Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Foresight in Public Agencies
Three Case Studies
Jake Dunagan (@dunagan23)
Director, Governance Futures Lab, IFTF
Managing ...
SOCIETY IS A SOCIAL INVENTION,
AND YOU ARE SOCIAL INVENTORS.
— JIM DATOR
Trends
Wild Cards
Disruptions/ Emerging Issues
Three Lenses on the Future
Connected Citizens
Case 1
ContextContext
• Technology (ICT) changing governmen
• Public engagement platform
• Arab Spring?
• Leadership role for UAE
Process
CA Administrative Office of the Courts:
Building a Judicial Network
Case 2
Context
• Technological disruption to court business
• Failed Implementation of Case Management System
• Massive budget cu...
THE FUTURE DOESN’T COUNT,
BECAUSE THE FUTURE DOESN’T
VOTE
Jim Dator:
Process
• Environmental scanning/trends research
• Workshops with experts
• Interviews with major stakeholders
Outcomes
• Report: Building a Judicial Network
• Videos: Seven vignettes
• Presentation to Court Technology
Committee
• NO...
UCSF 2.0
Case 3
Context
• Campus-wide and extended community discussion
• Generating new ideas through an inclusive process
• Setting a ne...
Process: Foresight Engine
Questions?
Foresight in Public Agencies: Three Case Studies
Foresight in Public Agencies: Three Case Studies
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Foresight in Public Agencies : Three Case Studies

1,395 views

Published on

Presentation made by Jake Dunagan (@dunagan23) at #UNDP4Future foresight methodology in development event in Istanbul on 16 June, 2014.

  • Be the first to comment

Foresight in Public Agencies : Three Case Studies

  1. 1. Foresight in Public Agencies Three Case Studies Jake Dunagan (@dunagan23) Director, Governance Futures Lab, IFTF Managing Director, verynice futures
  2. 2. SOCIETY IS A SOCIAL INVENTION, AND YOU ARE SOCIAL INVENTORS. — JIM DATOR
  3. 3. Trends Wild Cards Disruptions/ Emerging Issues Three Lenses on the Future
  4. 4. Connected Citizens Case 1
  5. 5. ContextContext • Technology (ICT) changing governmen • Public engagement platform • Arab Spring? • Leadership role for UAE
  6. 6. Process
  7. 7. CA Administrative Office of the Courts: Building a Judicial Network Case 2
  8. 8. Context • Technological disruption to court business • Failed Implementation of Case Management System • Massive budget cuts • Shrinking public trust and confidence in the courts
  9. 9. THE FUTURE DOESN’T COUNT, BECAUSE THE FUTURE DOESN’T VOTE Jim Dator:
  10. 10. Process • Environmental scanning/trends research • Workshops with experts • Interviews with major stakeholders
  11. 11. Outcomes • Report: Building a Judicial Network • Videos: Seven vignettes • Presentation to Court Technology Committee • NO REAL CHANGE
  12. 12. UCSF 2.0 Case 3
  13. 13. Context • Campus-wide and extended community discussion • Generating new ideas through an inclusive process • Setting a new vision for the university
  14. 14. Process: Foresight Engine
  15. 15. Questions?

×