Processing.js vs. three.js

7,839 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Art & Photos
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
7,839
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
35
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Processing.js vs. three.js

  1. 1. Processing.js vs. Three.js A comparison
  2. 2. HTML5 <canvas> rich interactive 2D or 3D content JavaScript engines are better now   "2d" and "webgl" contexts hardware-accelerated graphics
  3. 3. Game engines reduce the necessary time to build a complex game  rendering, physics, collision detection, sound, scripting, animation, artificial intelligence, networking etc.   We’ll compare two popular engines: Processing.js and Three.js
  4. 4. Processing.js sister project of the Processing visual programming language   used by artists, designers and researchers for learning andprototyping procedural art or experimenting with new forms of user interaction   Used for: data visualizations, digital art, interactive animations, educational graphs
  5. 5. Processing.js
  6. 6. Three.js lightweight 3D engine   a scene-graph API and abstracting objects which directly defineconcepts used by graphics programming professionals (like complex materials or other properties)   Used for: render compelling 3D scenes using JavaScript
  7. 7. Three.js
  8. 8. ?

×