Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Digital in 2018 in Eastern Europe Part 1 - West

37,050 views

Published on

All the stats, data, and trends you need to understand the state of the internet, social media, and mobile in Eastern Europe in 2018.

Published in: Internet

Digital in 2018 in Eastern Europe Part 1 - West

  1. 1. DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1:WEST
  2. 2. 2
  3. 3. 3 COUNTRIES INCLUDED IN EACH EUROPE REPORT AUSTRIA BELGIUM FRANCE GERMANY LIECHTENSTEIN LUXEMBOURG MONACO NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND DIGITAL IN 2018 IN WESTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION DIGITAL IN 2018 IN NORTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN NORTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN SOUTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN SOUTHERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 1: WEST DIGITAL IN 2018 IN EASTERN EUROPEESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE ACROSS THE REGION PART 2: EAST GUERNSEY IRELAND ISLE OF MAN JERSEY UNITED KINGDOM FAROE ISLANDS ICELAND DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND LATVIA LITHUANIA NORWAY SWEDEN ANDORRA GIBRALTAR ITALY MALTA PORTUGAL SAN MARINO SPAIN ALBANIA BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA CROATIA GREECE KOSOVO TFYR MACEDONIA MONTENEGRO SERBIA SLOVENIA CZECH REPUBLIC HUNGARY POLAND SLOVAKIA BELARUS BULGARIA MOLDOVA ROMANIA RUSSIA UKRAINE WESTERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST NORTHERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST SOUTHERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST SOUTHERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST EASTERN EUROPE PART 1: EAST EASTERN EUROPE PART 1: WEST
  4. 4. 1 GLOBAL YEARBOOK BRUNEI DOMINICAN REP. GUYANA LIBERIA NEPAL ST KITTS & NEVIS TAJIKISTAN AFGHANISTAN BULGARIA ECUADOR HAITI LIBYA NETHERLANDS ST LUCIA TANZANIA ALBANIA BURKINA FASO EGYPT HONDURAS LIECHTENSTEIN NEW CALEDONIA ST MARTIN THAILAND ALGERIA BURUNDI EL SALVADOR HONG KONG LITHUANIA NEW ZEALAND ST PIERRE & MIQUELON TIMOR-LESTE AMERICAN SAMOA CABO VERDE EQUATORIAL GUINEA HUNGARY LUXEMBOURG NICARAGUA ST VINCENT, GRENADINES TOGO ANDORRA CAMBODIA ERITREA ICELAND MACAU NIGER SAMOA TOKELAU ANGOLA CAMEROON ESTONIA INDIA TFYR MACEDONIA NIGERIA SAN MARINO TONGA ANGUILLA CANADA ETHIOPIA INDONESIA MADAGASCAR NIUE SÃO TOMÉ & PRÍNCIPE TRINIDAD & TOBAGO ANTIGUA & BARBUDA CAYMAN IS. FAROE IS. IRAN MALAWI NORFOLK IS. SAUDI ARABIA TUNISIA ARGENTINA CENTRAL AFRICAN REP. FALKLAND IS. IRAQ MALAYSIA NORTHERN MARIANA IS. SENEGAL TURKEY ARMENIA CHAD FIJI IRELAND MALDIVES NORWAY SERBIA TURKMENISTAN ARUBA CHILE FINLAND ISLE OF MAN MALI OMAN SEYCHELLES TURKS & CAICOS IS. AUSTRALIA CHINA FRANCE ISRAEL MALTA PAKISTAN SIERRA LEONE TUVALU AUSTRIA CHRISTMAS IS. FRENCH GUIANA ITALY MARSHALL IS. PALAU SINGAPORE UGANDA AZERBAIJAN COCOS IS. FRENCH POLYNESIA JAMAICA MARTINIQUE PALESTINE ST MAARTEN UKRAINE BAHAMAS COLOMBIA GABON JAPAN MAURITANIA PANAMA SLOVAKIA U.A.E. BAHRAIN COMOROS GAMBIA JERSEY MAURITIUS PAPUA NEW GUINEA SLOVENIA U.K. BANGLADESH CONGO, DEM. REP. GEORGIA JORDAN MAYOTTE PARAGUAY SOLOMON IS. U.S.A. BARBADOS CONGO, REP. GERMANY KAZAKHSTAN MEXICO PERU SOMALIA URUGUAY BELARUS COOK IS. GHANA KENYA MICRONESIA PHILIPPINES SOUTH AFRICA UZBEKISTAN BELGIUM COSTA RICA GIBRALTAR KIRIBATI MOLDOVA POLAND SOUTH SUDAN VANUATU BELIZE CÔTE D'IVOIRE GREECE KOREA, NORTH MONACO PORTUGAL SPAIN VENEZUELA BENIN CROATIA GREENLAND KOREA, SOUTH MONGOLIA PUERTO RICO SRI LANKA VIETNAM BERMUDA CUBA GRENADA KOSOVO MONTENEGRO QATAR SUDAN BRITISH VIRGIN IS. BHUTAN CURAÇAO GUADELOUPE KUWAIT MONTSERRAT RÉUNION SURINAME U.S. VIRGIN IS. BOLIVIA CYPRUS GUAM KYRGYZSTAN MOROCCO ROMANIA SWAZILAND WALLIS & FUTUNA BONAIRE, ST EUSTATIUS, SABA CZECH REP. GUATEMALA LAOS MOZAMBIQUE RUSSIA SWEDEN WESTERN SAHARA BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA DENMARK GUERNSEY LATVIA MYANMAR RWANDA SWITZERLAND YEMEN BOTSWANA DJIBOUTI GUINEA LEBANON NAMIBIA ST BARTHÉLEMY SYRIA ZAMBIA BRAZIL DOMINICA GUINEA-BISSAU LESOTHO NAURU ST HELENA TAIWAN ZIMBABWE CLICK THE COUNTRY NAMES BELOW TO ACCESS OUR IN-DEPTH COUNTRY REPORTS
  5. 5. 5 GLOBAL OVERVIEW
  6. 6. 6 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL AROUND THE WORLD IN 2018KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS FOR THE WORLD’S INTERNET, MOBILE, AND SOCIAL MEDIA USERS 7.593 4.021 3.196 5.135 2.958 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION 55% 53% 42% 68% 39%
  7. 7. 7 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 ANNUAL GROWTHYEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +7% +13% +4% +14% +248 MILLION +362 MILLION +218 MILLION +360 MILLION
  8. 8. 8 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA INTERNET PENETRATION BY REGIONJAN 2018 REGIONAL PENETRATION FIGURES, COMPARING INTERNET USERS TO TOTAL POPULATION 53% 88% 61% 48% 68% 94% 90% 77% 74% 49% 39% 12% 27% 51% 65% 50% 36% 57% 58% 69%
  9. 9. 9 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION BY REGIONJAN 2018 TOTAL ACTIVE ACCOUNTS ON THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL NETWORK IN EACH COUNTRY, COMPARED TO POPULATION 42% 70% 59% 40% 63% 66% 54% 56% 45% 38% 11% 6% 7% 31% 55% 12% 20% 64% 55% 55%
  10. 10. 10 GLOBAL AVERAGE: SOURCES: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. NORTHERN AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICA SOUTH AMERICA SOUTHERN AFRICA WESTERN ASIA NORTHERN EUROPE EASTERN EUROPE EASTERN ASIA OCEANIA CENTRAL ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA SOUTHEAST ASIA THE CARIBBEAN WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MOBILE CONNECTIVITY BY REGIONJAN 2018 THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED TO POPULATION (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE USERS) 112% 103% 96% 74% 115% 123% 119% 126% 157% 106% 89% 58% 61% 147% 108% 98% 91% 103% 141% 110%
  11. 11. 11 ACTIVE USERS OF KEY GLOBAL SOCIAL PLATFORMSJAN 2018 BASED ON THE MOST RECENTLY PUBLISHED MONTHLY ACTIVE USER ACCOUNTS FOR EACH PLATFORM, IN MILLIONS SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; LATEST COMPANY EARNINGS RELEASES, PRESS RELEASES OR MEDIA STATEMENTS; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE MEDIA; ALL AS OF JANUARY 2018. *ADVISORY: PLATFORMS IDENTIFIED BY (*) HAVE NOT PUBLISHED UPDATED USER FIGURES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS, SO FIGURES MAY BE LESS RELIABLE. **NOTES: THESE PLATFORMS DO NOT PUBLISH MAU DATA. TUMBLR FIGURE IS FOR MONTHLY UNIQUE VISITORS IN DEC 2017, VIA SIMILARWEB. SNAPCHAT FIGURE VIA TECHCRUNCH, JUN 2017. LINKEDIN DATA VIA FORTUNE / APPTOPIA, APR 2017. SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP DATA CORRECT TO: 27 JANUARY 2018 2,167 1,500 1,300 1,300 980 843 800 794 568 376 330 300 300 260 260 255 250 203 200 117 100 97 63 49 FACEBOOK YOUTUBE WHATSAPP FB MESSENGER WECHAT QQ INSTAGRAM TUMBLR** QZONE SINA WEIBO TWITTER BAIDU TIEBA* SKYPE* LINKEDIN** VIBER* SNAPCHAT** REDDIT LINE PINTEREST YY TELEGRAM* VKONTAKTE BBM* KAKAOTALK
  12. 12. 12 TOP MESSENGER APPS BY COUNTRYJAN 2018 BASED ON THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE RANK FOR EACH COUNTRY IN DECEMBER 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE RANK FOR DECEMBER 2017. FIGURES IN PARENTHESES IN THE LEGEND REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES / TERRITORIES IN WHICH EACH PLATFORM IS THE TOP-RANKED MESSENGER APP. WHATSAPP (128) FACEBOOK MESSENGER (72) VIBER (10) WECHAT (3) LINE (3) TELEGRAM (3) IMO (3) KAKAOTALK (1) HANGOUTS (1) ANDROID MESSENGER (1) NO DATA (14)
  13. 13. 13 With more than 4 billion people using the internet for an average of 6 hours each per day, digital has become an essential part of everyday life for most of us. We’re using that connectivity in almost every aspect of our lives, whether it’s chatting with friends, playing games, researching products, tracking our health, or even finding love. As a result, brands need to evolve beyond today’s siloed approach to digital, and build seamless digital integration into everything they do – just as our audiences already have. Here are some tips to help with that: WE ARE SOCIAL’S ANALYSIS: DIGITAL IN 2018 Start with what people really need and want, and not just what the technology can do Focus on creating mutual value at every opportunity, instead of simply ‘selling more stuff’ Make it easy for people to buy online as soon as they’re ready, wherever they are Harness digital tools to keep the conversation going, even after you make a successful sale To learn more about what these Digital, Social and Mobile trends mean for your brand, click here to download our Think Forward report.
  14. 14. 14 HOOTSUITE’S PERSPECTIVE: 2018 SOCIAL TRENDS The evolution of social ROI. It's the end of the road for vanity metrics. Expect to see more organisations evolve their metrics as they look to quantify social’s contribution to tangible business challenges such as lowering costs, increasing revenue, mitigating risk, and attracting talent. Mobile fuels the growth of social TV. In 2018, social networks will encourage brands to become broadcasters as mobile video and social-TV content take the spotlight. We advise caution here as the metrics that bump the stock price of social networks—such as mobile video views—might not help your organisation achieve your own business outcomes. Trust declines, while peer influence rises. From Trump’s tumultuous triumph over traditional media to the fake news phenomenon, we saw a shift in media culture in 2017. It’s clear we’re moving away from trusting traditional institutions—and moving towards smaller spheres of influence where customer communities and engaged employees matter more than ever. Humans, meet AI. The machines have risen. And marketers have discovered they can be delightfully useful. But while marketers rush ahead with chatbots and AI-generated content, it’s still unclear whether customers will value these human- less engagements. The promise (and reality) of social data. From tying together analytics systems to CRM integrations, marketers underestimated the complexity of social data initiatives. Organisations must recalculate the effort and resources needed to turn social data into a true—and unified—source of customer insights. Click here to download our 2018 Social Media Trends Toolkit to align your strategy with the year’s key social network and digital trends.
  15. 15. 11 CLICK HERE TO READ ‘DIGITAL IN 2018’, OUR MAIN GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT DIGITAL IN 2018ESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND ECOMMERCE USE AROUND THE WORLD
  16. 16. 16 IN-DEPTH COUNTRY PROFILES
  17. 17. 17 CZECH REPUBLIC
  18. 18. 18 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 10.62 9.32 5.30 8.73 4.30 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 73% 88% 50% 82% 40%
  19. 19. 19 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. 0% +8% +0.7% +10% (UNCHANGED) +400 THOUSAND +58 THOUSAND +400 THOUSAND
  20. 20. 20 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 10.62 50.8% 49.2% +0.1% 42.5 MILLION YEARS OLD 73% $35,140 99% 99% 99%
  21. 21. 21 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 98% 65% 76% 29% 90% 7% 4% 6%
  22. 22. 22 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 9.32 88% 7.56 71% MILLION MILLION
  23. 23. 23 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 9.32 8.12 9.32 8.13 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  24. 24. 24 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 80% 17% 3% 0%
  25. 25. 25 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 35.26 36.13 42% 35% 18% MBPS MBPS
  26. 26. 26 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 79% 18% 3% 0.08% -8% +65% -2% +33%
  27. 27. 27 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.CZ SEARCH 132,000,000 13M 10S 10.2 SEZNAM.CZ NEWS & MEDIA 130,300,000 12M 08S 8.2 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 102,200,000 17M 40S 13.3 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 94,400,000 26M 47S 11.4 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 66,700,000 12M 02S 13.6 NOVINKY.CZ NEWS & MEDIA 44,500,000 4M 11S 2.9 IDNES.CZ NEWS & MEDIA 37,900,000 7M 10S 8.2 SZN.CZ EMAIL 26,800,000 2M 45S 1.7 SUPER.CZ CELEBRITIES 25,000,000 2M 16S 2.2 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 19,600,000 4M 56S 3.9
  28. 28. 28 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.CZ 6M 21S 10.61 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 SEZNAM.CZ 6M 22S 3.08 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 IDNES.CZ 7M 50S 4.78 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 NOVINKY.CZ 5M 15S 3.24 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 CSFD.CZ 5M 09S 5.88 SUPER.CZ 2M 55S 2.73 ALZA.CZ 6M 58S 6.17 SZN.CZ 1M 09S 1.21 HEUREKA.CZ 3M 56S 4.20 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 CENTRUM.CZ 4M 30S 2.21 ULOZ.TO 5M 14S 4.12 AKTUALNE.CZ 4M 29S 2.62 SEZNAMZPRAVY.CZ 2M 33S 1.47
  29. 29. 29 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 45% 34% 5% 28% 16% 69% 42% 11% 43% 26%
  30. 30. 30 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). SEZNAM 100 FACEBOOK 71 YOUTUBE 51 GOOGLE 44 SE 35 PŘEKLADAČ 31 POČASÍ 29 IDOS 19 IDNES 16 CENTRUM 14 MAPY 12 EMAIL 12 PREKLADAC 11 POCASI 11 SPORT 10 BAZOS 10 INSTAGRAM 9 LIDL 9 SEZNAM.CZ 9 CSFD 9
  31. 31. 31 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 40% 32% 11% 2% 15%
  32. 32. 32 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 86% 22% 18% 17% 25%
  33. 33. 33 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 5.30 50% 4.30 40% MILLION MILLION
  34. 34. 34 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 5.30 +8% 81% 52% 48% MILLION
  35. 35. 35 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 5,300,000 52% 48% 13 – 17 370,000 4% 3% 18 – 24 1,000,000 10% 10% 25 – 34 1,500,000 14% 14% 35 – 44 1,200,000 12% 11% 45 – 54 660,000 7% 6% 55 – 64 330,000 4% 3% 65+ 240,000 2% 2% 201 522 722 632 361 191 120 166 528 733 567 303 137 117
  36. 36. 36 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.17% 3.9% 0.7% 9.1% 18.2%
  37. 37. 37 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 4.62% 6.28% 3.83% 0.73% 1.34%
  38. 38. 38 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 1.80 17% 54% 46% MILLION
  39. 39. 39 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 8.73 82% 14.57 137% 1.67 MILLION MILLION
  40. 40. 40 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 14.57 137% 35% 65% 68% MILLION
  41. 41. 41 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 76.95 71.71 78.71 84.71 73.31
  42. 42. 42 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 59% 25% 34% 1% 49% 22% 6% 12%
  43. 43. 43 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 82% 26% [N/A] 46% 21% 30% 44% 48%
  44. 44. 44 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $847.9 $789.4 $117.9 $446.1 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $385.4 $339.2 $8.2 $117.5 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  45. 45. 45 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +12% +5% +11% +14% +7% +24% +7% +9%
  46. 46. 46 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 4.93 46% $2.587 $525 MILLION BILLION +3% +9% +6%
  47. 47. 47 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 32% 25% 12% 7% 6% 5% 5% 4% 1% TELEVISION ONLINE IN-STORE PRESS DIRECT MAIL POSTER EMAIL OTHER RADIO
  48. 48. 48 HUNGARY
  49. 49. 49 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN HUNGARY 9.71 7.67 5.80 7.86 4.80 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 72% 79% 60% 81% 49%
  50. 50. 50 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. -2.6% +5% [N/A] +12% -208 THOUSAND +300 THOUSAND [N/A] +500 THOUSAND
  51. 51. 51 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 9.71 52.4% 47.6% -0.3% 42.7 MILLION YEARS OLD 72% $26,997 99% 99% 99%
  52. 52. 52 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 96% 65% 73% 23% 93% 9% 2% 7%
  53. 53. 53 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 7.67 79% 6.35 65% MILLION MILLION
  54. 54. 54 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 7.87 7.69 7.87 7.70 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  55. 55. 55 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 89% 9% 2% 0%
  56. 56. 56 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 90.69 48.55 34% 35% 27% MBPS MBPS
  57. 57. 57 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 64% 33% 2% 0.06% -16% +61% -18% +20%
  58. 58. 58 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.HU SEARCH 344,700,000 9M 19S 7.4 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 237,700,000 14M 55S 12.5 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 142,500,000 7M 21S 8.3 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 131,000,000 20M 27S 9.7 INDEX.HU NEWS & MEDIA 44,800,000 6M 10S 3.8 ORIGO.HU NEWS & MEDIA 37,800,000 10M 44S 3.3 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 30,300,000 3M 41S 2.7 INDAPASS.HU EMAIL 28,100,000 1M 16S 1.2 NCORE.CC TORRENTS 25,300,000 6M 17S 7.1 FREEMAIL.HU EMAIL 24,800,000 6M 20S 8.4
  59. 59. 59 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.HU 6M 10S 10.22 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 INDEX.HU 8M 15S 3.99 NCORE.CC 5M 58S 3.04 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 ORIGO.HU 5M 42S 2.70 BIEN.HU 2M 38S 1.74 JOFOGAS.HU 10M 19S 6.87 24.HU 4M 29S 2.62 FREEMAIL.HU 3M 26S 3.66 BLOG.HU 3M 05S 2.01 IDOKEP.HU 2M 40S 2.82 ARUKERESO.HU 3M 35S 3.39 HVG.HU 5M 45S 2.68 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 444.HU 6M 33S 3.17 QUIZALERT.COM 5M 44S 5.77 INDAVIDEO.HU 4M 20S 4.08
  60. 60. 60 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 43% 43% 9% 36% 17% 57% 47% 12% 43% 26%
  61. 61. 61 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 39 GOOGLE 30 BUDAPEST 30 FORDÍTÓ 23 IDŐJÁRÁS 19 FREEMAIL 18 FACEBOOK BELÉPÉS 15 GMAIL 13 IDŐKÉP 13 INDEX 11 MENETREND 11 HASZNÁLTAUTÓ 10 JÓFOGÁS 10 FILMEK 10 STARTLAP 8 OTP 7 ORIGO 7 TÉRKÉP 7 GOOGLE FORDÍTÓ 7
  62. 62. 62 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 49% 28% 11% 2% 10%
  63. 63. 63 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 93% 18% 6% 12% 21%
  64. 64. 64 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 5.80 60% 4.80 49% MILLION MILLION
  65. 65. 65 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 5.80 +5% 83% 53% 47% MILLION
  66. 66. 66 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 5,800,000 53% 47% 13 – 17 290,000 3% 2% 18 – 24 1,100,000 9% 10% 25 – 34 1,400,000 12% 12% 35 – 44 1,300,000 12% 11% 45 – 54 830,000 8% 6% 55 – 64 560,000 6% 4% 65+ 360,000 3% 3% 152 546 667 667 465 354 202 138 573 692 613 366 208 158
  67. 67. 67 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.08% 8.2% 1.6% 8.2% 25.3%
  68. 68. 68 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 8.87% 9.27% 8.84% 7.84% 5.23%
  69. 69. 69 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 1.70 18% 54% 46% MILLION
  70. 70. 70 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 7.86 81% 11.35 117% 1.44 MILLION MILLION
  71. 71. 71 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 11.35 117% 38% 62% 65% MILLION
  72. 72. 72 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 75.17 70.08 74.98 83.00 73.20
  73. 73. 73 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 54% 8% 36% 3% 49% 26% 9% 13%
  74. 74. 74 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 72% 12% [N/A] 22% 12% 12% 21% 24%
  75. 75. 75 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $435.8 $430.5 $171.2 $230.5 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $387.1 $312.2 $6.3 $50.1 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  76. 76. 76 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +15% +10% +14% +15% +13% +25% +12% +13%
  77. 77. 77 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 5.57 57% $1.655 $297 MILLION BILLION +5% +13% +8%
  78. 78. 78 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 40% 22% 13% 8% 6% 4% 3% 1% 1% ONLINE TELEVISION PRESS IN-STORE OTHER POSTER EMAIL RADIO DIRECT MAIL
  79. 79. 79 POLAND
  80. 80. 80 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN POLAND 38.14 29.75 17.00 30.86 14.00 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 61% 78% 45% 81% 37%
  81. 81. 81 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. +7% +13% +3% +17% +2 MILLION +2 MILLION +944 THOUSAND +2 MILLION
  82. 82. 82 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 38.14 51.7% 48.3% -0.2% 41.1 MILLION YEARS OLD 61% $27,923 100% 100% 100%
  83. 83. 83 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 96% 70% 80% 27% 88% 8% 4% 4%
  84. 84. 84 AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME (BROADCAST, STREAMING AND VIDEO ON DEMAND) AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT LISTENING TO STREAMING MUSIC JAN 2018 TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS. 5H 55M 1H 42M 3H 06M 0H 50M
  85. 85. 85 BELIEVE THAT NEW TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS PREFER TO COMPLETE TASKS DIGITALLY WHENEVER POSSIBLE BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY AND PROTECTION ARE VERY IMPORTANT DELETE COOKIES FROM INTERNET BROWSER TO PROTECT PRIVACY JAN 2018 ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES USE AN AD-BLOCKING TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS BEING DISPLAYED SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS. 41% 55% 90% 44% 43%
  86. 86. 86 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 29.75 78% 25.28 66% MILLION MILLION
  87. 87. 87 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 28.27 27.96 27.92 27.95 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  88. 88. 88 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 82% 13% 5% 1%
  89. 89. 89 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 44.76 22.85 38% 31% 26% MBPS MBPS
  90. 90. 90 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 40% 59% 1% 0.13% -5% +4% -23% +225%
  91. 91. 91 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.PL SEARCH 610,500,000 14M 11S 10.4 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 349,100,000 29M 32S 13.1 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 325,700,000 17M 38S 13.1 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 196,300,000 10M 42S 13.0 ONET.PL NEWS & MEDIA 135,400,000 8M 06S 7.8 WP.PL NEWS & MEDIA 134,000,000 9M 00S 9.0 ALLEGRO.PL SHOPPING 122,000,000 13M 33S 19.8 INTERIA.PL NEWS & MEDIA 72,400,000 7M 56S 6.7 OLX.PL SHOPPING 67,300,000 11M 26S 13.9 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 65,100,000 4M 57S 3.7
  92. 92. 92 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.PL 6M 42S 11.52 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 ALLEGRO.PL 12M 24S 10.13 ONET.PL 6M 41S 3.87 WP.PL 7M 30S 4.58 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 OLX.PL 10M 51S 8.62 VK.COM 10M 28S 4.74 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 INTERIA.PL 6M 30S 4.17 WYKOP.PL 14M 51S 8.85 FILMWEB.PL 4M 36S 5.18 INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S 3.34 GAZETA.PL 5M 38S 3.72 CDA.PL 4M 10S 4.08 WIOCHA.PL 10M 46S 7.20 REDDIT.COM 15M 46S 10.05 CENEO.PL 2M 53S 3.63
  93. 93. 93 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 44% 31% 8% 34% 27% 54% 34% 11% 42% 30%
  94. 94. 94 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 POGODA 71 ONET 63 YOUTUBE 55 WP 51 ALLEGRO 50 FB 48 GOOGLE 47 OLX 47 CDA 39 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S INTERIA.PL 6M 30S WYKOP.PL 14M 51S FILMWEB.PL 4M 36S INSTAGRAM.COM 5M 23S GAZETA.PL 5M 38S CDA.PL 4M 10S WIOCHA.PL 10M 46S REDDIT.COM 15M 46S CENEO.PL 2M 53S
  95. 95. 95 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 51% 27% 11% 1% 10%
  96. 96. 96 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 85% 26% 11% 21% 31%
  97. 97. 97 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 17.00 45% 14.00 37% MILLION MILLION
  98. 98. 98 JAN 2018 MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT. 64% 61% 41% 29% 24% 24% 19% 18% 16% 15% 12% 11% YOUTUBE FACEBOOK FB MESSENGER GOOGLE+ INSTAGRAM SKYPE WHATSAPP TWITTER NK.PL SNAPCHAT LINKEDIN PINTEREST
  99. 99. 99 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 17.00 +13% 82% 51% 49% MILLION
  100. 100. 100 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN MILLIONS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE MILLION. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 17,000,000 51% 49% 13 – 17 1,900,000 6% 5% 18 – 24 3,800,000 11% 12% 25 – 34 4,900,000 15% 14% 35 – 44 3,300,000 11% 9% 45 – 54 1,500,000 5% 4% 55 – 64 970,000 3% 2% 65+ 550,000 2% 2% 1.0 1.8 2.5 1.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.9 2.0 2.4 1.5 0.7 0.4 0.3
  101. 101. 101 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.05% 7.1% 6.4% 30.2% 27.5%
  102. 102. 102 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 2.26% 3.47% 3.18% 1.13% 1.28%
  103. 103. 103 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 5.40 14% 58% 42% MILLION
  104. 104. 104 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 30.86 81% 49.79 131% 1.61 MILLION MILLION
  105. 105. 105 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 49.79 131% 33% 67% 78% MILLION
  106. 106. 106 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 75.97 68.60 77.36 84.67 74.12
  107. 107. 107 PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MESSENGERS PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION WATCHING VIDEOS ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION PLAYING GAMES ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE BANKING JAN 2018 MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MAP SERVICES SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 49% 51% 38% 34% 49%
  108. 108. 108 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 54% 20% 30% 5% 47% 24% 8% 12%
  109. 109. 109 JAN 2018 TOP APP RANKINGSRANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS AND BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 SOURCE: APP ANNIE, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON DATA IN THE APP ANNIE 2017 RETROSPECTIVE REPORT. FOR MORE DETAILS, VISIT HTTPS://WWW.APPANNIE.COM/ NOTES: RANKINGS ARE BASED ON COMBINED DATA FOR BOTH THE APPLE iOS APP STORE AND THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE. MONTHLY ACTIVE USER RANKINGS ARE BASED ON MONTHLY AVERAGES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: RANKINGS EXCLUDE PRE-INSTALLED APPS, SUCH AS YOUTUBE ON ANDROID DEVICES, AND SAFARI ON APPLE DEVICES. FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK FACEBOOK FACEBOOK WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK ALLEGRO GRUPA ALLEGRO SPOTIFY SPOTIFY JAKDOJADE.PL CITY-NAV SNAPCHAT SNAP OLX.PL NASPERS MBANK MBANK FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK FACEBOOK FACEBOOK WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK ALLEGRO GRUPA ALLEGRO SPOTIFY SPOTIFY JAKDOJADE.PL CITY-NAV SNAPCHAT SNAP OLX.PL NASPERS MBANK MBANK
  110. 110. 110 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 78% 17% [N/A] 43% 14% 19% 39% 47%
  111. 111. 111 SEARCHED ONLINE FOR A PRODUCT OR SERVICE TO BUY VISITED AN ONLINE RETAIL STORE PURCHASED A PRODUCT OR SERVICE ONLINE MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A MOBILE DEVICE SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 66% 72% 57% 22% 22%
  112. 112. 112 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $2.671 $1.855 $0.641 $0.832 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION $1.524 $0.898 $0.024 $0.253 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
  113. 113. 113 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +11% +8% +11% +16% +10% +19% +10% +9%
  114. 114. 114 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 19.19 50% $7.523 $392 MILLION BILLION +2% +11% +8%
  115. 115. 115 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 30% 25% 11% 9% 9% 5% 3% 2% 2% TELEVISION ONLINE PRESS POSTER IN-STORE EMAIL OTHER RADIO DIRECT MAIL
  116. 116. 116 SLOVAKIA
  117. 117. 117 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN SLOVAKIA 5.45 4.52 2.70 4.34 2.30 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 53% 83% 50% 80% 42%
  118. 118. 118 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. -2.1% +8% [N/A] +15% -95 THOUSAND +200 THOUSAND [N/A] +300 THOUSAND
  119. 119. 119 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 5.45 51.4% 48.6% (UNCHANGED) 41.0 MILLION YEARS OLD 53% $31,339 100% 100% 100%
  120. 120. 120 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 95% 70% 79% 32% 94% 10% 4% 6%
  121. 121. 121 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR FULL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 4.52 83% 3.85 71% MILLION MILLION
  122. 122. 122 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 4.63 4.38 4.48 4.39 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  123. 123. 123 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 80% 15% 4% 1%
  124. 124. 124 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 39.55 28.57 35% 28% 24% MBPS MBPS
  125. 125. 125 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 68% 29% 3% 0.07% -12% +46% -11% -13%
  126. 126. 126 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.SK SEARCH 92,400,000 13M 17S 10.5 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 62,200,000 18M 03S 15.4 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 60,100,000 27M 27S 11.8 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 53,800,000 10M 40S 13.1 SME.SK NEWS & MEDIA 14,300,000 5M 48S 6.0 AZET.SK REFERENCE 13,100,000 11M 25S 13.7 ZOZNAM.SK NEWS & MEDIA 11,700,000 4M 59S 4.2 AKTUALITY.SK NEWS & MEDIA 10,700,000 4M 18S 3.1 WIKIPEDIA.ORG REFERENCE 9,700,000 4M 48S 3.8 TOPKY.SK NEWS & MEDIA 9,700,000 5M 24S 4.2
  127. 127. 127 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.SK 6M 02S 10.06 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 AZET.SK 7M 47S 6.01 SME.SK 6M 13S 3.89 BAZOS.SK 11M 29S 13.00 ZOZNAM.SK 3M 54S 2.99 AKTUALITY.SK 4M 51S 3.24 BONGACAMS.COM 4M 22S 2.03 CAS.SK 6M 46S 5.61 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 4M 16S 3.31 TOPKY.SK 5M 43S 4.37 HEUREKA.SK 3M 40S 3.97 ALZA.SK 7M 26S 6.57 CSFD.CZ 5M 09S 5.88 CENTRUM.SK 4M 10S 2.52 PLUSKA.SK 4M 35S 3.36 PRAVDA.SK 5M 14S 3.54 ALIEXPRESS.COM 14M 15S 11.29
  128. 128. 128 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 38% 34% 4% 28% 14% 47% 34% 7% 32% 19%
  129. 129. 129 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). FACEBOOK 100 YOUTUBE 46 GOOGLE 28 BAZOS 28 TOPKY 27 POKEC 23 POCASIE 23 PROGRAM 21 POČASIE 20 CAS 20 GMAIL 17 PREKLADAC 16 CENTRUM 14 AZET 14 ZOZNAM 14 CP 12 SHMU 12 PROGRAM TV 11 NOVY CAS 11 SME 9
  130. 130. 130 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 45% 26% 10% 2% 16%
  131. 131. 131 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 82% 22% 17% 14% 15%
  132. 132. 132 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 2.70 50% 2.30 42% MILLION MILLION
  133. 133. 133 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 2.70 +8% 85% 52% 48% MILLION
  134. 134. 134 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN THOUSANDS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE THOUSAND. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 2,700,000 52% 48% 13 – 17 150,000 3% 3% 18 – 24 590,000 11% 11% 25 – 34 770,000 14% 15% 35 – 44 590,000 11% 10% 45 – 54 320,000 7% 5% 55 – 64 180,000 4% 3% 65+ 94,000 2% 2% 82 289 372 310 186 114 49 71 299 402 279 134 69 45
  135. 135. 135 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +0.12% 9.2% 4.7% 22.2% 21.5%
  136. 136. 136 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 2.58% 2.23% 4.57% 5.41% 1.13%
  137. 137. 137 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 860.0 16% 53% 47% THOUSAND
  138. 138. 138 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 4.34 80% 7.48 137% 1.72 MILLION MILLION
  139. 139. 139 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 7.48 137% 28% 72% 64% MILLION
  140. 140. 140 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 74.25 66.18 78.68 82.73 70.56
  141. 141. 141 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 58% 21% 34% 4% 54% 40% 7% 7%
  142. 142. 142 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 77% 17% [N/A] 37% 17% 17% 39% 34%
  143. 143. 143 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $134.8 $294.9 $18.9 $100.0 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION $198.6 $164.3 $4.2 $16.2 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  144. 144. 144 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +13% +10% +12% +13% +6% +30% +11% +7%

×