Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Review
Many companies have attempted to produce a large, note-pleasant smartphone, but non-e have succeeded
quite along with Samsung. While the 1st Galaxy Note was rather large and lacking in ref inement, Samsung
has steadily improved the line, this year releasing the brand new Galaxy Note 3, and contains some true
competitors f or the very f irst time.
Sharing similarities with the Galaxy S4 in design and hardware, the Galaxy Take note 3 is amazing in many
aspects. Based on what model you select you’ll be handled to a robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 or
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa SoC, a 5.7-inch 1080p Very AMOLED display, removable storage, a 13-megapixel
camera and the ever-helpf ul S-Pen. TouchWiz is also included on the Note, but that’s a tale f or later on in
I have both Galaxy Note 3 models with me f or this review, making it a f ascinating comparison between the
f resh Exynos 5 Octa and the trusted Snapdragon 800. Which design is most ef f ective f or customers
around the globe? May be the Note 3 plenty of of an update f rom the prior Galaxy Note?
T he Exynos-powered Galaxy Note 3 f ound in this review was supplied by Negri Electronics kindly. No matter
where you’re on earth (Australia, US or overseas), Negri of f ers unlocked smartphones and capsules initial
and f or the cheapest prices – and you could choose whichever Note 3 design you like.
Samsung hasn’t been the king of smartphone style. T he Galaxy S4, while f unctional and ergonomic, lacked
the ref ined experience of other smartphones it had been competing against. T he Take note 3 tries to
rectif y a f ew of the strange style options of its predecessors, but it’s not minus the signature Samsung
oddities that we’ve arrived at know.
Like prior models, the Galaxy Take note 3 is quite huge but it’s not ungainly as soon as you get accustomed
to the dimension. Unlike the Sony Xperia Z Ultra, the Take note 3 f its reasonably properly in pockets and
doesn’t restrict motion to the same education. One handed make use of isn’t easy and simple when you’re
coping with a 5.7-inch display, but with repetition it gets easier than it seems f irst.
Despite a 0.2-inch upsurge in display size when compared to Note II, the overall f ootprint of the Note 3 has
actually decreased. T he display of the Notice 3 covers 75% of its f ront f ace in comparison to 69% on the
Notice II, and it’s f urthermore slimmer (8.3mm versus 9.4mm) and lighter in weight (168g versus 180g); all
changes that improve the usability of the handset. T he reduction in the bezel around the display is a
marked improvement both f rom a visible and ergonomic standpoint.
On a less good note, there’s Samsung’s odd selection of components on the Notice 3′s removable back
again panel. T he business has addressed some problems I got with the prior model – the trunk is not any
longer a clean, slippery little bit of cheap, f limsy plastic – but not to the point of a complete resolution.
Aside f rom the f ront which is covered with Gorilla Glass, Samsung has utilized plastic f or all of those other
Note 3’s build.
In most cases I don’t have trouble with plastic: when used properly, it’s rather a great option to metal in
premium devices. Samsung continues to utilize plastic in an awf ul way however. It’s obvious that the trunk
panel isn’t leather immediately, but plastic designed to appear to be leather with f aux-sewn edges. It f eels
decent readily available reasonably, nonetheless it looks so certainly artif icial that it resembles even more a
Chinese knock-of f when compared to a premium smartphone.
T he same could possibly be said concerning the edges of the handset. Instantly you might be f ooled into
considering it’s a steel rim, but Samsung of f ers a metal-lookalike plastic material rim instead. I wouldn’t
have just as much of a concern with the materials selection if Samsung acquired unashamedly long gone
with plastic material and utilized it like plastic material. Instead it f eels as though they are attempting to
cheat clients by designing a mobile phone that appears like it’s created f rom premium components like
aluminium and leather, but actually isn’t.
Moving on, leading panel of the Be aware 3 is dominated simply by the 5.7-inch AMOLED display and a
triangle-patterned bezel. Above it you’ll discover the metallic loudspeaker grill, noticeable sensors which
look unusual somewhat, a f ront f acing surveillance camera, and the ever-usef ul, very large notif ication
light. May be the traditional physical house button below, and also the menu button lef t and the relative
back again button to the proper.
Almost every other smartphones have the buttons within the opposite conf iguration, this means upgraders
f rom any non-Samsung smartphone may f ind themselves conf used f or a couple weeks. T he menu key in
underneath lef t is tough to press with all the phone in a single hand (suf f icient reason f or Google android
4.0+ it’s an unnecessary legacy button), theref ore the more used back again button is in f act in an
improved position f requently.
Read user comments (14)
Many companies have tried to make a large, note-f riendly smartphone, but none have succeeded quite as
well as Samsung. While the f irst Galaxy Note was rather large and lacking in ref inement, Samsung has
steadily improved the line, this year releasing the brand new Galaxy Note 3, and it has some true
competition f or the f irst time.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 – $640+ (unlocked)
5.7”, 1920×1080 Super AMOLED (388 ppi)
Snapdragon 800, or Exynos 5 Octa SoC
Krait 400 quad-core CPU, or Cortex A7+A15 octa-core CPU
Adreno 330 GPU, or Mali-T 628 MP6 GPU
16/32/64 GB internal storage, 3 GB RAM, microSD card slot
13 MP camera, 1/3.06” sensor, f /2.2 lens, up to 4K video
3,200 mAh, 12.16 Wh battery
LT E or HSPA+, Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC
Android 4.3 ‘Jelly Bean’
168 grams, 8.3mm thick
Sharing similarities with the Galaxy S4 in design and hardware, the Galaxy Note 3 is impressive in many
aspects. Depending on what model you choose you’ll be treated to a powerf ul Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
or Samsung Exynos 5 Octa SoC, a 5.7-inch 1080p Super AMOLED display, removable storage, a 13megapixel camera and the ever-usef ul S-Pen. TouchWiz is also included on the Note, but that’s a story f or
later in the review.
I have both Galaxy Note 3 models with me f or this review, making it an interesting comparison between the
new Exynos 5 Octa and the trusted Snapdragon 800. Which model is best suited f or users around the
globe? Is the Note 3 enough of an upgrade f rom the previous Galaxy Note?
The Exynos-powered Galaxy Note 3 used in this review was kindly provided by Negri Electronics. No matter
where you are in the world (Australia, US or abroad), Negri provides unlocked smartphones and tablets first
and for the lowest prices – and you can choose whichever Note 3 model you like.
Samsung has never been the king of smartphone design. T he Galaxy S4, while ergonomic and f unctional,
lacked the ref ined f eel of other smartphones it was competing against. T he Note 3 attempts to rectif y
some of the strange design choices of its predecessors, but it’s not without the signature Samsung
oddities that we’ve come to know.
Like previous models, the Galaxy Note 3 is quite large but it’s not ungainly once you get used to the size.
Unlike the Sony Xperia Z Ultra, the Note 3 f its reasonably well in pockets and doesn’t restrict movement to
the same degree. One handed use isn’t the easiest when you’re dealing with a 5.7-inch display, but with
practice it becomes easier than it f irst appears.
Despite a 0.2-inch increase in display size compared to the Note II, the overall f ootprint of the Note 3 has
actually decreased. T he screen of the Note 3 covers 75% of its f ront f ace compared to 69% on the Note II,
and it’s also slimmer (8.3mm versus 9.4mm) and lighter (168g versus 180g); all changes that improve the
usability of the handset. T he reduction in the bezel around the display is a marked improvement both f rom
a visual and ergonomic standpoint.
On a less positive note, there is Samsung’s odd choice of materials on the Note 3′s removable back panel.
T he company has addressed some issues I had with the previous model – the back is no longer a smooth,
slippery piece of cheap, f limsy plastic – but not to the point of a complete resolution. Aside f rom the f ront
which is covered with Gorilla Glass, Samsung has used plastic f or the rest of the Note 3’s build.
Generally speaking I don’t have a problem with plastic: when used well, it can be a great alternative to metal
on premium devices. However Samsung continues to use plastic in a terrible way. It’s immediately obvious
that the back panel is not leather, but plastic made to look like leather with f aux-sewn edges. It f eels
reasonably decent on hand, but it looks so obviously f ake that it resembles more a Chinese knock-of f than
a premium smartphone.
T he same could be said about the edges of the handset. At a glance you may be f ooled into thinking it’s a
metal rim, but instead Samsung provides a metal-lookalike plastic rim. I wouldn’t have as much of an issue
with the materials choice if Samsung had unashamedly gone with plastic and used it like plastic. Instead it
f eels like they are trying to cheat customers by designing a phone that looks like it’s made f rom premium
materials like aluminium and leather, but actually isn’t.
Moving on, the f ront panel of the Note 3 is dominated by the 5.7-inch AMOLED display and a trianglepatterned bezel. Above it you’ll f ind the metallic speaker grill, visible sensors which look somewhat strange,
a f ront f acing camera, and the ever-usef ul, quite large notif ication light. Below is the traditional physical
home button, as well as the menu button to the lef t and the back button to the right.
Most other smartphones have the buttons in the opposite conf iguration, which means upgraders f rom any
non-Samsung smartphone could f ind themselves conf used f or a f ew weeks. T he menu button in the
bottom lef t is hard to press when using the phone in one hand (and with Android 4.0+ it’s an unnecessary
legacy button), so the more f requently used back button is actually in a better position.
Around the edges the lef t hand side has the volume rocker, the top has the 3.5mm headphone jack and
inf rared LED, and the right hand side has the power button. In a comf ortable holding position, the power
button is in the perf ect location f or easy operation.
T he bottom panel gets the microUSB 3.0 slot, that is larger than the typical microUSB 2.0 slot that you’re
utilized to see on additional devices but nonetheless accepts legacy wires. T here’s also the loudspeaker
grill lef t and the built-in stylus slot which keeps the S-Pen securely.
T he S-Pen is styled similarly to the Note 3, in that it’s created f rom white and metallic colored plastic. It’s
quite comf y to use, and the event button is simple to push and in an easy location.
WHEN I mentioned earlier, the back cover of the Galaxy Note 3 can be removed, revealing the removable
electric battery, microSD cards slot and SIM cards slot. T he removable electric battery is really a handy
f eature f or a f ew, but in numerous respects it will become a downside. Needing to produce a supplementary
plastic casing f or both internal parts and the electric battery itself can make the mobile phone larger and
battery smaller sized than what will be possible otherwise. Build quality also tends to suf f er when you use a
removable back panel.
T he Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is about the screen. A 5.7-inch FHD Super AMOLED panel af f ords an
impressive 89.6 sq. cm of screen property: 30% greater than a typical 5.0-inch display you’d f ind about a
device just like the Galaxy S4. In addition, it represents a little 7% boost on the f inal generation Note’s
screen, which isn’t a large amount, but still great considering the actual dimension of these devices hasn’t
T he 5.7-inch display includes a resolution of 1920 x 1080, which is the standard f or most high-end
smartphones this year, especially those with larger screens. It includes a pixel density of 386 PPI, dense
suf f icient that you won’t have the ability to distinguish personal pixels on the screen, even though it’s quite
near your f ace. T he two 2.07 million pixels crammed in to the display can make everything appear very
sharp, especially high-resolution images and text, where jagged edges certainly are a nonissue.
However it’s nearly hanging around with the Galaxy Note 3’s display, as there’s been hook quality
degradation when compared to Note II. Where in f act the Take note II’s Super AMOLED highlighted an Sstripe (RGB stripe) subpixel matrix, the Take note 3’s regresses to a PenTile matrix. If you’re unf amiliar with
screen subpixel matrices, the PenTile matrix, in its Take note 3 layout, includes outlines of environment
f riendly subpixels with alternating glowing blue and red subpixels among. As there isn’t one crimson, green
and glowing blue subpixel f or each pixel, the Take note 3’s display includes a lower ef f ective quality when
compared to a 1080p LCD panel, which utilizes the excellent RGB stripe three-subpixel matrix.
T he low ef f ective resolution of the Note 3’s Super AMOLED is visible to a tuned eye; it basic doesn’t look
as ef f ective as a competing LCD panel. T hat’s not saying the Note 3 is suf f ering f rom poor screen
sharpness or clarity – it’s still excellent generally in most respects – but it’s nearly as ef f ective as what’s
possible with other screen technology. T he PenTile matrix will be most noticeable round the edges of text
message, where sharp outlines aren’t as def ined, even though issue can be nowhere near as pronounced
as initial- and second-era AMOLED panels.
Will you spot the lower display quality because of the PenTile subpixel matrix somewhat? Without anything
to review it to, not probably, especially because the 1080p resolution helps it be very hard to tell apart the
pixels themselves. I’d choose an RGB stripe matrix f or the excess clarity, but it’s def inately not the f inish of
One section of AMOLED panels that can’t be beaten by LCD technology is normally inside the contrast
ratio. Blacks on the Note 3’s display look spectacular, because the display is actually of f when black must
be displayed because of the insuf f icient a backlight in the panel’s construction. T he degrees of black the
screen is with the capacity of are good however, not great: I couldn’t distinguish the distinction between
f ive of the squares in a typical 256-level black test, this means handf ul of detail in darkish scenes could
possibly be lost.
Whites are ok f rom the Note 3’s AMOLED, nonetheless it hasn’t been a solid suit of the display type. T here
exists an inclination to tint the screen blue-grey slightly, but not by around previous versions. Brightness is
good again, but not excellent, f alling behind many current-era LCD panels in optimum brightness levels. T he
several layers the display comprises helps visibility outdoors considerably, but it’s not easy and simple
panel to see in strong sunlight, particularly if you’ve got a white model where in f act the bezel ref lects a
whole lot of light.
Like various other AMOLED-packing Galaxy smartphones, you can f ind f our screen modes to pick f rom in
these devices settings: Dynamic, Regular, Prof essional Movie and Photo. T he def ault setting would be to
have the screen “adapt” (aka. pick the placing f or you with respect to the situations), and in every respect it
looks quite great, albeit oversaturated just like the usual AMOLED. Shades pop and images appearance
vibrant, nonetheless it certainly isn’t probably the most precise setting to depart it on.
In the def ault placing, gamma is way of f (around 2.5 than the regular 2 rather.2) and oversaturation causes
details and nuances in colour to end up being clipped away, in debt and blue channels specif ically. T here’s
noticeable colour banding when considering f ull-spectrum gradients also, which can’t be resolved through
modif ying the display screen mode.
Annoyingly, it’s impossible to simply change the screen mode and f ix the problems. Dynamic mode produces
precise gamma, but can make the oversaturation concern worse, while Movie setting signif icantly pulls in
the saturation and can make the whitened point less blue, but gamma continues to be an presssing issue.
And that’s not really the only real issue, as setting the Take note 3 to probably the most accurate display
screen mode (Film) makes the operating-system generally look very boring, because Samsung is rolling out
it f or the radiant AMOLED panel.Looking at angles through the FHD Extremely AMOLED have become good,
as always, with text readable at all of f angles basically. T here’s hardly any contrast or color change when
adjusting the position of viewing, that is normal f or an f antastic and AMOLED as always. Having less layers
in the screen’s composition decreases ref lectivity also, so the screen is seen by you quite nicely in the
current presence of bright windows.
General, the Galaxy Note 3’s display is radiant and saturated in def ault situations (if inaccurate), and the
massive amount screen real estate is ideal f or writing mass media and tasks consumption. T he 1080p
quality keeps the display sharp, but it’s not really the sharpest panel I’ve run into, both because of the
PenTile and dimension matrix. I’m not really convinced AMOLED panels will be the best choice, as LCD
of f erings are usually so strong nowadays especially, however the Galaxy Note 3’s panel packs suf f iciently
quality to f ulf ill most buyers.
T he S-Pen
Perhaps probably the most emblematic item incorporated with every Galaxy Note 3 may be the S-Pen, which
neatly slots into the bottom of the device. T he S-Pen is really a passive stylus that just works together with
the Note 3, because of a particular pressure-sensitive digitizer that’s built-into the display module. Overall
the stylus is comf ortable to use, sporting an individual button f or additional f eatures.
Once you take away the stylus f rom its slot (or simply by tapping the S-Pen switch at any time as the pen is
hovering over the screen), a circular Air Control pop-upward appears. By hovering the stylus above the popup you will see f ive dif f erent options, which I’ll go through one-by-one below.
Action Memo may be the f irst option: a new f loating memo windowpane with greater f eatures than was
observed in the S Notice f loating window inside the Galaxy Notice II. In order to of insight is usually through
the stylus, but af ter you’ve rapidly jotted something down, it’s an easy task to highlight the text message
and perf orm an actions. For instance if you jot down a phone quantity, you can highlight the number and in
a f ew taps be calling it. Or you can jot down an tackle, highlight it, and in next to no time you’ll be looking at
T he app is among the most readily usef ul in the Galaxy Note’s sof tware array, building the best usage of
the handset’s stylus. Notes can also be saved f or later in the f ull Action Memo app, just in case you need
to access them later.
T he next option may be the Scrapbooker, where one can attract around items you see on the screen and
save them to your Scrapbook to revisit later on. T he theory behind this will be you will be searching the
internet f or the f avorite movie (f or instance), f inding cool content material in a variety of websites, and
saving items of it (eg. pictures) to a scrapbook f or the f ilm. I never f ound the f eature to be particularly
usef ul, but it f unctions suf f iciently that maybe it’s worth using.
T he 3rd option is Screen Write, which you’ll know about if you’ve used a Galaxy Note bef ore. Put simply,
tapping the option will take a screenshot that you can annotate and save f or later. If you want to capture
just a small portion of the screen rather than its entirety, instead of using Screen Write it is possible to
keep down the S-Pen switch and attract around what you need to capture; af terwards there are some
options f or saving the capture.
S Finder may be the f ourth option, and is simply a shortcut f or the application. In this app searching the
phone utilizing the keyboard (you’re much better of f making use of Google Research), or research via
handwriting recognition. Usually I wouldn’t bother by using this app at all, especially as handwriting
recognition is usually slower than typing, but it can research Wolf ram Alpha f or handwritten f ormulae, that
may come in handy.
T he ultimate option you have is f or Pen Window, an expanded version of f loating windows whereby you
attract on the screen to dictate how big is the window. Like multi-window apps, you can f ind limited Pen
Window programs, but some (like the Calculator) have become handy.
T he f inal S-Pen relevant f eature I wish to discuss is S Note, which remains among the best note-taking
applications I’ve used. Although f ast note-taking has happen to be shif ted to Actions Memo, if you’re
settling set f or an extended session of note-using (in a lecture, f or instance), look no f urther than S Note,
especially as it syncs with popular third-party application Evernote.
S Note posseses an astonishing selection of f eatures. Basic insight like key pad typing, handwriting and
annotations are usually supported – alongside numerous controls f or every – plus you may also insert an
enormous selection of items including pictures, video clips, audio, charts/graphs, tables, clip artwork,
sketches, maps and much more. And, as soon as you’ve inserted any kind of text message or graphic, there
are tons of manipulation options ranging f rom size and style controls, to a switch that can transf orm
handwriting into f ormulas.
Personal notebooks with pagination are backed, so each subject matter or section of your work could be
f iled right into an independent notebook. T he user interf ace of the app is f airly easy to get accustomed to,
and it’s an easy task to change between viewing and modif ying notes, especially with the help of the stylus.
It’s obvious Samsung has put a lot of resources into perf ecting the S Note app, as it’s much better than
any earlier iteration observed on the Galaxy Notes.
T he excess f unctionality the S-Pen provides to the table is pref erable to it has ever been previously, once
more showing that Samsung may be the leader with regards to stylus-supported, large-screen phones. If
you’re purchasing the Notice 3 f or the stylus, you won’t become disappointed.
Functionality: Exynos vs. Snapdragon
Af ter weeks of trying, I were able to secure both Qualcomm Snapdragon and Samsung Exynos variants of
the Galaxy Note 3 f or the perf ormance portion of this review. Much like what we noticed with the Galaxy S4,
both variants cover dif f erent marketplaces: Snapdragon f or LT E (SM-N9005), and Exynos f or HSPA+ just
(SM-N900). From the distinctions in radios though apart, expect some signif icant distinctions in lots of
aspects of the inner hardware.
T he Qualcomm-powered model uses the tried-and-true Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, which includes a 2.26
GHz quad-core Krait 400 CPU, Adreno 330 GPU at 450 MHz, a 600 MHz Hexagon QDSP6V5A DSP, Wi-Fi
802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0, and IZ AT Gen8B Gps navigation+GLONASS. T here’s f urthermore a dual-channel
LPDDR3 storage controller that connects to 3 GB of RAM, giving bandwidth of around 12.8 GB/s.
I’ve discussed the Snapdragon 800 inside some of my previous gadget testimonials – f or the LG G2, Sony
Xperia Z Ultra, Sony Xperia Z 1 and Search engines Nexus 5 – thus it’s best to return back and check out
those f or additional inf ormation on the SoC.
T he Exynos model is, in lots of respects, a f ar more interesting device to go over. T he last period I utilized
an Exynos-powered gadget was the HSPA+ just Galaxy S4 model, and there have been several issues that
produced is not worth taking into consideration when compared to Snapdragon 600 design simply. It had
been slower, f eatured worse electric battery lif e, and lacked some critical connection and camera f eatures.
T he Galaxy Note 3 SM-N900 doesn’t utilize the same Exynos 5 Octa 5410 SoC because the Galaxy S4
though, packing the upgraded Exynos 5 Octa 5420 instead. It’s built on a single ARM big still.LIT T LE
f oundations – 4 ARM Cortex-A new15 CPU cores at 1.9 GHz plus f our ARM Cortex-A7 cores at 1.3 GHz –
but nonetheless lacks the main element inclusion of heterogeneous multi-processing (HMP).
What is so excellent approximately HMP? In the Exynos Galaxy S4 (and in addition with the Note 3), it had
been only possible to utilize one group of CPU cores at the right time. If the controller wished to change
f rom power-conserving A7 cores to high-perf ormance A15s (imagine the changeover f rom songs playing to
internet browsing), it could need to switch on the A15 cluster, migrate the duty, and strength down the A7
cluster then. T he whole process used valuable time, and the Galaxy S4 had been laggy whenever it had a
need to migrate between your clusters noticeably.
HMP completely ditches the cluster migration model simply by allowing most eight cores to perf orm
simultaneously. Music playback could be tasked to the A7 cores as internet browsing will be tasked to the
A15s, without switchover necessary, no obvious lag. T he HMP design may be the ideal ARM huge.LIT T LE
implementation, since it not only provides even more processing f lexibility and power, but better power
administration. For all of us end users, a f aster ought to be experienced by people processor with better
electric battery lif e.
Unf ortunately, as the Exynos 5420 works with HMP, it is not enabled within the Galaxy Note 3 because of
thermal envelope problems. T his is disappointing to hear, nevertheless the cluster migration technique
considerably has been improved, removing the obvious lag as tasks changeover in one cluster to another.
In addition to a tweaked CPU setup, the GPU has been upgraded f rom the PowerVR SGX544MP3 to the
Mali-T 628 MP6, clocked at around 480 MHz somewhere, providing an (on-paper) doubling of graphics
perf ormance. Now there’s a somewhat f aster 14 also.9 GB/s dual-channel LPDDR3e memory controller
(also paired to 3 GB of RAM).
Connectivity-wise, the Exynos 5 Octa f alls at the rear of the Snapdragon 800, packing simply 42 Mbps
HSPA+ (no LT E). However, there’s the most common Wi-Fi 802 still.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC and
It’s all properly and good discussing the specif ications and equipment of both Galaxy Note 3s, but f ar
We’ve ignored how properly both devices in f act perf orm thus. Unlike with the Galaxy S4, where there is a
noticeable distinction between your two models, both Snapdragon and Exynos Note 3 variants succeed
extremely. Like any f lagship phone of 2013 just, the SoC capably handles any job thrown at it, f rom internet
browsing to app use.
T he excess GB of RAM (in comparison to other top-end Android handsets) allows a lot more apps to be
stored in the backdrop, roughly is Samsung’s reasoning behind its inclusion. I in f act didn’t notice an
excellent dif f erence between your multi-tasking ef f iciency of the Galaxy Take note 3 along with other highf inish handsets with just 2 GB of RAM. Loading apps f rom scratch is incredibly quick on the Snapdragon
800 or Exynos 5 Octa already, theref ore the extra RAM is only shaving of f several milliseconds when
accessing old previously used apps.
Gaming perf ormance is great f rom both Galaxy Take note models also. T he Snapdragon variant seems to
have a small edge on the Exynos variant, but both deliver great perf ormance in the very best 3D titles in the
Search engines Play Shop. T here wasn’t an individual time where in f act the Note became as well laggy to
play, when rendering at 1080p actually, that is just what you intend to see.
What you don’t desire to see is benchmark cheating, that is just what Samsung does with both types of the
Galaxy Note 3. From the benchmarks we run, 3DMark and Vellamo are usually both af f ected, f or the reason
that special program code within the operational program sof tware program f orces the CPU to perf orm at
f ull acceleration in the benchmarks, of the load regardless. T his type of practice is extremely created and
dodgy to inf late the synthetic ef f iciency of the device, so keep that at heart when looking at another f ew
In Peacekeeper, that is run in the stock browser (the web app), the Snapdragon-driven Note 3 published a
substantial speed advantage on the Exynos model. With f our cores clocked increased (2.26 GHz vs. 1.9
GHz), the SM-N9005 was 33% f aster.
In Vellamo, the perf ormance dif f erence was less substantial. In the HT ML5 check, designed to simulate
internet browsing, the Snapdragon Take note 3 was 6% quicker. T he dif f erence between your two
models had been negligible in the Steel benchmark, which talks about the perf ormance of several areas of
When benchmarking graphics perf ormance, the Snapdragon model was 29% f aster in 3DMark and 8%
quicker within GFXBench. T his is actually the same type of small ef f iciency gap we noticed with the
Exynos and Snapdragon variants of the Galaxy S4.
For the very f irst time in a handset I’ve reviewed, the Galaxy Take note 3 carries a microUSB 3.0 slot across
the bottom edge, signif ying it can exchange to and f rom your own PC considerably f aster than additional
gadgets. T he connector itself will be large and just a little awkward – it’s generally used just on
transportable hard drives – nonetheless it certainly does the secret, enabling you to transf er inf ormation
f rom the inner NAND more than doubly f ast as USB 2.0. Interestingly, USB 3.0 isn’t enabled automagically
once you connect the Take note to a supported PC, but tapping on the USB icon in the notif ication pane
reveals the choice.
While not contained in my benchmark as seen above, the inclusion of USB 3.0 speeds up transf ers to and
f rom microSD cards also, of f ering you have a high-ef f iciency one. Copying an array of songs f rom my 32
GB Course 10 microSD to my PC was around 1.5x f aster through the Galaxy Take note 3’s USB 3.0 choice,
with write speeds staying roughly exactly the same (because of microSD perf ormance limitations).
I actually didn’t have any problems with mobile network ef f iciency, attaining around 14 Mbps lower through
HSPA+ or associated with 25 Mbps down via Optus LT E upwards. Signal strength is apparently very good,
likely assisted by the inclusion of a more substantial antenna because of the larger phone dimension.
Unf ortunately I wasn’t in a position to test Wi-Fi 802.11ac inside the SM-N9005, but dual-band Wi-Fi n was
very speedy otherwise. I f ound no problems with Bluetooth also, GPS or NFC, which worked as promoted.
Both Snapdragon and Exynos designs can handle 1080p encoding and decoding, of f ering stutter-f ree
playback of one’s Blu-ray rips. T he Snapdragon model includes an one-up in that it could decode 4K Ultra
HD content also, but the insuf f icient broad availability of this article means this f unction is even more f or
f uture-proof ing than other things.
Overall I was extremely impressed with the ef f iciency of both Galaxy Note 3 models. T he Snapdragon 800
as soon as f lexes its muscles, topping the charts in both GPU and CPU ef f iciency, however the Exynos 5
Octa is not any slouch either. Several tweaks may actually have solved all the stutter problems with the
A15+A7 big.Small implementation, despite HMP proceeding missing even now, and largely there is absolutely
no noticeable perf ormance dif f erence inside real-world usage when you compare Exynos to Snapdragon.
I would still adhere to the Snapdragon design (when possible) because of the inclusion of LT E, 4K
encoding/decoding and Wi-Fi 802.11ac, but this best time around both options are close more than enough
that Exynos owners aren’t hugely disadvantaged.
Video and camera Quality
Unsurprisingly, Samsung of f ers repurposed the Galaxy S4’s camera module f or the Galaxy Note 3. What
you’re obtaining is really a 13-megapixel Sony Exmor RS IMX135 backside illuminated 1/3.06” CMOS sensor,
f eaturing 1.12 μm pixels, and also a 31mm (ef f ective) f /2.2 lens module. T here’s no optical picture
stabilization (OIS), which def initely af f ects low-light images, and the rear video camera will be paired with a
2-megapixel f ront-f acing unit.
In good lights conditions, ef f ects f rom the Note 3’s camera are f antastic, with strong color reproduction,
accurate white balance and reasonably good dynamic range. Considering f ull-resolution crops reveal
pictures are quite sharp, if over-processed slightly, and without grain usually. T he f /2.2 lens can f ocus close
suf f icient that macro-design images are possible, however bokeh is merely average, so expect amazing
Where conditions become less perf ect (indoors, cloudy times, artif icial lighting), the Note 3 is still a
reasonable perf ormer. Colors remain quite accurate although slightly less vibrant; sometimes images can be
washed out, but usually contrast is good enough. So f ar as smartphones proceed, the Note 3’s video
camera in moderate lights conditions is among the better types I’ve used, but not perf ect still.
Samsung has made some tweaks to what sort of camera sof tware f unctions inside lower degrees of light
to pay f or having less optical image stabilization. Once you capture a graphic in poor illumination, a dialog
appears stating “Processing”. While I’m not absolutely sure what is going on behind the scenes, I believe a
burst shot is being taken, with sof tware instantly selecting (and enhancing and post-digesting) the
sharpest picture af terwards.
T he tweaked sof tware seems to work quite nicely, with almost all images I took in lower lighting being quite
sharp, regardless of the insuf f icient OIS and sensor’s small pixels. However it’s obvious a high ISO has
been used, masked with quite severe noise reduction that signif icantly reduces the ef f ective resolution of
the image. You don’t need to view f ull-resolution pictures to start to see the quality decrease in low light,
especially in black areas where artif acts are immediately apparent.
Adding in OIS within a f uture model allows the camera sof tware program to employ a slower shutter velocity
and lower ISO, leading to better images comparable to the Nokia’s high-f inish Lumia devices.
Automagically, the Galaxy Notice 3 shoots 9-megapixel cropped 16:9 pictures (which f orm nearly all samples
in this section), nevertheless, you may expand this to complete 13-megapixel 4:3 pictures in the camera
conf igurations. T he 16:9 pictures f ill the display when you’re seeing them later, but if you want the extra
resolution at the top and bottom, it’s f ar better switch to 4:3.
Just like the Galaxy S4, there are always a wide variety of camera f unctions within the application f orm to
explore. A number of these f eatures depend on burst mode: Greatest Photo enables you to go f or one
image f rom the burst shot; Best Encounter takes f ive pictures and stiches in the very best f aces; Drama
requires a burst chance of a shif ting subject matter and merges the pictures; Eraser can remove shif ting
objects f rom the backdrop of a graphic; and Golf requires a f ast burst of a swing movement.
Animated Photo is really a photo mode where one can create cool even now/shif ting hybrid GIF pictures,
and Good & Shot adds a brief snippet of good to an image. You can f ind two panorama modes –
Panorama and Surround Chance (aka. Picture Sphere) – which are very simple to use, plus there’s a variety
of ef f ects/f ilters it is possible to apply instantly to pictures you take.
A number of these shooting modes are best f or one-of f cool pictures, but mostly you’ll be shooting in the
automatic mode, or the great Rich Tone (HDR) mode. High dynamic variety (HDR) pictures are composite
pictures of the main one scene at several exposures, and the Galaxy Notice 3 has among the best HDR
modes I’ve observed. If you’re taking a photo of a scene with lots of contrast or shadows, the HDR setting
will need an image with much larger levels of visible detail compared to the standard Auto setting, making it
an ideal shooting mode f or once you can’t obtain the exposure quite correct.
T he Galaxy Note 3 gets the best group of video recording f eatures I’ve observed in a smartphone, packing
around 3840p30 (4K Ultra HD) recording f or the very f irst time, utilizing the Snapdragon 800’s f ull group of
encoding f eatures.
Recording at Ultra High def inition is bound to the Snapdragon design, but in 48 Mbps High-user prof ile
H.264 and an answer of 3840 x 2160, the total results are f antastic. Especially when downscaling the video
to 1080p, the clarity that you get f rom f ilming in Ultra HD, even though limited to 5 minutes of capturing with
huge f ile sizes, rocks !. Color reproduction is similar to what you get f rom still photos, and audio quality is
also very good.
If you don’t desire to movie in Ultra HD, or you have purchased the Exynos design, the Galaxy Note 3 also
supports shooting 60 f rames per second 1080p video, like the LG G2. Filming in this mode, labelled Easy
Motion in the conf igurations, delivers stutter-f ree video clips, although sharing them completely quality
becomes dif f icult when websites like YouTube only assistance around 30 FPS videos.
Two other modes include Fast Movement, much like time lapse movie recording, and Slow Movement. I
always f ind slow motion recording incredibly f un and compelling, and the Galaxy Note 3 supports around
120 f rames per second at 720p. T he standard of each f ramework recorded in slow movement is not as
ef f ective as you’ll obtain when recording at 720p30, but it’s nevertheless a f ascinating f eature to
experiment with. If you need to proceed slower than 120 FPS, the Note does assistance documenting at 8x
slower than true to lif e (240 FPS), but playback is at 15 FPS.
Battery Lif e, SUMMARY
Bef ore LG G2 came around some time ago, the Samsung Galaxy Take note II had held the crown inside our
battery lif e rundown test. I’m expecting an solid electric battery displaying f rom the Galaxy Take note 3
equally, which sees an enhanced battery size somewhat, leaping f rom 11.78 Wh to 12.16 Wh (3,200 mAh at
3.8 V). Both Exynos 5420 and Snapdragon 800 SoCs tend to be more power ef f icient compared to the
Exynos 4412 f ound in the Galaxy Take note II, that ought to bring stamina improvements f urthermore.
Within my time using both Snapdragon plus Exynos Galaxy Note 3 variants, the battery lif e We experienced
was excellent. Regardless of the sizable 5.7-inch AMOLED display, generally usage We were usually still lef t
with around f if ty percent the juice remaining inside the battery f ollowing a day’s usage. On Wi-Fi especially,
both models seem to be very power ef f icient; I possibly could expect to browse webpages f or 10 hrs on
Wi-Fi reasonably, which would be considered a f antastic result.
Once the powerf ul quad-primary CPU and top-f inish GPU must f ire upward, such as f or example in 3Dintensive games, the expected battery lif e reduces as it would in virtually any other portable gadget
noticeably. If you anticipate using the Take note 3 as a handheld the game gaming console . f or titles such
as f or example GTA: San Andreas, you can get around six hrs of solid use at best probably, going on my
use styles in the spells of video gaming I did so on the device.
Considering our battery daily lif e rundown check, the Galaxy Note 3 SM-N9005 (Snapdragon 800 design)
tops the charts simply by delivering just over 15 hrs of playback, dethroning the LG G2. Meanwhile, the
Exynos Take note 3 perf orms admirably still, lasting in the same way long because the Galaxy Be aware II
T he Snapdragon model delivered 20% better battery lif e compared to the Exynos model, which might seem
like a whole lot, but recall that the Galaxy S4 Snapdragon model was a complete 43% f orward when I tested
it earlier this season, showing that Samsung is closing the gap. Large-screen competitors like the Sony
Xperia Z Ultra didn’t actually stand a chance against the Be aware; the SM-N9005 lasted a lot more than
twice as longer as Sony’s providing. SUMMARY
Af ter weeks with a Galaxy Take note 3 at hand, it’s clear that it’s the very best large-screened, stylus-
supporting smartphone you can obtain. T he S-Pen may be the perf ect companion device f or annotations
on the f ly, with quite a f ew impressive sof tware enhancements – specif ically S Note and Action Memo
Functionality f rom the Galaxy Be aware 3 is f antastic, which time both Exynos and Snapdragon versions are
usually to scratch up. T here’s no HMP assistance f or the octa-primary Exynos still, but the lag is f ully gone
and perf ormance is on-par with the Qualcomm design largely. I’d be wanting Snapdragon-only f unctions
such as f or example LT E and 4K movie recording in my own Note, however the Exynos model is really a
solid choice nevertheless.
T he 13-megapixel camera perf orms well generally in most light conditions. Battery lif e is great also,
maintaining the Note custom of lasting all day long with plenty of juice to extra easily, despite the large
screen. T he 5.7-inch 1080p AMOLED panel is amazing and quite very to look at, in case a tad inaccurate
rather than as high-high quality as a competing LCD display.
No Samsung mobile phone is complete without some ackward style choices though. Choosing f ake, plastic
material leather on the trunk panel is terrible merely, diluting other improvements designed to the design
with this iteration. T he program, while good in a f ew certain areas, is laden with much still, ugly tons and
skin of useless bloatware and gimmicks.
T he Galaxy Note 3 isn’t the best smartphone money can purchase, but it’s your best option in the category
it f ills, sure to help keep Samsung dominant f or another complete year or two.
Read more at rigsandgeeks.com