Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Life History of Building 3

974 views

Published on

This presentation will help you get started in exploring the Last House on the Hill Web edition, a multigraph about the Berkeley Archaeologists @ Çatalhöyük (BACH) project at this famous 9000-year old Neolithic mound settlement in Central Anatolia, Turkey. This video focuses on the life-history of Building 3, which was the main focus of the BACH project. It was excavated in its entirety during seven seasons of work 1997-2003. This movie guides you through the interpretation of Building 3 in terms of its life history phases from construction to closure and abandonment that will help guide your exploration of the archive of the LHotH web edition. To know more about the way in which we collected and documented the data from Building 3, watch the Getting Started movie on the Life-History of the BACH Project.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Life History of Building 3

  1. 1. The Life-History of Building 3 CoDA Center for Digital Archaeology www.codifi.info This video will help you get started in exploring the Last House on the Hill web edition, a multigraph about the Berkeley Archaeologists @ Çatalhöyük (BACH) project at this famous 9000-year old Neolithic mound settlement in Central Anatolia, Turkey. This video focuses on the life-history of Building 3, which was the main focus of the BACH project. It was excavated in its entirety during seven seasons of work 1997-2003. This movie guides you through the interpretation of Building 3 in terms of its life history phases from construction to closure and abandonment that will help guide your exploration of the archive of the LHotH web edition. To know more about the way in which we collected and documented the data from Building 3, watch the Getting Started movie on the Life-History of the BACH Project.
  2. 2. Çatalhöyük Research Project 1993N East Mound, Çatalhöyük North Area, East Mound The archaeological site of Çatalhöyük comprises two mounds. This is the earlier Neolithic East Mound that was the main focus of both the 1960s excavation and the renewed (since 1993) project. The northern eminence of the East Mound was untouched by archaeologists until 1993, when its top 10 cm were scraped off revealing this pattern of mud-brick walls. This was to be the NORTH Area of excavation.You can see in the southwest of the mound the excavation started in the 1960s, referred to as the SOUTH Area
  3. 3. Çatalhöyük Research Project 1993N NORTH Area, East Mound 1993-2003 Understanding the lives of individual houses was an important aim of the Çatalhöyük Research Project (including the BACH project) as a way of understanding the mass of mudbrick walls that seem to present in these floor plans a dense - almost agglomerated pattern of rooms and buildings. They might tempt us to imagine that this represents almost an urban landscape. But were the life histories of these houses synchronous, or does the pattern represent a more complicated set of chronological relationships? Are there, for example, only partial overlaps in time?
  4. 4. The North Area N Building 1 (Çatalhöyük Research Project) 1995-1997 We located the BACH project next to Building 1 whose excavation had started in 1995 so that we could compare and relate the two different buildings with their different life histories.
  5. 5. The North Area N Building 3: Berkeley Archaeologists @ Çatalhöyük (BACH) 1997-2003 Building 3 became the focus of the BACH project. Both Building 1 and Building 3 in a sense are Last Houses on THIS part of the Hill since - unusually - they were never built over. Characteristically the mud-brick houses of Çatalhöyük were truncated, filled in and built over, thus forming the mound. Building 1, for example was built using the truncated walls of an earlier Building 5 as its foundations.
  6. 6. The New (2008) Chronology at Çatalhöyük Mellaart’s Levels New (2008) Phases 1 T 11 S 111 R 1V Q V P VIA O VIB N VII M VIII L IX K X J XI I XII H pre-XII North Eminence G Building 1 Building 5 5900BC Building 3 7400BC After Farid (2008) Çatalhöyük Archive Reports, p.20 The two houses - Building 1 and Building 3 - are probably quite similar in age in terms of the East Mound’s history, overlapping in their history with each other and with the house below Building 1 called Building 5. According to James Mellaart’s original scheme, these three houses have been dated to the middle of the East Mound’s occupation (Phase VIA-VII, that spans roughly ca. 6900-6500BC). According to the new (2008) dating system at the site, Building 3 has been dated to Phase N. Many of the other houses excavated in this NORTH “neighborhood” after the BACH project also belong to roughly this time period.
  7. 7. Life-History of Building 3 - 50 years? Life-History of the BACH Project - 7 years Our identification of a change in phase in Building 3 was based on changes in the remodelling of architectural features inside the building, including the location of ovens, hearths, storage bins and basins, as well as the edges of the platforms. We also carefully matched floor re-plasterings with burial events. It seemed to us that starting with the earliest burial in Phase B3.3 many re-modelling events happened after burial events. You can check this idea yourself by exploring the archive of the LHotH web edition. Don’t forget that these phases are the results of our interpretation of observations; the residents almost certainly did not see them as “phases”, but they may very well have been aware of burials under the house floors and the subsequent re-modelling of the building as being markers of the life-history of the house (or their household). You can look at this image as a separate item at your own pace in the archive of LHotH, in addition to the individual phase image. And you can read in more detail about the sequence of phases of Building 3 in Chapters 4 and 5 of the printed edition of LHotH.
  8. 8. Reconstructions help to Visualize Life in a Neolithic House Illustration after Mellaart (1967) Çatal Hüyük Our understanding of what life was like in Building 3 is helped by images of reconstructions such as this one in James Mellaart’s book on Çatalhöyük.
  9. 9. Using a Replica at Çatalhöyük to Visualize Life in a Neolithic House At Çatalhöyük, during 1998-2001 BACH team co-director Mirjana Stevanovic built (with help) a full-sized replica of a Çatalhöyük Neolithic building, modeled on a composite of Building 1 and 3, complete with storage chambers and ladder for roof access. You can read more about this in Chapter 22 of the printed edition of LHotH and explore videos and images in the archive of the LHotH web edition.
  10. 10. Visualizing Life at Çatalhöyük with Okapi Island in Second Life Screenshots by Ruth Tringham and Okapi Island team We also created Okapi Island in the virtual world of Second Life that also enabled a visitor to vicariously experience the place of Çatalhöyük. This was a to-scale replica of the East mound, the reconstructed houses in the southwest corner of the mound, and the BACH Area. Sadly this is now defunct for financial reasons, but you will be able to experience it passively through watching a movie of the island housed in the archive of the LHotH web edition.
  11. 11. The later floors of Building 3 North Space 158 Southwest Platform: F.169 Southeast Platform: F.167 Space 86 Central Floor Area F.606 orm Central Platf East F.170 North al centr : m latfor P F.162 t theas Nor : tform Pla F.173 From its construction to its closure and abandonment Building 3 was charaterized by five platforms around a lower Central Floor Area. Each is identified with their feature number. The floors throughout Building 3 were re-plastered many many times during the occupation of the building and are key to building its life-history.
  12. 12. Units and Features in the BACH Project 6149 6138 6151 6206 6144 6211 6237 6207 6150 6157 6132 6135 Feature 162 (northcentral platform) Units of floor 1 and packing below, assigned to Phase B3.4B Feature 617 (burial) Units of burial cut, skeleton, fill and lid, assigned to Phase B3.4B To help keep track of the replasterings, each floor replastering was given a unique unit number (as a separate depositional event). Sometimes, as in this example of Feature 162, a specific floor might be divided arbitrarily (by archaeologists) into quadrants. Thus here the floor plaster (yellow outlined numbers) and underlying packing (turquoise outlined) of Phase B3.4B has eight units numbers, expressing different quadrants of the platform. Moreover, this floor and packing (along with all the underlying - earlier - floors) were cut by a pit dug for the burial (F.617) of a boy whose sequence of units also date to Phase B3.4B. You can find more details of these terms in the glossary, but the units and their groupings into features is the foundation to the documentation of Building 3.
  13. 13. lid: unit 6206 basket: unit 6239 fill: unit 6211 Feature 617: the last burial for Building 3 and first for the BACH Project 6206 skeleton: unit 6237 6211 6237 6239 cut: unit 6207 6207 This Feature 617 is the final burial of Building 3 - a 5-year old child in a basket - and was discovered at the end of the 1999 season. This shows you the way the different units describe the sequence of depositional events in burials at Çatalhöyük: first the cut or pit creating an edge and a void, then the body (in this case placed in a basket), then the fill of the pit, and finally its clay and plaster lid to mask its position on the floor.
  14. 14. Harris Matrix of Units in Feature 173 We work out the sequence of depositional events (units) that create the archaeological evidence of the life-history of Building 3 by building what is called a Harris Matrix. This image is part of the matrix for the northeast platform Feature 173. You can see the sequence of floors (orange) and their underlying packing (turquoise) and the phases that they have been assigned to; and you can see a burial (Feature 631) cutting through the phase B3.4B floors and actually also all the preceding floors. This is the most detailed scale at which we can work out the life-history. Eventually we will have the complete Harris Matrix for Building 3 in the archive of the LHotH web edition
  15. 15. Building 3 Features/Phases An easier way to understand the sequence is to examine it at the scale of “the feature” (a collection of units). On this chart, which you can examine also as a separate item in the archive of the LHotH web edition, features are described by category and by phase. Floor features are any features that are fixed to the floor such as ovens, hearths, bins, burial pits, basins etc. The phase in which a feature is constructed is yellow; if it continues into a later phase it becomes grey. Thus you can see that a big change happened between Phase B3.1D and Phase B3.2 when many earlier features were discontinued and many new ones were built. Hold that thought for later!
  16. 16. North Space 158 Space 201 Space 86 the zones of Building 3 wall/partition “clean” white platforms “dirty” kitchen & ladder area “dirty” food preparation & storage central floor area In the early part of its history, before Phase B3.4A, Building 3 comprised one large room that we designated Space 201. Partitioning by the two small walls and the screen wall transformed this space into the two rooms, Space 86 and Space 158. We grouped the changing configuration of features into three zones within Building 3 that are defined in the same way throughout the history of Building 3 (look in chapters 4 and 5 of the printed edition of LHotH for more details): The South-and-West Zone referred to sometimes as the “dirty” area of the building was the center for domestic activities around food and resources. This zone was further divided into a zone encompassing the small western room Space 158 and the southwest platform (F.169) that was a focus of food preparation and storage, and a zone that included the south-center lower area which we sometimes referred to as the “kitchen” and the southeast platform (F. 167) which was the location for the ladder entrance. The Northeast Zone referred to sometimes as the “clean” area of the building comprised the white plastered platforms (F.162, F.173, F.170) that were the location for burials and presumably - not domestic activities. The Central Floor Zone is a lower area connected directly to the “kitchen”; this acted as a transitional zone between “clean” and “dirty” areas, and was also the location for child burials.
  17. 17. Building 3, Phase 1A-D space 87 space 85 space 88 space 89 space 41 Prolonged stability and gradual changes were carried out through the four sub-phases of Phase B3.1. The spatial arrangements and the activities in the house indicate that, in the initial stages of its occupation, few domestic features were built; these were gradually acquired through time. The oven (red)(F.758), however, was in the SW corner from the beginning We assume that those activities, which in the earliest phases were not performed in Building 3, took place elsewhere in the settlement. As features were built into Building 3, their associated tasks and activities were brought inside it. For instance, the bins (yellow)(F. 770, 786) in the northwest corner began with one in Phase 3.1B and increased to two in Phase 3.1D; the basins (yellow) (F.780, 781) began with one in Phase 3.1B and then increased to 3-4 in Phase 3.1C. At the end of Phase B3.1, possibly as the accumulation of the necessary interior facilities was completed, the doorway (green)(F.633) to the outside or the neighboring house was closed up, perhaps indicating that the occupants of Building 3 could now act more as an independent social and economic entity. (Hearth is orange)
  18. 18. Building 3, Phase 2 space 87 space 85 space 88 space 89 space 41 Phase B3.2 was defined by major re-modelling with a thick layer of packing under the floor in the western zone burying the storage bins and bench of the previous phases. On top of this packing and floor plaster a new oven (red)(F.646) was located in the center of the house away from the perimeter walls - very unusual for Çatalhöyük. Moreover it was horseshoe shaped instead of the traditional oval. Next to the oven was another extraordinary feature (F.758) (orange), a shallow basin filled with tiny clay balls, that are most likely to have some purpose in cooking. Storage basins(yellow) were built where previously there had been the oven. (Hearth is also orange)
  19. 19. Building 3, Phase 3 space 87 space 85 space 88 space 89 space 41 In the Phase B3.3 remodel there was a return to the original organization of the interior space with the oven (red, F.642) back in the southwest corner. No remains of storage facilities in the form of basins or bins from this phase were found preserved. It is possible that in Phase B3.3 storage took place in movable containers such as bags or baskets that have not preserved or - more likely - storage was located outside of Building 3. In this phase the earliest burials (of three children) (F.648,756,757) occur in the Central Floor Zone. Between the burials of the two older children and earlier than them is the burial of a baby which was buried in a basket with obvious grave goods, the only such burial in the BACH Area
  20. 20. Building 3, Phase 4a space 87 space 85 space 88 Space 1 58 Space 8 6 space 89 space 41 Another major remodel (in Phase B3.4A) coincided with structural difficulties of the house caused by deterioration of the west wall. The major physical partitioning of the house into two distinct rooms (Space 86 and Space 158) began in this phase with the construction of two partition walls (grey) (F.160,161). The resulting long narrow room (Space 158) became clearly the location of storage basins and bins (yellow)(F.171,639). Three separate burial events occurred cutting below the north-central platform (F.634,644,647). For a story on interpreting one of these burials I can recommend that you seek out the video “once upon a time at Çatalhöyük” in the archive of the LHotH web edition. In this last part of the history of Building 3, the oven (red)(F.779)moved to the center of the south perimeter wall.
  21. 21. Building 3, Phase 4b space 87 space 85 Space 1 58 space 88 Space 8 6 space 89 space 41 The final occupation phase B3.4B continues many of the trends of the previous phase. Most obvious is the construction of the Screen Wall (beige)(F.155/601) in the space between the two partition walls, flanked by two pillars. In this way, the narrow room Space 158 was cut off entirely from the main residential area of Building 3, while the collapse of its west perimeter wall was perhaps slowed down by the construction of shoring walls (grey) on its interior. No features for storage in this room Space 158 occur in this phase. The single burial (F.631) of an older male under the northeast platform (F.173) occurs in this phase. In the final burial event of Building 3 a young child was buried in a basket (F.617) under the north-central platform (F.162). You can find a time-lapse movie of the excavation in the archive of the LHotH web edition that helps share the experience in 3 mins of 32 hours of excavation. Probably simultaneously with this event, the northern partition wall (F.160) was painted red.
  22. 22. Building 3, Phase 5A space 87 space 85 Space 1 58 space 88 Space 8 6 space 89 space 41 roof collapse Closure, Death and Burial of Building 3 Phase B3.5A encompasses the household abandonment of this building and – presumably their move to a new or different house. As the surviving members of the household established a new location of residence, the old house was taken through an elaborate and symbolically intense process of closure. The end of the life of a house at Catalhoyuk was marked almost universally by some acts of planned demolition of features and decorative installations, by final simple plastering of all surfaces, and by the deposition of objects on the ground. In Building 3, we had the deposition of a dagger and horns at the top of the fill of a room (Space 89) outside Building 3 but associated with it. Inside Building 3 itself, two significant groups of objects in the house were placed on the final floor plasters: In the southern part of the house (Cluster 1) large numbers of cattle and deer scapulae have been interpreted as possible feasting debris; Cluster 2 in the center of Building 3 comprised two human skulls and a carved cattle skull (boukranion). The boukranion had originally stood on the roof and was placed on the ground after the roof was demolished. The demolition of the roof (grey)(F.157) was carried out carefully onto the northern half of the building, so that the clean platforms and burials underneath were protected.
  23. 23. The Roof of Building 3 The discovery of the roof was fortuitous and helped by the excavation of a post-Roman burial through it. It is one of the very few instances of a preserved roof remains in the Neolithic of the Near East.
  24. 24. illustration by John G. Swogger The Roof of Building 3 Micromorphological analysis helped the interpretation that the roof was used for a large number of domestic activities especially in the warmer seasons.
  25. 25. Space 87 Space 88 Space 89 Phase B3.5B: Post-Neolithic 3rd century AD burials Space 158 Space 86 On this image you can see that the post-Neolithic visitors for the most part buried their dead entirely inside Building 3. We wonder what they would have been able to see of the abandoned Neolithic buildings on the surface that would indicate to them where the ground was softest. All except one are buried with an east-west orientation. Only one, with richest grave goods is buried north-south.
  26. 26. Phase B3.5B: Post-Neolithic 3rd century AD burials The excavation of burial Feature 153 In these images you can see the excavation of the grave (Feature 153) that cut through the many layers of the collapsed roof of Building 3 that can be seen showing in the side wall of the burial cut.
  27. 27. Excavating the Neighborhood Originally we chose the location for the BACH Area in order to consider Building 3 in the light of its neighbor Building 1 whose life-history was also known. Since 2003, the excavation in the NORTH Area expanded hugely. A surface scraping in a 40x40m area south of the BACH Area revealed a similar dense pattern of mud-brick walls.
  28. 28. Excavating the Neighborhood after the BACH Project BACH Area 2008 Excavation in this area started in 2004 and has continued until the present, with many buildings being defined from a similar period in the history of the East Mound, but not necessarily with a life history exactly parallel to that of Building 3. A shelter was planned to cover the former BACH Area and Building 1/5 and the new 4040 Area - to cover the complete neighborhood, with walkways between the buildings for modern visitors to view the ghosts. You can see the outline of the proposed shelter if you look hard. In 2008 this dream was achieved with this beautiful shelter.
  29. 29. Building 77 Viewing the Neighborhood 2008 Here you can see visitors walking past the invisible BACH Area, looking down at the half excavated Building 5 and the half-excavated Building 77
  30. 30. Building 3 in its neighborhood midden 2008 B.114 path 2012 In the 2008 image we are looking from the viewpoint of Building 5 with the BACH Area on our left south towards the rest of the neighborhood. In 2012 excavation started to fill in the missing part of the neighborhood immediately north and south of the BACH Area. In the 2012 image, we see Space 87, a tiny room full of 9 burial events that had been excavated as part of the BACH project revealed to be part of a small building that expanded westwards and probably included also Space 88 to its east that had also been excavated by the BACH project. From our excavations we know that the resulting Building 114 was closely related to the history of Building 3, but not entirely parallel having been constructed when Building 3 already existed.
  31. 31. Life-History of Building 3 - 50 years? So what have we learned about Building 3? It is smaller than many houses of the same phase of the East Mound at Çatalhöyük. Maybe it was also shorter-lived. Fewer people are buried in it than in many other houses in the neighborhood (Building 1, for example, housed 56!). Eight people are buried in Building 3 plus two detached heads. Are the latter related to those buried under the house? Are they all related to each other, how? Unusually, Building 3 was not built on foundations of a previous building, but on midden. All of these observations need explanation; their answers cannot be given without the help of informed imagination, but they will begin to build a history of this household as rich as any soap opera. Please join in the effort with your own stories, comments, and re-use of the archive of the LHotH web edition
  32. 32. Credits • Creator and Speaker: Ruth Tringham • Photographs and Videos (unless individually specified): ©Çatalhöyük Research Project with Creative Commons 2.5 license (photographers Michael Ashley and Jason Quinlan) • Many many thanks to • Mirjana Stevanovic and the BACH Project family • Ian Hodder, Shahina Farid and our many other Çatalhöyük colleagues • BACH Project angel: John Coker • UC Berkeley: Archaeological Research Facility & MACTiA • My collaborators in the Center for Digital Archaeology (CoDA) CoDA Center for Digital Archaeology www.codifi.info

×