Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Global Economic Crisis and Poverty


Published on

Global Economic Crisis and Poverty in Pakistan

Published in: Education
  • Economic crisis at Pakistan is mainly due to throwing its PUBLIC MONEY abroad, the worst terrorism with Pakistan. The elite/ruling class is busy twisting the constitution to facilitate this dogmatism of theirs, resulting in Pakistan’s destroyed economy & constant devaluation in its currency. The devils think this throwing of Pakistan’s National Wealth abroad as protecting their illegally looted (non-tax paid) money, but they forget Saudi Arab having been refused return of its funds unless the Saudi King speaks in favor of every dogmatism on earth by the anti Islamic lobby.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Global Economic Crisis and Poverty

  1. 1. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MICROSIMULATION (2010) 3(1) 127-129Global Economic Crisis and Poverty in PakistanVaqar Ahmed1 and Cathal O’ Donoghue21 Planning Commission of Pakistan; email: vahmed@gmail.com2 Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC), Teagasc, Ireland; email: Cathal.ODonoghue@teagasc.ieABSTRACT: In this case study we adopt a macro-micro framework in order to evaluate the impact of thecurrent global crisis on the Pakistan economy. We use a ‘top-down’ approach to combine a staticcomputable general equilibrium model with a microsimulation model. Our results suggest that between2007 and 2009 the poverty headcount ratio is likely to have increased by almost 80 percent, from 22 to40 percentage points. However, our results also show that this increase is attributable in part to the fueland food crisis that preceded the financial crisis. Our results also indicate a differential impact, with wageincreases for farm workers and a decrease in wages for skilled labour.Keywords: CGE; micro-macro; global economic crisis; PakistanI. INTRODUCTION respectively. The overall poverty related public spending declined by 45 percent.The global economic crisis impacts developingeconomies through trade, aid, remittances and There have been several attempts to trace theinvestment channels. The precise magnitude of impacts of external shocks such as the globaleffect across countries differs, depending on their financial crisis on national poverty profiles inlevel of integration into the world economy. The developing countries. For the impact on monetaryeconomy of Pakistan, which during this decade poverty, see Friedman and Levinsohn (2001),witnessed steady growth along with rising foreign Robilliard et al. (2001), Bourguignon et al. (2003),direct investment, remittances and exports, has and Weeks (2009). For the impact of economicfound itself recently with declining foreign crises on nutritional status and welfare in general,exchange reserves1, rising twin deficits2, and see Block et al. (2004), Chapman-Novakofskifalling overall economic growth3. (2009), and Chen and Ravallion (2009). In this paper we have adopted a macro-micro frameworkTable 1 provides a snapshot of recent economic in order to evaluate the impact of the currentperformance. The real GDP growth rate declined global crisis on the Pakistan economy.from 9 percent in 2005 to as low as 2 percent in2009. Before the crisis, poverty had fallensubstantially with the headcount ratio declining II. DATA AND METHODOLOGYfrom almost 35 percent in 2001 to 22 percent in2006. However for 2009, it is provisionally We use a static computable general equilibriumestimated to have climbed to as much as 40 (CGE) model following Decaluwé et al. (2009). Wepercent, an increase of almost 80 percent. link this model in a top-down manner with an income generation framework shown in Alatas andThe reduction in poverty and progress toward the Bourguignon (2005). The Social Accounting Matrixachievement of the Millennium Development Goals (SAM) for our Computable General Equilibriumwere to some extent attributable to the (CGE) model is derived from Dorosh et al. (2006).unprecedented increase in poverty-related public The main data source for the microsimulationspending that was possible due to the increased model is the 2002 Household Integrated Economicfiscal space available to the federal government Survey (HIES).during this period. However, soon after the globaleconomic crisis, a sharp reduction was observed in In the agricultural sector, capital and land arethis spending. The shares of public sector assumed to be fixed and in non-agriculture sectordevelopment expenditure on for example health only capital is fixed. Unskilled non-farm labour isand education were cut by 34 and 26 percent, fully mobile between sectors, whereas unskilledTable 1 Pakistan - Macroeconomic Situation 2001 - 2009Indicators 2001 2005 2006 2007 2009*GDP growth (%) 2.0 9.0 5.8 6.8 2.0Exports (US $ billion) 9.2 14.4 16.4 16.9 17.8Imports (US $ billion) 10.7 20.6 28.6 30.5 34.8FDI (US $ billion) 1.5 3.5 5.1 3.7Remittances (US $ billion) 4.2 4.6 5.5 7.8External debt and liabilities (US $ billion) 35.4 37.2 40.3 52.8Poverty headcount ratio 34.5 23.9 22.3 35 – 40Poverty related expenditure (US $ billion) 5.3 6.3 7.0 3.8Exchange Rate 58.4 59.4 59.9 60.6 78.0Source: Economic Survey of Pakistan, State Bank of Pakistan - Annual Reports 2001-2009.Notes: *provisional estimates
  2. 2. AHMED AND O’DONOGHUE Global Economic Crisis and Poverty in Pakistan 128farm labour is only used in agriculture and skilled food and fuel import bill.8 As a result, foodlabour is only used in non-agricultural sectors, consumption falls by 1.3 percent. The povertywhere they are also fully mobile. Supply of land is headcount ratio increases by almost 4 percent,fixed and sector-specific. Total investment is fixed with the poverty gap and severity increasing byand equal to total savings, which is comprised of 1.5 and 1 percent, respectively.household, firm, foreign and government savings.Real government expenditure is held fixed and thepublic deficit is flexible. The nominal exchange Table 2 Decline in External Resourcerate is kept flexible, which implies that foreign Inflow (foreign savings) Variables Percentagesavings, which are fixed in nominal terms, are Changeflexible in domestic currency terms. Thus the Real Investment -1.2external account is cleared by the nominal Government Revenue 0.9exchange rate. Wages Unskilled_farm 3.6 Unskilled_non farm 0.0III. RESULTS Skilled -2.8 Self employment 0.2 Returns to Land 3.9In what follows we analyse the impact of the crisis Exportsin a two-pronged manner. First, we simulate the Cotton yarn 0.8poverty effect of observed changes in wage rates, Textile 5.0self-employment and consumer prices between Consumer Prices2007 and 2009. However, these changes are not Food 3.4necessarily only attributable to financial crisis, as Fuel 1.9 Povertyother factors may have come into play such as the FGT 1 3.6rise in fuel and food prices preceding the crisis. FGT 2 1.5Second, we use our combined CGE and FGT 3 0.9microsimulation models to simulate the macro- Consumption (food) -1.3micro impact of a 25 percent decline in externalresource inflows (foreign savings). This reflectswhat has been observed during the financial crisis, The impact of fall in foreign inflows onleading to a depreciation of the Pakistani Rupee by disaggregated food consumption is shown in Tablealmost 28 percent. 3 and reveals adjustments in consumption patterns in response to changes in relative pricesIn the first analysis, we note that, between 2007 and falling incomes. The consumption of cerealsand 2009, wages for skilled and unskilled labour and pulses increases, which are staples, while thatfell by almost 9.5 and 3.6 percent. Returns to self of meat, fish, sugar products, vegetables andemployment declined by 11 percent. Food prices processed food, (which are also imported)increased by almost 28 percent and the price for decreases. This substitution away from non-fuel went up by almost 70 percent.4 Using only the essential food items toward staples is a commonmicro model we estimated that this will have led coping strategy to preserve caloric an increase in poverty by almost 39.6 percent.5The poverty gap and severity will also haveincreased by 26.8 and 19.4 percent, respectively. Table 3 Change in food consumption (quantity)The overall decline in per capita caloric intake is Percentageestimated at around 8.5 percent, with urban Product changehouseholds facing a higher magnitude of decline. Milk products 0.2Average per capita daily caloric intake was 2349 Meat & fish -0.5 Fruits -1.6calories in 2007. With an 8.5 percent decline, this Vegetables -1.7will now be around 2149 calories. Sugar products -0.4 Beverages -1.5In the second analysis, using the macro-micro Cereals 1.3framework, we see that the decline in external Pulses 1.2resources will have reduced real investment by Oil & fats -1.41.2 percent (Table 2). Imports decrease on Tea -1.5account of the currency depreciation and there issome increase seen in exports, which becomerelatively more competitive. Textile exports IV. CONCLUSIONincrease by 5 percent. This is of particularimportance as textiles constitute around 60 In this short case study we have tried to show thepercent of Pakistani exports and an important impact of the global economic crisis on Pakistansource of employment. Wages increase for farm economy. Our results estimate that between 2007workers6, remain unchanged for unskilled non- and 2009, poverty increased by almost 40farm workers, rise marginally in the case of the percent. However this is also attributable to theself employed and decline for skilled labour.7 A fuel and food crisis that preceded the financialgeneral increase in consumer prices is observed as crisis. More recently Pakistan witnessed a sharpa result of the depreciation of rupee and the rising reduction in foreign capital inflows on account of
  3. 3. AHMED AND O’DONOGHUE Global Economic Crisis and Poverty in Pakistan 129 8the global recession, among other reasons. This In the overall imports, food and fuel importsled to a sharp depreciation, a decline in have 7 and 23 percent share respectively.investment, falling wages for skilled workers, anda general rise in consumer prices. At the micro REFERENCESlevel, we estimate that this resulted in a 4 percentincrease in poverty with food consumption Alatas V and Bourguignon F (2005) ‘The Evolutiondeclining by 1.3 percent. of Income Distribution during Indonesias Fast Growth, 1980-1996’, in Bourguignon F, F H GDealing with the crisis is difficult for Pakistan due Ferreira and N Lustig (Eds.) Theto fiscal constraints. Balance of payments microeconomics of income distributionweaknesses forced the country to resort to an IMF dynamics in East Asia and Latin America, Newstand-by arrangement, which imposed further York: World Bank and Oxford University Press,conditionalities on the budget. Subsidies on 175-218.wheat, electricity, fertilizer and oil had to be Block S A, Kiess L, Webb P and Kosen S (2004)phased out, which in turn increased the ‘Macro shocks and micro outcomes: childinflationary burden on the consumer. While there nutrition during Indonesia’s crisis’, Economicsare some social safety nets at the federal and & Human Biology, 2(1), 21-44.provincial level, access to these has generally Bourguignon F, Robilliard A-S and Robinson S.become more difficult. Reforms to better target (2003). Representative versus real householdssocial safety nets are still underway. in the macroeconomic modelling of inequality. Dial document de travail dt/2003-10.Acknowledgements Chapman-Novakofski, K (2009) ‘The Economic Crisis—What Is the Role for NutritionThe authors would like to acknowledge funding Educators?’, Journal of Nutrition Education andfrom the Poverty and Economic Policy (PEP) Behavior, 41(1), 1-2.research network which is financed by the Chen S and Ravallion M (2009) ‘The impact ofAustralian Agency for International Development global financial crisis on the worlds poorest’,(AusAid) and the government of Canada through Working Paper, World Bank, Washington D.C..the International Development Research Centre Decaluwé B, Lemelin A, Maisonnave H and(IDRC) and Canadian International Development Robichaud V (2009) PEP-1-1 Standard PEPAgency (CIDA). Acknowledgements are also due Model, Single-Country, Static Versionto John Cockburn, Paul Dorosh, Stefan Boeters, (Provisional Edition). Poverty and Economicand Saira Ahmed for their comments and technical Policy Network, Université Laval, Qué Dorosh P, Niazi M K and Nazli H (2006) Social Accounting Matrix for Pakistan, 2001-02:Notes Methodology and Results. Pakistan Institute of1 Development Economics, Islamabad. The accumulated forex reserves declined to Friedman J and Levinsohn J (2001) The record low levels in the wake of rising cost of Distributional Impacts of Indonesias Financial importing fuel and food. Crisis on Household Welfare: A Rapid Response2 The import bill reached to unprecedented Methodology. National Bureau of Economic levels. The fiscal deficit worsened as the Research, Inc, Cambridge. government continued subsidies on wheat, Robilliard, A-S, Bourguignon F and Robinson S electricity, fertilizer and oil, in order not to pass (2001) ‘Crisis and Income Distribution: A Micro on the full effect of rising prices abroad. - Macro Model for Indonesia’, DIAL Working3 The domestic manufacturing sector found it Paper, Développement, Institutions & Analyses difficult to maintain the growth momentum due de Long terme (DIAL), Paris. to infrastructure shortages particularly poor Weeks, J (2009) ‘The impact of the global financial provision of energy. Consequently in 2008-09 crisis on the economy of Sierra Leone’, UNDP the growth rate of large scale manufacturing Country Study no. 18. United National turned negative and remained so consecutively Development Programme, New York. for the next 17 months. The textile sector was also hit to some extent by declining external demand.4 Also attributable to the removal of a subsidy as a result of IMF conditionality.5 Our findings are in line with the Panel of Economists Report submitted to Pakistan’s Planning Commission, which found an increase in poverty from 22 to almost 40 percent.6 Shown separately from other unskilled workers.7 The increase in textile and particularly cotton based textile exports are also partly responsible for increased returns to farm workers and also helped the change in returns to unskilled workers from turning negative.