals provide direction for selecting Prof. Dev. </li></ul><ul><li>Content selected for Prof. Dev. is research-based. </li></ul><ul><li>Prof. Dev. Process is cyclical. </li></ul>
  9. 10. Research-Based
  10. 11. Content Network
  11. 12. PD is Cyclical <ul><li>Intensive PD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Follow-up, support, tech assistance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Collaboration </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Teachers work together on reg. basis </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Study of Implementation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Faculty study student data </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Evaluation (Formative/Summative) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Systematic collection of relevant data </li></ul></ul>
  12. 14. Cyclical Design
  13. 15. Let’s Look at Your SD Plans <ul><li>Review your plan </li></ul><ul><li>Can you find the parts of the Iowa Model? </li></ul><ul><li>What needs to be added? </li></ul><ul><li>How would you make changes? </li></ul>
  14. 16. Creating A PD Plan <ul><li>Form PD team </li></ul><ul><li>Collect and Analyze Data </li></ul><ul><li>Identify Student Needs </li></ul><ul><li>Discuss School’s Data </li></ul><ul><li>Establish Target for Building-Level PD </li></ul><ul><li>Select Content </li></ul><ul><li>Design an Process </li></ul>
  15. 17. Creating A PD Plan <ul><li>Ongoing Cycle </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Training Opportunities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Implementation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaboration </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Evaluation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Formative </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Summative </li></ul></ul>

×