Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
COGENERATION OF POWER<br />A Case Study of Cement Industry<br />
Cement Industry: An Introduction<br />An energy intensive industry consuming about 4GJ per tonne of cement produced.<br />...
Process Description<br />Procurement of Raw Materials<br />Raw Milling – Preparation of raw materials for the pyro-process...
Wet Process Raw Material Grinding<br />Limestone<br />Water<br />Kiln<br />Crusher<br />Raw Mill<br />Slurry Basin<br />St...
Dry Process Raw Material Grinding<br />EP<br />Dryer<br />Preheater and Kiln<br />BT<br />ST<br />Storage<br />Raw Mill<br...
Average Energy Consumption in a  1 MTPA Cement Plant<br />Thermal Energy: 0.80 Million Kcal/Tonne Clinker<br />Electrical ...
Total Power & Captive Power Requirement for Various Plant Capacities<br />* Taking Captive Power Requirement @ 30% of Tota...
PREHEATER EXIT GAS, 300 – 400OC, 180-250 KCAL/KG<br />COOLER EXIT GAS, 200 – 300OC, 80-130 KCAL/KG<br />SOURCES OF WASTE H...
COGENERATION POTENTIAL IN INDIA<br />Plants that are amenable for Cogeneration : 40<br />Total Cogeneration Capacity, MW :...
CO2 Reduction Possibilities<br />CO2 Reduction Potential : 1.50<br />   (Million Tonnes per Year)<br />Percentage Reductio...
Power Generation through Waste Heat Recovery<br />Utilization of waste heat from the Pre-Heater gases for power generation...
Technical Consideration For Cogeneration Schemes	<br />Availability of waste heat for cogeneration<br />Location of Waste ...
Recent Developments<br />Improved Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (THERMOWIR)<br />Removing 60% (48-60 gm/Nm3) dust from the ga...
Recent Developments<br />Modified Rankine Cycle System “KALINA Cycle”<br />Uses Binary fluid of Ammonia and Water<br />Eff...
Recent Developments<br />Organic Rankine Cycle (ORMAT Energy Convertor (OEC))<br />Uses organic fluid as working medium in...
Case Study: 1.2MTPA, 4-Stage Preheater Cement Plant<br />
Estimated Cogeneration Potential<br />
Barriers in Adoption of Cogeneration Technology<br />Technical Barriers<br />Financial Barriers<br />Institutional Barrier...
Technical/Technological Barriers<br />Non Availability of Proven technology indigenously.<br />Design of waste heat recove...
Financial Barriers<br />Large Capital Requirement and financial constraints.<br />Viability remains to be established.<br ...
Institutional Barriers<br />Lack of incentives for adoption of technology.<br />Lack of capacity building efforts resultin...
THANK YOU!<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Cogeneration Of Power

4,675 views

Published on

Cogeneration Scenario in Cement Industry: A case study

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Follow the link, new dating source: ❤❤❤ http://bit.ly/2F7hN3u ❤❤❤
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Dating for everyone is here: ♥♥♥ http://bit.ly/2F7hN3u ♥♥♥
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Intimacy has never been so much fun! Buy the clinically proven men's natural supplement that helped guys increase satisfaction by 71.43%! ★★★ https://bit.ly/30G1ZO1
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Cogeneration Of Power

  1. 1. COGENERATION OF POWER<br />A Case Study of Cement Industry<br />
  2. 2. Cement Industry: An Introduction<br />An energy intensive industry consuming about 4GJ per tonne of cement produced.<br />In dry process cement plants, nearly 40 percent of the total heat input is rejected as waste heat from exist gases of pre-heater and grate cooler.<br />In India, the industry accounts for 10.3% of total fuel consumption in the manufacturing sector.<br />
  3. 3. Process Description<br />Procurement of Raw Materials<br />Raw Milling – Preparation of raw materials for the pyro-processing system<br />Pyroprocessing – pyroprocessing raw materials to form portland cement clinker<br />Cooling of portland cement clinker<br />Storage of portland cement clinker<br />Finish milling<br />Packing and Loading<br />
  4. 4. Wet Process Raw Material Grinding<br />Limestone<br />Water<br />Kiln<br />Crusher<br />Raw Mill<br />Slurry Basin<br />Storage Yard<br />Slurry Tank<br />Additives<br />Clay basin<br />Water<br />Clay<br />Wash Mill<br />
  5. 5. Dry Process Raw Material Grinding<br />EP<br />Dryer<br />Preheater and Kiln<br />BT<br />ST<br />Storage<br />Raw Mill<br />Dryer<br />Heat generated<br />BT – Blending Tank<br />ST – Storage Tank<br />EP – Electrostatic Precipitator<br />
  6. 6. Average Energy Consumption in a 1 MTPA Cement Plant<br />Thermal Energy: 0.80 Million Kcal/Tonne Clinker<br />Electrical Energy: 100 KWH/Tonne cement<br />Coal Requirement: 2,00,000 Tonnes/Year<br />Power Requirement: 20 MW (At 70% Load Factor)<br />
  7. 7. Total Power & Captive Power Requirement for Various Plant Capacities<br />* Taking Captive Power Requirement @ 30% of Total Power for Maintaining Continuous Production from Kiln<br />
  8. 8. PREHEATER EXIT GAS, 300 – 400OC, 180-250 KCAL/KG<br />COOLER EXIT GAS, 200 – 300OC, 80-130 KCAL/KG<br />SOURCES OF WASTE HEAT<br />
  9. 9. COGENERATION POTENTIAL IN INDIA<br />Plants that are amenable for Cogeneration : 40<br />Total Cogeneration Capacity, MW : 160<br />Expected Power Savings : Upto 25 – 30% of Total Power Requirement can be achieved in a cement plant<br />
  10. 10. CO2 Reduction Possibilities<br />CO2 Reduction Potential : 1.50<br /> (Million Tonnes per Year)<br />Percentage Reduction as compared to emissions due to electricity consumption : 18<br />
  11. 11. Power Generation through Waste Heat Recovery<br />Utilization of waste heat from the Pre-Heater gases for power generation.<br />Utilization of waste heat from AQC.<br />Utilizing 40% Thermal Energy discharging into the atmosphere.<br />Producing about 30% of Total Power Requirement for the Plant itself.<br />Reducing CO2 amount in the atmosphere.<br />
  12. 12. Technical Consideration For Cogeneration Schemes <br />Availability of waste heat for cogeneration<br />Location of Waste Heat Boiler<br />Suitability of Waste Heat Recovery Boiler<br />Maximum Flue Gas Temperature<br />Quantity of Heat Recovery<br />Type of Boilers, Turbines and Condensers<br />De-dusting Arrangement<br />Availability of Water<br />
  13. 13. Recent Developments<br />Improved Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (THERMOWIR)<br />Removing 60% (48-60 gm/Nm3) dust from the gases reducing load on existing ESP<br />Higher efficiency compared to conventional Heat Exchangers<br />
  14. 14. Recent Developments<br />Modified Rankine Cycle System “KALINA Cycle”<br />Uses Binary fluid of Ammonia and Water<br />Efficiency gains of upto 50% for low temperature (200-280oC) and upto 20% for higher temperature heat sources compared to rankine cycle<br />
  15. 15. Recent Developments<br />Organic Rankine Cycle (ORMAT Energy Convertor (OEC))<br />Uses organic fluid as working medium instead of steam<br />Suitable for much lower temperature heat sources as organic fluid has a much lower boiling point as compared to water.<br />
  16. 16.
  17. 17. Case Study: 1.2MTPA, 4-Stage Preheater Cement Plant<br />
  18. 18. Estimated Cogeneration Potential<br />
  19. 19. Barriers in Adoption of Cogeneration Technology<br />Technical Barriers<br />Financial Barriers<br />Institutional Barriers<br />
  20. 20. Technical/Technological Barriers<br />Non Availability of Proven technology indigenously.<br />Design of waste heat recovery boiler suitable to withstand high dust load in the waste gases.<br />High performance risk due to demonstration.<br />
  21. 21. Financial Barriers<br />Large Capital Requirement and financial constraints.<br />Viability remains to be established.<br />High cost of technology and access to funds.<br />Depressed cement marketing scenario.<br />
  22. 22. Institutional Barriers<br />Lack of incentives for adoption of technology.<br />Lack of capacity building efforts resulting in lack of operating experience and confidence level.<br />
  23. 23. THANK YOU!<br />

×