SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
The PUPPETS Project: puppets and change in teacher practice




                Stuart Naylor, Brenda Keogh (Millgate House)

            Brigid Downing (Manchester Metropolitan University)

     Jane Maloney, Shirley Simon (Institute of Education, University of
                                London)




                       Paper presented at the
     European Science Education Research Association Conference,
                     Malmo, Sweden, August 2007




Address for correspondence
30 Mill Hill Lane
Sandbach
Cheshire CW11 4PN
UK
Tel +44 1270 762340


Email addresses
stuartnaylor@millgatehouse.co.uk
brendakeogh@millgatehouse.co.uk
b.downing@mmu.ac.uk
j.maloney@ioe.ac.uk
s.simon@ioe.ac.uk
Background, aims and framework
The PUPPETS Project is a research and development initiative funded by the Nuffield
Foundation, UK, which aimed to help teachers provide more opportunities for productive talk
in science lessons, using puppets as a stimulus. The research focused on the effectiveness
of hand-held puppets to engage primary school children’s attention and promote
conversations involving reasoning in science.

The value of talk in children’s learning is well-documented. Vygotsky’s (1978) work on
language and social interaction has been built on by Mercer and his colleagues in their
research into classroom interactions (e.g. Mercer, Wegerif & Dawes, 1999). These and other
researchers have found that talking about their ideas helps children to clarify their thinking
and develop their capacity to reason (Kuhn, Shaw & Felton, 1997; Venville, 2002). The
amount and nature of children’s talk in science lessons depends on decisions made by the
teacher. The opportunities provided for talk, the stimulus to generate talk and the learning
environment to support talk are all determined by teachers. However, research such as
Newton, Driver and Osborne (1999) indicates that in many science classrooms teachers do
not create circumstances that maximise children’s talk. Reasons for this may include the
uncertainty teachers have about the value of children’s conversations, limited knowledge of
appropriate teaching strategies, and insecure subject knowledge (Osborne and Simon, 1996;
Solomon, 1998).

In our research we set out to investigate whether the use of puppets can provide a stimulus
that will generate the kind of talk that helps thinking and reasoning in science. A major aim of
the project was to provide a resource for teachers that would help them to enhance their
practice by increasing the opportunities for children’s talk that promotes thinking and
reasoning and to become more dialogic in their teaching (Alexander 2005).

Two research questions were reported on at the ESERA 2005 Conference, namely: In what
ways can puppets be used to enhance children’s engagement and promote talk in science
lessons? and What is the impact on children’s talk involving reasoning when puppets are
used in science? (Naylor, Keogh, Downing, Maloney and Simon, 2005). In the research
reported on here we analyse further the teachers’ involvement in this reasoning talk and
changes to their professional practice. The question guiding our research was What is the
impact of using puppets on teachers’ beliefs and practice in relation to talk?

Methodology
The project began with a pilot phase, involving eight teachers working across the primary age
range. These teachers attended workshops to become familiar with the use of puppets, after
which each teacher was audio and video-recorded during a science lesson where puppets
were used. The pilot study identified issues relating to the use of puppets, including their
suitability for a variety of ages and contexts. It also enabled an analytical framework for
teacher/child discourse to be developed for the main study. A further 16 teachers, teaching
across age ranges 7-11, were involved in the main study, drawn from primary schools in
London and Manchester covering a range of social, cultural and ethnic backgrounds.

The 16 teachers were observed and video-recorded teaching a typical science lesson. They
were interviewed to obtain their views on the nature and value of children’s talk and details
about how they taught science. These initial observations and interviews provided a baseline
against which future lessons could be compared.

The teachers attended a preparation meeting to provide guidance on how puppets might be
used effectively, including issues such as role and characterisation of the puppets. Video
clips and transcripts from the pilot phase were used to illustrate aspects of the teacher’s role
and how puppets might interact with the children. After a period of several weeks, in which
teachers could become more confident in using the puppets, a second lesson in which
puppets were used in science teaching was video-taped and the teacher was interviewed
about the impact of the puppets in their lessons. For each teacher, both of the lessons
observed were based on their normal science curriculum; the puppets lessons were not
‘special’ in any other respect.

Interviews with groups of children were video-recorded to provide data from the children’s
perspective, and some audio-recording of small group conversation was undertaken. The
range of data sources and collection methods allowed extensive triangulation and cross-
referencing of the data. A follow-up meeting with the teachers provided feedback on the
longer-term impact of using puppets, including whether and how they continued to use
puppets in their science lessons.

The analytical framework was developed using an open-coding approach (Strauss and
Corbin, 1998), in which transcripts of conversations involving teachers, puppets and children
were provisionally coded. The coding system was discussed between researchers and
refined during the study. An extensive range of codes was developed to pick out episodes of
discourse which seemed significant in the lessons. Codes focused on either the teacher, the
puppet or the children. Those which focused on the teacher included codes for asking
questions that require reasoning; asking non-reasoning questions; use of argumentation to
challenge or justify ideas; providing information; encouraging children through praise or
positive comments; and use of narrative and characterisation to contextualise scientific ideas.

Examples of the codes used included:
TQ: teacher asks a question which requires a reasoned answer
TP: teacher gives procedural information or instruction
PS: puppet creates a story, which provides a contextualising narrative for scientific ideas
PE: puppet encourages by offering praise or positive endorsement

Video-recordings of each lesson taught (with and without the use of puppets) were analysed
and categorised using these codes on an observation schedule with 30-second time
intervals. This analysis enabled us to make comparisons between the time spent in various
types of discourse. In addition to these codes, data were also recorded in relation to
grouping of children (such as whole class, small group or individual), children’s activity and
interactions (such as listening, discussing, practical work, off task), the role of the teacher
(such as asking questions, instructing) and the role of the puppet (similar to teacher). This
enabled us to make more general judgements about the nature of the lesson, the roles of the
various participants and the nature of children’s interactions. A reliability check was
performed by different researchers independently coding the same piece of video, and then
comparing codings.

The analytical framework enabled us to make comparisons between the typical science
lessons without puppets and those where puppets were used. In this way any changes in
aspects of the teachers’ practice could be identified.

Data
The total number of instances of each of the different types of teacher discourse are shown in
the table. In the lessons with puppets the numbers indicate the totals for the teacher and the
puppet together.


     Type of teacher discourse           Lessons without            Lessons with
                                         puppets                    puppets
Non-reasoning questions                          388                       273
Reasoning questions                               73                       263
Providing information                            329                       235
Use of argumentation                             111                       199
Encouragement                                    132                       200
Use of narrative                                  4                         66

The interview data shows that all of the teachers felt positive about using puppets in their
science teaching, saying that they enjoyed using them and were pleased with the children’
responses. All of them intend to continue to use puppets in science lessons. All the teachers
appear to have settled on an arrangement in which puppets are used near the start of a
lesson to present problems to children. This is when the puppets appear to have most
impact and when the purpose of using them is most evident. The teachers also used
puppets at the end of their lessons to explore with the children what new learning has taken
place.

Although teachers were not explicitly asked to change their practice in any other way,
changes in practice did indeed occur. Of the 11 teachers for whom interview transcripts are
available, 9 of them claimed to have changed aspects of their practice. Five teachers noted
that their lesson plans included a greater emphasis on discussion and more opportunities for
the children to talk. One teacher described how he normally took on a didactic role in
teaching science, but when using puppets he thought more about getting the children to talk
with each other rather than just to him. Another teacher said she had planned more talking
tasks and that without the puppets:
      I didn’t give them opportunities to talk even if they would. I didn’t know whether
      they would (talk) because I didn’t give them many opportunities to talk so that’s
      definitely increased the amount of time for talking.
She also said her lessons had become more relevant to the children as she had linked the
science they were doing to their experience.

One teacher from the pilot phase claims to be a more interesting teacher in other subjects as
a result of using puppets in his science teaching. He claimed that using puppets had helped
him to see the value of children’s engagement and raised his awareness of how to interact
with children to maximise their engagement. Another teacher described how the puppets:
       … have opened me up and changed my practice to ways of thinking and ways of
       getting the children involved in open questions. . . it’s altered the way I deliver the
curriculum.

Conclusions and implications
The data show a decrease in the number of non-reasoning questions and an increase in the
use of reasoning questions when puppets were used. This is consistent with the way that
puppets present a problem to the class. When teachers used puppets they were more likely
to ask open, thought-provoking questions which created opportunities for children’s talk. This
contrasts with their typical science lessons, which were more dominated by recall questions.

There was a decrease in the amount of information provided by the teachers and an increase
in the use of argumentation in science lessons when puppets were used. This created more
opportunities for children’s thinking and reasoning talk in the puppets lessons compared to
the typical lessons without puppets. Again this indicates a shift in teaching style towards
more thought-provoking lessons.

The other differences in the teaching style used were an increase in the use of
contextualising narrative, which helped to provided a rationale for the activity, and greater use
of encouragement to children to talk and share their ideas. Both of these changes indicate
that teachers are providing a more positive learning environment in which talk is valued.

It appears that the use of puppets has enabled the teachers to become more dialogic in their
science teaching, and that introducing puppets into the classroom has influenced some
fundamental aspects of their pedagogy. Chi-squared tests show that each of the changes
indicated above is significant.

The literature on teacher change is consistent in suggesting that change in teacher practice
can be difficult to achieve in a short period of time (e.g. Adey, Hewitt, Hewitt and Landau,
2004; Fullan, 2001). However we found that using the puppets had a greater effect on
teacher practice over a short period of time than we would have anticipated. Most of the
teachers involved in the project changed their practice in significant ways as a consequence
of using puppets. The follow up meetings and ongoing contact with some of the teachers
suggest that these changes have been long-lasting and that they have continued to use
puppets to generate talk in their science lessons. These changes occurred after only a short
preparation session and with the teachers working entirely within their usual science
curriculum. There were no changes in lesson timing, lesson objectives, practical activity or
scheme of work. In this respect the introduction of puppets appears to compare favourably
with some other innovations in science education, where more far-reaching changes are
viewed as necessary for the innovation to be successful.

The project appears to have the potential to have a positive impact on primary science
teaching. The research is now entering a phase in which the impact on secondary science
teaching and learning in the 11-16 age group will be identified. Funding has been secured
from GlaxoSmithKline plc and Millgate House Publishing to support a programme of
professional development for teachers, along with provision of resources, including puppets
and scenarios in which the puppets can operate.

A number of factors have emerged from the research which appear to be relevant in ensuring
that this programme of professional development is effective. These factors include:
   The project is entirely located within the existing primary school science curriculum.
    Teachers do not have to put on special puppets lessons which fall outside the usual
    science curriculum. They do not have to invest any additional curriculum time in using
    puppets, but can incorporate puppets within their current Schemes of Work.
   The training programme and level of commitment that teachers are required to make to
    the project are modest. Teachers do not need to invest extensive amounts of time,
    energy or resources in introducing the project to their school.
   Teachers do not need to make major shifts in their professional practice before they try
    the approach in their teaching. Although involvement in the project may well lead to
    changes in professional values, beliefs and practice, this is not a pre-requisite for using
    puppets successfully. This is consistent with what we have found in other projects, where
    teachers may be willing to take on an innovation which does not appear to require any
    fundamental change in professional values and practice, only to find that fundamental
    changes then take place as a consequence of taking on the innovation.

These factors lead us to believe that teachers are likely to welcome the professional
development programme, and that professional development decision-makers will be keen to
gain access to the project for their teachers.

References
Adey, P. Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J. & Landau, N. (2004). The professional development of
   teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.
Alexander, R. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching. York, Dialogos.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). London,
   RoutledgeFalmer.
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V. and Felton, M. (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative
   reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315.
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of
   reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111.
Naylor S., Keogh B., Downing, B., Maloney, J. and Simon, S. (2005) The PUPPETS Project:
   using puppets to promote engagement and talk in science. Paper presented at the Fifth
   ERERA Conference. Barcelona, Spain.
Newton, P., Driver, R. and Osborne, J. (1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of
   school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 5, 553-576.
Osborne, J. and Simon. S. (1996) Primary Science: Past and Future Directions. Studies in
   Science Education, 27, 99-147.
Solomon, J. (1998) About argument and discussion. School Science Review, 80 (291),
   57-62.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Venville, G. (2002). Enhancing the quality of thinking in Year 1 classes. In M. Shayer & P.
   Adey (eds.) Learning Intelligence. Buckingham, Open University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes.
   Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

More Related Content

What's hot

Henning_Holzheuer_Final_Report
Henning_Holzheuer_Final_ReportHenning_Holzheuer_Final_Report
Henning_Holzheuer_Final_ReportHenning Holzheuer
 
EdIC706 The Global Classroom
EdIC706 The Global ClassroomEdIC706 The Global Classroom
EdIC706 The Global Classroomnlb18
 
Third obsevation reflective questions
Third obsevation reflective questions Third obsevation reflective questions
Third obsevation reflective questions BelenEscudero3
 
Language experience approach .msw03
Language experience approach .msw03Language experience approach .msw03
Language experience approach .msw03Peggy Seufert
 
Is your lesson a grecian urn
Is your lesson a grecian urnIs your lesson a grecian urn
Is your lesson a grecian urnAntonis Stergiou
 
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...yapsmail
 
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation Changed For Blog
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation  Changed For BlogThe Language Experience Classroom Presentation  Changed For Blog
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation Changed For Blogndaviskunyung
 
School internship experience at catalunya school
School internship experience at catalunya schoolSchool internship experience at catalunya school
School internship experience at catalunya schoolcarlatutu
 
Pohatu2013 meettheteacher
Pohatu2013 meettheteacherPohatu2013 meettheteacher
Pohatu2013 meettheteachernikkijelangford
 
Coq.burn pns april 2014
Coq.burn pns april 2014Coq.burn pns april 2014
Coq.burn pns april 2014Faye Brownlie
 
P.point erasmus
P.point erasmusP.point erasmus
P.point erasmuscarmandrea
 
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantil
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantilCómo enseñar inglés en educación infantil
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantilmerino9
 

What's hot (20)

Henning_Holzheuer_Final_Report
Henning_Holzheuer_Final_ReportHenning_Holzheuer_Final_Report
Henning_Holzheuer_Final_Report
 
EdIC706 The Global Classroom
EdIC706 The Global ClassroomEdIC706 The Global Classroom
EdIC706 The Global Classroom
 
Photojournal.2014
Photojournal.2014Photojournal.2014
Photojournal.2014
 
Teaching with Drama
Teaching with DramaTeaching with Drama
Teaching with Drama
 
Third obsevation reflective questions
Third obsevation reflective questions Third obsevation reflective questions
Third obsevation reflective questions
 
Language experience approach .msw03
Language experience approach .msw03Language experience approach .msw03
Language experience approach .msw03
 
Is your lesson a grecian urn
Is your lesson a grecian urnIs your lesson a grecian urn
Is your lesson a grecian urn
 
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...
P3&p4 mtp Slides of the P3 and P4 Dialogue Session with the Principal on Frid...
 
Debbie research ed_oxford
Debbie research ed_oxfordDebbie research ed_oxford
Debbie research ed_oxford
 
Dogme
DogmeDogme
Dogme
 
Ben&bella trphi
Ben&bella trphiBen&bella trphi
Ben&bella trphi
 
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation Changed For Blog
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation  Changed For BlogThe Language Experience Classroom Presentation  Changed For Blog
The Language Experience Classroom Presentation Changed For Blog
 
School internship experience at catalunya school
School internship experience at catalunya schoolSchool internship experience at catalunya school
School internship experience at catalunya school
 
Pohatu2013 meettheteacher
Pohatu2013 meettheteacherPohatu2013 meettheteacher
Pohatu2013 meettheteacher
 
Dogme elt demo
Dogme elt demoDogme elt demo
Dogme elt demo
 
Coq.burn pns april 2014
Coq.burn pns april 2014Coq.burn pns april 2014
Coq.burn pns april 2014
 
Minimizing the chaos
Minimizing the chaosMinimizing the chaos
Minimizing the chaos
 
100 tesol activities
100 tesol activities100 tesol activities
100 tesol activities
 
P.point erasmus
P.point erasmusP.point erasmus
P.point erasmus
 
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantil
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantilCómo enseñar inglés en educación infantil
Cómo enseñar inglés en educación infantil
 

Viewers also liked

Think it through 8th grade 1st. period
Think it through 8th grade 1st. periodThink it through 8th grade 1st. period
Think it through 8th grade 1st. periodvickytg123
 
The dictionary
The dictionaryThe dictionary
The dictionaryvickytg123
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timeline
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timelineChapter 5 lesson 2 timeline
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timelinevickytg123
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Class rules
Class rulesClass rules
Class rules
 
La gringuita
La gringuitaLa gringuita
La gringuita
 
Board basics
Board basicsBoard basics
Board basics
 
Think it through 8th grade 1st. period
Think it through 8th grade 1st. periodThink it through 8th grade 1st. period
Think it through 8th grade 1st. period
 
The dictionary
The dictionaryThe dictionary
The dictionary
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timeline
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timelineChapter 5 lesson 2 timeline
Chapter 5 lesson 2 timeline
 
Sabías que
Sabías queSabías que
Sabías que
 
Chapter 6
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Chapter 6
 
Dictionary
DictionaryDictionary
Dictionary
 

Similar to Esera 2007 paper

A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...
A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...
A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...Alexander Decker
 
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schools
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schoolsImpact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schools
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schoolsResearchWap
 
INTS 3330 Final Project
INTS 3330 Final ProjectINTS 3330 Final Project
INTS 3330 Final ProjectCaleb Hall
 
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2Benjamin Yoell
 
A Representation Construction Approach
A Representation Construction ApproachA Representation Construction Approach
A Representation Construction ApproachAmy Cernava
 
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...Alexander Decker
 
Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching Silas Spence
 
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptx
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptxLecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptx
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptxKarabo Khoza
 
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSION
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSIONJAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSION
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSIONMonyatsi Tomeletso
 
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...Alexander Decker
 
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...The Higher Education Academy
 
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docxrhetttrevannion
 
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...Premier Publishers
 
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil Mercer
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil MercerExploratory talk - Professor Neil Mercer
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil MercerMarga Rubio Soto
 
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiry
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiryConceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiry
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiryPetros Lameras
 
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.pptShaliniVerma380300
 

Similar to Esera 2007 paper (20)

A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...
A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...
A test of the efficacy of field trip and discussion approaches to teaching in...
 
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schools
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schoolsImpact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schools
Impact of audiovisual aids in teaching home economics in secondary schools
 
INTS 3330 Final Project
INTS 3330 Final ProjectINTS 3330 Final Project
INTS 3330 Final Project
 
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2
Gonzalez Haramia Yoell comm156I-2
 
A Representation Construction Approach
A Representation Construction ApproachA Representation Construction Approach
A Representation Construction Approach
 
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...
Effects of computer based mastery learning on secondary school students’ moti...
 
Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching Inquiry based teaching
Inquiry based teaching
 
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptx
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptxLecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptx
Lecture 8 and 9_INQUIRY BASED LEARNING 27.03.2023 (1).pptx
 
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSION
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSIONJAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSION
JAE Article preparation2 - SUBMISSION
 
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...
Effects of computer based mastery learning approach on students’ motivation t...
 
Research
ResearchResearch
Research
 
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...
Developing a web-based research app to support practice-based enquiry in teac...
 
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx
2Week 3 AssignmentUDLCAST Instructional Plan AnalysisDU 6.docx
 
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...
Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Student...
 
Bahan 0
Bahan 0Bahan 0
Bahan 0
 
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil Mercer
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil MercerExploratory talk - Professor Neil Mercer
Exploratory talk - Professor Neil Mercer
 
7806 eps1002l2a
7806 eps1002l2a7806 eps1002l2a
7806 eps1002l2a
 
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiry
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiryConceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiry
Conceptions of teaching and learning: Findings from a Phenomenohraphic inquiry
 
ED610428.pdf
ED610428.pdfED610428.pdf
ED610428.pdf
 
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt
527375072-50-Innovative-Teaching-Methods-in-Teaching-Science.ppt
 

More from vickytg123

Athens and Greece Vocabulary
Athens and Greece VocabularyAthens and Greece Vocabulary
Athens and Greece Vocabularyvickytg123
 
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARY
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARYCHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARY
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARYvickytg123
 
Quiz review8 def
Quiz review8 defQuiz review8 def
Quiz review8 defvickytg123
 
Chapter 5 section 3
Chapter 5 section 3Chapter 5 section 3
Chapter 5 section 3vickytg123
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabulary
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabularyChapter 5 lesson 2 vocabulary
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabularyvickytg123
 
8 def the sacred well
8 def the sacred well8 def the sacred well
8 def the sacred wellvickytg123
 
7 bd week 2 fourth period
7 bd week 2 fourth period7 bd week 2 fourth period
7 bd week 2 fourth periodvickytg123
 
7 bd spellint lesson 8
7 bd spellint lesson 87 bd spellint lesson 8
7 bd spellint lesson 8vickytg123
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answers
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answersChapter 5 lesson 2 answers
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answersvickytg123
 
The benefits of incorporating music
The benefits of incorporating musicThe benefits of incorporating music
The benefits of incorporating musicvickytg123
 
7 bd homework 4th period
7 bd homework 4th period7 bd homework 4th period
7 bd homework 4th periodvickytg123
 
Tec flashcards
Tec flashcardsTec flashcards
Tec flashcardsvickytg123
 
Magazines, newspapers and articles
Magazines, newspapers and articlesMagazines, newspapers and articles
Magazines, newspapers and articlesvickytg123
 
Charts and posters
Charts and postersCharts and posters
Charts and postersvickytg123
 
Quadratic function
Quadratic functionQuadratic function
Quadratic functionvickytg123
 
7 sp. lesson 7 db
7 sp. lesson 7 db7 sp. lesson 7 db
7 sp. lesson 7 dbvickytg123
 

More from vickytg123 (20)

Athens and Greece Vocabulary
Athens and Greece VocabularyAthens and Greece Vocabulary
Athens and Greece Vocabulary
 
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARY
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARYCHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARY
CHAPTER 5 LESSON 3 VOCABULARY
 
Quiz review8 def
Quiz review8 defQuiz review8 def
Quiz review8 def
 
Chapter 5 section 3
Chapter 5 section 3Chapter 5 section 3
Chapter 5 section 3
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabulary
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabularyChapter 5 lesson 2 vocabulary
Chapter 5 lesson 2 vocabulary
 
8 def the sacred well
8 def the sacred well8 def the sacred well
8 def the sacred well
 
7 bd week 2 fourth period
7 bd week 2 fourth period7 bd week 2 fourth period
7 bd week 2 fourth period
 
7 bd spellint lesson 8
7 bd spellint lesson 87 bd spellint lesson 8
7 bd spellint lesson 8
 
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answers
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answersChapter 5 lesson 2 answers
Chapter 5 lesson 2 answers
 
The benefits of incorporating music
The benefits of incorporating musicThe benefits of incorporating music
The benefits of incorporating music
 
7 bd homework 4th period
7 bd homework 4th period7 bd homework 4th period
7 bd homework 4th period
 
Chapter05
Chapter05Chapter05
Chapter05
 
Greece
GreeceGreece
Greece
 
Tec flashcards
Tec flashcardsTec flashcards
Tec flashcards
 
Realia
RealiaRealia
Realia
 
Posters
PostersPosters
Posters
 
Magazines, newspapers and articles
Magazines, newspapers and articlesMagazines, newspapers and articles
Magazines, newspapers and articles
 
Charts and posters
Charts and postersCharts and posters
Charts and posters
 
Quadratic function
Quadratic functionQuadratic function
Quadratic function
 
7 sp. lesson 7 db
7 sp. lesson 7 db7 sp. lesson 7 db
7 sp. lesson 7 db
 

Recently uploaded

3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptxmary850239
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationMJDuyan
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...raviapr7
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentXsasf Sfdfasd
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxAditiChauhan701637
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17Celine George
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesMohammad Hassany
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsEugene Lysak
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptx
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptxPractical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptx
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxraviapr7
 

Recently uploaded (20)

3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
 
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptxIn - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
In - Vivo and In - Vitro Correlation.pptx
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quizPrelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
 
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptx
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptxPractical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptx
Practical Research 1 Lesson 9 Scope and delimitation.pptx
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
 

Esera 2007 paper

  • 1. The PUPPETS Project: puppets and change in teacher practice Stuart Naylor, Brenda Keogh (Millgate House) Brigid Downing (Manchester Metropolitan University) Jane Maloney, Shirley Simon (Institute of Education, University of London) Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Malmo, Sweden, August 2007 Address for correspondence 30 Mill Hill Lane Sandbach Cheshire CW11 4PN UK Tel +44 1270 762340 Email addresses stuartnaylor@millgatehouse.co.uk brendakeogh@millgatehouse.co.uk b.downing@mmu.ac.uk j.maloney@ioe.ac.uk s.simon@ioe.ac.uk
  • 2. Background, aims and framework The PUPPETS Project is a research and development initiative funded by the Nuffield Foundation, UK, which aimed to help teachers provide more opportunities for productive talk in science lessons, using puppets as a stimulus. The research focused on the effectiveness of hand-held puppets to engage primary school children’s attention and promote conversations involving reasoning in science. The value of talk in children’s learning is well-documented. Vygotsky’s (1978) work on language and social interaction has been built on by Mercer and his colleagues in their research into classroom interactions (e.g. Mercer, Wegerif & Dawes, 1999). These and other researchers have found that talking about their ideas helps children to clarify their thinking and develop their capacity to reason (Kuhn, Shaw & Felton, 1997; Venville, 2002). The amount and nature of children’s talk in science lessons depends on decisions made by the teacher. The opportunities provided for talk, the stimulus to generate talk and the learning environment to support talk are all determined by teachers. However, research such as Newton, Driver and Osborne (1999) indicates that in many science classrooms teachers do not create circumstances that maximise children’s talk. Reasons for this may include the uncertainty teachers have about the value of children’s conversations, limited knowledge of appropriate teaching strategies, and insecure subject knowledge (Osborne and Simon, 1996; Solomon, 1998). In our research we set out to investigate whether the use of puppets can provide a stimulus that will generate the kind of talk that helps thinking and reasoning in science. A major aim of the project was to provide a resource for teachers that would help them to enhance their practice by increasing the opportunities for children’s talk that promotes thinking and reasoning and to become more dialogic in their teaching (Alexander 2005). Two research questions were reported on at the ESERA 2005 Conference, namely: In what ways can puppets be used to enhance children’s engagement and promote talk in science lessons? and What is the impact on children’s talk involving reasoning when puppets are used in science? (Naylor, Keogh, Downing, Maloney and Simon, 2005). In the research reported on here we analyse further the teachers’ involvement in this reasoning talk and changes to their professional practice. The question guiding our research was What is the impact of using puppets on teachers’ beliefs and practice in relation to talk? Methodology The project began with a pilot phase, involving eight teachers working across the primary age range. These teachers attended workshops to become familiar with the use of puppets, after which each teacher was audio and video-recorded during a science lesson where puppets were used. The pilot study identified issues relating to the use of puppets, including their suitability for a variety of ages and contexts. It also enabled an analytical framework for teacher/child discourse to be developed for the main study. A further 16 teachers, teaching across age ranges 7-11, were involved in the main study, drawn from primary schools in London and Manchester covering a range of social, cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The 16 teachers were observed and video-recorded teaching a typical science lesson. They were interviewed to obtain their views on the nature and value of children’s talk and details about how they taught science. These initial observations and interviews provided a baseline
  • 3. against which future lessons could be compared. The teachers attended a preparation meeting to provide guidance on how puppets might be used effectively, including issues such as role and characterisation of the puppets. Video clips and transcripts from the pilot phase were used to illustrate aspects of the teacher’s role and how puppets might interact with the children. After a period of several weeks, in which teachers could become more confident in using the puppets, a second lesson in which puppets were used in science teaching was video-taped and the teacher was interviewed about the impact of the puppets in their lessons. For each teacher, both of the lessons observed were based on their normal science curriculum; the puppets lessons were not ‘special’ in any other respect. Interviews with groups of children were video-recorded to provide data from the children’s perspective, and some audio-recording of small group conversation was undertaken. The range of data sources and collection methods allowed extensive triangulation and cross- referencing of the data. A follow-up meeting with the teachers provided feedback on the longer-term impact of using puppets, including whether and how they continued to use puppets in their science lessons. The analytical framework was developed using an open-coding approach (Strauss and Corbin, 1998), in which transcripts of conversations involving teachers, puppets and children were provisionally coded. The coding system was discussed between researchers and refined during the study. An extensive range of codes was developed to pick out episodes of discourse which seemed significant in the lessons. Codes focused on either the teacher, the puppet or the children. Those which focused on the teacher included codes for asking questions that require reasoning; asking non-reasoning questions; use of argumentation to challenge or justify ideas; providing information; encouraging children through praise or positive comments; and use of narrative and characterisation to contextualise scientific ideas. Examples of the codes used included: TQ: teacher asks a question which requires a reasoned answer TP: teacher gives procedural information or instruction PS: puppet creates a story, which provides a contextualising narrative for scientific ideas PE: puppet encourages by offering praise or positive endorsement Video-recordings of each lesson taught (with and without the use of puppets) were analysed and categorised using these codes on an observation schedule with 30-second time intervals. This analysis enabled us to make comparisons between the time spent in various types of discourse. In addition to these codes, data were also recorded in relation to grouping of children (such as whole class, small group or individual), children’s activity and interactions (such as listening, discussing, practical work, off task), the role of the teacher (such as asking questions, instructing) and the role of the puppet (similar to teacher). This enabled us to make more general judgements about the nature of the lesson, the roles of the various participants and the nature of children’s interactions. A reliability check was performed by different researchers independently coding the same piece of video, and then comparing codings. The analytical framework enabled us to make comparisons between the typical science
  • 4. lessons without puppets and those where puppets were used. In this way any changes in aspects of the teachers’ practice could be identified. Data The total number of instances of each of the different types of teacher discourse are shown in the table. In the lessons with puppets the numbers indicate the totals for the teacher and the puppet together. Type of teacher discourse Lessons without Lessons with puppets puppets Non-reasoning questions 388 273 Reasoning questions 73 263 Providing information 329 235 Use of argumentation 111 199 Encouragement 132 200 Use of narrative 4 66 The interview data shows that all of the teachers felt positive about using puppets in their science teaching, saying that they enjoyed using them and were pleased with the children’ responses. All of them intend to continue to use puppets in science lessons. All the teachers appear to have settled on an arrangement in which puppets are used near the start of a lesson to present problems to children. This is when the puppets appear to have most impact and when the purpose of using them is most evident. The teachers also used puppets at the end of their lessons to explore with the children what new learning has taken place. Although teachers were not explicitly asked to change their practice in any other way, changes in practice did indeed occur. Of the 11 teachers for whom interview transcripts are available, 9 of them claimed to have changed aspects of their practice. Five teachers noted that their lesson plans included a greater emphasis on discussion and more opportunities for the children to talk. One teacher described how he normally took on a didactic role in teaching science, but when using puppets he thought more about getting the children to talk with each other rather than just to him. Another teacher said she had planned more talking tasks and that without the puppets: I didn’t give them opportunities to talk even if they would. I didn’t know whether they would (talk) because I didn’t give them many opportunities to talk so that’s definitely increased the amount of time for talking. She also said her lessons had become more relevant to the children as she had linked the science they were doing to their experience. One teacher from the pilot phase claims to be a more interesting teacher in other subjects as a result of using puppets in his science teaching. He claimed that using puppets had helped him to see the value of children’s engagement and raised his awareness of how to interact with children to maximise their engagement. Another teacher described how the puppets: … have opened me up and changed my practice to ways of thinking and ways of getting the children involved in open questions. . . it’s altered the way I deliver the
  • 5. curriculum. Conclusions and implications The data show a decrease in the number of non-reasoning questions and an increase in the use of reasoning questions when puppets were used. This is consistent with the way that puppets present a problem to the class. When teachers used puppets they were more likely to ask open, thought-provoking questions which created opportunities for children’s talk. This contrasts with their typical science lessons, which were more dominated by recall questions. There was a decrease in the amount of information provided by the teachers and an increase in the use of argumentation in science lessons when puppets were used. This created more opportunities for children’s thinking and reasoning talk in the puppets lessons compared to the typical lessons without puppets. Again this indicates a shift in teaching style towards more thought-provoking lessons. The other differences in the teaching style used were an increase in the use of contextualising narrative, which helped to provided a rationale for the activity, and greater use of encouragement to children to talk and share their ideas. Both of these changes indicate that teachers are providing a more positive learning environment in which talk is valued. It appears that the use of puppets has enabled the teachers to become more dialogic in their science teaching, and that introducing puppets into the classroom has influenced some fundamental aspects of their pedagogy. Chi-squared tests show that each of the changes indicated above is significant. The literature on teacher change is consistent in suggesting that change in teacher practice can be difficult to achieve in a short period of time (e.g. Adey, Hewitt, Hewitt and Landau, 2004; Fullan, 2001). However we found that using the puppets had a greater effect on teacher practice over a short period of time than we would have anticipated. Most of the teachers involved in the project changed their practice in significant ways as a consequence of using puppets. The follow up meetings and ongoing contact with some of the teachers suggest that these changes have been long-lasting and that they have continued to use puppets to generate talk in their science lessons. These changes occurred after only a short preparation session and with the teachers working entirely within their usual science curriculum. There were no changes in lesson timing, lesson objectives, practical activity or scheme of work. In this respect the introduction of puppets appears to compare favourably with some other innovations in science education, where more far-reaching changes are viewed as necessary for the innovation to be successful. The project appears to have the potential to have a positive impact on primary science teaching. The research is now entering a phase in which the impact on secondary science teaching and learning in the 11-16 age group will be identified. Funding has been secured from GlaxoSmithKline plc and Millgate House Publishing to support a programme of professional development for teachers, along with provision of resources, including puppets and scenarios in which the puppets can operate. A number of factors have emerged from the research which appear to be relevant in ensuring that this programme of professional development is effective. These factors include:
  • 6. The project is entirely located within the existing primary school science curriculum. Teachers do not have to put on special puppets lessons which fall outside the usual science curriculum. They do not have to invest any additional curriculum time in using puppets, but can incorporate puppets within their current Schemes of Work.  The training programme and level of commitment that teachers are required to make to the project are modest. Teachers do not need to invest extensive amounts of time, energy or resources in introducing the project to their school.  Teachers do not need to make major shifts in their professional practice before they try the approach in their teaching. Although involvement in the project may well lead to changes in professional values, beliefs and practice, this is not a pre-requisite for using puppets successfully. This is consistent with what we have found in other projects, where teachers may be willing to take on an innovation which does not appear to require any fundamental change in professional values and practice, only to find that fundamental changes then take place as a consequence of taking on the innovation. These factors lead us to believe that teachers are likely to welcome the professional development programme, and that professional development decision-makers will be keen to gain access to the project for their teachers. References Adey, P. Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J. & Landau, N. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic. Alexander, R. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching. York, Dialogos. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). London, RoutledgeFalmer. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V. and Felton, M. (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111. Naylor S., Keogh B., Downing, B., Maloney, J. and Simon, S. (2005) The PUPPETS Project: using puppets to promote engagement and talk in science. Paper presented at the Fifth ERERA Conference. Barcelona, Spain. Newton, P., Driver, R. and Osborne, J. (1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 5, 553-576. Osborne, J. and Simon. S. (1996) Primary Science: Past and Future Directions. Studies in Science Education, 27, 99-147. Solomon, J. (1998) About argument and discussion. School Science Review, 80 (291), 57-62. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications. Venville, G. (2002). Enhancing the quality of thinking in Year 1 classes. In M. Shayer & P. Adey (eds.) Learning Intelligence. Buckingham, Open University Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.