Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Digital in 2018 in Eastern Europe Part 2 - East

45,285 views

Published on

All the stats, data, and trends you need to understand the state of the internet, social media, and mobile in Eastern Europe in 2018.

Published in: Internet
  • Be the first to comment

Digital in 2018 in Eastern Europe Part 2 - East

  1. 1. DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST
  2. 2. 2
  3. 3. 3 COUNTRIES INCLUDED IN EACH EUROPE REPORT AUSTRIA BELGIUM FRANCE GERMANY LIECHTENSTEIN LUXEMBOURG MONACO NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND DIGITAL IN 2018 IN WESTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION DIGITAL IN 2018 IN NORTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN NORTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN SOUTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN SOUTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST GUERNSEY IRELAND ISLE OF MAN JERSEY UNITED KINGDOM FAROE ISLANDS ICELAND DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND LATVIA LITHUANIA NORWAY SWEDEN ANDORRA GIBRALTAR ITALY MALTA PORTUGAL SAN MARINO SPAIN ALBANIA BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA CROATIA GREECE KOSOVO TFYR MACEDONIA MONTENEGRO SERBIA SLOVENIA CZECH REPUBLIC HUNGARY POLAND SLOVAKIA BELARUS BULGARIA MOLDOVA ROMANIA RUSSIA UKRAINE WESTERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST NORTHERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST SOUTHERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST SOUTHERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST EASTERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST EASTERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST
  4. 4. 1 GLOBAL YEARBOOK BRUNEI DOMINICAN REP. GUYANA LIBERIA NEPAL ST KITTS & NEVIS TAJIKISTAN AFGHANISTAN BULGARIA ECUADOR HAITI LIBYA NETHERLANDS ST LUCIA TANZANIA ALBANIA BURKINA FASO EGYPT HONDURAS LIECHTENSTEIN NEW CALEDONIA ST MARTIN THAILAND ALGERIA BURUNDI EL SALVADOR HONG KONG LITHUANIA NEW ZEALAND ST PIERRE & MIQUELON TIMOR-LESTE AMERICAN SAMOA CABO VERDE EQUATORIAL GUINEA HUNGARY LUXEMBOURG NICARAGUA ST VINCENT, GRENADINES TOGO ANDORRA CAMBODIA ERITREA ICELAND MACAU NIGER SAMOA TOKELAU ANGOLA CAMEROON ESTONIA INDIA TFYR MACEDONIA NIGERIA SAN MARINO TONGA ANGUILLA CANADA ETHIOPIA INDONESIA MADAGASCAR NIUE SÃO TOMÉ & PRÍNCIPE TRINIDAD & TOBAGO ANTIGUA & BARBUDA CAYMAN IS. FAROE IS. IRAN MALAWI NORFOLK IS. SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA ARGENTINA CENTRAL AFRICAN REP. FALKLAND IS. IRAQ MALAYSIA NORTHERN MARIANA IS. SENEGAL TURKEY ARMENIA CHAD FIJI IRELAND MALDIVES NORWAY SERBIA TURKMENISTAN ARUBA CHILE FINLAND ISLE OF MAN MALI OMAN SEYCHELLES TURKS & CAICOS IS. AUSTRALIA CHINA FRANCE ISRAEL MALTA PAKISTAN SIERRA LEONE TUVALU AUSTRIA CHRISTMAS IS. FRENCH GUIANA ITALY MARSHALL IS. PALAU SINGAPORE UGANDA AZERBAIJAN COCOS IS. FRENCH POLYNESIA JAMAICA MARTINIQUE PALESTINE ST MAARTEN UKRAINE BAHAMAS COLOMBIA GABON JAPAN MAURITANIA PANAMA SLOVAKIA U.A.E. BAHRAIN COMOROS GAMBIA JERSEY MAURITIUS PAPUA NEW GUINEA SLOVENIA U.K. BANGLADESH CONGO, DEM. REP. GEORGIA JORDAN MAYOTTE PARAGUAY SOLOMON IS. U.S.A. BARBADOS CONGO, REP. GERMANY KAZAKHSTAN MEXICO PERU SOMALIA URUGUAY BELARUS COOK IS. GHANA KENYA MICRONESIA PHILIPPINES SOUTH AFRICA UZBEKISTAN BELGIUM COSTA RICA GIBRALTAR KIRIBATI MOLDOVA POLAND SOUTH SUDAN VANUATU BELIZE CÔTE D'IVOIRE GREECE KOREA, NORTH MONACO PORTUGAL SPAIN VENEZUELA BENIN CROATIA GREENLAND KOREA, SOUTH MONGOLIA PUERTO RICO SRI LANKA VIETNAM BERMUDA CUBA GRENADA KOSOVO MONTENEGRO QATAR SUDAN BRITISH VIRGIN IS. BHUTAN CURAÇAO GUADELOUPE KUWAIT MONTSERRAT RÉUNION SURINAME U.S. VIRGIN IS. BOLIVIA CYPRUS GUAM KYRGYZSTAN MOROCCO ROMANIA SWAZILAND WALLIS & FUTUNA BONAIRE, ST EUSTATIUS, SABA CZECH REP. GUATEMALA LAOS MOZAMBIQUE RUSSIA SWEDEN WESTERN SAHARA BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA DENMARK GUERNSEY LATVIA MYANMAR RWANDA SWITZERLAND YEMEN BOTSWANA DJIBOUTI GUINEA LEBANON NAMIBIA ST BARTHÉLEMY SYRIA ZAMBIA BRAZIL DOMINICA GUINEA-BISSAU LESOTHO NAURU ST HELENA TAIWAN ZIMBABWE CLICK THE COUNTRY NAMES BELOW TO ACCESS OUR IN-DEPTH COUNTRY REPORTS
  5. 5. 5 GLOBAL OVERVIEW
  6. 6. 6 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL AROUND THE WORLD IN 2018KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS FOR THE WORLD’S INTERNET, MOBILE, AND SOCIAL MEDIA USERS 7.593 4.021 3.196 5.135 2.958 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION 55% 53% 42% 68% 39%
  7. 7. 7 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 ANNUAL GROWTHYEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +7% +13% +4% +14% +248 MILLION +362 MILLION +218 MILLION +360 MILLION
  8. 8. 8 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA INTERNET PENETRATION BY REGIONJAN 2018 REGIONAL PENETRATION FIGURES, COMPARING INTERNET USERS TO TOTAL POPULATION 53% 88% 61% 48% 68% 94% 90% 77% 74% 49% 39% 12% 27% 51% 65% 50% 36% 57% 58% 69%
  9. 9. 9 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION BY REGIONJAN 2018 TOTAL ACTIVE ACCOUNTS ON THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL NETWORK IN EACH COUNTRY, COMPARED TO POPULATION 42% 70% 59% 40% 63% 66% 54% 56% 45% 38% 11% 6% 7% 31% 55% 12% 20% 64% 55% 55%
  10. 10. 10 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MOBILE CONNECTIVITY BY REGIONJAN 2018 THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED TO POPULATION (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE USERS) 112% 103% 96% 74% 115% 123% 119% 126% 157% 106% 89% 58% 61% 147% 108% 98% 91% 103% 141% 110%
  11. 11. 11 ACTIVE USERS OF KEY GLOBAL SOCIAL PLATFORMSJAN 2018 BASED ON THE MOST RECENTLY PUBLISHED MONTHLY ACTIVE USER ACCOUNTS FOR EACH PLATFORM, IN MILLIONS SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; LATEST COMPANY EARNINGS RELEASES, PRESS RELEASES OR MEDIA STATEMENTS; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE MEDIA; ALL AS OF JANUARY 2018. *ADVISORY: PLATFORMS IDENTIFIED BY (*) HAVE NOT PUBLISHED UPDATED USER FIGURES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS, SO FIGURES MAY BE LESS RELIABLE. **NOTES: THESE PLATFORMS DO NOT PUBLISH MAU DATA. TUMBLR FIGURE IS FOR MONTHLY UNIQUE VISITORS IN DEC 2017, VIA SIMILARWEB. SNAPCHAT FIGURE VIA TECHCRUNCH, JUN 2017. LINKEDIN DATA VIA FORTUNE / APPTOPIA, APR 2017. SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP DATA CORRECT TO: 27 JANUARY 2018 2,167 1,500 1,300 1,300 980 843 800 794 568 376 330 300 300 260 260 255 250 203 200 117 100 97 63 49 FACEBOOK YOUTUBE WHATSAPP FB MESSENGER WECHAT QQ INSTAGRAM TUMBLR** QZONE SINA WEIBO TWITTER BAIDU TIEBA* SKYPE* LINKEDIN** VIBER* SNAPCHAT** REDDIT LINE PINTEREST YY TELEGRAM* VKONTAKTE BBM* KAKAOTALK
  12. 12. 12 TOP MESSENGER APPS BY COUNTRYJAN 2018 BASED ON THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE RANK FOR EACH COUNTRY IN DECEMBER 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE RANK FOR DECEMBER 2017. FIGURES IN PARENTHESES IN THE LEGEND REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES / TERRITORIES IN WHICH EACH PLATFORM IS THE TOP-RANKED MESSENGER APP. WHATSAPP (128) FACEBOOK MESSENGER (72) VIBER (10) WECHAT (3) LINE (3) TELEGRAM (3) IMO (3) KAKAOTALK (1) HANGOUTS (1) ANDROID MESSENGER (1) NO DATA (14)
  13. 13. 13 With more than 4 billion people using the internet for an average of 6 hours each per day, digital has become an essential part of everyday life for most of us. We’re using that connectivity in almost every aspect of our lives, whether it’s chatting with friends, playing games, researching products, tracking our health, or even finding love. As a result, brands need to evolve beyond today’s siloed approach to digital, and build seamless digital integration into everything they do – just as our audiences already have. Here are some tips to help with that: WE ARE SOCIAL’S ANALYSIS: DIGITAL IN 2018 Start with what people really need and want, and not just what the technology can do Focus on creating mutual value at every opportunity, instead of simply ‘selling more stuff’ Make it easy for people to buy online as soon as they’re ready, wherever they are Harness digital tools to keep the conversation going, even after you make a successful sale To learn more about what these Digital, Social and Mobile trends mean for your brand, click here to download our Think Forward report.
  14. 14. 14 HOOTSUITE’S PERSPECTIVE: 2018 SOCIAL TRENDS The evolution of social ROI. It's the end of the road for vanity metrics. Expect to see more organisations evolve their metrics as they look to quantify social’s contribution to tangible business challenges such as lowering costs, increasing revenue, mitigating risk, and attracting talent. Mobile fuels the growth of social TV. In 2018, social networks will encourage brands to become broadcasters as mobile video and social-TV content take the spotlight. We advise caution here as the metrics that bump the stock price of social networks—such as mobile video views—might not help your organisation achieve your own business outcomes. Trust declines, while peer influence rises. From Trump’s tumultuous triumph over traditional media to the fake news phenomenon, we saw a shift in media culture in 2017. It’s clear we’re moving away from trusting traditional institutions—and moving towards smaller spheres of influence where customer communities and engaged employees matter more than ever. Humans, meet AI. The machines have risen. And marketers have discovered they can be delightfully useful. But while marketers rush ahead with chatbots and AI-generated content, it’s still unclear whether customers will value these human- less engagements. The promise (and reality) of social data. From tying together analytics systems to CRM integrations, marketers underestimated the complexity of social data initiatives. Organisations must recalculate the effort and resources needed to turn social data into a true—and unified—source of customer insights. Click here to download our 2018 Social Media Trends Toolkit to align your strategy with the year’s key social network and digital trends.
  15. 15. 11 CLICK HERE TO READ ‘DIGITAL IN 2018’, OUR MAIN GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT DIGITAL IN 2018ESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE AROUND THE WORLD
  16. 16. 16 IN-DEPTH COUNTRY PROFILES
  17. 17. 17 BELARUS
  18. 18. 18 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS vs. POPULATION: A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN BELARUS 9.46 6.73 4.67 11.83 3.85 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 78% 71% 49% 125% 41%
  19. 19. 19 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +14% -0.6% +0.3% +6% +834 THOUSAND -27 THOUSAND +34 THOUSAND +234 THOUSAND
  20. 20. 20 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 9.46 53.5% 46.5% -0.2% 40.3 MILLION YEARS OLD 78% $18,091 100% 100% 100%
  21. 21. 21 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 6.73 71% 3.20 34% MILLION MILLION
  22. 22. 22 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 6.73 6.73 5.79 6.73 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  23. 23. 23 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 78% 20% 2% 0.03% -5% +28% -7% [N/A]
  24. 24. 24 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.BY 5M 48S 9.00 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 YANDEX.BY 3M 48S 2.52 OK.RU 4M 48S 2.15 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 TUT.BY 7M 57S 4.60 ONLINER.BY 9M 52S 5.67 MAIL.RU 5M 23S 3.63 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 ALIEXPRESS.COM 14M 15S 11.29 KUFAR.BY 14M 49S 10.23 ASB.BY 7M 20S 19.90 KINOGO.BY 2M 16S 2.74 SEASONVAR.RU 2M 37S 2.64 GOOGLE.RU 5M 50S 9.76 KINOGO.CC 3M 17S 3.83 AV.BY 16M 28S 13.50 YANDEX.RU 5M 21S 3.22
  25. 25. 25 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). ВК 100 ПОГОДА 82 ОДНОКЛАССНИКИ 64 ЮТУБ 39 КУФАР 34 ТУТ 34 ПЕРЕВОДЧИК 32 ТУТ БАЙ 32 НОВОСТИ 31 ВКОНТАКТЕ 21 ТАБОР 19 ЯНДЕКС 19 ФИЛЬМЫ 18 ОНЛАЙНЕР 16 РЕШЕБНИК 14 ИГРЫ 13 VK 13 ПОГОДА МИНСК 13 В КОНТАКТЕ 13 КАРТА 13
  26. 26. 26 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 4.67 49% 3.85 41% MILLION MILLION
  27. 27. 27 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 2.10 +62% 48% 58% 42% MILLION
  28. 28. 28 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.01% 15.8% 4.1% 8.6% 21.2%
  29. 29. 29 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 4.32% 6.26% 4.37% 2.83% 1.11%
  30. 30. 30 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 1.50 16% 61% 39% MILLION
  31. 31. 31 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 11.83 125% 53% 47% 54% MILLION
  32. 32. 32 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 69.61 51.21 76.71 88.18 67.78
  33. 33. 33 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 72% 13% [N/A] 22% 10% 17% 22% 22%
  34. 34. 34 BULGARIA
  35. 35. 35 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN BULGARIA 7.06 4.66 3.70 5.61 3.20 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 75% 66% 52% 79% 45%
  36. 36. 36 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +12% +3% [N/A] +10% +505 THOUSAND +100 THOUSAND [N/A] +300 THOUSAND
  37. 37. 37 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 7.06 51.4% 48.6% -0.7% 43.0 MILLION YEARS OLD 75% $19,509 98% 98% 99%
  38. 38. 38 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 94% 55% 63% 26% 96% 12% 5% 3%
  39. 39. 39 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 4.66 66% 4.03 57% MILLION MILLION
  40. 40. 40 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 4.21 4.22 4.16 4.22 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  41. 41. 41 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 85% 11% 3% 1%
  42. 42. 42 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 43.81 31.52 29% 41% 23% MBPS MBPS
  43. 43. 43 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 59% 38% 3% 0.03% -13% +29% -5% [N/A]
  44. 44. 44 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.BG SEARCH 96,000,000 12M 43S 10.1 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 75,300,000 19M 45S 18.4 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 64,700,000 30M 27S 13.2 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 33,500,000 10M 32S 13.0 ABV.BG EMAIL 22,400,000 7M 29S 9.5 ZAMUNDA.NET TORRENTS 14,600,000 6M 45S 11.1 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 11,100,000 4M 49S 4.0 OLX.BG SHOPPING 8,800,000 10M 14S 11.5 DIR.BG NEWS & MEDIA 6,200,000 6M 09S 6.5 SPORTAL.BG NEWS & MEDIA 5,800,000 5M 52S 4.2
  45. 45. 45 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.BG 6M 23S 10.74 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 ZAMUNDA.NET 6M 11S 11.00 ABV.BG 4M 02S 3.61 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 OLX.BG 9M 39S 8.15 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 ARENABG.COM 4M 18S 6.04 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 BRADVA.BG 5M 02S 2.90 DIR.BG 7M 19S 6.79 YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 SINOPTIK.BG 1M 58S 2.24 VBOX7.COM 2M 49S 2.01 REDDIT.COM 15M 46S 10.05 VESTI.BG 4M 28S 3.59 EMAG.BG 7M 00S 6.66
  46. 46. 46 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 35% 38% 9% 29% 19% 38% 36% 11% 30% 20%
  47. 47. 47 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 36 ABV 34 ФЕЙСБУК 31 GOOGLE 30 НОВИНИ 25 ВРЕМЕТО 19 АБВ 13 ПРЕВОДАЧ 12 TRANSLATE 11 MOBILE 11 OLX 10 БЛИЦ 10 PREVODACH 10 NOVINI 10 MP3 10 24 9 NOVA 9 YOU 8 СИНОПТИК 8
  48. 48. 48 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 56% 18% 9% 4% 13%
  49. 49. 49 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 95% 17% 20% 20% 25%
  50. 50. 50 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 3.70 52% 3.20 45% MILLION MILLION
  51. 51. 51 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 3.70 +3% 86% 51% 49% MILLION
  52. 52. 52 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 3,700,000 51% 49% 13 – 17 220,000 3% 3% 18 – 24 700,000 9% 10% 25 – 34 950,000 13% 13% 35 – 44 800,000 11% 11% 45 – 54 540,000 8% 7% 55 – 64 320,000 5% 3% 65+ 160,000 2% 2% 111 342 463 402 292 201 90 110 360 490 400 250 120 69
  53. 53. 53 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.07% 14.9% 0.9% 7.0% 14.8%
  54. 54. 54 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 5.12% 6.28% 2.93% 4.83% 4.83%
  55. 55. 55 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 1.00 14% 53% 47% MILLION
  56. 56. 56 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 5.61 79% 10.92 155% 1.95 MILLION MILLION
  57. 57. 57 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 10.92 155% 21% 79% 63% MILLION
  58. 58. 58 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 71.06 62.56 70.77 84.25 68.37
  59. 59. 59 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 47% 15% 36% 5% 47% 29% 13% 15%
  60. 60. 60 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 63% 12% [N/A] 16% 10% 15% 14% 19%
  61. 61. 61 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $229.3 $169.8 $51.7 $37.2 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $48.5 $105.7 $1.4 $9.8 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  62. 62. 62 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +12% +9% +10% +12% +7% +28% +13% +11%
  63. 63. 63 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 2.58 37% $536.4 $208 MILLION MILLION +7% +10% +4%
  64. 64. 64 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 39% 36% 6% 5% 4% 4% 3% 2% 1% ONLINE TELEVISION POSTER PRESS DIRECT MAIL IN-STORE EMAIL OTHER RADIO
  65. 65. 65 MOLDOVA
  66. 66. 66 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS vs. POPULATION: A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN MOLDOVA 4.05 2.88 1.00 4.56 0.80 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 45% 71% 25% 113% 20%
  67. 67. 67 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +42% +23% +21% +31% +856 THOUSAND +190 THOUSAND +786 THOUSAND +190 THOUSAND
  68. 68. 68 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 4.05 52.0% 48.0% -0.3% 37.0 MILLION YEARS OLD 45% $5,343 99% 99% 100%
  69. 69. 69 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 2.88 71% 2.30 57% MILLION MILLION
  70. 70. 70 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 2.88 2.87 1.95 2.87 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  71. 71. 71 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 74% 24% 2% 0.01% -7% +33% -8% [N/A]
  72. 72. 72 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 OK.RU 4M 48S 2.15 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 999.MD 20M 22S 12.60 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 MAIL.RU 5M 23S 3.63 YANDEX.RU 5M 21S 3.22 GOOGLE.RU 5M 50S 9.76 ALIEXPRESS.COM 14M 15S 11.29 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 GOOGLE.MD 4M 18S 6.02 POINT.MD 8M 09S 3.90 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 KINOGO.CC 3M 17S 3.83 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 GISMETEO.MD 2M 20S 2.66 TORRENTSMD.COM 5M 23S 3.10 IVI.RU 3M 09S 2.78 MAKLER.MD 9M 04S 5.78
  73. 73. 73 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). YOUTUBE 100 СКАЧАТЬ 94 ПОГОДА 74 FACEBOOK 72 GOOGLE 66 ODNOKLASSNIKI 63 ВК 55 999 54 ОДНОКЛАССНИКИ 52 OK 47 TRANSLATE 39 ЮТУБ 38 METEO 37 ФИЛЬМЫ 34 ПЕРЕВОДЧИК 29 НОВОСТИ 27 JOCURI 25 VK 22 999.MD 22 ИГРЫ 21
  74. 74. 74 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 1.00 25% 800.0 20% MILLION THOUSAND
  75. 75. 75 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 1.00 +23% 80% 56% 44% MILLION
  76. 76. 76 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.11% 7.9% 9.0% 22.1% 35.7%
  77. 77. 77 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 3.70% 2.49% 2.96% 4.77% 1.06%
  78. 78. 78 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 450.0 11% 59% 41% THOUSAND
  79. 79. 79 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 4.56 113% 67% 33% 59% MILLION
  80. 80. 80 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 67.16 61.29 65.93 80.38 62.65
  81. 81. 81 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 18% 6% [N/A] 10% 6% 7% 10% 10%
  82. 82. 82 ROMANIA
  83. 83. 83 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN ROMANIA 19.63 13.74 10.00 15.97 8.90 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 55% 70% 51% 81% 45%
  84. 84. 84 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +22% +6% +8% +11% +3 MILLION +600 THOUSAND +1 MILLION +900 THOUSAND
  85. 85. 85 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 19.63 51.6% 48.4% -0.5% 41.6 MILLION YEARS OLD 55% $23,626 99% 99% 99%
  86. 86. 86 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 96% 60% 56% 23% 96% 4% 3% 5%
  87. 87. 87 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 13.74 70% 12.23 62% MILLION MILLION
  88. 88. 88 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 12.08 11.68 11.24 11.68 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  89. 89. 89 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 85% 8% 4% 3%
  90. 90. 90 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 98.64 28.65 20% 32% 38% MBPS MBPS
  91. 91. 91 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 59% 38% 3% 0.04% -7% +16% -23% +100%
  92. 92. 92 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.RO SEARCH 161,300,000 12M 12S 9.4 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 115,100,000 36M 32S 14.7 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 112,800,000 19M 55S 19.1 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 59,800,000 10M 23S 13.1 YAHOO.COM NEWS & MEDIA 43,800,000 8M 17S 7.3 EMAG.RO SHOPPING 16,300,000 9M 35S 11.2 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 14,300,000 4M 47S 4.3 FILELIST.RO TORRENTS 13,500,000 6M 20S 8.0 OLX.RO SHOPPING 13,000,000 12M 05S 13.3 BETANO.COM ENTERTAINMENT 8,600,000 3M 01S 2.2
  93. 93. 93 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.RO 6M 20S 10.26 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61 EMAG.RO 8M 55S 7.83 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 OLX.RO 10M 06S 8.74 FILELIST.RO 5M 38S 7.27 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 OK.RU 4M 48S 2.15 IMDB.COM 3M 30S 4.14 GOOGLE.COM.UA 6M 17S 8.05 REDDIT.COM 15M 46S 10.05 ADEVARUL.RO 4M 16S 2.25 BETANO.COM 1M 18S 1.11 OLX.UA 14M 26S 10.33 LIVEJASMIN.COM 1M 59S 1.44
  94. 94. 94 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 44% 44% 11% 36% 21% 40% 34% 10% 31% 16%
  95. 95. 95 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 39 GOOGLE 33 FILME 30 VREMEA 27 YAHOO 25 TRANSLATE 22 MAIL 22 OLX 20 YAHOO MAIL 17 METEO 16 EMAG 12 GOOGLE TRANSLATE 11 STIRI 11 FILME ONLINE 10 FLASHSCORE 10 SPORT 9 JOCURI 8 YOU 6 TRADUCERE 6
  96. 96. 96 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 57% 17% 7% 3% 17%
  97. 97. 97 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 96% 10% 4% 12% 12%
  98. 98. 98 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 10.00 51% 8.90 45% MILLION MILLION
  99. 99. 99 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 10.00 +6% 89% 50% 50% MILLION
  100. 100. 100 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 10,000,000 50% 50% 13 – 17 730,000 4% 4% 18 – 24 2,100,000 10% 11% 25 – 34 2,600,000 13% 14% 35 – 44 2,200,000 11% 11% 45 – 54 1,400,000 7% 6% 55 – 64 720,000 4% 3% 65+ 310,000 1% 2% 376 990 1,287 1,089 743 416 149 357 1,062 1,351 1,062 647 309 164
  101. 101. 101 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.87% 21.9% 18.2% 28.8% 21.2%
  102. 102. 102 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 7.73% 9.80% 10.85% 3.42% 10.22%
  103. 103. 103 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 3.20 16% 53% 47% MILLION
  104. 104. 104 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 15.97 81% 27.61 141% 1.73 MILLION MILLION
  105. 105. 105 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 27.61 141% 50% 50% 68% MILLION
  106. 106. 106 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 71.51 66.05 71.90 78.88 69.81
  107. 107. 107 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 44% 12% 30% 4% 43% 25% 11% 12%
  108. 108. 108 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 61% 12% 0.5% 12% 10% 13% 11% 12%
  109. 109. 109 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $436.5 $712.5 $174.8 $346.1 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $427.7 $437.4 $2.7 $49.7 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  110. 110. 110 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +22% +11% +19% +19% +15% +31% +11% +12%
  111. 111. 111 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 9.39 48% $2.098 $223 MILLION BILLION +9% +16% +6%
  112. 112. 112 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 35% 34% 6% 6% 6% 4% 3% 3% 1% ONLINE TELEVISION PRESS IN-STORE OTHER EMAIL RADIO POSTER DIRECT MAIL
  113. 113. 113 THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
  114. 114. 114 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 144.0 110.0 67.8 114.2 55.9 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 74% 76% 47% 79% 39%
  115. 115. 115 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +4% +15% +3% +23% +5 MILLION +9 MILLION +3 MILLION +11 MILLION
  116. 116. 116 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 144.0 53.5% 46.5% (UNCHANGED) 39.8 MILLION YEARS OLD 74% $23,163 100% 100% 100%
  117. 117. 117 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 97% 61% 68% 28% 92% 3% 4% 3%
  118. 118. 118 AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME (BROADCAST, STREAMING AND VIDEO ON DEMAND) AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT LISTENING TO STREAMING MUSIC JAN 2018 TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS. 6H 27M 2H 19M 2H 53M 0H 46M
  119. 119. 119 BELIEVE THAT NEW TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS PREFER TO COMPLETE TASKS DIGITALLY WHENEVER POSSIBLE BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY AND PROTECTION ARE VERY IMPORTANT DELETE COOKIES FROM INTERNET BROWSER TO PROTECT PRIVACY JAN 2018 ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES USE AN AD-BLOCKING TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS BEING DISPLAYED SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS. 48% 44% 81% 30% 36%
  120. 120. 120 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 110.0 76% 91.4 63% MILLION MILLION
  121. 121. 121 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 109.6 110.0 102.3 110.0 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  122. 122. 122 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 85% 11% 4% 0%
  123. 123. 123 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 37.41 16.65 37% 29% 31% MBPS MBPS
  124. 124. 124 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 75% 21% 4% 0.05% -5% +28% -9% +25%
  125. 125. 125 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 YANDEX.RU SEARCH 2,854,200,000 10M 28S 9.1 GOOGLE.RU SEARCH 2,433,600,000 7M 54S 5.7 VK.COM SOCIAL 2,143,700,000 16M 58S 23.4 MAIL.RU EMAIL 1,495,500,000 7M 21S 6.4 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 1,352,400,000 18M 38S 8.4 OK.RU SOCIAL 965,700,000 13M 54S 18.2 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 788,500,000 5M 25S 5.9 AVITO.RU SHOPPING 347,000,000 11M 03S 14.2 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 315,100,000 3M 52S 2.9 NEWS.YANDEX.RU NEWS & MEDIA 292,700,000 3M 23S 4.7
  126. 126. 126 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 GOOGLE.RU 5M 50S 9.76 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 YANDEX.RU 5M 21S 3.22 MAIL.RU 5M 23S 3.63 OK.RU 4M 48S 2.15 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 AVITO.RU 15M 07S 12.53 ALIEXPRESS.COM 14M 15S 11.29 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 SBERBANK.RU 8M 40S 6.31 KINOPOISK.RU 4M 14S 3.71 RAMBLER.RU 6M 38S 3.99 USERAPI.COM 4M 18S 3.32 GISMETEO.RU 2M 27S 2.77 LIVEJOURNAL.COM 5M 57S 3.35 DROM.RU 13M 02S 12.16 PIKABU.RU 7M 54S 3.66 TWITCH.TV 5M 55S 2.91
  127. 127. 127 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 42% 37% 7% 33% 16% 50% 40% 14% 40% 18%
  128. 128. 128 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 44 BLIC 39 KURIR 38 BEOGRAD 36 VESTI 32 PROGNOZA 27 GOOGLE 26 VREMENSKA PROGNOZA 24 KUPUJEM PRODAJEM 18 GMAIL 16 POLOVNI 16 TRANSLATE 16 INSTAGRAM 13 PREVODILAC 13 REZULTATI 12 VREME 12 ALO 12 POLOVNI AUTOMOBILI 12 B92 10
  129. 129. 129 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 56% 22% 8% 1% 12%
  130. 130. 130 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 91% 11% 10% 19% 34%
  131. 131. 131 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 67.8 47% 55.9 39% MILLION MILLION
  132. 132. 132 JAN 2018 MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT. 63% 61% 42% 38% 38% 35% 33% 31% 30% 18% 11% 7% YOUTUBE VK ODNOKLASSNIKI WHATSAPP SKYPE FACEBOOK VIBER INSTAGRAM GOOGLE+ TWITTER FB MESSENGER TWITCH
  133. 133. 133 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 36.00 +89% 39% 56% 44% MILLION
  134. 134. 134 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN MILLIONS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE MILLION. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 36,000,000 56% 44% 13 – 17 2,600,000 5% 3% 18 – 24 6,800,000 10% 9% 25 – 34 10,000,000 16% 13% 35 – 44 9,600,000 14% 12% 45 – 54 4,600,000 7% 5% 55 – 64 1,400,000 2% 2% 65+ 580,000 0.9% 0.7% 1.6 3.7 5.7 5.2 2.6 0.9 0.3 0.9 3.1 4.8 4.4 1.9 0.6 0.3
  135. 135. 135 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +1.28% 12.9% 11.3% 23.8% 27.4%
  136. 136. 136 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 5.62% 10.64% 6.17% 6.07% 5.65%
  137. 137. 137 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 29.00 20% 59% 41% MILLION
  138. 138. 138 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 114.2 79% 253.6 176% 2.22 MILLION MILLION
  139. 139. 139 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 253.6 176% 75% 25% 56% MILLION
  140. 140. 140 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 70.34 51.56 75.27 86.40 73.01
  141. 141. 141 PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MESSENGERS PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION WATCHING VIDEOS ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION PLAYING GAMES ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE BANKING JAN 2018 MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MAP SERVICES SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 51% 45% 38% 29% 43%
  142. 142. 142 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 53% 8% 28% 3% 44% 21% 16% 11%
  143. 143. 143 JAN 2018 TOP APP RANKINGSRANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS AND BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 SOURCE: APP ANNIE, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON DATA IN THE APP ANNIE 2017 RETROSPECTIVE REPORT. FOR MORE DETAILS, VISIT HTTPS://WWW.APPANNIE.COM/ NOTES: RANKINGS ARE BASED ON COMBINED DATA FOR BOTH THE APPLE iOS APP STORE AND THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE. MONTHLY ACTIVE USER RANKINGS ARE BASED ON MONTHLY AVERAGES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: RANKINGS EXCLUDE PRE-INSTALLED APPS, SUCH AS YOUTUBE ON ANDROID DEVICES, AND SAFARI ON APPLE DEVICES. WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK VIBER RAKUTEN VK MAIL.RU GROUP SBERBANK ONLINE SBERBANK OF RUSSIA INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK ALIEXPRESS ALIBABA GROUP 2GIS LISTINGS 2GIS SKYPE MICROSOFT YANDEX.NAVIGATOR YANDEX YANDEX.MAPS YANDEX WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK VK MAIL.RU GROUP VIBER RAKUTEN SBERBANK ONLINE SBERBANK OF RUSSIA YOULA MAIL.RU GROUP INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK ALIEXPRESS ALIBABA GROUP AVITO NASPERS YANDEX.BROWSER YANDEX OK.RU MAIL.RU GROUP
  144. 144. 144 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 67% 21% [N/A] 18% 20% 22% 17% 18%
  145. 145. 145 SEARCHED ONLINE FOR A PRODUCT OR SERVICE TO BUY VISITED AN ONLINE RETAIL STORE PURCHASED A PRODUCT OR SERVICE ONLINE MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A MOBILE DEVICE SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 63% 67% 46% 23% 23%
  146. 146. 146 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $4.783 $3.665 $1.349 $2.071 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION $4.175 $7.903 $0.030 $0.713 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION

×