Apache HBase Low Latency

1. HBase Low Latency Nick Dimiduk, Hortonworks (@xefyr) Nicolas Liochon, Scaled Risk (@nkeywal) HBaseCon May 5, 2014

2. Agenda •  Latency, what is it, how to measure it •  Write path •  Read path •  Next steps

3. What’s low latency Latency is about percenJles •  Average != 50% percenJle •  There are oRen order of magnitudes between « average » and « 95 percenJle » •  Post 99% = « magical 1% ». Work in progress here. •  Meaning from micro seconds (High Frequency Trading) to seconds (interacJve queries) •  In this talk milliseconds

4. Measure latency bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluaJon •  More opJons related to HBase: autoﬂush, replicas, … •  Latency measured in micro second •  Easier for internal analysis YCSB -‐ Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark •  Useful for comparison between databases •  Set of workload already deﬁned

5. Write path •  Two parts •  Single put (WAL) •  The client just sends the put •  MulJple puts from the client (new behavior since 0.96) •  The client is much smarter •  Four stages to look at for latency •  Start (establish tcp connecJons, etc.) •  Steady: when expected condiJons are met •  Machine failure: expected as well •  Overloaded system

6. Single put: communica>on & scheduling •  Client: TCP connecJon to the server •  Shared: mulJtheads on the same client are using the same TCP connecJon •  Pooling is possible and does improve the performances in some circonstances •  hbase.client.ipc.pool.size •  Server: mulJple calls from mulJple threads on mulJple machines •  Can become thousand of simultaneous queries •  Scheduling is required

7. Single put: real work •  The server must •  Write into the WAL queue •  Sync the WAL queue (HDFS ﬂush) •  Write into the memstore •  WALs queue is shared between all the regions/handlers •  Sync is avoided if another handlers did the work •  You may ﬂush more than expected

8. Simple put: A small run Percen&le Time in ms Mean 1.21 50% 0.95 95% 1.50 99% 2.12

9. Latency sources •  Candidate one: network •  0.5ms within a datacenter •  Much less between nodes in the same rack Percen&le Time in ms Mean 0.13 50% 0.12 95% 0.15 99% 0.47

10. Latency sources •  Candidate two: HDFS Flush •  We can sJll do beier: HADOOP-‐7714 & sons. Percen&le Time in ms Mean 0.33 50% 0.26 95% 0.59 99% 1.24

11. Latency sources •  Millisecond world: everything can go wrong •  JVM •  Network •  OS Scheduler •  File System •  All this goes into the post 99% percenJle •  Requires monitoring •  Usually using the latest version shelps.

12. Latency sources •  Split (and presplits) •  Autosharding is great! •  Puts have to wait •  Impacts: seconds •  Balance •  Regions move •  Triggers a retry for the client •  hbase.client.pause = 100ms since HBase 0.96 •  Garbage CollecJon •  Impacts: 10’s of ms, even with a good conﬁg •  Covered with the read path of this talk

13. From steady to loaded and overloaded •  Number of concurrent tasks is a factor of •  Number of cores •  Number of disks •  Number of remote machines used •  Diﬃcult to esJmate •  Queues are doomed to happen •  hbase.regionserver.handler.count •  So for low latency •  Replable scheduler since HBase 0.98 (HBASE-‐8884). Requires speciﬁc code. •  RPC PrioriJes: work in progress (HBASE-‐11048)

14. From loaded to overloaded •  MemStore takes too much room: flush, then blocksquite quickly •  hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.size.lower.limit •  hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.size •  hbase.hregion.memstore.block.multiplier •  Too many Hfiles: block unJl compacJons keep up •  hbase.hstore.blockingStoreFiles •  Too many WALs files: Flush and block •  hbase.regionserver.maxlogs

15. Machine failure •  Failure •  Dectect •  Reallocate •  Replay WAL •  Replaying WAL is NOT required for puts •  hbase.master.distributed.log.replay •  (default true in 1.0) •  Failure = Dectect + Reallocate + Retry •  That’s in the range of ~1s for simple failures •  Silent failures leads puts you in the 10s range if the hardware does not help •  zookeeper.session.timeout

16. Single puts •  Millisecond range •  Spikes do happen in steady mode •  100ms •  Causes: GC, load, splits

17. Streaming puts Htable#setAutoFlushTo(false)! Htable#put! Htable#flushCommit! •  As simple puts, but •  Puts are grouped and send in background •  Load is taken into account •  Does not block

18. Mul>ple puts hbase.client.max.total.tasks (default 100) hbase.client.max.perserver.tasks (default 5) hbase.client.max.perregion.tasks (default 1) •  Decouple the client from a latency spike of a region server •  Increase the throughput by 50% compared to old mulJput •  Makes split and GC more transparent

19. Conclusion on write path •  Single puts can be very fast •  It’s not a « hard real Jme » system: there are spikes •  Most latency spikes can be hidden when streaming puts •  Failure are NOT that diﬃcult for the write path •  No WAL to replay

20. And now for the read path

21. Read path •  Get/short scan are assumed for low-‐latency operaJons •  Again, two APIs •  Single get: HTable#get(Get) •  MulJ-‐get: HTable#get(List<Get>) •  Four stages, same as write path •  Start (tcp connecJon, …) •  Steady: when expected condiJons are met •  Machine failure: expected as well •  Overloaded system: you may need to add machines or tune your workload

22. Mul> get / Client Group Gets by RegionServer Execute them one by one

23. Mul> get / Server

24. Mul> get / Server

25. Access latency magnides Storage hierarchy: a different view Dean/2009 Memory is 100000x faster than disk! Disk seek = 10ms

26. Known unknowns •  For each candidate HFile •  Exclude by ﬁle metadata •  Timestamp •  Rowkey range •  Exclude by bloom ﬁlter StoreFileScanner# shouldUseScanner()

27. Unknown knowns •  Merge sort results polled from Stores •  Seek each scanner to a reference KeyValue •  Retrieve candidate data from disk •  MulJple HFiles => mulitple seeks •  hbase.storescanner.parallel.seek.enable=true •  Short Circuit Reads •  dfs.client.read.shortcircuit=true •  Block locality •  Happy clusters compact! HFileBlock# readBlockData()

28. BlockCache •  Reuse previously read data •  Maximize cache hit rate •  Larger cache •  Temporal access locality •  Physical access locality BlockCache#getBlock()

29. BlockCache Showdown •  LruBlockCache •  Default, onheap •  Quite good most of the Jme •  EvicJons impact GC •  BucketCache •  Oxeap alternaJve •  SerializaJon overhead •  Large memory conﬁguraJons hip://www.n10k.com/blog/ blockcache-‐showdown/ L2 oﬀ-‐heap BucketCache makes a strong showing

30. Latency enemies: Garbage Collec>on •  Use heap. Not too much. With CMS. •  Max heap •  30GB (compressed pointers) •  8-‐16GB if you care about 9’s •  Healthy cluster load •  regular, reliable collecJons •  25-‐100ms pause on regular interval •  Overloaded RegionServer suﬀers GC overmuch

31. Oﬀ-‐heap to the rescue? •  BucketCache (0.96, HBASE-‐7404) •  Network interfaces (HBASE-‐9535) •  MemStore et al (HBASE-‐10191)

32. Latency enemies: Compac>ons •  Fewer HFiles => fewer seeks •  Evict data blocks! •  Evict Index blocks!! •  hfile.block.index.cacheonwrite •  Evict bloom blocks!!! •  hfile.block.bloom.cacheonwrite •  OS buffer cache to the rescue •  Compactected data is sJll fresh •  Beier than going all the way back to disk

33. Failure •  Detect + Reassign + Replay •  Strong consistency requires replay •  Locality drops to 0 •  Cache starts from scratch

34. Hedging our bets •  HDFS Hedged reads (2.4, HDFS-‐5776) •  Reads on secondary DataNodes •  Strongly consistent •  Works at the HDFS level •  Timeline consistency (HBASE-‐10070) •  Reads on « Replica Region » •  Not strongly consistent

35. Read latency in summary •  Steady mode •  Cache hit: < 1 ms •  Cache miss: + 10 ms per seek •  WriJng while reading => cache churn •  GC: 25-‐100ms pause on regular interval Network request + (1 -‐ P(cache hit)) * (10 ms * seeks) •  Same long tail issues as write •  Overloaded: same scheduling issues as write •  ParJal failures hurt a lot

36. HBase ranges for 99% latency Put Streamed Mul&put Get Timeline get Steady milliseconds milliseconds milliseconds milliseconds Failure seconds seconds seconds milliseconds GC 10’s of milliseconds milliseconds 10’s of milliseconds milliseconds

37. What’s next •  Less GC •  Use less objects •  Oxeap •  Compressed BlockCache (HBASE-‐8894) •  Prefered locaJon (HBASE-‐4755) •  The « magical 1% » •  Most tools stops at the 99% latency •  What happens aRer is much more complex

38. Thanks! Nick Dimiduk, Hortonworks (@xefyr) Nicolas Liochon, Scaled Risk (@nkeywal) HBaseCon May 5, 2014

Apache HBase Low Latency

You are reading a preview.

Apache HBase Low Latency

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Similar to Apache HBase Low Latency

More from Nick Dimiduk

Featured

Related Books

Related Audiobooks