Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Olympia schools - Blended learning 2014.

  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Olympia schools - Blended learning 2014.

  1. 1. From Disruptive Innovation to Blended Learning
  2. 2. “Disruptive innovation” definition on Wikipedia: A disruptive innovation is an innovation that helps create a new market and value network, and eventually disrupts an existing market and value network (over a few years or decades), displacing an earlier technology. The term is used in business and technology literature to describe innovations that improve a product or service in ways that the market does not expect, typically first by designing for a different set of consumers in a new market and later by lowering prices in the existing market. In contrast to disruptive innovation, a sustaining innovation does not create new markets or value networks but rather only evolves existing ones with better value, allowing the firms within to compete against each other's sustaining improvements. Sustaining innovations may be either "discontinuous"[1] (i.e. "transformational" or "revolutionary") or "continuous" (i.e. "evolutionary"). Clayton. Christensen: “Đổi mới (innovation) được gọi là đột phá khi cho phép một tập khách hàng mới hoàn toàn sử dụng một sản phẩm hay dịch vụ mà trong quá khứ chỉ những người có rất nhiều tiền hoặc kỹ năng mới có thể sử dụng.” Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 2
  3. 3. Disruptive Innovation diagram. Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 3
  4. 4. Individualization Benefits of online and blended learning Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 4 Teacher Effectiveness Data and Feedback Cost Control
  5. 5. The rise of K-12 blended learning Definition of blended learning A formal education program in which a student learns at least in part through online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path and/or pace at least in part in a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home (such as school). 100010 001111 010101 000 1000100 0111101 0101000 The modalities along each student’s learning path within a course or subject are connected to provide an integrated learning experience. Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 5
  6. 6. Emerging blended-learning models Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 6
  7. 7. Station Rotation Model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 7
  8. 8. Lab Rotation Model Flipped Classroom Model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 8
  9. 9. Individual Rotation Model Flex Model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 9
  10. 10. A La Carte Model Enriched Virtual model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 10
  11. 11. Choose a rally cry Identify measurable outcomes Design the model Organize the team Content Technology Facilities Staffing Identify and prioritize beliefs Test and learn Adjust!Adjust! Implementing blended learning Culture Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 11
  12. 12. Twin Challenges in Education • …while containing or reducing costs. • Meeting increasing and increasingly varied demand for quality higher education…. (Source: Tapio Varis, GLOBAL UNIVERSITY IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETIES) Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 12
  13. 13. Is College Worth It? Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 13
  14. 14. Higher Education with Higher Price • General cost: $1 in 1978, $3.3 in 2008 • Medical care: soared twice as much • Tuition: three times Source: http://satyagraha.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/college-tuition-hyperinflation/ Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 14
  15. 15. Student Protest Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 15
  16. 16. Why are tuition bills going up? • Education industry: 100% highly skilled labor • Global competition • Two major factors for excellency 1. Well-treated professors 2. Educational infrastructure • “By and large, colleges and universities have not yet begun to realize the promise of technology to improve the quality of student learning and reduce the costs of instruction.” – Twigg, Carol (2003). “Improving Learning and Reducing Costs.” Educause, 11/12/2003. pp.28-38. Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 16
  17. 17. Is Online Education the Answer? Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 17
  18. 18. Is it possible? Quality vs. Cost 18 Quality Cost Q C Q C Q C Sustaining Innovation Disruptive Innovation Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools.
  19. 19. Inverted, ‘Flipped’, Learning Model? Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 19 Learning Inf. Acquisition Inf. Assimilation InClass Lecture AfterClass Homework -Mass Education Traditional model -Quality up - Cost down Inverted model
  20. 20. Content Sources • Open – MIT OCW – Carnegie Melon U. OpenLearning Initiative – MERLOTS – YouTube • Commercial – Pearson’s MyLab – Wiley Plus – McGraw Hill Connect Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 20
  21. 21. Future Educational Model Current: Distribution model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 22 Future: Network model Instructor Students C C Students C C Coach
  22. 22. UNIST Case: Practical IT (Cont’d) Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 23 Classical Model Lecture #1 (35%) Lecture #2 (35%) Problem-based Learning (30%) Flipped Model Lecture #1 (35%) Problem-based Learning (50%) Web-based Learning (50%)
  23. 23. UNIST Case: Practical IT • Benefits – Quality up: • Active learning - PBL • One-on-one assistance • Ongoing assessment on each learning module and prompt (automated) feedback – Cost reduction: More than 60% – Teaching load down: More than 50% Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 24
  24. 24. Management Online Education Departments Support Team 4 5 Clear and Strong Policy from Top Level Management Strong support from e- Learning related departments • School of Digital Media (International Awards) • ICT Center (SCMS, Own Tier 3 Data Center with DRS and quality Campus wide WiFi) • Media Center (Industrial Standard) Dedication of the E-lecturer at a School Level • Central body supporting and driving the University as a whole for excellence in in-class online teaching and learning as well as distance education. • Utilizing sufficiency economy method for sustainable development and online education eco-system of the modern era. • A leader in Educational Technology Sripatum Uni. Case: SMART Approach Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 25
  25. 25. S: Shared Vision M: Motivation A: Action Plan R: Responsi bility T Technology & Teaching • Students view pre-class recordings at home/anywhere • Online delivery and participation • Equal all-must participate opportunity • Teacher moderates • Participative and deeper collaborative learning • Flip the class 49 Sripatum Uni. Case: SMART Model Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 26
  26. 26. 39% (before) 84% (after) Students’ average score: Up by > 50% 6 2 Research for Teaching Developments Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 27
  27. 27. 4.25 (from 5) Students’ satisfaction: on blog: 6 3 Students’ satisfaction on e-Learning: 4.42 (from 5) Research for Teaching Developments Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 28
  28. 28. • Blended-Learning is a proven teaching and learning approach. It increases learning outcome and students’ satisfaction. • Blended-Learning is very doable from the lecturer’s perspectives. It is surely not a burden. 6 6 Summary Blended Learning 2014. Olympia Schools. 29

×