The document discusses the origins and nature of language. It explores the relationship between words, grammar, meaning, and thinking. A key point is that Noam Chomsky argues that grammar was present in the human brain before the first words or pictures, and that grammar was necessary for true thinking. The document also examines how the basic concept of "merging" or combining elements is crucial to language and allowed early humans to develop more advanced cognitive abilities.
5. Language as CREATION
• Hindu myth:
• God wanted to speak
• God said bhur and the Earth was created
• God said bhuvar and Space was created
• God said suvar and Sky was created
6. Language as CREATION
• The Bible
• In the beginning was the Word
• And the Word was with God
• And the Word was God
7. Language as CREATION
• Let there be light!
• Let there be animals!
• Let there be sea!
• Etc
64. • Picture:
• 1. Sign (the picture)
• 2. The meaning (the idea of horse, for example)
• Word:
• 1. Sign (the sound)
• 2. The meaning (the idea of horse, for example)
• Anything else?
65. • Word:
• 1. Sign (the sound)
• 2. The meaning (the idea of horse, for
example)
• 3. Grammar (syntax)
210. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF
“him”
211. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF “him”
NOTICE the Ys are merging already.
WHY?
212. PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
VALENCY and
SEM SPECS
213. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF “him”
215. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE MERGE SEMANTIC INFO?
216. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
217. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
WHAT
KIND OF
INDEX FOR
“sees
him”?
218. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
INDEX
identifies
as a
situation
or
individual
219. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
Is “sees
him” more
like an
individual
or a
situation?
220. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
Probably a
situation
221. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
How
about
Frames?
222. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
Well
FRAMES is
a list
223. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
FRAMES is
a list of
general
meanings
224. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
So we can
keep both
225. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
226. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
227. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
228. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
229. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees him”
Identity as a
situation from
the DOMINANT
(Stronger)
PARENT
230. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees him”
General meaning
(FRAMES) from
BOTH PARENTS
231. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees” “him”
“sees him”
232. Isn’t this fun?!
• In MERGE …
• Sound (PHONOLOGICAL) info comes from
both parents equally
• General meaning (FRAMES) info comes from
both parents equally
• But the identity (INDEX) comes from the
dominant parent
233. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees” “him”
“sees him”
239. SYNTAX for “him”
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
240. SYNTAX for “ sees him”?
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
241. What do you think?
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
242. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
SYNTAX of “sees him”
243. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
Exactly
the same
as the
SYNTAX of
the verb …
244. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X>
… minus
the object
in the
VALENCY
list