Identity and practice come together. Legitimate participant in the field. Etc.
Genre instead of critical eval. Persona and ‘learning’ separate.
Some people visit the web. Some people live there.
DEPARTMENT FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED LIFELONG LEARNINGSome people visit theWeb. Some people livethere.David White@daveowhiteTechnology AssistedLifelong LearningUniversity of Oxford
Visitors and Residents the process Blog post - http://goo.gl/Wom15 Tweet - @daveowhite Presentation - http://goo.gl/Qr3CF Video - http://is.gd/vandrvideo Funding - http://is.gd/vandrproject Paper - http://is.gd/vandrpaper
Impact – REF impact pilot exercise findings …impact should be defined broadly to include social, economic, cultural, environmental, health and quality of life benefits. Impact purely within academia should not be included in this part of the REF
Impact – REF impact pilot exercise findings ‘reach’ and ‘significance’
Reach – Knowledge Mobilisation? Melissa Terras – Digital Humanities http://goo.gl/tIBe3
Public Engagement – Access? www.mathsinthecity.com
Public Engagement – Access? www.oxfordsparks.net
Resident practice…and I’m now part of the Urban Design Groupon Facebook as well, so I tend to post things.So if I’m looking, you know, just procrastinatingon the internet and looking for architecturalthings, or things about house decoration, whichI like a lot, and I find something interesting, Ithink will be useful for them, I post to them onthe group. UKF5
Emerging, Establishing,Embedding, ExperiencedConvenience, Connection, Authority, Relevance Distractionease of use, sharing with legitimacyaccessibility others Create ReliabilitySearching Collaborate Speed Fun, Quantity enjoyment Visitors and Residents
Belonging - practice …the Facebook group is extremely active also, if not for just complaining about an assignment or trying to find a particular reading, but also sharing current news articles with each other. UKG2
Resident practiceI don’t get involved with things like Facebookand Twitter. I have major misgivings about theconfidentiality of things such as that and thefact that people do trawl it to see who saidwhat, and it’s not easy to wipe off what yousaid at some later stage. …I don’t have anobjection to them in principle, but I think inpractice they can actually be quite dangerousweapons. UKF4
Belonging - practice So Wikipedia, I say Wikipedia often but it is not just for learning, I like to go on there and just read things, anything really. So I don’t use that often, if I can avoid it I do. If I was using it as a source in my coursework I probably wouldn’t use Wikipedia because it is unreliable. UKS3
Comments:Good post, Dave, but no (I think)……I think you’re drawing a third discretecategory of interpersonal interaction where youneed to be seeing the boundaries of the othertwo as very fuzzy and indistinct. But that latteridea isn’t going to get anyone keynote gigs orradio 4 interviews…
Things to consider Am I already well known? Is the ‘success’ criteria changing? What do I consider to be credible practice? What do I believe about the production of knowledge? Am I prepared to ‘decompartmentalise’?