1
Informatika
Benchmarking Kurikulum
Sistem Informasi
Indriani Noor Hapsari, M. T.
(indriani.nh@gmail.com)
2
KK - Informatika
Pendahuluan
• Tujuan
• Peserta memahami keragaman kurikulum Sistem Informasi.
• Mengidentifikasi dugaan...
3
KK - Informatika
Perkembangan Sistem Informasi
• The IS discipline has a history that it has been recognized and
grown a...
4
KK - Informatika
Ringkasan Model Kurikulum SI 2010
(IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate
Degree Programs in ...
5
KK - Informatika
Benchmarking Program SI
di Indonesia
Prodi Fakultas/Sekolah Institusi
STI Sekolah Teknik Elektro dan In...
6
KK - Informatika
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
ITB
UI
ITS
UGM
GNDARMA
BINUS
Benchmarking Program SI
di Indonesia
Univ.
I...
7
KK - Informatika
Capabilities and Knowledge Expected for IS
Program Graduates
ANALYTICAL AND
CRITICAL THINKING
Organizat...
8
KK - Informatika
Outcome Expectations for
IS Program Graduates
IS SPESIFIC
KNOWLEDGE
AND SKILLS
I.A Identifying and desi...
9
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (ITB)
2%
10%
2%
4%
2%
6%
24%
6%
1% 1%
6%
2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Dugaan Kompete...
10
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (UI)
2%
17%
10%
2% 2%
4%
2%2%
28%
2% 2%
9%
2%
8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Dugaan K...
11
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (ITS)
10%
2%
24%
14%
0%
3%
0% 0%
7%
0%
8%
5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Dugaan Kompe...
12
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (UGM)
0% 0%
29%
2%
0% 0% 0%
2%
6%
1% 0% 0%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Dugaan Komp...
13
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (GUNADARMA)
11%
4% 4%5%
45%
1% 1%
5%
3%
11%
2%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%...
14
KK - Informatika
Competence Mapping (BINUS)
8%
41%
8%
3%
10%
3% 3%5%
27%
3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%...
15
KK - Informatika
Information System in Japan
• The word MIS remains more popular than IS in Japan and there are
many mo...
16
KK - Informatika
Distribution of Academic Affiliation in AIS, JASMIN, JSIM
17
KK - Informatika
IS in Korea
• IS began to be considered as a field of academic study in the mid-
1980s.
• Most dominan...
18
KK - Informatika
IS in Korea:
Administrative Placement of IS Groups
19
KK - Informatika
IS in Singapore
• IS curriculum in National University of Singapore aims to
produce technically-strong...
20
KK - Informatika
IS in Singapore
The IS curriculum in Singapore generally follows the
curriculum outlined by the AIS bu...
21
KK - Informatika
IS in Taiwan
• The first IS department was started in 1981.
• IS is regarded as a business discipline ...
22
KK - Informatika
IS in Taiwan
Course Distribution in Different Programs
23
KK - Informatika
IS in Australia
• The organizational location of IS in Australian universities
has been highly varied ...
24
KK - Informatika
Case
Study:
IS in
Queens-
land
25
KK - Informatika
IS in Asia Pasific
(Guy G. Gable, 2007)
26
KK - Informatika
Akreditasi Internasional
untuk Program SI
• AACSB (The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Bu...
27
KK - Informatika
ABET IS Accredited Characteristics (2006-2012)
(MacKinnon et al, 2012)
28
KK - Informatika
Sample Univ. Degrees & Business Credits
Required
(MacKinnon et al, 2012)
29
KK - Informatika
ABET IS Requirements 2012
(MacKinnon et al, 2012)
30
KK - Informatika
Adopsi Panduan IS2010
pada Program SI Terakreditasi AACSB
• IS 2010.2―Data and Information Management
...
31
KK - Informatika
Penutup
• Mayoritas Program SI di Indonesia berada di bawah
fakultas/institusi teknik/CS dan dominan d...
32
KK - Informatika
Referensi
• Guy G. Gable, 2007. The Information Systems Academic Discipline in
Pasific Asia: A Context...
33
KK - Informatika
Referensi
• Osam Sato, Takeshi Kosaka, Paul Turner. 2009. Information
Systems Research and Academic So...
34
KK - Informatika
Referensi
• Kurikulum SI Universitas Gunadarma
http://filkom.gunadarma.ac.id/sisinformasi/page/detail/...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

03 slide inh & ks - benchmarking kurikulum

624 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
624
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

03 slide inh & ks - benchmarking kurikulum

  1. 1. 1 Informatika Benchmarking Kurikulum Sistem Informasi Indriani Noor Hapsari, M. T. (indriani.nh@gmail.com)
  2. 2. 2 KK - Informatika Pendahuluan • Tujuan • Peserta memahami keragaman kurikulum Sistem Informasi. • Mengidentifikasi dugaan kompetensi lulusan dalam keragaman kurikulum Sistem Informasi.
  3. 3. 3 KK - Informatika Perkembangan Sistem Informasi • The IS discipline has a history that it has been recognized and grown as a typical interdisciplinary field from many related research domains, especially from organization sciences (OS), computer sciences (CS), and management sciences (MS) (Culnan et al., 1986; Grover et al, 2006).(Sato, 2009) • MIS Quarterly (MISQ) was only first published in 1977. (Sato, 2009) • Model Kurikulum SI diperkenalkan sejak th 1995 (IS’95 MIS Quarterly) dan mengalami penyesuaian terakhir kali pada tahun 2010 (IS2010, Communications of the Association of Information Systems) (Corbin et al, 2013)
  4. 4. 4 KK - Informatika Ringkasan Model Kurikulum SI 2010 (IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems) • Motivasi Perubahan: • Accommodate IS outside business school context • Address lack of flexibility in IS 2002―Introduce career tracks to avoid a single career objective • Expand input from the global community • Strong focus on deriving the curriculum from outcome expectations • Importance of serving local needs • Rekomendasi • Includes required (7 core) and electives options. The core topics do not necessarily map directly to courses. Rather, topics can be combined into one or more courses according to local resources and constraints. • Introduces career tracks based on groupings of electives: to expand the scope of the target IS programs beyond business-school-centric models (Corbin Bell et al, 2013)
  5. 5. 5 KK - Informatika Benchmarking Program SI di Indonesia Prodi Fakultas/Sekolah Institusi STI Sekolah Teknik Elektro dan Informatika ITB SI Fakultas Ilmu Komputer UI SI Fakultas Teknologi Informasi ITS TI Fakultas Teknik UGM SI Fakultas Ilmu Komputer GUNADARMA SI Sekolah Sistem Informasi BINUS
  6. 6. 6 KK - Informatika 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 ITB UI ITS UGM GNDARMA BINUS Benchmarking Program SI di Indonesia Univ. IS Credits IS Credits IS Credits Programming Credits Business Credits TOTAL Credits Required Electives TOTAL Required Required ITB 42 12 54 6 0 144 UI 45 24 69 13 3 144 ITS 71 8 89 7 6 144 UGM 30 12 42 18 2 144 GNDARMA 56 20 76 23 4 152* BINUS 36 28 64 8 10 146 Mapping keragaman kompetensi dilakukan berdasarkan outcome expectations terdefinisi dalam Panduan IS2010. * perkiraan
  7. 7. 7 KK - Informatika Capabilities and Knowledge Expected for IS Program Graduates ANALYTICAL AND CRITICAL THINKING Organizational Problem Solving Ethics and Professionalism Creativity BUSINESS FUNDAMENTALS Business Models Functional Business Area Evaluation of Business Performance INTERPERSONAL, COMMUNICATION, AND TEAM SKILLS Interpersonal Teamwork and Leadership Communication TECHNOLOGY Application Development Internet Systems Architecture and Development Database Design and Administration System Infrastructure and Integration TECHNOLOGY- ENABLED BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT System Analysis and Design Business Process Design System Implementation IS Project Management (ACM IS2002)
  8. 8. 8 KK - Informatika Outcome Expectations for IS Program Graduates IS SPESIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS I.A Identifying and designing opportunities for IT-enabled organizational improvement. I. B Analyzing trade-offs. I.C Designing and implementing information systems solutions. I.D Managing ongoing information technology operations. FOUNDATIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL II.A Leadership and Collaboration II.B Communication II.C Negotiation II.D Analytical and critical thinking, including creativity and ethical analysis. II.E Mathematical Foundation KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL RELATED TO DOMAIN FUNDAMENTAL III.A General models of the domain. III.B Key specializations within the domain. III.C Evaluation of performance within the domain. (ACM IS2010)
  9. 9. 9 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (ITB) 2% 10% 2% 4% 2% 6% 24% 6% 1% 1% 6% 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (ITB) Kompetensi Bidang Minat Kompetensi Inti
  10. 10. 10 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (UI) 2% 17% 10% 2% 2% 4% 2%2% 28% 2% 2% 9% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (UI) Kompetensi Bidang Minat Kompetensi Inti
  11. 11. 11 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (ITS) 10% 2% 24% 14% 0% 3% 0% 0% 7% 0% 8% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (ITS) Kompetensi Inti
  12. 12. 12 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (UGM) 0% 0% 29% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 6% 1% 0% 0%0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (UGM) Kompetensi Inti
  13. 13. 13 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (GUNADARMA) 11% 4% 4%5% 45% 1% 1% 5% 3% 11% 2%0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (Gunadarma) Kompetensi Bidang Minat Kompetensi Inti
  14. 14. 14 KK - Informatika Competence Mapping (BINUS) 8% 41% 8% 3% 10% 3% 3%5% 27% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Dugaan Kompetensi Lulusan (Binus) Kompetensi Bidang Minat Kompetensi Inti
  15. 15. 15 KK - Informatika Information System in Japan • The word MIS remains more popular than IS in Japan and there are many more departments of MIS in the universities. • IS still has not been recognized as an independent discipline, and its education is usually organized as a sub-department. Otherwise, IS education is conducted as a part of IT (CS) education in a school as a course (class in Japanese). • Differences in Japanese & International IS research • The broader focus and diversity in research topics and range of contributors as well as the administrative placement of IS academics within Japanese universities • Membership of Japanese IS societies also appears to be much more diverse than those of comparable international counterparts. • There is a stronger business focus in the AIS than amongst the Japanese IS societies. • Japanese universities also appear to contain fewer dedicated IS academics with many staff being drawn from a diverse range of other disciplines. (Sato et al, 2009)
  16. 16. 16 KK - Informatika Distribution of Academic Affiliation in AIS, JASMIN, JSIM
  17. 17. 17 KK - Informatika IS in Korea • IS began to be considered as a field of academic study in the mid- 1980s. • Most dominant IS Programs name in Korea is “Management Information Systems,”; located under the College of Business Administration as one of the majors or one of the departments. • There exist two major ways to understand the departmental location of IS in Korea. • IS as a major: has been mainly adopted by top-tier schools. • IS as a department under a business school: has been considered by second-tier schools. • Korean scholars seem to agree that the IS discipline should be in a business school as a major rather than as a separate department. This only means that IS as a discipline in Korea is not in its mature stage yet. (Jae-Nam Lee, Seung-Weon Yoo, 2007)
  18. 18. 18 KK - Informatika IS in Korea: Administrative Placement of IS Groups
  19. 19. 19 KK - Informatika IS in Singapore • IS curriculum in National University of Singapore aims to produce technically-strong students that could effectively deploy IT for business • Nanyang Technological University aims to produce business students who understand IT and are able to identify and deploy IT in enhancing/supporting their business functions. • Singapore Management University aims to produce IS students who understand business processes/architecture and how IT could be deployed in the context of these processes. (Jae-Nam Lee, Seung-Weon Yoo, 2007)
  20. 20. 20 KK - Informatika IS in Singapore The IS curriculum in Singapore generally follows the curriculum outlined by the AIS but also includes some distinctive subjects developed on the advice of the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore, which conducts surveys into local industry needs.
  21. 21. 21 KK - Informatika IS in Taiwan • The first IS department was started in 1981. • IS is regarded as a business discipline and is generally called Information Management. • Information Management programs in Taiwan differ somewhat from the typical IS program in the United States in that students are required to learn not only the strategic and organizational aspects of information systems but place much emphasis on programming and systems development. • Most graduates find a ready market for this combination of technical and business skills in Taiwan’s high-tech manufacturing or service industries. • Recruiters indicated that they need candidates to be able to develop in- house application systems and maintain servers, in addition to handling organizational issues.
  22. 22. 22 KK - Informatika IS in Taiwan Course Distribution in Different Programs
  23. 23. 23 KK - Informatika IS in Australia • The organizational location of IS in Australian universities has been highly varied from the outset. In 2006, more universities had IS located within a business faculty than within a technology faculty (ratio 60/40). • Five universities had two separate IS groups, with one group in business and one in technology. • The diversity of curriculum approaches, the disparate administrative location of IS academics, and the lack of a strong identity for IS in some universities led to the conclusion that IS has a low degree of “professionalisation” relative to longer-standing disciplines. IS cannot yet be considered a mature, distinct academic discipline in Australia. (Guy G. Gable, 2007)
  24. 24. 24 KK - Informatika Case Study: IS in Queens- land
  25. 25. 25 KK - Informatika IS in Asia Pasific (Guy G. Gable, 2007)
  26. 26. 26 KK - Informatika Akreditasi Internasional untuk Program SI • AACSB (The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) • by December 2011 AACSB has accredited 643 business and accounting programs. • ABET (The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) • ABET has been accrediting engineering programs since 1936, almost every engineering program in the US is ABET accredited. • In 1985 ABET helped to establish the Computer Science Accreditation Board (CSAB) and ABET has also become the standard for CS accreditation. • ABET started to accredit IS programs in 2000, 92% of the IS programs that he surveyed had their business school accredited by AACSB and less that 1% of them were accredited by ABET • Over the past 10 years 35 programs have been accredited: IS programs have 33 BS degrees and only one BBA degree. • dll.
  27. 27. 27 KK - Informatika ABET IS Accredited Characteristics (2006-2012) (MacKinnon et al, 2012)
  28. 28. 28 KK - Informatika Sample Univ. Degrees & Business Credits Required (MacKinnon et al, 2012)
  29. 29. 29 KK - Informatika ABET IS Requirements 2012 (MacKinnon et al, 2012)
  30. 30. 30 KK - Informatika Adopsi Panduan IS2010 pada Program SI Terakreditasi AACSB • IS 2010.2―Data and Information Management • IS 2010.1―Foundations of Information Systems • IS 2010.5―IT Infrastructure • IS 2010.6―Systems Analysis and Design • IS 2010.7―IS Strategy, Management, and Acquisition. • IS 2010.3―Enterprise Architecture 97% >50% 17% 29% (Corbin Bell et al, 2013)
  31. 31. 31 KK - Informatika Penutup • Mayoritas Program SI di Indonesia berada di bawah fakultas/institusi teknik/CS dan dominan dalam perancangan dan implementasi solusi. • Ragam disiplin Sistem Informasi dalam berbagai universitas/negara menunjukkan tahapan perkembangan yang berbeda sesuai dengan faktor unik tiap universitas/negara. • Perubahan perkembangan disiplin Sistem Informasi sangat cepat dan luasnya irisan dengan domain dan disiplin ilmu lainnya juga menjadi salah satu pemicu ragam disiplin SI di dunia.
  32. 32. 32 KK - Informatika Referensi • Guy G. Gable, 2007. The Information Systems Academic Discipline in Pasific Asia: A Contextual Analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 21, No.1) 23-48. • Guy G. Gable, 2007. The Information Systems Academic Discipline in Australia. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 21, No.2) 1-22. • Jae-Nam Lee, Seung-Weon Yoo. 2007. The Information Systems Academic Discipline in Korea: A Focus on Leading Universities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 21, No.4) 61-86. • Bernard C.Y. Tan, Taizan Chan. 2007. The Information Systems Academic Discipline in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 21, No.6) 104-115.
  33. 33. 33 KK - Informatika Referensi • Osam Sato, Takeshi Kosaka, Paul Turner. 2009. Information Systems Research and Academic Societies in Japan: an Overview. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 1, No. 2) 53-71. • Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) - Association for Information Systems (AIS). 2010. IS 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Program in Information Systems. • Corbin Bell, Robert Mills, Kelly Fadel. 2013. An Analysis of Undergraduate Information Systems Curricula: Adoption of the IS 2010 Curriculum Guidelines. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 32, 2013) 73- 94.
  34. 34. 34 KK - Informatika Referensi • Kurikulum SI Universitas Gunadarma http://filkom.gunadarma.ac.id/sisinformasi/page/detail/39/Kurikulum • Kurikulum SI Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November • http://is.its.ac.id/scholar/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/kurikulum.pdf • Kurikulum SI Universitas Indonesia • http://www.cs.ui.ac.id/id/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Kurikulum_2010.pdf • Kurikulum STI Institut Teknologi Bandung • Kurikulum SI Bina Nusantara • http://curriculum.binus.ac.id/files/2012/04/IS.pdf • Kurikulum TI Universitas Gadjah Mada • http://s1.te.ugm.ac.id/index.php?main=WjhKS0xVVk9iIHpR=&part=Y0ZK=&vs=Qg===

×