Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Imaging for Radiotherapy delivery and verification

2,482 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • DOWNLOAD FULL MOVIE, INTO AVAILABLE FORMAT ......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... ,DOWNLOAD FULL. MOVIE 4K,FHD,HD,480P here { https://tinyurl.com/yybdfxwh }
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Imaging for Radiotherapy delivery and verification

  1. 1. Imaging  for  Planning  and   Treatment  Verifica4on   (Rota&on  7)   Mentor:  Ryan  Flynn,  Ph.D.     (12/16/09  –  01/15/10)   By      Vibha  Chaswal,  Ph.D.   2/24/14   1  
  2. 2. Syllabus   PHEW!!!!!!!   2/24/14   2  
  3. 3. EPID  QA   •  Uniformity  versus  thickness  (across  flat-­‐field   images)   •  SNR  versus  thickness  of  solid  water   •  MTF   •  CNR   •  SNR   •  EPID’s  alignment  with  gantry  isocenter   2/24/14   3  
  4. 4. Addi4onal   •  •  •  •  •  CNR  vs  Thickness  vs  Dose   Effect  of  filtraRon  on  images   MTF  calculaRon  validaRon   Contrast  calculaRons  for  Air  &  Bone  in  water     DidacRc     2/24/14   4  
  5. 5. EPID  QA:  Image  Uniformity  vs  Thickness   2/24/14   5  
  6. 6. 1 3 5 4 2 Uniformity  (Normalized  mean  PV  in  an  ROI)   Image  Uniformity  vs  Solid  Water  Thickness   1.010   0.980   0.950   ROI_1  (top)     ROI_2    (boaom)   ROI_3  (right)   ROI_4  (leb)   ROI_5  (center)   0.920   0.890   0.860   0.830   0.800   0   2/24/14   5   10   15   20   Solid  Water  Thickness  (cm)   25   30   35   6  
  7. 7. EPID  QA:  Signal-­‐to-­‐Noise  raRo  vs  Thickness   2/24/14   7  
  8. 8. 2/24/14   8  
  9. 9. Signal-­‐to-­‐Noise  Ra4o  vs  Thickness  of  SW  slab   300   250   SNR   200   150   100   50   0   0   5   10   15   20   25   30   35   Sold  Water  Thickness  (cm)   2/24/14   9  
  10. 10. EPID  QA:     Imaging  Parameters   (SNR,  CNR,  MTF,  Dose  dependence)   2/24/14   10  
  11. 11. Material   Physical   density  (g/cm3)   PVC   1.00   Al   2.6   Pb   11.34   0.23 lp/mm 5 mm lead 15 mm PVC QC - 3V Phantom s/n 104 0.43 lp/mm 15 mm Al 11 mm Pb 0.76 lp/mm 0.2 lp/mm 0.1 lp/mm 7.5 mm Pb 2/24/14   11  
  12. 12. MTF Calculation Validation 2/24/14   Droege R.T, Morin R. L, ‘A practical method to measure MTF of scanners’, Med. Phys. 9(5), 1982 12  
  13. 13. EPID spatial resolution: MTF Calculation lp/mm   0.1   663.45   0.2   1342.163   0.23   2066.66   0.43   MTF  measured  using  QC-­‐3V  phantom     Std  Dev   2315.17   0.76   2825.81   1.20   1.00   MTF   0.80   0.60   0.40   0.20   0.00   0   2/24/14   0.1   0.2   0.3   0.4   0.5   line-­‐pairs/mm  (lp/mm)   0.6   0.7   0.8   13  
  14. 14. Imaging  Parameters:  SNR   Region   Physical   density  (g/ cm3)   Depth    (cm)   Radiological  Path-­‐ length   (g/cm2)   1  (Pb)   11.34   0.75   8.505   2  (PVC)   1   1.5   1.5   3  (Pb)   11.34   0.5   5.67   4  (Al)   2.6   1.5   3.9   5  (Pb)   11.34   1.1   12.474   6  (Pb)   11.34   0.75   8.505   SNR  versus  Radiological  Path-­‐length   SNR  (standard  devia4on)   140   120   100   80   60   40   20   0   0   2/24/14   2   4   6   8   10   Radiological  pathlength  (g/cm2)   12   14   14  
  15. 15. SNR  analysis  ROIs  1  &  6   ROI 1 2/24/14   ROI 6 15  
  16. 16. EPID  QA:  CNR  vs  Thickness  vs  Dose   10-QC-10 1MU 2MU 3MU (QC-3V as tumor inside varying solid water thickness patients) 10 cm 20-QC-10 1MU 2MU 3MU 30-QC-10 1MU 2MU 3MU 20 cm 30 cm 2/24/14   16  
  17. 17. CNR  of  QC-­‐3  phantom  vs  Radiological  Thickness   (for  different  doses  and  solid  water  thicknesses)    60.00     Contrast-­‐to-­‐Noise  Ra4o  w.r.t.  15mm  PVC   1 MU 2 MU  50.00     10 cm 3 MU  40.00      30.00     20 cm  20.00     30  cm    10.00      -­‐         0   2   4   6   8   10   12   14   Radiological  Thickness  (g/cm2)   2/24/14   17  
  18. 18. EDPI QA: EPID Alignment (Oncor A) Gantry 0 degree Gantry 90 degree 2/24/14   18   Gantry 270 degree, Gantry 180 degree
  19. 19. Fig 4(c): Gantry 180 degree, distance measurements between x-retic and e-retic. 2/24/14   Fig 4(d): Gantry 180 degree, distance measurements between x-retic and e-retic at the central ISIS sphere region that coincides with radiation isocenter; note that distance between x-retic and e-retic is 2.3mm, which is more than the tolerance value of 2mm. Hence, EPID is not aligned within specifications at 19   Gantry angle 180-degrees.
  20. 20. Fig 4(e): Gantry 180 degree, distance measurements between x-retic and center of pinhole of ISIS. Fig 4(f): Gantry 180 degree, distance measurements between e-retic and center of pinhole of ISIS. 2/24/14   20  
  21. 21. Clinical  ObservaRon   •  •  •  •  •  •  Whole  brain  x  1   Head  and  neck  x  2  (MVCBCT)     Pelvis  x  1  (portal)  x  3  (MVCBCT)     Thoracic  x  1  (portal)  x  2  (MVCBCT)     Extra-­‐cranial  lung  x  1  (MVCBCT)     Supine  Breast  x  1  (portal)   2/24/14   21  
  22. 22. Treatment Verification: MVCBCT Extra-Cranial Lung Head & Neck 2/24/14   Pelvic 22  
  23. 23. Treatment Verification: Portal Imaging Reference DRR Right Lat Treatment day Right lat portal image Whole Brain DRR Registered DRR and portal image Pelvic DRR Reference Planning PA DRR 2/24/14   Treatment day PA portal image Registered PA images 23  
  24. 24. Thoracic DRR Reference Planning AP setup DRR Reference Planning Left Anterior Oblique field DRR at Gantry 45-deg Reference Planning field DRR Left Lat Gantry 90-deg Reference Planning Right Anterior Oblique field DRR 2/24/14   at Gantry 344.9-deg Treatment day AP double exposure portal image Treatment day Left Anterior Oblique field portal image at Gantry 45-deg Registered AP DRR and portal images Registered Left Anterior Oblique DRR and portal images Treatment day Left Lat field portal image at Gantry 90- Registered Left Lat DRR and portal images deg Treatment day Right Anterior Oblique field portal image at Gantry 344.9-deg Registered Right Anterior Oblique DRR and portal 24   images
  25. 25. THANK  YOU!!!!!   2/24/14   25  

×