Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Development, Selection, and Adoption of Clinical Research Eligibility Representation Standards and Screening Methods: Curr...
<ul><li>Some are slides not included </li></ul>
Vojtech Huser <ul><li>Survey results </li></ul>
Survey <ul><li>Investigate current technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Convenience sample of institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Qua...
Institutions <ul><li>Different types of institutions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>university affiliated medical centers, integrat...
1. Query <ul><li>How many Hodgkin Lymphoma patients in 2008? </li></ul><ul><li>Mediated data warehouse request </li></ul><...
 
2. Screening <ul><li>How can you enroll new HL patients (2010)? </li></ul><ul><li>Wide variation, active area of research ...
Example 2: Marshfield Clinic Editor Execution Engine
Patient self-referral example http://clinicaltrials.coh.org
3. Follow-up <ul><li>Are you willing to undergo additional tests? Are you planning to be pregnant? </li></ul><ul><li>Paper...
CTMSs
 
Electronic research form within PHR
Form setup example (Velos): Are you willing to undergo additional tests? Data element creation: Form creation: (XSLT+JavaS...
Survey conclusions <ul><li>Existing standards are not equally adopted by surveyed sites </li></ul><ul><li>Limited ability ...
Future <ul><li>New initiatives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ERGO and OCRe </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New Oct 2009 release of BRID...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Vojtech huser-2009-amia-clinical-research-informatics-panel-eligibility-v011

918 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Vojtech huser-2009-amia-clinical-research-informatics-panel-eligibility-v011

  1. 1. Development, Selection, and Adoption of Clinical Research Eligibility Representation Standards and Screening Methods: Current and Future Directions fall AMIA 2009 panel (CRI WG sponsored) Joyce C. Niland, PhD, MS1, Gilan El Saadawi, MD, PhD2, Chunhua Weng, PhD3, Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD 4, Jason P. Jones, PhD5,6 , Rachel Richesson, PhD7 1City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte CA; 2University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA; 3Columbia University, New York, NY; 4Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI; 5Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; 6University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 6University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
  2. 2. <ul><li>Some are slides not included </li></ul>
  3. 3. Vojtech Huser <ul><li>Survey results </li></ul>
  4. 4. Survey <ul><li>Investigate current technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Convenience sample of institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Qualitative analysis (structured interviews) </li></ul><ul><li>Example scenario (Hodgkin Lymphoma) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1. Number of HL patients in 2008 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2. Strategy to enroll HL patients in 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3. Additional questions (additional tests, future plans) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Related Standards and Initiatives (BRIDG, Arden Syntax, caGrid, i2b2, CCHIT) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Institutions <ul><li>Different types of institutions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>university affiliated medical centers, integrated delivery network </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Range of other factors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>home-grown EHR vs. vendor, CTSA site </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Institutions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Columbia U </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>U of Pittsburg </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Marshfield Clinic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Intermountain Healthcare </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>City of Hope Medical Center </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. 1. Query <ul><li>How many Hodgkin Lymphoma patients in 2008? </li></ul><ul><li>Mediated data warehouse request </li></ul><ul><li>Non-mediated system </li></ul><ul><li>Example: Intermountain Healthcare </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clinical Programs framework </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Designated analyst with expert data warehouse knowledge for a given domain </li></ul></ul>http://intermountainhealthcare.org/about/quality/Pages/ClinicalPrograms.aspx
  7. 8. 2. Screening <ul><li>How can you enroll new HL patients (2010)? </li></ul><ul><li>Wide variation, active area of research </li></ul><ul><li>Data source: EHR system vs. Data Warehouse </li></ul><ul><li>Example1: Columbia university </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Vigilance system </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standard: Arden Syntax </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Example2: Marshfield Clinic </li></ul><ul><ul><li>FlowGuide system (pilot phase) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standard: XML process definition language </li></ul></ul>
  8. 9. Example 2: Marshfield Clinic Editor Execution Engine
  9. 10. Patient self-referral example http://clinicaltrials.coh.org
  10. 11. 3. Follow-up <ul><li>Are you willing to undergo additional tests? Are you planning to be pregnant? </li></ul><ul><li>Paper based Case Report Forms (CRF) </li></ul><ul><li>Size of the study (local, consortium, industry) </li></ul><ul><li>Standards: role of BRIDG? </li></ul><ul><li>Research features of EHR systems (CCHIT) </li></ul><ul><li>Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) capabilities </li></ul>
  11. 12. CTMSs
  12. 14. Electronic research form within PHR
  13. 15. Form setup example (Velos): Are you willing to undergo additional tests? Data element creation: Form creation: (XSLT+JavaScript; FieldID)
  14. 16. Survey conclusions <ul><li>Existing standards are not equally adopted by surveyed sites </li></ul><ul><li>Limited ability of existing standards to represent and distribute a query, enrolment logic and follow-up questions </li></ul><ul><li>Survey limitations </li></ul>
  15. 17. Future <ul><li>New initiatives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ERGO and OCRe </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New Oct 2009 release of BRIDG (ver 3.0) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>HL7: Clinical Research Filtered Query Service </li></ul></ul><ul><li>CTMS vendors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Standard adoption </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Proprietary solutions </li></ul></ul>Niland (2008), Sim (2008), Tu (2008), Wang (2009)

×