Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

SEO split tests you should run - Will Critchlow

9,312 views

Published on

My BrightonSEO deck September 2016. Why and how to run SEO split tests, and some lessons we have learned from running our own tests via our DistilledODN platform.

Published in: Marketing

SEO split tests you should run - Will Critchlow

  1. 1. SEO split tests you should be running Will Critchlow / @willcritchlow BrightonSEO
  2. 2. Robert Liston famously: Carried out an operation with a 300% mortality rate Via: reddit
  3. 3. He amputated: 1. The patient’s leg 2. His assistant’s fingers Via: reddit
  4. 4. Both of them died, along with a bystander Via: reddit
  5. 5. Before germ theory, 25-50% of patients died from infections (Speed also used to be a prized surgical skill pre-anaesthetic) It wasn’t always confidence-inspiring
  6. 6. Liston could amputate a leg in 2 ½ minutes
  7. 7. Liston could amputate a leg in 2 ½ minutes (but in his enthusiasm he once cut off the patient’s testicles too)
  8. 8. “Welcome. I’ll be your doctor today.” Confidence inspiring stuff
  9. 9. The “Liston” of site migrations Step 1: fail to put redirects in place
  10. 10. The “Liston” of site migrations Step 2: rel=canonical every page to the homepage
  11. 11. Good for the patientBad for the patient Accidental Deliberate
  12. 12. Good for the patientBad for the patient Accidental Deliberate Mercury for syphilis
  13. 13. Good for the patientBad for the patient Accidental Deliberate Mercury for syphilis Not washing hands
  14. 14. Good for the patientBad for the patient Accidental Deliberate Mercury for syphilis Not washing hands Garlic + Onion
  15. 15. Of course a lot of deliberate things were neither harmful nor beneficial
  16. 16. Cargo cult: During WW2, Pacific islanders who had never seen manufactured equipment saw modern military planes bring cargo to their remote islands. Read Richard Feynman’s speech
  17. 17. Cargo cult: After the war, cults developed that tried to recreate the conditions that “brought” the planes (runways, control towers, military uniforms) without understanding what had really happened. Read Richard Feynman’s speech
  18. 18. Do we have our own cargo cults?
  19. 19. Do you recommend changing h2 to h1? Do you have a good reason why? Even if it does help, does it help enough to be worth it?
  20. 20. Let’s start washing our hands
  21. 21. The scientific method Step 1: Generate hypotheses
  22. 22. In medicine, old wives tales are a great place to start. Looking at things that appear to work, but we have no idea why is a good source of hypotheses. A great example is this 1,000-year-old “spell” that included garlic, onion and cow’s stomach, and turned out to kill MRSA. I guess the SEO equivalent is to ask the old timers.
  23. 23. In all areas of science, you are at an advantage if you can figure from first principles. Richard Feynman famously used to draw what became known as “Feynman diagrams” to understand sub-atomic interactions through thought experiments alone. The SEO equivalent is to stay abreast of information retrieval and ML papers and formulate hypotheses based on an understanding of how the algorithm likely works.
  24. 24. Finally, you can go mining the data. The obvious SEO equivalent is the various correlation studies into ranking factors. In both medicine and SEO, you obviously have to be wary of spurious correlations. Blindly mining data can get arbitrarily high correlations (the example above has a correlation of 0.993!).
  25. 25. The scientific method Step 2: Try things in the lab Problem: results may not hold, or may come with new side effects
  26. 26. In the SEO space, this is work like that done by IMEC labs. It involves attempting to run controlled experiments on test domains and / or with volunteer participants. The outcomes are normally not improved rankings or traffic that participants care about.
  27. 27. Potential pitfalls
  28. 28. What works in tests may not work in the real world Source: National Institutes of Health
  29. 29. Do you recommend http → https migrations? All else being equal, secure is better. All else is never equal. Side effects may include ranking fluctuations, traffic drops, difficult conversations with your boss. Side effects may include headache, nausea, vomiting, death, dizziness, dysentery, cardiac arrhythmia, mild heart explosions, varicose veins, darkened stool, darkened soul, lycanthropy, trucanthropy, more vomiting, arteriosclerosis, hemorrhoids, mild discomfort, vampirism, spontaneous dental hydroplosion, sugar high, even more vomiting, and mild rash.
  30. 30. The scientific method Step 3: Gold standard scientific trials
  31. 31. TL;DR scurvy bad, science hard You should read the story of one of the first controlled scientific experiments that proved lemons could cure scurvy (in 1747!). The incredible story of how the discovery supported British naval supremacy, and then how compounding errors involving the colonial supply-chain, faster steam-powered ships, and polar bear offal led to the loss of the knowledge, the death of polar explorers, and the eventual rediscovery of vitamin C. Source: idlewords
  32. 32. How SEO split tests work
  33. 33. You might have seen @TomAnthonySEO tweeting about the platform we’ve built to make this easy
  34. 34. Excuse a brief diversion into geeky details
  35. 35. Instead of comparing the performance of the control pages directly with the variant pages, we build a forecast of what’s called the counterfactual which is an estimate of what would have happened if we hadn’t made the change. We use the control group to make a counterfactual forecast that takes into account seasonality and site-wide changes. The black line on the chart above is the actual organic traffic to the variant pages. The blue line is the counterfactual. More: Distilled blog post and free forecasting tool
  36. 36. It’s easiest to analyse the results by looking at the cumulative difference over time between the actual organic traffic and the counterfactual. The pale blue area is the 95% confidence interval. We can see a (statistically) zero effect for an initial time while Google crawls and indexes the test, followed by steady growth. A couple of weeks in, the confidence interval goes above zero and we have a winning test. More: Distilled blog
  37. 37. It’s easiest to analyse the results by looking at the cumulative difference over time between the actual organic traffic and the counterfactual. The pale blue area is the 95% confidence interval. We can see a (statistically) zero effect for an initial time while Google crawls and indexes the test, followed by steady growth. A couple of weeks in, the confidence interval goes above zero and we have a winning test. More: Distilled blog Hashtag winning
  38. 38. Further reading for those interested: ● Predicting the present with Bayesian structural time series [PDF] ● Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time series [PDF] ● CausalImpact R package ● Finding the ROI of title tag changes More: Distilled blog
  39. 39. What should you be testing?
  40. 40. Add structured data One of the easiest tests to run is the addition of structured data - we recommend schema.org via JSON-LD.
  41. 41. smokymountains.com
  42. 42. We got one of the fastest and clearest uplifts we have seen so far with the addition of structured data to detail pages. This chart shows the uplift from adding location-based data to individual property pages.
  43. 43. Improve your organic “adverts” Advert testing plays a huge part in PPC. Looking at typical meta descriptions, it appears it’s rarely a priority in organic.
  44. 44. More: Distilled blog This is the chart I showed you earlier when I was describing the statistics. It’s actually an uplift from improved clickthrough rate. We didn’t detect an accompanying ranking improvement during this experiment.
  45. 45. Make your site mobile friendly I’ve spent a lot of time trying to persuade people to do this without data to back me up. Now I’m going to carry on with data.
  46. 46. More: @TomAnthonySEO This chart shows the uplift from making a bunch of category pages mobile-friendly (with some simple responsiveness) on a holiday site.
  47. 47. Just to help prove that these are real uplifts, we ran a “null” test designed to have no impact
  48. 48. ...and there are tons of tests where we don’t have pretty charts we can share yet
  49. 49. Tabbed versus flat We know Google in particular is paying more attention to CSS and JS. How much difference does it make it content is visible initially on page load?
  50. 50. Additional content You might want to test both adding and removing additional content on category pages. This would test the benefit of additional text vs. increased focus and possibly-improved usage metrics.
  51. 51. Breadcrumbs How much difference does it make if you add breadcrumbs to product pages? Note: this introduces the complexity of testing internal linking. I’ll come back to this.
  52. 52. Canonicals vs. noindex We’ve often argued about the best ways of keeping certain pages and page-types out of the index. Argue with data.
  53. 53. We have all kinds of keyword-targeting test ideas ● Simpler messaging ○ (what happens if you have less keyword targeting?) ● Timely keywords ○ (what happens if you add "2016" in appropriate places?) Argue with data
  54. 54. We’re running tests like these right now Follow @distilled to hear the results first
  55. 55. If you’re going to implement split-testing, there are some things you should know
  56. 56. You can’t assume traffic equality between “buckets” of pages This is why we build a counterfactual comparison using control pages.
  57. 57. Different pages can have different seasonality For example, “roses” pages on valentine’s day. You need to cut outliers.
  58. 58. One site I looked at had 72<html> tags on a single page You’ll find some of your work more sensitive to amusingly broken HTML
  59. 59. We’re not quite sure how to model cross-section impacts This will be needed for testing internal linking structures, for example.
  60. 60. You may detect unexplained phenomena In medicine, this would be things like the placebo effect with no known pathway.
  61. 61. We may find that things that “shouldn’t” work, in fact do drive uplifts. We can speculate that the continuing benefit of changing 302s to 301s (despite Google’s insistence that 302s don’t lose PageRank) is to do with them losing other link signals, but we don’t really know. I’m not sure this matters.
  62. 62. It’s changing the way we make recommendations
  63. 63. The big one: Business cases I wrote more about this in my better business documents post
  64. 64. But I’m also seeing more subtle impacts on my recommendations: ● You can recommend small tweaks and see the benefits compound ● You can test wild hypotheses with unknown upsides ● You can try things that might have a downside (more focused targeting, less copy, etc.) And that’s even before you get the benefits of testing clickthrough rate, and the benefits of pretty charts to show the boss highlighting the impact of your work! More: blog post
  65. 65. Our work is so much easier than theirs
  66. 66. But still, let’s move past “cut the leg off as fast as you can”
  67. 67. @willcritchlow PS - We’re hiring: distilled.net/jobs
  68. 68. ● Surgeons - Phalinn Ooi ● Operating chair - Peter Pelisek ● Potions - Sam Simpson ● Old operating theatre - Uglix ● Searchmetrics rankings drop - img_eisy ● Air drop - Wikipedia ● Test tubes - ironpoison ● Syringes - ad-vantage ● Pills - ashleyrosex ● Stethoscope - proimos ● Old wives’ tale - Jon Bunting, pgillard and John Davey Image credits ● Richard Feynman - Juana la loca, dullhunk and jkannenberg ● Spurious correlation - Tyler Vigen ● Lemon, lime, polar bear - abhijittembhekar, libraryman, ucumari ● Blackboard - arenamontanus ● Facepalm - brandongrasley ● Buckets - mamarazzi ● Rose - alicelingching ● Girders - JFB119 ● Ghost - daveallday ● Bezos - jurvetson

×