Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Uv a winter 2014 fatca and eoi

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 72 Ad

Uv a winter 2014 fatca and eoi

Download to read offline

The countries of the world, pushed by a U.S. Treasury promotional campaign, have inevitably capitulated to the U.S. unilateral demand for information although the per-country compliance cost may exceed one billion dollars and privacy protection laws must be amended. However, push back by important U.S. trading partners resulted in the U.S. Treasury entering into an expanding network of bi-lateral intergovernmental agreements that in most instances provide for automatic exchange between the competent authorities of the required financial information to fulfill FATCA compliance. These agreements may lead to an imposition of FATCA reporting compliance, though to a lesser extent, upon U.S. financial institutions, that the U.S. Treasury may in turn provide automatically to the foreign competent authority.

FATCA should not be observed in a historical vacuum but instead requires at least an understanding of the U.S. previous attempt to collect such information under the qualified intermediary (‘QI’) regime. Moreover, FATCA should not be observed in a unilateral vacuum but instead requires an overview of the EU and OECD information exchange initiatives and challenges thereto, tax collection and remission alternatives, as well as an overview of the spawn of FATCA (e.g. the UK’s son-of-FATCA approach).

This discussion will also explore the general nature, issues, and challenges of information collection and exchange. During this discussion we will digress into the topic of the information of a business’ financials and of its operations, the topic of domestic and cross border asymmetry of information, as well as the dialogue for global harmonization of information (such as standardization of accounts and of tax base determination), and for exchange of such information. Such conversation is necessary for a robust understanding of the topics of base erosion and the efforts of countries to control ‘transfer pricing’. See the news story at http://profwilliambyrnes.com/2014/01/22/professor-byrnes-lectures-for-university-of-amsterdams-international-tax-program/

FATCA Compliance Program and Manual

The LexisNexis® Guide to FATCA Compliance (2nd Edition) comprises 600 pages of analysis in 34 Chapters grouped into three parts: compliance program (Chapters 1–4), analysis of FATCA regulations (Chapters 5–16) and analysis of FATCA’s application for certain trading partners of the U.S. (Chapters 17–34), including intergovernmental agreements as well as the OECD’s TRACE initiative for global automatic information exchange protocols and systems. The 34 chapters include many practical examples for use by the FATCA compliance officer. http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&prodId=prod19190327&ORIGINATION_CODE=00247

The countries of the world, pushed by a U.S. Treasury promotional campaign, have inevitably capitulated to the U.S. unilateral demand for information although the per-country compliance cost may exceed one billion dollars and privacy protection laws must be amended. However, push back by important U.S. trading partners resulted in the U.S. Treasury entering into an expanding network of bi-lateral intergovernmental agreements that in most instances provide for automatic exchange between the competent authorities of the required financial information to fulfill FATCA compliance. These agreements may lead to an imposition of FATCA reporting compliance, though to a lesser extent, upon U.S. financial institutions, that the U.S. Treasury may in turn provide automatically to the foreign competent authority.

FATCA should not be observed in a historical vacuum but instead requires at least an understanding of the U.S. previous attempt to collect such information under the qualified intermediary (‘QI’) regime. Moreover, FATCA should not be observed in a unilateral vacuum but instead requires an overview of the EU and OECD information exchange initiatives and challenges thereto, tax collection and remission alternatives, as well as an overview of the spawn of FATCA (e.g. the UK’s son-of-FATCA approach).

This discussion will also explore the general nature, issues, and challenges of information collection and exchange. During this discussion we will digress into the topic of the information of a business’ financials and of its operations, the topic of domestic and cross border asymmetry of information, as well as the dialogue for global harmonization of information (such as standardization of accounts and of tax base determination), and for exchange of such information. Such conversation is necessary for a robust understanding of the topics of base erosion and the efforts of countries to control ‘transfer pricing’. See the news story at http://profwilliambyrnes.com/2014/01/22/professor-byrnes-lectures-for-university-of-amsterdams-international-tax-program/

FATCA Compliance Program and Manual

The LexisNexis® Guide to FATCA Compliance (2nd Edition) comprises 600 pages of analysis in 34 Chapters grouped into three parts: compliance program (Chapters 1–4), analysis of FATCA regulations (Chapters 5–16) and analysis of FATCA’s application for certain trading partners of the U.S. (Chapters 17–34), including intergovernmental agreements as well as the OECD’s TRACE initiative for global automatic information exchange protocols and systems. The 34 chapters include many practical examples for use by the FATCA compliance officer. http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&prodId=prod19190327&ORIGINATION_CODE=00247

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (19)

Similar to Uv a winter 2014 fatca and eoi (20)

Advertisement

More from William Byrnes (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Uv a winter 2014 fatca and eoi

  1. 1. Exchange of Information and FATCA William Byrnes www.profwilliambyrnes.com LexisNexis® Guide to FATCA Compliance University of Amsterdam Centre for Tax Law
  2. 2. What is FATCA? – Information Reporting Regime on Foreign Institutions & Entities to Collect Identification and Financial Information about US Individual Taxpayers – Match this information to new Form 8938 Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets (and the Foreign Bank & Financial Accounts form FBAR FinCEN Form 114) – 30% withholding
  3. 3. What Caused FATCA? – 60+ Tax Treaty EOI articles, 20+TIEAs, MLATs, and Hague Evidence Convention – FBAR (Foreign Bank & Financial Accounts) • 1996 by BSA • in 2003 FINCEN signed MOA for IRS to enforce – QI Regime (2000) • Approx. 5,500 financial institutions (vs.
  4. 4. EOI Requirements (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) identity of the person under examination or investigation; a statement of the information sought including its nature; the tax purpose for which the information is sought; the information is held in the requested party or is in the possession or control of a person within the jurisdiction; to the extent known, the name and address of any person believed to be in possession of the requested information; a statement that the request is in conformity with the law and administrative practices of the applicant party, would be able to obtain the information under the laws of the applicant party; a statement has pursued all means available, except disproportionate difficulties
  5. 5. What Caused FATCA? 7.6 million U.S. citizens reside abroad more U.S. residents have foreign accounts only 807,040 FBAR submissions in 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs 2009 & 2011: 33,000 raised $5B 2012 remains open: 1,500 (total $5.5B) UBS headline case: 17,000 hide $20B, $780m fine with $104m to convicted insider whistleblower Bradley Birkenfield
  6. 6. Art 26 expansion [1] Information for Non-Tax Purposes [2] Groups of Taxpayers [3] Reasonable Possibility of Relevancy
  7. 7. EU Data Protection & Civil Law Privacy - costs of obtaining each client’s signature on new FATCA waiver EU TSD and Tax Exchange Directive (2013 by request / 2015 automatic of 2014 info) (a) income from employment (b) director's fees (c) life insurance products (d) pensions (e) ownership of and income from immovable property
  8. 8. EU Sabou case (22 Oct. 2013) Mr Sabou claimed to incur expenditure in several Member States with a view to a possible transfer to one of the football clubs in those Member States. The Czech tax authorities, however, raised doubts over the truthfulness of that expenditure and carried out an inspection involving requests for information from the tax authorities of the Member States concerned. The Czech tax authorities sought assistance from the Spanish, French and United Kingdom tax authorities. None of the clubs allegedly approached knew either Mr Sabou or his agent. The Czech tax authorities also contacted the Hungarian tax authorities about a number of invoices submitted by Mr Sabou concerning services allegedly provided by a company established in Hungary. On 28 May 2009, the Czech tax authorities issued an additional notice of assessment for approximately EUR 9,800.
  9. 9. ECJ Sabou Case Mr Sabou claimed that the Czech tax authorities had obtained information about him illegally. (1) not informed him of their request, so that he had not been able to take part in formulating the questions addressed to those authorities. (2) he had not been invited to take part in the examination of witnesses in other Member States, in contrast to the rights he enjoys under Czech law in similar domestic proceedings.
  10. 10. ECJ (i) whether EU law, as it results in particular from Directive 77/799 and the fundamental right to be heard, confers on a taxpayer from a Member State the right to be informed of a request, to take part in formulating the request addressed to the requested Member State, and to take part in an examination of witnesses organised by the requested Member State, and (ii) whether Directive 77/799 must be interpreted as meaning that, (1) the taxpayer may challenge the information concerning him conveyed to the tax authorities of the requesting Member State, and, (2) when the tax authorities of the requested Member State convey the information gathered, they are bound to disclose the sources of the information and how that information was obtained.
  11. 11. ECJ (1) the purpose of Directive 77/799 is to govern cooperation between the tax authorities of Member States by imposing certain obligations on the Member States. (2) The directive does not confer specific rights on the taxpayer, and does not lay down any obligation for the competent authorities of the Member States to consult the taxpayer. (3) necessary to consider whether the taxpayer may nevertheless derive from the ‘rights of the defence’ a right to participate in the exchange of information between the competent authorities
  12. 12. ECJ a fundamental distinction between: (i) the tax inspection procedures which constitute an investigation stage, during which information is collected and which includes the request for information by one tax authority to another, and (ii) the contentious stage, between the tax authorities and the taxpayer, which begins when the taxpayer is sent the proposed adjustment
  13. 13. Various Initiatives Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (63 signatories, 13 by extension, 4 to sign) UK – LDF / Swiss RUBIK / soF disclosure facilities son of FATCA IGA OECD TRACE (Treaty Relief & Compliance Enhancement)
  14. 14. EU TSD Art 8 Info 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. identity and residence of the beneficial owner; name and address of the paying agent; account number of the beneficial owner; and amount of interest income earned TIN if available • If resident in a country different than passport or I.D. card, then tax residence certificate
  15. 15. EU’s FATCA Equivalent • income from employment, • director’s fees, • life insurance products not covered by other EU legal instruments on the exchange of information, • pensions, and • ownership of and income from immovable property.
  16. 16. EU’s FATCA Equivalent (a) may be a loss of tax in the other Member State; (b) a person liable to tax obtains a reduction in, or an exemption from, tax in one Member State which would give rise to an increase in tax or to liability to tax in the other Member State; (c) Income shifting: business dealings are conducted through one or more countries that a saving of tax may result from artificial transfers of profits within groups; (d) Transfer pricing: a saving of tax may result from artificial transfers of profits within groups of enterprises; (e) may be relevant in assessing liability to tax in the latter Member State.
  17. 17. Congress Push to Provide Additional Tools to Avoid Tax Evasion • Problem: Country Sovereignty and Bank Secrecy Laws used to Promote Non-Tax Compliance • Congressional Solution: – New Chapter 4 – • Creates a Withholding Tax not for the sake of Collecting Tax, but to Encourage (Coerce some would say) FFIs into providing detailed account information of U.S. persons
  18. 18. QI Differences? • Expanded application of reporting – (names + specific account in(s)/out(s)) • Look through to UBO • Expanded application of reporting persons • Expanded application of reportable transactions • FFI cannot determine customer w/h pools • Only approx. 5,500 QI v. 100,000s of FFIs and FEs
  19. 19. Chapter 3 Taxpayer Character of Income Withholding Tax Withholding Agent Exemption IRC 1441 NRA’s Foreign Partnerships -FDAP Income: Interest, Premiums, Annuities, Dividends, Compensations, Rents, Royalties, Salaries, Wages, Remunerations, Emoluments, etc. 30% gross Payor -ECI -Portfolio Interest -Interest and Dividends from 80/20 Corporations - Real Estate (871) IRC 1442 Foreign Corps. Idem 30% gross Payor Idem IRC 1445 Foreign Persons Real Estate Dispositional Income 10% gross Payor Certificate of Reduced WH’ IRC 1446 Foreign Partner Partnership Income Effectively Connected to a U.S. Trade or Business Progressive tax rate Payor Income not ECI
  20. 20. Taxpayer Character of Income IRC 1471 Non Participating FFI Withholding Tax Withholding Agent Exemption 30% gross Chapter 4 U.S Payor Payment whose beneficial owners are: -Foreign governments “withholdable payments”: which in Theory includes all of Chapter 3 -international Organizations -foreign central bank of issue -“Low risk tax evaders” . U.S. Recalcitrant Account Holders “pass-thru payments” 30% gross FFI What happens with the withholding exemptions or modifications under IRC Chapter 3??
  21. 21. Compliance Costs? 1. Financial Costs 2. Labor / Service / Software & Systems 3. Management
  22. 22. Financial Costs? Treasury: $100m per large institution Can. Bankers Association: $1B each for 5 largest banks Generally accepted: $250m per large bank $30m-$80m for UK investment banks E20-E50 per investor for investment funds, $1m per fund How much did Y2K cost? EU Savings Directive? New expanded reporting? QI regime?
  23. 23. Labor / Systems Costs? Which department will wear the FATCA yoke? (Tax, AML, Comp) • Employ / Outsource add. compliance manager / staff ? • Employ / Outsource add. systems and software integration staff (probably both, at least on short term contracts) • Employ / Outsource FATCA consultants least cost is your Lexis FATCA Compliance Handbook ;-)
  24. 24. Labor / Systems Costs? - enterprise software programming/building (AML, FATCA, Internal and External treasury/client reports) - new protocols and rules - new onboarding procedures - data entry - middleware - systems maintenance
  25. 25. Management Enterprise Steering Committees • Each business unit has working team • Drilling down impact by country, product Decision making process: CCO, CTO, AMLRO, CLO (GC), and new FATCA “Responsible (Certification) Officer”? Investment Funds re-drawing investor agreements
  26. 26. Who does FATCA apply to? Two Categories: FFI & NFFE Foreign Financial Institution Non-Financial Foreign Entity
  27. 27. What is an FFI? - Accepts deposits in ordinary course of bus. - Holds financial assets for 3rdp as sub. bus. - bus. of investing, trading in securities, commodities, p’shp interests, futures, forwards
  28. 28. Examples of FFI? - Investment, hedge, equity, mutual funds, unit trusts - Clearing houses, Brokerages - Insurance (cash value), annuity, pension, - Trust companies, custodians
  29. 29. FFI Example 1 An Investment Advisor case. A Fund Manager is an investment entity that organizes and manages various types of funds including Fund A. Fund A invests primarily in equities. An Investment Advisor (a foreign entity) is hired by the Fund Manager to advise and provide discretionary management of a portion of the financial assets held by Fund A. More than 50 percent of the Investment Advisor’s gross income was earned for the last three years from providing similar services. The Investment Advisor is an investment entity and an FFI as well since it primarily conducts a business of managing financial assets on behalf of clients.
  30. 30. FFI Example 2 An entity managed by an FFI. The facts are the same as above Example 1. In addition, Fund A has earned more than 50 percent of its gross income from investing in financial assets in every year since its formation. Because Fund A is managed by a Fund Manager and an Investment Advisor and has gross income primarily from investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets, Fund A is an investment entity.
  31. 31. FFI Example 3 An Investment Manager case. An Investment Manager (a U.S. entity) is an investment entity that organizes and registers Fund A in a country outside the U.S. Purchases and sales of financial assets are facilitated by the Investment Manager. Fund A has earned more than 50% of its gross income from investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets in every year since its formation. Fund A is an investment entity and an FFI.
  32. 32. FFI Example 4 foreign real estate investment fund that is managed by a FFI. The facts are the same as in Example 3, except that Fund A’s assets consist of only non-debt, direct interests in real property located inside the U.S. and around the world. Since Fund A has less than 50 percent of its gross income from investing, reinvesting, or trading in financial assets, Fund A is not an investment entity
  33. 33. FFI Example 5 A fund with a feeder. The facts are the same as in Example 4, except that some investors come into Fund A through a non-U.S. corporate “feeder” or “blocker” vehicle that owns stock of Fund A and does not hold significant other assets. This feeder is also managed by the investment manager (or an affiliate). The feeder is likely to be an investment entity, and an FFI since it directly holds financial assets (equity in Fund A), notwithstanding that the Fund is invested primarily in nonfinancial assets (the real estate).
  34. 34. FFI Example 6 A trust managed by an individual. On January 1, 2013, Trust A (a nongrantor foreign trust) was formed by X (an individual) for the benefit of his or her children. Trustee A (an individual) was appointed by X to act as the Trustee. The assets of the Trust are managed by Trustee A. The Trust only holds financial assets and its sole source of income is from these financial assets. Trustee A does not hire any thirdparty. Since it is managed only by Trustee A (an individual), Trust A is not an investment entity.
  35. 35. FFI Example 7 A trust managed by a trust company. The facts are the same as in Example 6, except that X hires a Trust Company (a FFI) to act as Trustee for Trust A. Under the terms of the Trust Instrument, the Trust Company manages the assets of Trust A as Trustee for the benefit of X’s children. Because Trust A is managed by a FFI, Trust A is an investment entity and a FFI as well.
  36. 36. FFI Example 8 individual Introducing Broker. Person B is an Individual Introducing Broker who provides investing advice to his or her clients. B retains the services of a foreign entity to conduct and execute trades for his or her clients. For the past three years, B has earned 50 percent or more of his or her gross income from his or her services as an investment advisor. Because B is an individual, he or she is not an investment entity. But if entity, then is IE and FFI.
  37. 37. Exempt from FFI? “Low Risk of Tax Evasion” Foreign governments, Central Banks
  38. 38. Registered Deemed Compliant ? Still Register with Treasury but as compliant FFI Certain local-only banks if >98% accounts local and undertake US DD on accounts after 2011 Qualified collective investment fund no US investor over $50,000 Restrictive fund < $175m assets & < $7m revenue no US distribution + USDD after 2011
  39. 39. Certified Deemed Compliant? Don’t register with IRS but certify to W/H agents Certain small local banks with local accounts < $175m assets Low Value Accounts < $50,000 & < $50m assets Non-profits Certain retirement plans
  40. 40. Certified Deemed Compliant? Retirement Plans organized locally, by local employer for local employees, contributions tax exempt & no employee has >5% or < 20 participants, earned income only, if outside local then < 20% of assets + < $250,000
  41. 41. Challenges? SWAPS – difficult to value, changing counter parties in opaque market Funds: lack access to information for approx. 40%-45% UBOs, distributors & transfer agents must become PFFI fund of funds private equity funds & tie-up periods Life Insurance: whole life touch points with owner
  42. 42. NFFE? Exemptions • foreign governments, IGO, central banks; • publicly traded companies and entities within their expanded group of affiliates; • U.S. possessions Active NFFEs (less than 50% of gross income from assets that produce passive income). If not exempt: US (10%) shareholders W-8BEN-E
  43. 43. FFI Due Diligence ? 3 categories of accounts / 2 time periods 1. < $50,000 2. $50,000 - $1m 3. > $1m (high value accounts) Current (look back) vs. New (onboarding)
  44. 44. FFI DD $50k - $1m Electronic Search of AML records of the KYC / CIP program > $1m CCO -> RM communicate about account holder and if necessary, review account file docs for previous 5 years W8Ben (foreign) or W9 (US): “Trust but Verify”
  45. 45. US Indicia (1) Citizenship or residency in U.S.; (2) U.S. place of birth; (3) U.S. residency or mailing address; (4) U.S. telephone number; (5) any standing instructions to transfer funds to a U.S. account; (6) any power of attorney or other signatory authority to any person with a U.S. address; or (7) Whether the account holder has provided any verified “in-care” or “hold mail” address with the U.S.
  46. 46. EDD for High Value Accounts RM communicate about account holder using file and KYC or CCO directly accesses file • review account file KYC for previous 5 years • account opening documents, signatory card • POA / incapacitation or death instructions
  47. 47. DD for NFFE W-9 on file ? specified U.S. person ? • < $250,000 - Excluded from review, until account balance exceeds $1,000,000. • Search existing CIP/KYC info/account opening docs to determine status • Passive NFFEs – Must identify substantial U.S. owners or certify that there are no substantial U.S. owners.
  48. 48. specified US person is not • Publicly traded corporation • Affiliates of a publicly traded corporation • Exempt organization or IRA • REIT • RIC / SEC registered (1940 Investment Company Act) • The United States • U.S. state, DC, or U.S. possession • US bank • Common trust fund • Exempt trust under section 664(c) • US registered dealer • US Broker – 26 USC 6045(c)
  49. 49. Participating FFIs Systems • Documentation: evolve current AML systems to capture FATCA DD across enterprise customer base • Reporting: implementing then maintaining annual reporting system with US (or IGA) for US individuals, including identifiers, account balances, gross payments • Withholding: building system for 30% withholding on recalcitrant account holders
  50. 50. Foreign Info Reporting? • Report must contain – Name / address / TIN – Account No(s) / Balance(s) – Annual Gross transactions (receipt/deposits/payments/withdrawals) • Can elect to report like US-FI (1099s) • Or w/h and close account
  51. 51. US Info Report to IRS? 1. the name, address, and TIN of any person that is a resident of FATCA Partner and is an Account Holder; 2. the account number; 3. the name and identifying number of the U.S. Financial Institution; 4. the gross amount of interest paid on a Depository Account; 5. the gross amount of U.S. source dividends paid or credited to the account; and 6. the gross amount of other U.S. source income paid or credited to the account
  52. 52. Withholding Portfolio interest Repayment of note principal Proceeds from sale of real estate if FIRPTA applies Sale of shares Not on services or goods in ordinary course of business
  53. 53. Withholding WH agent (USWHA or PFFI) required to report annually Form 1042 and Form 1042-S • Form 1042 to IRS, with aggregated reportable amounts and any tax withheld. • Form 1042S to IRS, copy US specified person with reportable amounts paid. • Form 1042-S is required for each US person, with separate Forms for each separate type of payment.
  54. 54. Withholding • • • • • FDAP portfolio interest loan principal Real estate proceeds (FIRPTA subject payments) Proceeds from sale of stock in US corp. or other non-dividend distributions Not payments for ordinary course of business for non-financial services like consulting (but FDAP applies)
  55. 55. IGA • • • • • • • No IRS agreements required for FFIs ƒ No officer certifications directly to the IRS ƒ Retirement account issues addressed ƒ Data privacy concerns addressed ƒ Withholding concerns addressed ƒ Customer identification issues addressed ƒ No closing accounts of recalcitrant account hold
  56. 56. What is FATCA? – U.S. Domestic Tax Compliance law (2010) – Supporting regulations (2012, 2013, evolving) – Intergovernmental Agreements Force countries to provide U.S. Treasury detailed financial information about all U.S. persons
  57. 57. U.S. Constitutional Framework • Constitution Article 2 , Section 2 He [President] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds [66%] of the Senators present concur
  58. 58. U.S. Constitutional Framework US Constitution Article 1 Section 7: “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.” Section 8: “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, … To regulate commerce with foreign nations, …”
  59. 59. Types of Tax Agreements • Treaty (e.g. Tax Treaty, Double Tax Convention) U.S. not a signatory Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties (VCLT) but is Public International Law (PIL) • Tension between Treaty Clause and Tax “Origination” Clause
  60. 60. Types of Agreements • Congressional-Executive Agreements e.g. Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA) and Trade Agreements Requires Congressional Statutory Pre-Approval Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 274(h)(6)(C)(i): “…The Secretary is authorized to negotiate and conclude an agreement for the exchange of information with any beneficiary country. …”
  61. 61. Types of Agreements • Derivative Agreements of a Treaty e.g. Protocols to Tax Agreements Must be within scope of original treaty e.g. procedural mechanisms, definitions
  62. 62. Types of Agreements • Sole Executive Agreement e.g. Protocols to Tax Agreements administrative and routine matters only, e.g. procedural mechanisms, definitions
  63. 63. Discussion Items • • • • Is a TIEA or an IGA a treaty? What does Treasury say either is? What may the other State (NL) consider either? Is an IGA an aspect of the tax system and tax policy? • Does it regulate commerce between nations?
  64. 64. Timeline Reporting 3/15/2015 start of annual report (for 2014) via Form 1042(S) of FATCA reportable amounts (Foreign Person’s U.S. Source Income Subject to Withholding)
  65. 65. Timeline Reporting 3/31/2015 (for 2013 and 2014) annual report: • US accounts (name, address, TIN and account balance) • recalcitrant account holders (aggregate reporting) 3/31/2016 + income associated with these US accounts 3/31/2017 + gross proceeds
  66. 66. FORM 8938 (WILLIAM) A specified foreign financial asset is: • Any financial account maintained by a foreign financial institution • Other foreign financial assets held for investment that are not in an account maintained by a US or foreign financial institution, namely: – Stock or securities issued by someone other than a U.S. person – Any interest in a foreign entity, and – Any financial instrument or contract that has as an issuer or counterparty that is other than a U.S. person.
  67. 67. 8938 thresholds Individual / Filing Separate taxpayers in the US: total value of specified foreign financial assets > $50,000 on the last day of the tax year or > $75,000 at any time during the tax year (Joint = 2x threshold) Living Abroad: foreign tax residence + bona fide or 330 days in 12 months ending in tax year > $200,000 / $300,000 (Joint = 2x threshold)
  68. 68. 8938 Foreign Financial Account – Foreign bank accounts – Foreign mutual funds – Foreign hedge funds – Foreign private equity funds – Certain foreign insurance products
  69. 69. 8938 Foreign Financial Asset – Stock or securities issued not by US person – Any interest in a foreign entity – Any financial instrument or contract that has as an issuer or counterparty that is not US person – Foreign pensions and deferred comp plans – Foreign estates
  70. 70. 8938 Foreign Property ? Not if direct ownership of real property Yes if -> foreign entity -> Property (FE interest) Yes if mortgage (FA interest) Not if direct ownership of movable assets (e.g. metals, jewels, art works)
  71. 71. 8938 Questions Part II Other Foreign Assets (see instructions) Note. If you reported specified foreign financial assets on Forms 3520, 3520A, 5471, 8621, or 8865, you do not have to include the assets on Form 8938. You must complete Part IV. See instructions. If you have more than one asset to report, attach a continuation sheet with the same information for each additional asset (see instructions). 1 Description of asset 2 Identifying number or other designation 3 Complete all that apply a Date asset acquired during tax year, if applicable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b Date asset disposed of during tax year, if applicable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c Check if asset jointly owned with spouse d Check if no tax item reported in Part III with respect to this asset 4 Maximum value of asset during tax year (check box that applies) a $0 - $50,000 b $50,001 - $100,000 c $100,001 - $150,000 d $150,001 - $200,000 e If more than $200,000, list value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5 Did you use a foreign currency exchange rate to convert the value of the asset into U.S. dollars? . . . Yes No
  72. 72. 8938 Questions 7 If asset reported in Part II, line 1, is stock of a foreign entity or an interest in a foreign entity, report the following information. a Name of foreign entity b Type of foreign entity (1) Partnership (2) Corporation (3) Trust (4) Estate c Check if foreign entity is a PFIC d Mailing address of foreign entity 8 If asset reported in Part II, line 1, is not stock of a foreign entity or an interest in a foreign entity, enter the following information for the asset. a Name of issuer or counterparty b Type of issuer or counterparty (1) Individual (2) Partnership (3) Corporation (4) Trust (5) Estate c Check if issuer or counterparty is a U.S. person Foreign person d Mailing address of issuer or counterparty.

×