Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

July 2011 Trademark Lunch


Published on

Topics covered in this month’s Trademark Group presentation include:
• US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is now emailing acceptance of 8 & 15 declarations,
• a proposed rule to permit the USPTO to require more than one specimen for declarations of use,
• .XXX domain names,
• a review of the case concerning John Dillinger’s right of publicity,
• a case concerning the MUSCLE MAIZE trademark is descriptive, and
• a case concerning word reversal in trademarks.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

July 2011 Trademark Lunch

  1. 1. Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks July, 2011
  2. 2. Practice Announcements <ul><li>USPTO emailing acceptance of 8 & 15 declarations as of 7/3/11 </li></ul><ul><li>Proposed PTO Rule: to permit the Office to require more than one specimen for declarations of use after registration. Comments are due by September 12, 2011. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Handouts <ul><li>Changes to assignment form – CPS </li></ul><ul><li>Guidance forms for SOU, declarations of use/incontestability, renewal and specimens </li></ul><ul><li>.XXX Domain Names - Announcement to clients and offer to submit their trademark to be excluded </li></ul>
  4. 4. John Dillinger – a deal you could refuse <ul><li>Dillinger, LLC sues Electronic Arts </li></ul><ul><li>for references to “Dillinger Tommy </li></ul><ul><li>Gun” in video games based on </li></ul><ul><li>The Godfather </li></ul><ul><li>Indiana’s statute does not apply to personalities that died before Indiana ROP statute was passed in 1994 (predicts IN Sup. Ct. interpretation) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Creating rights after death would greatly expand potential liability under the statute </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assets created after death would frustrate probate law including tax collection and creditors </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. MUSCLE MAIZE is Descriptive of ?? <ul><li>Dictionary definitions of &quot;muscle&quot; and &quot;maize,&quot; third-party registrations with MUSCLE disclaimed, and website evidence convinced TTAB that MUSCLE MAIZE is merely descriptive of &quot;dietary and nutritional supplements&quot; </li></ul><ul><ul><li>MUSCLE MAIZE &quot;would immediately describe, without conjecture or speculation, a significant characteristic or feature of such goods, namely, that they are dietary or nutritional supplements that contain maize starch intended to promote muscle growth and recovery .&quot; </li></ul></ul><ul><li>In re Nutraquest, Inc. , Serial No. 77729645 (July 7, 2011) [not precedential]. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Word Reversal Not Reversible <ul><li>Application for TEKSTONE opposed by Registrant of STONETEC – both by vinyl flooring (identical goods) </li></ul><ul><li>TTAB: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>&quot;the transposition of terms is not always sufficient to distinguish the resulting marks.&quot; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the transposition does not &quot;add anything which would change the commercial impression fostered by these marks.&quot; They are similar in sound and appearance, and &quot;engender the same suggestive connotations inasmuch as they both reference stone technology .&quot; </li></ul></ul><ul><li>StonCor Group, Inc. v. Metroflor Corporation , Opposition No. 91194599 (June 24, 2011) [not precedential]. </li></ul>