Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Processing.js vs. three.js

9,088 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Art & Photos
  • Be the first to comment

Processing.js vs. three.js

  1. 1. Processing.js vs. Three.js A comparison
  2. 2. HTML5 <canvas> rich interactive 2D or 3D content JavaScript engines are better now   "2d" and "webgl" contexts hardware-accelerated graphics
  3. 3. Game engines reduce the necessary time to build a complex game  rendering, physics, collision detection, sound, scripting, animation, artificial intelligence, networking etc.   We’ll compare two popular engines: Processing.js and Three.js
  4. 4. Processing.js sister project of the Processing visual programming language   used by artists, designers and researchers for learning andprototyping procedural art or experimenting with new forms of user interaction   Used for: data visualizations, digital art, interactive animations, educational graphs
  5. 5. Processing.js
  6. 6. Three.js lightweight 3D engine   a scene-graph API and abstracting objects which directly defineconcepts used by graphics programming professionals (like complex materials or other properties)   Used for: render compelling 3D scenes using JavaScript
  7. 7. Three.js
  8. 8. ?

×