Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking

1,639 views

Published on

KAIZEN vs KAIKAKU thinking

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking

  1. 1. A Picture of the thinking required for KAIKAKU Contrast and Compare KAIZEN thinking to KAIKAKU thinking VS Kaizen Thinking Kaikaku Thinking Incremental Change <> Tortoise Velocity Step Change <> Rocket Velocity A Picture of the thinking required for KAIKAKU Contrast and Compare KAIZEN thinking to KAIKAKU thinking PDCA SDCA from Honorable Imai Masaaki PDCA and SDCA Systematic KAIZEN Improvement Pathway Created by: Todd McCann (from Gemba KAIZEN Masaaki PDCA and SDCA Step Change KAIKAKU Pathway Created by: Todd McCann (from Gemba KAIZEN Masaaki Imai) Imai) The Natural Progression of Improvement by applying Systematic Thinking Date: 3-15-2009 Rev: 3 The Natural Progression of Improvement by applying Systematic Thinking Date: 3-15-2009 Rev: 3 (Plan – Do – Check – Act with Standardize – Do – Check – Act) (Plan – Do – Check – Act with Standardize – Do – Check – Act) Measure Measure Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. LSL USL 3458 A P LSL Target Process Data 3456.5 * LSL USL 3458 Within Overall LSL Target Process Data 3456.5 * Within Overall Potential (Within) C apability Act Plan P Potential (Within) Capability USL 3457.5 KAIZEN USL 3457.5 A Cp 1.09 Sample Mean 3456.77 Cp 1.09 C PL 0.59 Sample Mean 3456.77 Sample N 693 C PL 0.59 StDev(Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 Sample N 693 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 StDev (Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 C Cpk 1.09 StDev (O v erall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 Ov erall Capability C C pk 1.09 Act C Pp 0.47 Plan O v erall C apability D PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 Ppk 0.26 Pp 0.47 C pm * PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 Ppk 0.26 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 C pm * Observ ed Performance PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM > USL PPM Total 1443.00 226551.23 Exp. Within Performance PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM > USL PPM Total 0.88 37236.60 Exp. O verall Performance PPM < LSL 221596.02 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 241574.93 C D 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Check Do Check Do O bserv ed Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 225108.23 1443.00 Exp. Within Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 37235.72 0.88 Exp. O v erall Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 221596.02 19978.92 Measure PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93KAIZEN Improvements Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. A P KAIKAKU Improvement LSL USL 3458 Process Data Within LSL 3456.5 Overall Target * Potential (Within) Capability Act USL 3457.5 Sample Mean 3456.77 Cp C PL 1.09 0.59 Plan KAIZEN Sample N 693 StDev(Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 C Cpk 1.09 Ov erall Capability Pp 0.47 P PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Ppk C pm 0.26 * C D A Observ ed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. O verall Performance Check Do KAIZEN PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM < LSL 221596.02 Act PPM > USL 1443.00 PPM > USL 0.88 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93 Plan VS Measure A S Act Standardize C D P S Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. LSL Process Data 3456.5 LSL USL 3458 Within Overall A Check Do A Target USL Sample Mean Sample N * 3457.5 3456.77 693 Potential (Within) Capability Cp C PL 1.09 0.59 Act Plan C D StDev(Within) 0.152393 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C PU 1.59 C pk C Cpk 1.09 0.59 Ov erall Capability Pp PPL 0.47 0.26

×