Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Electronic Education

1,330 views

Published on

A market landscape, research and analysis about the ed

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Electronic Education

  1. 1. e-EDUCATIONEducation in the Web 2.0 Era Final PresentationKhang, Vinay, Jacque, Tomas & Santi
  2. 2. Introduction CHANGINGPARADIGM SHIFT LANDSCAPE • More universities (both public & Classroom private) opening up to the idea Education of E-content • Consumers are more willing than ever to learn from non- Distance traditional sources Learning • ‘Education’ is one of the top market segments expected to grow rapidly from Web 2.0 and e-Learning Mobile perspective • Giants such as ‘Apple’ is focusing on sealing its position through iPad, iBooks and iBooks e-Education Author offerings • Governments showing interest in technology aided education
  3. 3. Technology Internet Speed: 35MBps Great Cloud Computing Infrastructure Video Streaming iPad/Tablet Tools
  4. 4. Self-authoring/teaching tools
  5. 5. e-EducationPlatform and its Implications • School studentsOTHER STAKEHOLDERS • College graduatesTraining Academies | Authors | Publishers | • ProfessionalsCertification bodies • Enthusiasts
  6. 6. Business Models e-EDUCATION Paid Subscriptions Open & Freei. Access to entire • Distribution throughwebsite Youtube, Vimeo etcii. Buy specific courses • Distribution through dedicated portals• Varied access levels• Monthly/Half- • Funded by yearly/yearly philanthropic funds subscriptions• Institutional buy package
  7. 7. Business Issues e-EDUCATION Paid Subscriptions Open & Free• Pricing – • Sustainability Profitability • Conflict of Interest• Scalability • Credibility• Credibility• Relevance
  8. 8. Customers •University/graduate/PhD Students •Education degree/diploma/certificate Product •Classroom lectures, Laboratory learning • Discussions – Teacher talks more • Learning Process – Whole class participation • Emphasis – more on What, not How Business Process • Teacher’s role – Authority • Location – Classroom/School • Lesson Structure – Teacher-dictated Faculty Student UniversityParticipants Information Technology Colleges and information information Universities Curriculum system Education Relevant Instructional board courses systems Uni Knowledge Multimedia path for degrees
  9. 9. •Anyone who: Customers •Has internet access •Eager to learn •Online certifications/degrees Product •Online classes/courses through web portals • Discussions – Students talk as much • Learning Process – In groups or individual • Emphasis – more How, less What Business Process • Teacher’s role – Directs to the info • Location – No fixed location • Lesson Structure – Group-dictated Course Student Web-basedParticipants Information Technology Lecturers information technologies System Online Courses Communicatio designers Knowledge n technologies Website path is (blogs, wikis, DBs) developers determined by CAA Web student EPSS administrators
  10. 10. e-Education : Porter’s 5 Forces Threats of New Entrants o Lack of academic Analysis Medium - High network o Content scalability o Establishment of reputation Bargaining Power ofBargaining Power of Buyers Suppliers Medium – High (IT) Low-Medium Low – Medium Competitive Rivalry (niche) Medium - High o Young market o Low (Niche subjects) o Young demand o Medium/High (IT, Design) Threat of Substitute Products o Classroom Medium - High education o Training institutions o Private tutoring
  11. 11. Evolution
  12. 12. Timeline
  13. 13. Market Landscape
  14. 14. Location
  15. 15. Unique Visits
  16. 16. e-Education on Policy Policy e-Education Focus on Quality Access NGOs, PrivAffected Players Educators Developers Students ate Players
  17. 17. Conclusion“e-Education should not be viewed as just a product, an identifiable artifact of learning objectives, contents and interactions.e-Education as a product is of uncertainvalue until it is deployed in a context thatincludes its users, technical & organizationalattributes ” ~ Dr. John Eklund, 2003

×