Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Surname !1
Topic: Tax Law Type: Letter Subject: Accounting and Finance
Academic Level: Undergraduate Style: Turabian Langu...
Surname !3
Dear Client,
Thank you for the chance to offer advice pertaining this legal matter at hand. Basing on
my person...
Surname !4
transfer of the tax burdens to the new holding party. Hence, it is significant to acknowledge tax
burdens as sp...
Surname !5
Subsequently, under the IRS based laws, shares, as well as stocks, hold to be subsidiaries.
Thus, a case in poi...
Surname !6
on both sides as appropriate relating to IRS section 1031. Hence, in case of any pressing
inquiries please let ...
Turabian paper example
Turabian paper example
Turabian paper example
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Turabian paper example

1,254 views

Published on

Topic: Tax Law ; Type: Letter Subject: Accounting and Finance; Academic Level: Undergraduate; Style: Turabian Language: English (U.S); Number of sources: 3

Published in: Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

Turabian paper example

  1. 1. Surname !1 Topic: Tax Law Type: Letter Subject: Accounting and Finance Academic Level: Undergraduate Style: Turabian Language: English (U.S) Number of Pages: 3 (double-spaced, Times New Roman, Font 12) Number of sources: 3 Completed by: https://writersperhour.com Task Details Your client owns an apartment building in Los Angeles for which he paid a price of $500,000 which was his original basis. During the ten years he has owned the building, he has taken depreciation deductions that total $120,000. An investor has offered to buy the building from your client for a price of $850,000 which is agreeable to your customer if the customer can avoid paying taxes on his gain. The client has found an office building located in San Diego, which was legally converted into co-op shares in 2012. Two shares in the co-op are for sale for a price of $425,000 each, so the client would like to acquire those as part of an exchange qualifying under IRC sec. 1031. The client would have the investor buy the two shares immediately prior to exchanging those two shares so that at the end of the exchange the investor owns the apartment building and your client owns the two shares in the office co-op. Write a letter to the client explaining all of the income tax-related consequences and risks of this transaction. Try to identify issues in tax law (court cases and sources written by Congress, Treasury, and the IRS).
  2. 2. Surname !3 Dear Client, Thank you for the chance to offer advice pertaining this legal matter at hand. Basing on my personal investigations your situation involves a few related tax issues from a wider perspective. For starters, one is required to consider the conditions under which one holds the liability resulting from the building depreciation. Subsequently, it is of significance to whether is achievable under tax laws to successfully withdraw tax payments under gains acquired from the purchased building. Conversant with the related tax issues is the consideration of qualifying exchanges under the IRC involving the tradable shares. Thus, taxation laws appear to be relatively strict enough in the matters pertaining business deductions. Conversely, in the recent1 periods in our developing financial industry, there have arose cases where case laws have indeed devised altering stances in regards to such deductions. Therefore, in this letter, I will take full2 interest in explaining a few of such possible upshots. Under the recent income tax laws, “an individual is liable to pay taxes under the conditions where the amounts are acquired from self-employment” Subsequently, “sales as well3 as other dispositions relating to a business property producing long-term capital gains and occurring ordinary losses are liable to tax as per the unrelated incomes” However, in this4 particular scenario a transfer of the Los Angeles building holds to be a key transaction. Therefore, in such a case the IRS rules that the changes in ownership is associated with the Ferguson, N. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. The Penguin Press HC, 2008.1 Ward, Ruby, Trent Teegerstrom, and Joseph G. Hiller. "One Size Does Not Fit All." Choices 28.2, 2013.2 Balakrishnan, K., X. Li, and H. Yang. Mandatory Financial Reporting and Voluntary3 Disclosure:Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption. 2012. IRC Sub-Section 512(b)(5)(B)4
  3. 3. Surname !4 transfer of the tax burdens to the new holding party. Hence, it is significant to acknowledge tax burdens as specified under Tax laws. In the US Social Security workforce taxes require that5 every individual pay tax by paying half their totals.6 However, from an economic perspective, “payroll taxes pose to be different; thus, as a rule, it would be essential to every person to accept their tax burdens willingly as an individual”7 Thus, in a similar case relating to section 1231, it was held that the new owner of the building under sale considerations will be liable for paying taxes from his operational gains. Conversant8 with the operational gains involves the incentives acquired from the operation of the building after agreeing and signing the transaction contracts. Thus, this agreement will consider the9 exclusions involving the depreciation values of the building. Therefore, this poses relevance to10 the tax payment issues. Hence, in the end as a client, once the transfer of ownership is made every participant will have to alter their tax payment schedules. Thus, the client will need to avoid evading from his personal tax responsibilities by having a full agreement with the investor on the transfer of the tax burden.11 Lee, T. "The Changing Form of the Corporate Annual Report." The Accounting Historians Journal 21,5 no. 1 (1994): 215-232. Nobes, C., and R. Parker. Comparative International Accounting. Latest Edition. Prentice Hall, n.d.6 Hopkins, Bruce R. The law of tax-exempt organizations. Vol. 5. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.7 Onyebuchi, V. "Ethics in Accounting." International Journal of Business and Social Science 2, no. 128 (2011): 914-925. VanStel, S., and Thurik. "The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business9 entrepreneurship." Small Business Economics (2007): 171-186. Hansmann, H., and H. Hansmann. The ownership of the enterprise. Harvard University Press, 2009.10 Reinhart., and Rogoff. This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University11 Press, 2009.
  4. 4. Surname !5 Subsequently, under the IRS based laws, shares, as well as stocks, hold to be subsidiaries. Thus, a case in point involving an exempt organization deriving its substantial portions of its income from the unrelated business. Hence, attempting to secure its tax-exempt eminence, the company would establish a wholly-control for-profit subsidiaries. Thus, the individual is capable of entering into the lease with the subsidiaries for fixed rental amounts almost equivalent to 100% of the relating after-expense net revenues. By deducting rental payments to the parent12 from gross income, the subsidiary would incur almost no tax liability. Therefore, the extant Code primarily includes rents, interests, as well as various other forms of passive revenues resulting from controllable taxable subsidiaries as taxable unrelated incomes. Dividends and shares13 remain to be omitted from taxation since the subsidiaries normally pay taxes on retributions before the distribution of dividends to the exempt persons.14 Therefore, a controlled entity is distinct by the IRS as an organization controllable to the degree of 80% or more by other organizations. This percentage of control level is conventional through share ownership as well as by interlocking the boards of directors. However, I would endorse that you take part in the transaction since by the tax laws the transaction is considerate Burkhauser, Richard V., et al. "Recent trends in top income shares in the United States (2012):12 371-388. IFC Forum. Research into the positive impacts of tax competition and tax planning. February 15,13 2014. http://www.ifcforum.org (accessed March 10, 2015). IRC Sub-Section 512(b) (13) Note: under distinct documentation applicable to every private14 foundation, ownership is prohibited where an individual speculates to acquire more than 20% of a corporation's stock.
  5. 5. Surname !6 on both sides as appropriate relating to IRS section 1031. Hence, in case of any pressing inquiries please let me know. Sincerely, Sign Completed by: https://writersperhour.com

×