 There has been mounting concerns all over thesociety about cell-tower radiation Many self-proclaimed activists have sta...
Some credible international bodieslike – WHO ICNIRP IARC National Library for Medicinehave something else to say...
 The reports / finding by such agencies clearlyindicate that the radiations emitted from cell-towers are weak The eviden...
Thus the findings proove that radiation from cell-tower is weak & hence, cell-tower radiation is notdangerous.
http://theradiationdoctor.wordpress.com/
Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?
Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?
Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?
Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?
Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?

789 views

Published on

Deck which has an answer to one of the most

Published in: Technology, Health & Medicine
1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • The 1998 ICNIRP study is not only ancient but also funded by Big Telecom.
    ICNIRP is backed by the Telecom sector (research funding from commercial entities like NTT DOCOMO, TOSHIBA, PANASONIC Corp. etc etc)
    [http://www.icnirp.de/documents/DoIHirata_2013.PDF]

    Now go through this:
    The Council of Europe says: 'it is most curious, to say the least, that the applicable official threshold values for limiting the health impact of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and high frequency waves were drawn up and proposed to international political institutions (WHO, European Commission, governments) by the ICNIRP, an NGO whose origin and structure are none too clear and which is furthermore suspected of having rather close links with the industries whose expansion is shaped by recommendations for maximum threshold values for the different frequencies of electromagnetic fields.'

    The Interphone, involving research groups from 13 countries, was launched already in 2000 and the collection of data was finished by 2004. The study was mainly funded by the mobile phone industry [GSM Association (GSMA) and Mobile Manufacturers Forum (MMF)] and by the EU. [http://interphone.iarc.fr/interphone_funding.php]

    Mark Repacholi who headed the EMF project on behalf of WHO received huge kickbacks from telecom giants (http://microwavenews.com/CT.htm).

    People who are genuinely interested must go through the latest Bio Initiative Report and the research work of Dr. Henry Lai and Dr. Narendra Singh on the DNA damage of non-ionising radiation like microwaves.

    Your pompous 'Radiation Doctor' moniker is an eerie reminder of the 'Throat Doctor' ads of Big Tobacco: http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images.php?token2=fm_st001.php&token1=fm_img0002.php&theme_file=fm_mt001.php&theme_name=Doctors%20Smoking&subtheme_name=More%20Doctors%20Smoke%20Camels
    [http://goo.gl/RRC6K]
    See the similarity?
    Crooks posing as 'doctors' to fool gullible people and pushing poison.

    Btw, these slideshows are beyond stupid, contain antiquated news and are frankly an insult to one's intellect.

    Are you even aware of the amount of power that the antennae atop the cell towers are emitting? Are you not aware that the people living nearby are being dosed with hundreds for watts of radiation per day? Are you a ghoul who likes to feed on the dead even if it makes you a little cash?

    Do something else and get a life, will you? Or pimping for COAI is the only way you make a living?
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
789
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Is Cell-tower Radiation Dangerous?

  1. 1.  There has been mounting concerns all over thesociety about cell-tower radiation Many self-proclaimed activists have stated thatcell-tower causes cancer & other health hazards Hence, people in general protest against thetowers, without even bothering about the otherside of story However, the protestors do not seem to considerthe credible facts before deriving the conclusions
  2. 2. Some credible international bodieslike – WHO ICNIRP IARC National Library for Medicinehave something else to say...
  3. 3.  The reports / finding by such agencies clearlyindicate that the radiations emitted from cell-towers are weak The evidences supporting ill-effects of radiation onhealth are inadequate to draw conclusions onvarious types of cancer They also state that there could be no connectionestablished between cancer & radiation till date
  4. 4. Thus the findings proove that radiation from cell-tower is weak & hence, cell-tower radiation is notdangerous.
  5. 5. http://theradiationdoctor.wordpress.com/

×