Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Transparency Camp 2009 William Beutler    Government + Wikipedia: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly Innovation Manager, Public ...
What Wikipedia really is <ul><li>The happy go-lucky PR speak: </li></ul><ul><li>“ the free online encyclopedia that anyone...
Wikipedia is the most important reference site in the world Intro  > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tool...
Oh noes! You’ve been caught! Intro  > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
WikiScanner: An important tool, but offers no conclusions Intro  > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools ...
The dogma vs. the guidelines <ul><li>“ A dogma has developed … that suggests it is inappropriate for anyone to write about...
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly Intro >  Good, Bad, Ugly  > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
Going about it the wrong way <ul><li>Former Rep. Gil Gutknecht gets off on the right foot… </li></ul>Intro >  Good, Bad, U...
Going about it the wrong way <ul><li>… but somewhere along the line, it all goes wrong big-time. </li></ul>Intro >  Good, ...
Or the  really  wrong way <ul><li>Virginia Delegate Dave Albo won’t take “stop” for an answer… </li></ul>Intro >  Good, Ba...
On the bubble <ul><li>Former Rep. Marty Meehan was pretty close: </li></ul>Intro >  Good, Bad, Ugly  > Getting Started > T...
A better way to go about it <ul><li>Written by campaign volunteer, with relationship disclosed </li></ul>Intro >  Good, Ba...
Getting Started Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly >  Getting Started  > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
Create a [[WP:ACCOUNT]] for crying out loud <ul><li>“ If you are not logged in, all your edits are publicly associated wit...
Mixed signals in the [[WP:COI]] guideline? <ul><li>“ Editing in the interests of public relations is particularly  frowned...
Learn the [[WP:COI]] facts <ul><li>“ Where advancing outside interests is more important  to an editor than advancing  the...
Learn the policies and guidelines Approx. 50 mandatory policies, 150 pretty mandatory guidelines  Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly ...
<ul><li>No Original Research:   Have citations for everything – or it probably won’t stick. </li></ul><ul><li>Verifiabilit...
Non-controversial edits you can always make <ul><li>Removing  spam  and reverting  vandalism .  </li></ul><ul><li>Deleting...
But you can  encourage  controversial edits <ul><li>“ Those who feel the need to make controversial edits, in spite of a r...
Transparency Tools Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started >  Transparency Tools  > Conclusion
WikiRage and Popular Pages shows most edits, page views <ul><li>http://www.wikirage.com/ </li></ul><ul><li>http://en.wikip...
WikiDashboard shows an article’s top editors and patterns  <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikidashboard   </li></ul>Intro > Go...
Edit Counter analyzes history of a single account <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/soxrededitcounter   </li></ul><ul><li>Also tr...
WikiBlame tells who added – or removed – a given phrase <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikiblame   </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad...
The Future: Wikitrust, APIs, and who knows what else? <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikitrust   </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, ...
Guess who’s still editing Wikipedia? <ul><li>IP “user” 143.231.249.141 – aka the U.S. House of Representatives -- is more ...
Thank You! Questions? <ul><li>Contact info: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wikipedia: User:WWB & User:NMS_Bill </li></ul></ul><...
You’ve finished this document.
Download and read it offline.
Upcoming SlideShare
Causes Of Deforestation
Next
Upcoming SlideShare
Causes Of Deforestation
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

1

Share

Government and Wikipedia: The Good, the Bad & the Ugly

Download to read offline

Presentation delivered at TransparencyCamp09 about government edits to Wikipedia, with tips for getting started and round-up of tools for transparency.

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Government and Wikipedia: The Good, the Bad & the Ugly

  1. 1. Transparency Camp 2009 William Beutler Government + Wikipedia: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly Innovation Manager, Public Affairs
  2. 2. What Wikipedia really is <ul><li>The happy go-lucky PR speak: </li></ul><ul><li>“ the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” </li></ul><ul><li>The behind-the-scenes description: </li></ul><ul><li>“ a neutral and unbiased compilation of </li></ul><ul><li>previously written, verifiable facts.” </li></ul><ul><li>A more realistic view: </li></ul><ul><li>an often useful but frequently </li></ul><ul><li>complicated and sometimes </li></ul><ul><li>unreliable place to start </li></ul><ul><li>doing research. </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  3. 3. Wikipedia is the most important reference site in the world Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  4. 4. Oh noes! You’ve been caught! Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  5. 5. WikiScanner: An important tool, but offers no conclusions Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  6. 6. The dogma vs. the guidelines <ul><li>“ A dogma has developed … that suggests it is inappropriate for anyone to write about themselves or anything they are personally involved with … the presumption seems to be that if an original source adds something to a Wikipedia entry, it must be false or spun or have some hidden agenda.” </li></ul><ul><li>– Blogger and consultant Rex Hammock, January 2007 </li></ul>“ [F]or every dodgy [edit] there are many, many more uncontroversial edits where people at the BBC have added information or changed a detail in good faith. The scanner also shows the same kind of results for a wide variety of other media organisations.“ – BBC's Head of Interactive News, Pete Clifton, August 2007 Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  7. 7. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  8. 8. Going about it the wrong way <ul><li>Former Rep. Gil Gutknecht gets off on the right foot… </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  9. 9. Going about it the wrong way <ul><li>… but somewhere along the line, it all goes wrong big-time. </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  10. 10. Or the really wrong way <ul><li>Virginia Delegate Dave Albo won’t take “stop” for an answer… </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  11. 11. On the bubble <ul><li>Former Rep. Marty Meehan was pretty close: </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  12. 12. A better way to go about it <ul><li>Written by campaign volunteer, with relationship disclosed </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  13. 13. Getting Started Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  14. 14. Create a [[WP:ACCOUNT]] for crying out loud <ul><li>“ If you are not logged in, all your edits are publicly associated with your IP address at the time of that edit.” </li></ul>According to WikiScanner creator Virgil Griffith, 21% of Wikipedia edits are anonymous Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  15. 15. Mixed signals in the [[WP:COI]] guideline? <ul><li>“ Editing in the interests of public relations is particularly frowned upon. This includes, but is not limited to, edits made by public relations departments of corporations or governmental entities … with the sole intent of improving that organization's image.” </li></ul><ul><li>Compare To </li></ul><ul><li>“ Who has written the material should be irrelevant so long as these policies are closely adhered to.” </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  16. 16. Learn the [[WP:COI]] facts <ul><li>“ Where advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest.” </li></ul><ul><li>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  17. 17. Learn the policies and guidelines Approx. 50 mandatory policies, 150 pretty mandatory guidelines Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  18. 18. <ul><li>No Original Research: Have citations for everything – or it probably won’t stick. </li></ul><ul><li>Verifiability: Those citations must be high quality – no blogs (usually). </li></ul><ul><li>Neutral Point of View: No press release language or marketing-speak allowed. </li></ul>Start with the three primary content rules Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  19. 19. Non-controversial edits you can always make <ul><li>Removing spam and reverting vandalism . </li></ul><ul><li>Deleting content that violates Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. </li></ul><ul><li>Fixing spelling and grammar errors. </li></ul><ul><li>Reverting or removing their own COI edits. Cleaning up your own mess is allowed and encouraged. </li></ul><ul><li>Making edits that have been agreed to on the talk page . </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  20. 20. But you can encourage controversial edits <ul><li>“ Those who feel the need to make controversial edits, in spite of a real or perceived conflict of interest, are strongly encouraged to submit proposed edits for review on the article's talk page along with a {{Request edit}} tag to attract users to review the edit.” </li></ul>{{Request edit}} (should get you the attention you need) Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  21. 21. Transparency Tools Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  22. 22. WikiRage and Popular Pages shows most edits, page views <ul><li>http://www.wikirage.com/ </li></ul><ul><li>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Popular_pages </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  23. 23. WikiDashboard shows an article’s top editors and patterns <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikidashboard </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  24. 24. Edit Counter analyzes history of a single account <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/soxrededitcounter </li></ul><ul><li>Also try: Interiot’s “Wannabe Kate” </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  25. 25. WikiBlame tells who added – or removed – a given phrase <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikiblame </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  26. 26. The Future: Wikitrust, APIs, and who knows what else? <ul><li>http://tinyurl.com/wikitrust </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  27. 27. Guess who’s still editing Wikipedia? <ul><li>IP “user” 143.231.249.141 – aka the U.S. House of Representatives -- is more active than most Wikipedians: </li></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  28. 28. Thank You! Questions? <ul><li>Contact info: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wikipedia: User:WWB & User:NMS_Bill </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Twitter: @williambeutler </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Blog P.I.: http://blogpi.net </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The Wikipedian: http:// thewikipedian.net </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>E-mail: [email_address] </li></ul></ul></ul>Intro > Good, Bad, Ugly > Getting Started > Transparency Tools > Conclusion
  • karvetski

    Jul. 29, 2009

Presentation delivered at TransparencyCamp09 about government edits to Wikipedia, with tips for getting started and round-up of tools for transparency.

Views

Total views

3,551

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

210

Actions

Downloads

17

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

1

×