Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Aga Bojko - NeuroUX: Smoke and Mirrors or the Future of UX Research

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 135 Ad

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (15)

Advertisement

Aga Bojko - NeuroUX: Smoke and Mirrors or the Future of UX Research

  1. 1. n eu r oUX @agabojko smoke and mirrors or the future of user experience research? Aga Bojko, GfK User Centric neljapäev, 29. november 12
  2. 2. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  3. 3. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  4. 4. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  5. 5. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  6. 6. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  7. 7. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  8. 8. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  9. 9. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  10. 10. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  11. 11. Image Source: http://talipsisman.deviantart.com/art/Future-City-182675382 neljapäev, 29. november 12 “you should talk about the future of UX”
  12. 12. yeah OK, let me just get my crystal ball… neljapäev, 29. november 12
  13. 13. emerging UX research methods neljapäev, 29. november 12
  14. 14. what about old-school research methods? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  15. 15. observing what people do neljapäev, 29. november 12
  16. 16. listening to what people say neljapäev, 29. november 12
  17. 17. user testing = foundation of UX research neljapäev, 29. november 12
  18. 18. but the UX field is maturing… neljapäev, 29. november 12
  19. 19. people have many options neljapäev, 29. november 12
  20. 20. people have many options neljapäev, 29. november 12
  21. 21. people have many options neljapäev, 29. november 12
  22. 22. same product, different brands neljapäev, 29. november 12
  23. 23. usability is not enough to win the race neljapäev, 29. november 12
  24. 24. experiences must exceed expectations neljapäev, 29. november 12
  25. 25. but how do we measure that? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  26. 26. what do users think? how do they feel? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  27. 27. UX researchers are digging deeper neljapäev, 29. november 12
  28. 28. starting to use sophisticated instruments neljapäev, 29. november 12
  29. 29. to understand biological reactions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  30. 30. recognizing facial expressions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  31. 31. measuring brain activity neljapäev, 29. november 12
  32. 32. tracking users’ eye movements neljapäev, 29. november 12
  33. 33. to better understand the user experience neljapäev, 29. november 12
  34. 34. recognizing facial expressions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  35. 35. why care about facial expressions? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  36. 36. facial expressions indicate emotions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  37. 37. facial expressions indicate emotions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  38. 38. facial expressions indicate emotions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  39. 39. from Charles Darwin to Paul Ekman neljapäev, 29. november 12
  40. 40. facial action coding system (FACS) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  41. 41. Anger: 4+5+7+23 Disgust: 9+15+16 Fear: 1+2+4+5+20+26 Happiness: 6+12 Sadness: 1+4+15 Surprise: 1+2+5B+26 Contempt: R12A+R14A FACS affect interpretation dictionary neljapäev, 29. november 12
  42. 42. Image Source: http://www.emg-eeg.com/tag/beyin-damar-ultrasonu neljapäev, 29. november 12 facial electromyography (fEMG)
  43. 43. video-based solutions are less intrusive neljapäev, 29. november 12
  44. 44. Image Source: http://thirdsight.co/products/emovision/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 EmoVision dashboard
  45. 45. Image Source: http://www.noldus.com/human-behavior-research/products/facereader neljapäev, 29. november 12 FaceReader dashboard
  46. 46. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  47. 47. requires stable head (no talking!) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  48. 48. no face touching neljapäev, 29. november 12
  49. 49. doesn’t work well with glasses neljapäev, 29. november 12
  50. 50. facial hair can be a problem neljapäev, 29. november 12
  51. 51. needs more lighting than usual neljapäev, 29. november 12
  52. 52. recognizes simple & strong expressions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  53. 53. recognizes simple & strong expressions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  54. 54. …but participants’ expressions are subtle neljapäev, 29. november 12
  55. 55. m e as u ring br ain a ctivity neljapäev, 29. november 12
  56. 56. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  57. 57. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  58. 58. brain parts map to cognitive functions neljapäev, 29. november 12
  59. 59. fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging neljapäev, 29. november 12
  60. 60. fMRI machine = giant donut magnet neljapäev, 29. november 12
  61. 61. loud and you can’t move neljapäev, 29. november 12
  62. 62. Image Source: http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/davidson08.html neljapäev, 29. november 12 the control room
  63. 63. Image Source: http://www.news.wisc.edu/newsphotos/davidson08.html neljapäev, 29. november 12 the control room
  64. 64. the brain is always on neljapäev, 29. november 12
  65. 65. ge Source: http://www.baars-gage.com/ to learn anything, we must subtract neljapäev, 29. november 12
  66. 66. if we want to see where emotions live… neljapäev, 29. november 12
  67. 67. Image Source: http://www.baars-gage.co neljapäev, 29. november 12
  68. 68. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  69. 69. e Source: http://www.moderncancertreatments.com/heart-health/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 coke vs. pepsi fMRI study
  70. 70. published in “neuron” in 2004 Article Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627304006129 neljapäev, 29. november 12
  71. 71. what participants saw and tasted Image Source: http://www.yalescientific.org/2011/05/your-brain-on-food neljapäev, 29. november 12
  72. 72. how did the brain react? ? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  73. 73. how did the brain react? [ brand-cued brain activity [ - [ light-cued brain activity [ = hippocampus DLPFC neljapäev, 29. november 12
  74. 74. pepsi = taste coke = taste + brand neljapäev, 29. november 12
  75. 75. who uses fMRI to understand users? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  76. 76. who uses fMRI to understand users? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  77. 77. who uses fMRI to understand users? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  78. 78. who uses fMRI to understand users? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  79. 79. low temporal resolution (slow) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  80. 80. subjects can’t move Image Source: http://www.newswise.com/articles/intervention-helps-children-with-sickle-cell-disease-complete-mri-tests-without-sedation neljapäev, 29. november 12
  81. 81. costs $1 to 5 million neljapäev, 29. november 12
  82. 82. Image Source: http://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2012/05/3-t-gets-new-home.html neljapäev, 29. november 12 weighs 5 – 10 tons
  83. 83. Image Source: http://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2012/05/3-t-gets-new-home.html neljapäev, 29. november 12 not very portable
  84. 84. Image Source: http://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2012/05/3-t-gets-new-home.html neljapäev, 29. november 12 not very portable
  85. 85. Image Source: http://stopczynski.com/category/uncategorized/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 EEG = electroencephalography
  86. 86. electrical activity of the brain (raw data) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  87. 87. “doesn’t show valence” neljapäev, 29. november 12
  88. 88. but showing valence seems to be possible neljapäev, 29. november 12
  89. 89. cheaper and more portable than fMRI neljapäev, 29. november 12
  90. 90. better temporal resolution (real-time) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  91. 91. rce: https://share.sandia.gov/news/resources/news_releases/brain_study/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 conductive gel but no hair gel
  92. 92. Image Source: http://www.fuelyourproductdesign.com/mind-control-is-the-next-user-interface/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 emotiv headset (dry EEG)
  93. 93. poor spatial resolution (best for surface) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  94. 94. we must bridge the gap neljapäev, 29. november 12
  95. 95. e ye tr acking neljapäev, 29. november 12
  96. 96. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  97. 97. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  98. 98. way back when neljapäev, 29. november 12
  99. 99. NOW: misleadingly easy  a lot of misuse neljapäev, 29. november 12
  100. 100. why do the eyes move? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  101. 101. it’s all about the fovea neljapäev, 29. november 12
  102. 102. eyes move to bring things into focus neljapäev, 29. november 12
  103. 103. looking (foveating) ≈ paying attention neljapäev, 29. november 12
  104. 104. Tobii T60 (remote eye tracker) neljapäev, 29. november 12
  105. 105. Tobii X60 + mobile stand neljapäev, 29. november 12
  106. 106. Tobii eye tracking glasses neljapäev, 29. november 12
  107. 107. Image Source: http://www.eyetracking-glasses.com/gallery/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 SMI eye tracking glasses
  108. 108. SMI eye tracking glasses neljapäev, 29. november 12
  109. 109. Image Source: http://www.seeingmachines.com/pdfs/brochures/faceLAB-5.pdf neljapäev, 29. november 12 faceLAB from Seeing Machines
  110. 110. pupil vs. corneal reflection neljapäev, 29. november 12
  111. 111. heatmaps are not for analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  112. 112. gaze plots are for qualitative analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  113. 113. neljapäev, 29. november 12
  114. 114. gaze plots are for qualitative analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  115. 115. gaze plots are for qualitative analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  116. 116. gaze plots are for qualitative analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  117. 117. measures are for quantitative analysis neljapäev, 29. november 12
  118. 118. practical classification of measures Eye tracking MEASURES MEASURES OF OF Area Area Emotional Mental Cognitive Target Target noticeabilit interest arousal workload processing findability recognizabi Percentage of Number of Pupil diameter Pupil diameter Average fixation Time to 1st Time from 1st participants who fixations on an duration fixation on the fixation on target noticed an AOI AOI target to click Number of Total dwell time Number of Number of visits neljapäev, 29. november 12
  119. 119. time to 1 st fixation = noticeability measure neljapäev, 29. november 12
  120. 120. pupil size = emotional arousal measure 120 neljapäev, 29. november 12
  121. 121. pupil size = emotional arousal measure 121 neljapäev, 29. november 12
  122. 122. ave fixation length = processing measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 9 10 neljapäev, 29. november 12
  123. 123. ave fixation length = processing measure neljapäev, 29. november 12
  124. 124. mascara can be confused with the pupil neljapäev, 29. november 12
  125. 125. droopy eyelids can cover the pupil neljapäev, 29. november 12
  126. 126. glasses  extra reflections & shadows neljapäev, 29. november 12
  127. 127. air bubbles can cause multiple reflections neljapäev, 29. november 12
  128. 128. rce: http://www.flickr.com/photos/smieyetracking/6869094229/in/photostream neljapäev, 29. november 12 dynamic content  long analysis
  129. 129. ource: http://www.webusability.co.uk/what-we-do/mobile-testing/ neljapäev, 29. november 12 mobile devices can be hard to track
  130. 130. EEG + eye tracking neljapäev, 29. november 12
  131. 131. EEG + eye tracking neljapäev, 29. november 12
  132. 132. what does it all mean for us? neljapäev, 29. november 12
  133. 133. be careful… neljapäev, 29. november 12
  134. 134. …but inquisitive and unafraid neljapäev, 29. november 12
  135. 135. n eu r oUX @agabojko let’s cautiously embrace it Questions? abojko@usercentric.com neljapäev, 29. november 12

×