3. Work place assessments for
training in colposcopy
Professor Maggie Cruickshank
University of Aberdeen
4. Objectives
• Explain the principles of good assessment
• Describe the workplace-based assessment tools
• Consider useful feedback
• Consider descriptors in workplace assessment
tools
• Reflect on the challenges related to assessment
of performance
5. Principles of Assessment
An effective assessment system should:
• Provide feedback for trainees
• Clarify action plans
• Help assessors to measure trainee performance
• Help assessors decide on competency
6. Features of Good Assessment
• Reliability
• Validity
• Feasibility
• Educational impact
7. What is the best method of
assessing Colposcopy practice?
…is it valid/reliable?
8. Reliability
• Does the test consistently measure the
same thing?
• Expressed as a number between 0 and 1
1 = you are making it up
0 = useless
9. Validity
• Does the test measure what it is supposed
to measure?
…not always easy to define or demonstrate!
11. Competence vs Performance
• Competence-based assessment
measures what doctors can do in
controlled representations of professional
practice
• Performance-based assessment
measures what doctors actually do in their
professional practice
15. • Critical to learning and has a significant
influence on achievement
• Feedback is the largest influence on
achievement in learning or training
• Feedback alone is effective in 71% of
education studies
• Observation of a clinical performance
enhances learning
(Hattie 1999; Veloski 2006)
Formative Assessment and Feedback
16. Definition of Workplace-based
Assessment (WPA)
“The assessment of working practices based
on what doctors actually do in the
workplace, and is predominantly carried
out in the workplace itself”
17. Workplace-based Assessment (WPAs)
Methods
• Structured scoring systems to ensure systematic
review and feedback on colposcopy
performance
• Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX)
• Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS)
• Case-based Discussion (CbD)
18. Mini-CEX
• Focuses on formative assessment of
clinical skills
• Responds to the assessment problems of
the traditional long case
• Responds to the educational problems of
the workplace
19. Mini-CEX
• Assessor observes a trainee with a patient
• Usually a very specific focused task
– Take a history
– Do a colposcopy examination
– Explain results
– Form a management plan
– Not all components are assessed (i.e., mini)
• Assessor scores performance on a structured rating scale
• Trainee is given feedback
• Takes 5-10 minutes
20. Complexity of Low Average High
case:
Please grade the following areas using
the scale below
Below
expectations
Borderline Meets
expectations
Above
expectations
U/C*
1 History Taking 1 2
3
4
5 6
2 Examination Skills
3 Communication Skills
4 Clinical Judgement
5 Professionalism
6 Organisation/Efficiency
7 Overall clinical care
*U/C Please mark this if you have not observed the behaviour and therefore feel unable to comment
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development
Agreed action plan:
21. Why multiple MiniCEXes ?
• Improve the reliability of any single
assessment
• Completes picture of performance
• Must agree in advance of patient
interaction and document
• Must be relevant to colposcopy training
22. Direct Observation of Procedure
• Assessor observes a trainee undertaking a
procedure
– Routine colposcopy examination or procedure
– Assessor rates performance on a rating scale
(check list)
– Takes as long as procedure (minutes)
– Trainee gets instant feedback
– Multiple encounters
23. Direct Observation of Procedure
• Assesses technical competency of a
particular procedure
• Assesses when trainee is ready to move
on to independent practice for a procedure
• Combined with other work place
assessments to determine competency for
independent practice
25. Case-based Discussion
• Structured format for discussing a clinical case
• Helps to record conversation about, and
presentations of, cases by trainees
• Designed to assess clinical decision making and
the application or use of medical knowledge
• Allows the trainee to discuss why they acted as
they did
26. Strengths of WPA
• Sample widely across the training curriculum
• Multiple raters
• Formative and summative
– Used with more reliable assessments to inform
high stakes decisions
• Reinforce educational culture where
feedback for learning is the norm
• Identify struggling trainees early
28. Limitations of WPA
• Not reliable enough to stand alone
• Low scores = “failure”
• Early success reduces motivation
• Weaker trainees least likely to seek
feedback
• Time
• Availability of trainers