Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Haswell overclocked. The core i7 4770k at 4.7ghz


Published on

Haswell overclocked. The core i7 4770k at 4.7ghz

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Haswell overclocked. The core i7 4770k at 4.7ghz

  1. 1. Haswell overclocked: the Core i7-4770K at 4.7GHz /haswell-overclocked-the-core-i7-4770k-at-4-7ghz/ We’ve currently seen what the Primary i7-4770K can perf orm at its def ault rate of recurrence. Now, it is time to exceed the chip’s stock acceleration. K-collection Haswell processors provide overclockers with 3 ways to crank the CPU rate of recurrence. Raising the Turbo multiplier may be the easiest path to increased clock speeds. T his adjustable targets the CPU cores specif ically, so modif ications won’t af f ect other program parts. Multiplier tweaking has ended up the pref erred overclocking technique f or the previous f ew generations of Intel CPUs, also it remains theref ore f or Haswell. T he CPU f requency may be the product of the multiplier and the bottom clock speed. Increasing the latter can also produce higher core speeds. Nevertheless, the processor’s DMI and PCI Show interf aces f urthermore derive their f requencies f rom the bottom clock. Fiddling with the bottom f requency leads to those interf aces to perf orm out of spec, compromising stability potentially. Haswell supports f oundation clock handle, but we’re told simply by multiple f olks within the motherboard market that the number of usef ul f requencies is comparable to Ivy Bridge: yet another 5-10% at best. Having said that, Haswell improves upon Ivy with the addition of a f oundation clock strap inherited f rom Intel’s ultra-high-f inish Sandy Bridge-E processor. T his strap f unctions as a reduction gear f or the DMI and PCI interf aces. It’s with the capacity of dividing the bottom f requency by 1.25, 1.66, or 2.5, allowing that clock to be elevated to 125, 166, and 250MHz without messing with the chipset and peripheral links. Well, that is the theory, anyhow. Asus inf orms us it hasn’t discovered an individual Haswell CPU with the capacity of running a 250MHz f oundation clock. T he majority of chips will do 166MHz, it says, and 125MHz ought to be a lock f or several of them. You need to visit a similar +/- 5-10% adjustment variety at each strap establishing. With Z 87 boards supporting CPU boosts to 8GHz in ef f ective 100MHz increments via multiplier boosting, there’s little have to touch the bottom clock or its associated strap. Only intense overclockers seeking to set benchmark inf ormation should be worried about those settings.
  2. 2. Asus has tested a huge selection of Haswell CPUs within its ef f ort to user prof ile the chip f or auto-tuning algorithms. Based on the motherboard maker, Intel’s new hotness includes a little much less overclocking headroom than Ivy Bridge will. Perhaps more importantly, Haswell apparently has more variance f rom chip to chip, especially in the voltages necessary to hit specif ic speeds. Of the processors Asus has tested, 70% hit 4.5GHz, 30% reached 4.6GHz, and 20% made 4.7GHz. Just 10% were steady at 4.8GHz. Warmth is certainly reportedly the limiting element, and Asus recommends utilizing a dual-f an drinking water cooler to avoid thermal throttling previous about 4.5GHz or even 1.25V. Going beyond 1.35V is apparently problematic even f or high-end drinking water coolers. Since we’ve a high-end drinking water cooler in-house, we made a decision to see how f ar it might get our Core i7-4770K. It is a various chip compared to the one Scott usef ul f or his CPU benchmarks, and the test conf iguration dif f ered slightly f rom his, as well. T he machine was predicated on Asus’ Z 87-PRO motherboard and a GeForce 680 GT X DirectCU II graphics card. Corsair provided the Push GT 120GB SSD, the AX850 power, and 16GB of Vengeance Pro memory. Although the RAM is rated f or operation at boosts to 2400MHz, we conf ined ourselves to testing the limits of the CPU. Both Asus and Gigabyte tell us that higher memory space speeds can control CPU overclocking, so it may be worth exploring that dynamic in a separate article. To help keep the CPU cool, we used Corsair’s H80 drinking water cooler. T he radiator is not a double-wide af f air, nonetheless it will be sandwiched between double f ans. We f urthermore swapped the share spinners f or Corsair’s Atmosphere Series SP120 units.
  3. 3. We kept issues simple because of this round of testing and small ourselves to manually tweaking conf igurations via the motherboard f irmware. A variety of AIDA64′s CPU stress ensure that you the Unigine Character benchmark was utilized to test stability. To start, we let the motherboard select CPU voltages automatically as we raised the multiplier. We made it up to 4.2GHz without problem, and CPU-Z reported a new CPU voltage of just one 1.2V at that acceleration. T he machine blue-screened at as soon as we started our stress test at 4.3GHz, though. Establishing the CPU voltage to at least one 1.25V kept the loaded program stable f or two minutes prior to the next BSOD, thus we added more. In the f inal end, 4.3GHz required 1.275V. T hat voltage bump was suf f icient to sustain our CPU around 4.5GHz. However, glowing blue displays at 4.6GHz f orced us to nudge the CPU around 1.3V. At 4.7GHz, the chip needed 1.35V, and its own core temperatures spiked around 84°C with regularity-even with the drinking water cooler’s f ollowers and pump going in complete blast. T hermal throttling didn’t rear its mind until we attempted f or 4.8GHz, though. Keeping BSODs away at that speed needed 1.375V, and the excess voltage sent temperatures in to the 90s. No level of more tweaking produced a well balanced, throttle-f ree conf ig at 4.8GHz. At 4.7GHz, the system was stable enough to perf orm a handf ul of benchmarks. T he x264 check crashed on the initial run but f inished two subsequent three-loop classes without issue. (Even though screenshot above shows a new CPU voltage of just one 1.376V, the CPU has been set to at least one 1.35V inside the f irmware. Asus’ AI Suite sof tware program agreed with CPU-Z ’s reading through.)
  4. 4. T he numbers are pretty close to what one might expect. Pushing the Core we7-4770K to 4.7GHz increases perf ormance by 19-26%, that is in-line with the increase inside clock speeds. Our 4.7GHz overclock computes to increases of 21% and 27%, respectively, on the chip’s optimum Turbo f requencies f or solitary- and all-core loads. As is always the case with overclocking, your mileage can vary greatly. T hat said, it’s well worth noting that we strike 4.9GHz with a similarly early Ivy Bridge sample a new 12 months ago. T hat CPU required 1 also.35V, nonetheless it got by with a new dual-f an air cooler. All indications indicate overclocked Haswell processors requiring even more intense cooling than their Ivy predecessors. T he Primary i7-4770K has a higher T DP compared to the 3770K, but the associated heat is also spread over a larger die area. T he 4770K’s T DP per area computes to 0.47W/mm², as the 3770K’s is 0.48W/mm². Haswell and Ivy seem to be on even f ooting in that regard. T he die layouts f ollow exactly the same f undamental blueprint, as well. Haswell and Ivy Bridge also use a similar interf ace material between their dies and external heat spreaders. Intel used to hire a f luxless solder between those two items, nonetheless it switched to thermal paste with Ivy. We don’t possess a def initive description f or Haswell’s apparent dependence on most robust cooling, however the chip’s integrated VRM may are likely involved. Voltage regulation was dealt with of f -chip in Ivy Bridge, but Haswell provides it-and the connected heat-onboard the die. Integrated voltage regulation is really a big section of Haswell’s attractiveness f or mobile platf orms. Regrettably, it may also control the processor’s overclocking possible on the desktop. Read more at