Adaptation is not        fundamentally         different fromdevelopment activities    aiming at reducingvulnerability of ...
Adaptation reduces the impacts of climate stresseson human and natural systems and consists of amultitude of behavioural, ...
The need to adapt to changing environmental andclimatic conditions is not a new one.Societies throughout history have had ...
Overlaps do exist between “business-as-usual”development strategies and adaptation.Decisions taken as part of developmenta...
While there are overlaps between adaptation and   development, activities with an explicit focus on adaptation   and clima...
Business-as-usual development does not include activities that specifically  aim to address climate change andreduce its i...
DEVELOPMENTBottom-up/process-oriented andtop-down/outcome-orientedapproaches                                 Scales: Natio...
Process-based rather than static view of adaptive capacity !!!Socio-institutional process rather than the outcome of scena...
Adaptation vs. Development Debate
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Adaptation vs. Development Debate

868 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
868
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
276
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Adaptation vs. Development Debate

  1. 1. Adaptation is not fundamentally different fromdevelopment activities aiming at reducingvulnerability of people to current stresses (CIFOR 2009)
  2. 2. Adaptation reduces the impacts of climate stresseson human and natural systems and consists of amultitude of behavioural, structural andtechnological adjustments.Adaptation measures can vary in:  Timing (anticipatory vs. reactive; ex ante vs. ex post)  Scope (short-term vs. long-term; localised vs. regional)  Purposefulness (autonomous vs. planned; passive vs. active)  Adapting agent (private vs. public; societies vs. natural systems)
  3. 3. The need to adapt to changing environmental andclimatic conditions is not a new one.Societies throughout history have had to adapt tovariations or changes in their climate through avariety of strategies and by using knowledgeaccumulated through experience of past climaticevents. Is past experience with adaptation sufficient for dealing with the impacts of climate change?
  4. 4. Overlaps do exist between “business-as-usual”development strategies and adaptation.Decisions taken as part of developmentactivities can have considerable bearing onthe vulnerability of societies to the potentialimpacts of climate change.Better developed societies possess moreadaptive capacity than less developedsocieties and therefore have lowervulnerability to climate change.
  5. 5. While there are overlaps between adaptation and development, activities with an explicit focus on adaptation and climate change will also be required… Example: In the Nepal Himalayas, infrastructure and livelihoods could be catastrophically affected by glacial lake outburst floods and glacier retreat resulting from rising temperatures (Agrawala et al., 2004).In this case, adaptation would require more direct measures toreduce exposure to such risks, going beyond baseline povertyreduction and economic development !!!
  6. 6. Business-as-usual development does not include activities that specifically aim to address climate change andreduce its impacts or take advantage of any new opportunities. For such action, explicit adaptation activities need to be developed.(OECD 2009)
  7. 7. DEVELOPMENTBottom-up/process-oriented andtop-down/outcome-orientedapproaches Scales: National, regional, local Institutional setting Financing mechanisms Measuring efficiency ADAPTATION
  8. 8. Process-based rather than static view of adaptive capacity !!!Socio-institutional process rather than the outcome of scenarios of vulnerability with some anticipated adjustment.

×