Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Open Course Library Update


Published on

An Open Course Library Update given in Fall 2011

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Open Course Library Update

  1. 1. Open Course Library UpdateFall 2011<br />Tom Caswell<br />Open Education Policy Associate<br />WA State Board for Community & Technical Colleges<br />
  2. 2. Background<br />Open Course Library Goals<br />Design and share 81 high enrollment, gatekeeper courses<br />Improve course completion rates<br />Lower textbook costs for students (<$30)<br />Provide new resources for faculty to use in their courses<br />Fully engage our colleges in the global open educational resources discussion. <br />
  3. 3. Timeline<br />Phase 1: 42 courses<br />Available October 31, 2011 at<br />Phase 2 : 39 courses<br />Available Spring 2013<br />
  4. 4. Design Process<br />81 courses built by our own faculty<br />Define learning objectives<br />Use existing, quality Open Educational Resources (OER)<br />Fill in gaps with their own content<br />
  5. 5. Potential Savings<br />81 courses = 411,133 enrollments / year<br />Textbook savings up to $41M+ in / year <br />At 25% adoption (faculty decision), savings to students will be $7.2M / year. <br />Completions rates may also increase when all students can afford course materials<br />
  6. 6. Next Steps<br />Driving Open Course Library Course Adoptions<br />Regional conferences and workshops<br />New faculty trainings <br />Building open sharing into existing teaching workflows and technologies<br />Next LMS will have “open sharing” feature<br />Explore open sharing via Tegrity<br />
  7. 7. Lessons Learned<br />Phase 1 Faculty Concerns:<br />Project timelines and deliverables not clear<br />Many were unfamiliar with ANGEL LMS<br />No way to compare work between course teams<br />Too many websites to keep track of<br />Phase 2 Adjustments:<br />Timelines and deliverables made clear in RFP<br />Using Google Docs to collaborate & share as we go<br />All project information in one Google Site<br />
  8. 8. Why Google Docs?<br />Pros:<br />Collaborative, consistent, simple tool<br />Similar to Microsoft Word<br />Broader adoption base – not limited to specific LMS communities (LMS-neutral)<br />Allows for easier viewing, sharing, saving copies<br />Cons:<br />No automated quizzed & assessments<br />Designers can link to other tools or type up questions<br />Extra step for adopters using an LMS: move OCL resources into LMS<br />
  9. 9. Why Google Docs?<br />What About OCL Phase 1 Courses?<br />Remember: Not just building open courses – exploring new processes.<br />Both phases are useful:<br />Phase 1: less structured; developed with several tools<br />Phase 2: leverage a common tool; streamline process<br />Migrate Phase 1 from ANGEL to next LMS<br />Next LMS will include open sharing features<br />If Google Docs works best, we’ll figure out how to move phase 1 courses<br />
  10. 10. Tom CaswellOpen Education Policy Associate, <br />State Board for Community & Technical Colleges<br /><br /><br />Slides at:<br />