For-Profit Colleges: Organized forUrgency and Social “Pain”?Southern Sociological Society, 2013Tressie McMillan CottomPhD ...
Market Innovation or Social Process?In 2001, 8 of the top 10 producers ofblack bachelor‟s degree holders wereHBCUs. The ot...
Market Innovation or Social Process?• “Poor women were twice as likely aspoor males to start at for-profitinstitutions (23...
Higher Education: Mobility v. SocialReproductionWhat if for-profit colleges are aconsequence of the very economicinsecurit...
Structure, Orgs, and PeopleHigher education exists, “at the intersection ofmultiple institutions…connecting multiple socia...
The Study• Nine for-profit colleges in large urbanmetro. Institutions are representative of thesector.• 20 interviews with...
Institutions@tressiemcphd#SSS2013Note: Uses classification scheme from IHEP (2012). “A NewClassification Scheme for For-Pr...
The ProfitU Way: Enrollment, Not“Admissions”ProfitU: Urgency, RelationshipsTraditionalU: Extended admissionsperiod, Bureau...
Enrollment1. A student calls or emails and an enrollment counseloranswers or responds.2. A campus tour for any details, sc...
Urgency, Pain, and MotivationWe deal with people that live in the moment and for the moment.Their decision to start, stay ...
“They Knew I Was Ready”The data collected to develop urgency often invisible tostudents or it is constructed as expert gui...
Urgency, Pain, and MotivationUrgency: Organizational response to prospective students that haveto choose to go to college ...
“I’m All They Got”Of the nineteen respondents in my study, sixteen were women. All ofthe women I interviewed were parents,...
“I’m All They Got”The job insecurity that motivated the many of these women to enrollat Profit U was exacerbated by the re...
Discussion and Future WorkThe innovative for-profit college “market” is constructed fromeconomic insecurity and effects of...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

For profit colleges- organized for urgency and social pain

506 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
506
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

For profit colleges- organized for urgency and social pain

  1. 1. For-Profit Colleges: Organized forUrgency and Social “Pain”?Southern Sociological Society, 2013Tressie McMillan CottomPhD Student, Sociologytcottom@emory.edutressiemc.com@tressiemcphd
  2. 2. Market Innovation or Social Process?In 2001, 8 of the top 10 producers ofblack bachelor‟s degree holders wereHBCUs. The other two were TWIs. Thenumber one was Fisk.In 2010, the number one producer wasthe University of Phoenix. It was one ofthree for-profits in the top 10, with sixHBCUs and 1 TWIs.Source: Diverse: Issues of Higher Education@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  3. 3. Market Innovation or Social Process?• “Poor women were twice as likely aspoor males to start at for-profitinstitutions (23 percent versus 12percent), but the difference in terms ofstarting at a community college favoredlow-income males by 9 percentagepoints (58 percent versus 49 percent).”• Low-income female students from everyracial/ethnic group are nearly threetimes as likely to attend for-profits astheir higher-income femalecounterpartsSource: Institute Higher Education Policy (June, 2011). Portraits: Initial collegeattendance of low-income young adults. Washington, DC: IHEP@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  4. 4. Higher Education: Mobility v. SocialReproductionWhat if for-profit colleges are aconsequence of the very economicinsecurity to which they positionthemselves to solve?
  5. 5. Structure, Orgs, and PeopleHigher education exists, “at the intersection ofmultiple institutions…connecting multiple socialprocesses that often are regarded asdistinct”(Stevens, Armstrong, Arum 2008).All those processes intersect at the pointof admissions.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  6. 6. The Study• Nine for-profit colleges in large urbanmetro. Institutions are representative of thesector.• 20 interviews with students currentlyattending one of the nine schools.• Three traditional colleges: communitycollege, Adult Ed program, open accesspublic@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  7. 7. Institutions@tressiemcphd#SSS2013Note: Uses classification scheme from IHEP (2012). “A NewClassification Scheme for For-Profit Institutions”.
  8. 8. The ProfitU Way: Enrollment, Not“Admissions”ProfitU: Urgency, RelationshipsTraditionalU: Extended admissionsperiod, Bureaucratic DistanceAdmissions is about exclusion: high applicationsand low acceptance rates connotes prestige andquality.Enrollment is about open-access with low or noadmission standardEnrollment + Profit = Open access and expandingoverall market@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  9. 9. Enrollment1. A student calls or emails and an enrollment counseloranswers or responds.2. A campus tour for any details, scheduled as soon aspossible.3. Reminder calls to keep campus tour4. Greeted by receptionist when arrive for campus tour5. Information sheet. What it asks: motivations, contactinformation. What it doesn’t ask: educational biography.6. A brief interview with enrollment counselor, tour tailoredto interests on the information sheet.7. Asked to complete an enrollment agreement.8. Accelerated schedules means time from initial contact toclass start can be as little as 3-4 weeks.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  10. 10. Urgency, Pain, and MotivationWe deal with people that live in the moment and for the moment.Their decision to start, stay in school or quit school is based more onemotion than logic. Pain is the greater motivator in the short term."(Vatterott Educational Corporation documents in Senate HELP report,2012)“Remind them of what things will be like if they dont continue forwardand earn their degrees. Poke the pain a bit and remind them who elseis depending on them and their commitment to a better future." (ITTTechnical Institute’s Recruitment Manual, “Pain Funnel”, in SenateHELP report, 2012)@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  11. 11. “They Knew I Was Ready”The data collected to develop urgency often invisible tostudents or it is constructed as expert guidance:“To get started one need only dial a phone number. When you do, ahuman being answers. Sometimes called an enrollment assistant orthe office receptionist, this role is the frontline offense for the for-profitsector‟s assertive recruitment. To the prospective students it signalsaccessibility. Connie says, “I was ready. I been talking forever, saying„I‟m going back, I‟m going back‟ but this time I was ready. When Icalled I was ready. They told me they could tell I was ready on thephone.”Whether the enrollment adviser could ascertain Connie’scollege readiness or not, Connie constructed the banterdesigned to encourage a campus visit as a sign that theinstitution thought her ready.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  12. 12. Urgency, Pain, and MotivationUrgency: Organizational response to prospective students that haveto choose to go to college (Mullens 2010), rather than implicit defaultassumption to go to college.Pain: Empirical reality of those for whom economic insecurity is mostacute. Could contextualize gendered, racialized, classed patterns offor-profit students.Motivation: Has to come from either the individual or the structure.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  13. 13. “I’m All They Got”Of the nineteen respondents in my study, sixteen were women. All ofthe women I interviewed were parents, most of them parenting aloneor co-parenting with fathers not in the home. They allude, frequently,to the responsibility they feel to their children.“I am all she‟s got”, Lisa says of her four-year old daughter who has amild learning disability that requires monitoring and resources.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  14. 14. “I’m All They Got”The job insecurity that motivated the many of these women to enrollat Profit U was exacerbated by the responsibility they feel to provide asolid middle-class upbringing for their children.“She can dance. I want to enroll her in dance classes…something toburn up that energy. She can‟t sit still in school. She needs to…be insomething”, said Lisa.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013
  15. 15. Discussion and Future WorkThe innovative for-profit college “market” is constructed fromeconomic insecurity and effects of eroding social safety nets.Ascendancy of the sector pegged to major structural changes inthe 1990s and 2000s.Prestige-Price Correlation is disrupted: status competition hasnever been so expensive for the most socially vulnerable.Debt: a mobility vehicle or exacerbates poverty exposure?Many for-profit students (including those in my sample) arealso employed. Connections to credentialism, new corporatework arrangements, decline of internal labor markets? Couldalso explain gendered and racialized differences in for-profitparticipation.@tressiemcphd#SSS2013

×