Compartive And Non

507 views

Published on

Compartive And Non presentation

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
507
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Compartive And Non

  1. 1. A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND NON- COMPARATIVE Done by : Zahra Al-hoqani Asma Al-Amri
  2. 2. Non-Comparative Study Perceptions of Online Learning Quality given Comfort with Technology, Motivation to Learn Technology Skills, Satisfaction, & Online Learning Experience A Comparative Study Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning
  3. 3. The type of comparative study. <ul><li>The “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning” is Learners’ perception and performance comparative study </li></ul>
  4. 4. Define the problem, question and purpose of evaluation. <ul><li>The comparative study examines students’ perceptions of integrating online components in two undergraduate business courses where students completed online learning modules prior to class discussion. </li></ul><ul><li>The non-comparative examines audience comfort with technology, satisfaction with those experiences, and perceived quality, given their experience with online or hybrid courses. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Define participants and evaluation instruments applied. <ul><li>Comp: Survey was administered to students anonymously during the first class meeting and after class discussion of the online learning units. </li></ul><ul><li>Comp : Thirty six (of 40 enrolled) in the required course and eighteen (of 26 enrolled) in the elective course completed the survey. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Define participants and evaluation instruments applied. <ul><li>Non-comp : Survey was as an instrument; it was developed and reviewed by instructional technology experts and researchers. </li></ul><ul><li>Non-comp: It was conducted to approximately 700 professional and graduate education students. </li></ul>
  7. 7. Describe advantages or disadvantages of the two evaluation strategies. <ul><li>Advantage: </li></ul><ul><li>Comp: The research was not about assessing the difference between online vs. face-to-face instruction; rather, this research is more about how we can use technology effectively in the classroom and how students react to it. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Describe advantages or disadvantages of the two evaluation strategies. <ul><li>Disadvantage : </li></ul><ul><li>It was done without taking in the consideration of the factors that can affect the results like: learner characteristics, course content, and the learning context. </li></ul><ul><li>The largest dissatisfaction factor reported among the participants was the time required to complete the online modules. </li></ul>
  9. 9. Report the results <ul><li>Comp: The findings of the observation of the comparative one showed that most evaluation measures focus on subjects’ perceptions of the online units. </li></ul>
  10. 10. Report the results <ul><li>Non-comp :The findings of the survey showed that for students with Online course experience, comfort with technology was related to satisfaction with online course experience which was related to perceived quality; motivation to learn more about technology was also related to satisfaction of online learning experience. </li></ul>
  11. 11. Report the results <ul><li>For students with hybrid online course experience (WebCT), comfort was related to satisfaction and motivation; motivation was also related to satisfaction; and satisfaction was ultimately related to perceived quality. In this group (WebCT), comfort was also directly related to perceived quality. </li></ul><ul><li>Finally, among students with no online course-related experiences, comfort was related to motivation to learn about technology, but neither of these </li></ul>
  12. 12. References: <ul><li>Perceptions of Online Learning Quality given Comfort with Technology, Motivation to Learn Technology Skills, Satisfaction, & Online Learning Experience </li></ul><ul><li>Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning </li></ul>
  13. 13. Resources <ul><li>http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED491688&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED491688 </li></ul><ul><li>http://jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p201-219Smart54.pdf </li></ul>
  14. 14. <ul><li>THE END </li></ul>

×