Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Promise of the positive uclan 2013

278 views

Published on

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Promise of the positive uclan 2013

  1. 1. The Promise of the Positive in the Study of Resilience Sherry Hamby University of the South Collaborators: Victoria Banyard & John Grych Presented August 2, 2013 at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Honolulu, HI. Research supported by The John Templeton Foundation. sherry.hamby@sewanee.edu or lifepaths@sewanee.edu
  2. 2. The Way Things Were… and were and were and were Vincent Van Gogh— No relief for mental illness Cain & Abel in Titian’s rendition Rape of the Sabine Women, event 750BC depicted by Nicolas Poussin about 1635 Henry VIII, problematic partner 2
  3. 3. Centuries Go By… • …and slowly many mental health problems and many adversities are seen less as an inherent part of existence, and more as health and social problem that can be addressed. In 1824, the first modern humane organization is founded…. 3
  4. 4. • …to protect cats, dogs, and other animals! • It is the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, founded 1824 (www.rspca.org.uk) • Followed in 1866 by U.S. version (www.aspca.org). 4
  5. 5. The Beginnings of a Social Movement • Shortly afterwards, it occurred to some to organize the first Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children too. • “It is not alone the lower animals that are subject to ill-treatment and cruelty.” (The Northern Budget, Troy, N.Y., 1867, cited by NYSPCC, 2000) • 1st society est. in New York, 1875 Mary Ellen, who, in 1873, became the first child to receive a child protection intervention. 5
  6. 6. The Modern Discovery of Psychology • Late 1800s, early 1900s: The invention of the “talking cure” & the discipline of psychology • 1800s, early 1900s: 1st laws limiting or abolishing right to beat one’s wife passed in England, France, some U.S. states. • Post WWII—Psychotherapy goes mainstream. • 1962—The medical establishment “discovers” child abuse as a cause of traumatic injury (Kempe, 1962). • Early 1970s—1st refuges/shelters • Late 20th century: Huge social movements emerged to address all kinds of psychological issues. • Healthcare, schools, criminal justice, social services, policymakers—all major social institutions become involved. 6
  7. 7. A Surprising Amount of Disclosure • Important innovations in social science research, such as the U.S. National Crime Survey and Kinsey’s surveys on sexual behavior. • Research established that people would disclose – Violent behavior – Intimate behavior 1948: An early scientific bestseller • Straus, Gelles, & Steinmetz established that people would also disclose violence by intimates to researchers. • Mary Koss first presented on Hidden Rape in 1980. The 1975 National Family Violence Survey
  8. 8. Despite Strides, Limitations 8
  9. 9. The Field of Violence Dating violence Child abuse IPV Community Violence Sexual assault Family violence Bullying 9
  10. 10. More Silos of Psychology Adversity Coping IPV Psychology of Religion & Spirituality Resilience Positive psychology Community psychology 10
  11. 11. Grant reviewers like low-risk (=repetitive) methods Journal reviewers like familiar methods too Journal reviewers often seem to prefer results that confirm their preconceptions Grant reviewers like familiar questionnaires Tenure based on # more than quality Drags on Science Authors do lit reviews when they write their papers, not when they plan their studies From The Web of Violence, Hamby & Grych, 2013 11
  12. 12. 12
  13. 13. Too Much Focus on Problems, Not Strengths 13
  14. 14. Much of Violence Research Technology is Stalled in the 1970s 14
  15. 15. Looking For Communication Across Silos & Further Progress Promoting Well-Being 15
  16. 16. TWO NEW STRENGTHS-BASED PROJECTS ON COPING AND RESILIENCE: 1) BATTERED WOMEN’S PROTECTIVE STRATEGIES 2) LIFE PATHS RESEARCH PROJECT 16
  17. 17. BATTERED WOMEN’S PROTECTIVE STRATEGIES: STRONGER THAN YOU KNOW 17
  18. 18. A Deficit-Focused Paradigm & A Limited Research Base • We ask women over and over about trauma symptoms, substance use, and their own perpetration, but almost never ask about resources & strengths. • We teach the cycle of violence even though it is based on a single qualitative study more than 30 years old. • Safety planning is an almost universal service, but almost no safety planningbased research exists, either to map typical safety planning steps or the effectiveness of formal safety plans. The photo accompanying my blog on “The Many Strengths of Battered Women” at OUP 18
  19. 19. Recognizing Strengths Requires Recognizing All the Risks • Danger to self, yes, but also: • Danger to others • Other risks created by batterer (custody battles, threats to ruin credit, kidnapping children, etc) • Financial risks and obstacles • Institutional risks and obstacles • Social risks (family rejection, stigma, etc) • Personal values that influence coping 19
  20. 20. Battered Women’s Protective Strategies Immediate situational strategies Formal helpseeking to police, shelters, and other services Protecting children, family, and pets Protective Strategies Invisible strategies (under-recognized actions women take) Turning to religious and spiritual resources Reaching out for social support 20
  21. 21. Immediate Situational Strategies • Escaping the scene: Leave the house, Run to another room, Lock oneself in a room, Get into (or out of) a car, Walk away calmly • Luring away from dangerous parts of the house: Keep perpetrator away from gun cabinets, kitchens, etc. • Calling for help: Signal a neighbor or child, Teach children who to get help, Get a pay-as-you-go phone, Keep a landline telephone, Scream, Pass a note or leave a message in a public place • Defusing strategies: Distract with other activities such as making tea, Hold hand/cuddle with perpetrator, even if do not feel affectionate, Keep things quiet, Talk batterer out of abuse • Protecting children or others from the attacker • Self-defensive actions: Use force to stop perpetrator’s assault, Protect one’s body, Stop perpetrator from destroying objects around house 21
  22. 22. • Protecting Children, Family & Pets on children and loved Immediate protective strategies focused ones: Physically insert themselves between batterer and others, Try to get batterer to focus on them, Create code words and safety plans with children or others, Send children to their rooms or other safer location, Turn up stereo so children cannot hear violence • Longer term strategies for protecting children: Send children to stay with relatives, Seek full legal custody, Help children process experience, Volunteer at school, Delay leaving to protect children • Protecting pets: Delay leaving to protect pets from batterer’s threats, Enroll pets in “doggy day care” or place in kennel • Protecting other family members, friends, and co-workers: Quit job, Stay away from family and friends, Create separate email account that batterer does not know 22
  23. 23. Reaching Out for Social Support • • • • • • • • • Obtain emotional support Stay with family or friends Get financial or practical help with moving Ask family or friend to accompany women to court or agencies Ask for help filling out legal forms and other paperwork Get help with child care Get help with transportation Ask family or friends to store belongings or extra keys Ask family or friends to hold bank accounts or other assets in their name • Ask family to help negotiate a plan for reconciliation • Ask boss or co-workers to re-arrange schedules 23 • Ask for security plan at the workplace
  24. 24. Turning to Religious & Spiritual Resources • • • • • • • • • • • • Strength and perseverance from prayer & faith in God/higher power Comfort from inspirational stories in religious texts Hope for the future Social support from clergy, other members of the congregation Pastoral counseling from clergy Free social activities Help paying utility bills, home repair, transportation Support during illness or following birth of child Donations of food, clothing, furniture, and other necessities Help with immigration status Literacy and English as a second language classes School supplies, winter coats, and free activities for children 24
  25. 25. Formal Helpseeking • Contrary to stereotypes of passivity: • Helpseeking for DV is similar to helpseeking for psychological problems: – 28% in Canadian survey (Bland et al, 1997) – 26% in Europe (ESEMeD MHEDEA, 2004) – 41% in U.S. (Wang et al, 2005), but most of this not specialized help • Psychiatrists 12% • Other mental health providers 16% • 66% of DV victims had sought formal services in one Canadian survey (Barrett & Lapierre, 2010) 25
  26. 26. Types of Formal Helpseeking • • • • • • • • • • • Going to a Domestic Violence Shelter Other Domestic Violence Program Services Info, referral, transportation, court accompaniment, etc Calling the Police Seeking Help from Victim Assistance Programs Obtaining a Restraining Order/Order of Protection Mental Health Services Health Care 12-step programs such as Al-Anon Other Social Services Support groups 26
  27. 27. Invisible Strategies • • • • Money, money, money Arranging affairs Wellness Returning to batterer-yes, sometimes this is safest, best option from a range of really rotten choices • Activism 27
  28. 28. LIFE PATHS RESEARCH PROJECT 28
  29. 29. The Web of Violence Child Physical Abuse Intimate Partner Violence Dating Violence Child Neglect Child Sexual Abuse Community physical assault Sexual Assault & Rape Bullying Elder Abuse Gang violence Robbery Exposure to community violence
  30. 30. Interconnections in Representative Community Samples Interconnection Strength of association (OR) Well-known, well-established connections Exposure to IPV & child physical abuse 5.0 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2010) Exposure to IPV & teen dating victimization 3.8 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2010) Physical IPV & Stalking by intimate partner 7.0 (CDC, Krebs et al, 2011) Physical IPV & sexual violence by intimate partner 2.4 (CDC, Krebs et al, 2011) Strong but under-recognized connections Exposure to IPV & neglect 6.2 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2010) Exposure to IPV and sexual abuse by known adult 5.2 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2010) Any physical assault & any sexual victimization 6.2 (NatSCEV, Finkelhor et al, 2009) Any witnessed violence and any sexual victimization 4.5 (NatSCEV, Finkelhor et al, 2009) Teen dating victimization and peer sexual harassment 5.3 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2012) Weaker but still positive connections Exposure to IPV and peer relational aggression 1.7 (NatSCEV; Hamby et al 2010) Any property crime and any sexual victimization 3.2 (NatSCEV, Finkelhor et al, 2009)
  31. 31. What We Act Like We are Comparing IPV victims Nonvictim
  32. 32. What We are Comparing IPV victim Bullying victim Maltreatment victim Sexual assault victim Bullying victim Maltreatment victim Sexual assault victim
  33. 33. Etiological Process Relevant to Most Forms of Violence Situation • Environmental Conditions Person • Cognitive Processes – Beliefs about aggression – Schemas – Automatic cognitions • Affective Processes • Self-Regulation • Personality – Impulsivity – Narcissism – Heat – Overcrowding VIOLENCE • Use of drugs/alcohol • Social Integration • Behavior of Others – Hostility – Rejection • Relationship Context
  34. 34. • Considering multiple forms of violence offers a more comprehensive and integrated approach to understanding how these experiences can lead to maladaptive outcomes (including more violence). • See Hamby & Grych (2013) 34
  35. 35. Towards even greater integration… • The Web of Violence framework does not account for adaptive outcomes seen in some children and adults exposed to violence. 35
  36. 36. Towards even greater integration… • The Web of Violence framework does not account for adaptive outcomes seen in some children and adults exposed to violence. • Work on resilience shows that many individuals maintain or regain healthy functioning following stressful and traumatic events. 36
  37. 37. Towards even greater integration… • The Web of Violence framework does not account for adaptive outcomes seen in some children and adults exposed to violence. • Work on resilience shows that many individuals maintain or regain healthy functioning following stressful and traumatic events. • A truly comprehensive model of the effects of violence needs to account for adaptive and maladaptive outcomes 37
  38. 38. Examples of risk factors • Individual: – Poor self-regulation – Low intellectual functioning • Relational: – Insecure attachment – Inconsistent parenting • Environmental – Lower SES – Unsafe neighborhood 38
  39. 39. Examples of protective factors • Individual: – Good self-regulation – High intellectual functioning • Relational: – Secure attachment – Consistent parenting • Environmental – Higher SES – Safe neighborhood • Identifying “protective” factors that simply represent the flip side of “risk” factors does not advance understanding of the processes leading to adaptive outcomes 39
  40. 40. New Approaches to Resilience • A new conceptual model for resilience that focuses on 3 core sets of individual strengths: – interpersonal, – regulatory, and – spiritual • We believe these fit into a broader system of personal, family, and community resources to improve well-being (not just lack of symptoms). 40
  41. 41. Towards a comprehensive model of the impact of violence on health Adapted from Sandler (2001) Adversity Violence Other trauma Resources Individual Relational Environmental Adaptive Outcomes Mediating Processes -Secure relationships -Coping Apps & Behs -Sense of meaning Maladaptive Outcomes 41
  42. 42. Tools & Ideas For Moving Forward • Questionnaires still emphasize negative risk factors too. • Technology is a key step to changing research practices • Good to assess the density and diversity of strengths & adversities • We have developed numerous brief measures that are suitable for community samples, including adolescents. We are freely providing these for research & clinical use. 42
  43. 43. The Broader Conceptual Framework ROLE: Involvement in Violence Victim Perpetrator Both Mono-victim Acute, Isolated, Single form exposed Mono-perpetrator Criminal Specialists Mono perpetrator-victim Bully-victim Mutual IPV Poly-victim Complex trauma High ACES score Also: Multiple type victim, Multiple victim, Multiple crime-type victim, Multiple form exposed, Poly-perpetrator Criminal Generalists Violent polymorphism Poly perpetrator-victim Delinquent-victim Trauma-informed care model Repeat victim Re-victimized, Chronic victim, Complex trauma Repeat perpetrator Recidivist, Habitual offender, Reconviction, Revolving doors Repeat perpetrator-victim Cycle of violence, Intergenerational transmission Adapted from Hamby & Grych, 2013
  44. 44. Coordinated Violence Prevention Model: Hypothetical Common and Specific Elements
  45. 45. Where We Can Go A technician preparing penicillin in 1943 WE CAN HONOR THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE PAST WITHOUT GETTING STUCK IN THE PAST. • This point in the story is both sad & happy. • Sad: Unlike virtually every other form of science, our technology is mired in the 1970s. Our frameworks focus too much on “half empty” • Happy: There is information to guide us and advances are attainable. • Science is novelty, not convention. • We need to push back on the institutional forces that inhibit the best scientific & clinical practices. 45

×