28,501 views

Published on

The Failure of the deHavillands Comet and the Rise of Boeing “The view of fracture [Paul] Paris brought to Boeing was dramatically different from the one that had guided construction of the Comet. Cracks were the centerpiece of the investigation. They could not be eliminated.They were everywhere, permeating the structure, too small to be seen. The structure could not be made perfect, it was inherently flawed, and the goal of engineering design was not to certify the airframe free of cracks but to make it tolerate them.” http://stillness.ph.utexas.edu/~marder/BrokenEducation2011.pdfFriday, November 30, 12While it may seem that this philosophy of the internet is inappropriate for the highly engineered systems of the Industrial Internet, I’ll remind you of the failure of the deHavillands Comet in 1954 and the rise of Boeing as the dominant providerof commercial aircraft. Over the course of three years, three Comets fell out of the sky for initially unexplained reasons. It eventually became clear that the problem was metal fatigue. deHavilland tried to eliminate all cracks, Boeing learned tolive with them.

Published in: Technology
2 Comments
42 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Great presentation! Also, check out our industry tutorial on machine-to-machine (M2M) which currently (24 December 2012) has more than 36,000 downloads: http://bit.ly/U6vxO5.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • This is pretty good information. As a rising blogger am looking at new creative ways to write all the time. good stuff here. do u have a blog?
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
28,501
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4,458
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
461
Comments
2
Likes
42
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

×