Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Open Access Publishing: More Readers, More Impact


Published on

Ben Wagner, Sciences Librarian, Univ. at Buffalo

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Open Access Publishing: More Readers, More Impact

  1. 1. Open Access Publishing: More Readers, More Impact A. Ben Wagner, Sciences Librarian University at Buffalo WNY/Ontario ACRL Fall Conf. - Nov. 5, 2010 (or…Why scholars should care about open access and how to communicate that)
  2. 2. Do citation metrics really matter? Used to be Publish or Perish. Now it’s increasingly Get Cited or Perish. More departments tracking citation counts for individuals and subgroups in dept. Many more requests for citation metrics from faculty & even grad students Used increasingly in tenure, promotion, & funding allocations by departments, institutions, and even entire countries Rapidly moving beyond physical sciences
  3. 3. New NRC Report A Data-Based Assessment of Research- Doctorate Programs in the United States. Dept. by Dept. Ranking partially based on faculty publication metrics 2000-2006 using Web of Science citation data  
  4. 4. Do Metrics Really Matter? Nature, 16 June 2010. 465, p. 860-862
  5. 5. The OA Message to Researchers Open Access: more readers, more citations, more impact It’s your work; retain a few rights, at least posting a manuscript to repository. Sure you publish for prestige, but you also publish to be read!
  6. 6. 2007 All scholarly articles in journals covered by SSCI 238 Cites 2007 Impact = 238 2007 cites = 1.506 Factor 158 2005-06 articles 2005-2006 Child Abuse & Neglect (journal) 158 articles The Classic Journal Impact Factor
  7. 7. So what? JIF is a measure of extreme currency – 2 year window. JIF is a GROSS average. Average article in Nano Letters cited 10.371 times, But the citation RANGE = 0 - 319 times (14 articles cited zero times!). Never ever intended to measure quality of an individual article or author, even Thomson Scientific says that.
  8. 8. A Better Citation Metric h-Index (Hirsch Index) An h-Index of 11 means a person (or dept.) has 11 articles cited at least 11 times. Easily calculated from Web of Science
  9. 9. Critique of h-index Rewards longevity, but not least- publishable-unit or sheer quantity. Recent and old work rewarded equally Does not reward highly cited papers Many variants (g-index, m-index, etc. proposed to weight age, recent work, & highly cited papers, # of coauthors) Relatively insensitive to manipulation.
  10. 10. Variants of h-index g-index = g number of papers that received (collectively) g2 citations [Rewards highly cited papers] m-index = h-index / no. of years a researcher has published [normalizes for longevity]
  11. 11. Citation Indexes – Many more players – 1 SciFinder NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Google Scholar/Harzing’s POP Amazon (Search inside this book) Scitation/Spin Web/PROLA Citation Bridge (US Patents) USPTO Optics InfoBase
  12. 12. Citation Indexes – Many more players - 2 CiteSeer (primarily computer & info sci) ScienceDirect PsycInfo IEEE Xplore Spires (High Energy Physics) IOP Journals CrossRef
  13. 13. My Take For an individual or department: h-index plus Total cites to all published articles plus  Citation Report graphs from appropriate the citation databases (SCI, SSCI, AHCI,+?) Give a pretty good take on the impact of one’s journal articles within the limits of available citation data. Demonstrably superior to JIF
  14. 14. A Free, New Citation Tool Harzing’s Publish or Perish Install from: Automatically analyzes citations from Google Scholar for any author. Instructive to compare Web of Science citation report with Harzing’s report. Warning: Dirty data, don’t take at face value.
  15. 15. Harzing’s POP Statistics Total number of papers & citations Ave. number of citations per paper & per author Ave. number of papers per author & per year Hirsch's h-index and related parameters Egghe's g-index Other variations on the h-index Age-weighted citation rate Number of authors per paper
  16. 16. Primer on Open Access (OA) OA simply means free-to-read. OA is fully compatible with rigorous peer review. OA does not necessarily mean author-pay (there are many models being tested). OA journals can be low or high quality, just like subscription journals.
  17. 17. Can OA have Prestige? PLOS Biology JIF=12.916 (8th out of 283 biochem journals) Started in October 2003 PLOS One (in 2010 will be the largest science journal in the world) – est. 8,000 articles JIF= 4.351 (10th out of 76 gen. biology journals)
  18. 18. OA – a flash in the pan? Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)  More than 5,553 fully OA, peer reviewed journals 2 new titles per day 2,361 journals containing 461,954 articles are searchable at article level.
  19. 19. OA – a flash in the pan? NOT! 1,500 OA repositories - new repository every day. Scientific Commons – 38 million OA items. 20% medical lit avail. Free within 2 years (Heather Morrison) Over 120 OA publication mandates
  20. 20. SO WHAT! We publish for prestige, but we also publish to be read & cited. What if I point you to actual research that shows OA articles are cited 25-250% more than toll access (TA) articles? Open Access Citation Advantage: An Annotated Bibliography – A. Ben Wagner, Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, Winter 2010. 
  21. 21. A Couple of OA Cite Advantage Studies (OA-CA = citations to OA vs. TA articles) 44% OA-CA in Ecology (Norris & Rowland, 2008) The citation advantage of open-access articles. JASIST, 59(12), 1963-1972. OA-CA: Math (91%); Elec. Engineering (51%); Philosophy (45%) (Antelman 2004) Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries. 65(5): p. 372-382.
  22. 22. What scholars should know about OA Know what your OA options are.  OA journal not the whole story Most non-OA journals allow authors to deposit their articles in an IR/DR. See for publisher policies.
  23. 23. Remember Institutional Repositories You have rights! Retain right to mount your hard work to an IR/DR. Done right it will be visible to Google Scholar, OAIster, & other OAI harvestors. Wide variety of formats & document types It’s all about discovery. More avenues the better.
  24. 24. The OA Advantage As scholar, enlarge your audience/impact. As reader, enjoy free online access to the literature. As teacher, your students have free, liability-free access (fair use, course pack). For all of us, moving away from an unsustainable journal publishing system.
  25. 25. Two Stories Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Article (how I came out on top because of open access) Reviewer Hell (the system is really, truly, profoundly broken)
  26. 26. Check out: Open the channels of communication in your field. Create Change (SPARC) Making Change Work for You Practical steps as faculty, researcher, reviewer, editor, society member, teacher. 
  27. 27. From Opportunity Assessment Instrument  ACRL Scholarly Communication Toolkit:  “10 Things You Should Know About Scholarly Communication” %20101%2010%20Things%20You.pdf.  “Open Access Overview” (Peter Suber):  Open Access Scholarly Information Sourcebook: Practical Steps for Implementing Open Access:  “Transforming Scholarly Communication and Publishing” (UB Libraries – for faculty and students):  6 Things Researchers Need to Know about OA – P. Suber